基于离散元法的压裂裂缝特征研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.03.010

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 348-357.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.03.010

基于离散元法的压裂裂缝特征研究

李小刚¹(),何建冈¹,杨兆中¹,易良平^1,²(),黄刘科^3,⁴,杜博迪¹,张景强¹

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质与开发国家重点实验室，四川成都 610500
2.西南石油大学机电工程学院，四川成都 610500
3.西南石油大学土木工程与测绘学院，四川成都 610500
4.同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092

收稿日期:2022-03-29 出版日期:2023-06-26 发布日期:2023-06-26
通讯作者: 易良平（1991—），男，博士，助理研究员，从事油气增产改造理论、技术和非常规天然气开发研究。地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学，邮政编码：610500。E-mail: ylpfrac@163.com
作者简介:李小刚（1981—），男，博士，教授，本刊第一届青年编委，从事油气增产改造理论、技术和非常规天然气开发研究。地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号西南石油大学，邮政编码：610500。E-mail：swpuadam@126.com
基金资助:
四川省科技计划项目“页岩压裂的损伤力学特征研究”(2020JDJQ0059);油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室（成都理工大学）开放基金资助项目“基于相场理论的页岩地层压裂裂缝三维延伸数值模型与定量调控方法研究”(PLC20210314)

Fracture characteristics based on discrete element method

LI Xiaogang¹(),HE Jiangang¹,YANG Zhaozhong¹,YI Liangping^1,²(),HUANG Liuke^3,⁴,DU Bodi¹,ZHANG Jingqiang¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
3. School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
4. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2022-03-29 Online:2023-06-26 Published:2023-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探究弱面发育页岩压裂裂缝特征，基于三维块体离散元方法，建立考虑层理弱面和天然裂缝弱面的页岩储集层压裂裂缝扩展模型，分析了不同施工排量、压裂液黏度、层理抗拉强度和天然裂缝内聚力下的压裂裂缝特征。研究表明：高排量泵注和高压裂液黏度能够减少近井筒层理对水力裂缝的限制，增加水力裂缝穿层能力，当压裂液黏度达到10 mPa·s时，水力裂缝能够连续穿过6条层理；与天然裂缝连通的层理，其抗拉强度不是影响自身开启的主要因素；天然裂缝内聚力越大，其抗剪强度越大，开启程度越低。当井筒周围发育层理和天然裂缝时，通过提高前置液阶段排量、增大压裂液黏度，可以促使水力裂缝充分延伸；对于容易形成简单双翼裂缝的页岩储层，在前置液阶段泵注适量酸液，可以溶解天然裂缝填充物，从而达到降低天然裂缝内聚力，增加其开启程度，提高裂缝复杂度的效果。

关键词: 页岩, 层理, 天然裂缝, 裂缝扩展, 离散元

Abstract:

In order to explore the characteristics of fracturing fractures of shale with weak plane development, a fracture propagation model of shale reservoirs taking the weak plane of bedding and natural fractures into account is established by the three dimension discrete element method to analyze characteristics of fracturing fractures under different injection rates, fracturing fluid viscosity, bedding tensile strength and natural fracture cohesion. The research results show that the high-displacement injection and high fracturing fluid viscosity can reduce the restriction of near-wellbore bedding on hydraulic fractures and increase the ability of hydraulic fractures to penetrate layers. The hydraulic fractures can continuously pass through six beddings when the fracturing fluid viscosity is increased to 10 mPa·s. The tensile strength of the bedding connected to the natural fracture is not the main factor affecting its own opening. The greater the natural fracture cohesion is, the greater the natural fracture shear strength and the lower the degree of opening of natural fracture will be. When bedding and natural fractures develop near the wellbore, the hydraulic fractures can be fully extended by increasing the injection rates and the fracturing fluid viscosity in the early stage. For shale which is easy to form simple double-wing fractures, pumping an appropriate amount of acid in the early stage can dissolve the natural fracture filler, so as to reduce the natural fracture cohesion, increase its opening degree, and improve the complexity of fractures.

Key words: shale, bedding, natural fracture, fracture propagation, discrete element method

中图分类号:

TE371

李小刚, 何建冈, 杨兆中, 易良平, 黄刘科, 杜博迪, 张景强. 基于离散元法的压裂裂缝特征研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 348-357.

LI Xiaogang, HE Jiangang, YANG Zhaozhong, YI Liangping, HUANG Liuke, DU Bodi, ZHANG Jingqiang. Fracture characteristics based on discrete element method[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 348-357.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

参考文献 25

[1]	赵金洲, 任岚, 蒋廷学, 等. 中国页岩气压裂十年: 回顾与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 121-142.
	ZHAO Jinzhou, REN Lan, JIANG Tingxue, et al. Ten years of gas shale fracturing in China: Review and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 121-142.
[2]	张烈辉, 何骁, 李小刚, 等. 四川盆地页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 143-152.
	ZHANG Liehui, HE Xiao, LI Xiaogang, et al. Shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin: Progress,challenge and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 143-152.
[3]	邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 1-14.
	ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress,potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 1-14.
[4]	张莉娜, 刘欣, 张耀祖. 基于正交试验设计的页岩气藏压裂敏感性分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, 8(5): 77-86.
	ZHANG Lina, LIU Xin, ZHANG Yaozu. Fracturing sensitivity analysis of shale gas reservoir based on orthogonal experimental design[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(5):77-86.
[5]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 等. 四川盆地非常规气藏地质-工程一体化压裂实践与认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1221-1237.
	WANG Guangfu, LI Fengxia, WANG Haibo, et al. Application of an integrated geology-reservoir engineering approach to fracturing in unconventional gas reservoirs, Sichuan Basin and some insights[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1221-1237.
[6]	周庆凡. 页岩油气资源评价基本问题的讨论[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(1): 26-33.
	ZHOU Qingfan. Discussion on key issues of shale oil/gas resource assessment[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(1): 26-33.
[7]	蒲春生, 郑恒, 杨兆平, 等. 水平井分段体积压裂复杂裂缝形成机制研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1734-1743. doi: 10.7623/syxb202012025
	PU Chunsheng, ZHENG Heng, YANG Zhaoping, et al. Research status and development trend of the formation mechanism of complex fractures by staged volume fracturing in horizontal wells[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1734-1743. doi: 10.7623/syxb202012025
[8]	侯冰, 常智, 武安安, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油密切割压裂多簇裂缝竞争扩展模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 75-90. doi: 10.7623/syxb202201007
	HOU Bing, CHANG Zhi, WU An'an, et al. Simulation of competitive propagation of multi-fractures on shale oil reservoir multi-clustered fracturing in Jimsar sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 75-90. doi: 10.7623/syxb202201007
[9]	付海峰, 才博, 修乃岭, 等. 含层理储层水力压裂缝高延伸规律及现场监测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(11): 1610-1621.
	FU Haifeng, CAI Bo, XIU Nailing, et al. The study of hydraulic fracture vertical propagation in unconventional reservoir with beddings and field monitoring[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(11): 1610-1621.
[10]	施振生, 赵圣贤, 赵群, 等. 川南地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组含气页岩岩心裂缝特征及其页岩气意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1087-1101.
	SHI Zhensheng, ZHAO Shengxian, ZHAO Qun, et al. Fractures in cores from the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin and their implications for shale gas exploration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1087-1101.
[11]	YI L P, WAISMAN H, YANG Z Z, et al. A consistent phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in poroelastic media[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 372: 113396. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113396
[12]	YI L P, YANG C X, CHEN R, et al. Phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in porous medium and numerical simulation analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation in a layered reservoir[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14(16): 1-25. doi: 10.1007/s12517-020-06304-8
[13]	ZHENG Y X, LIU J J, ZHANG B H. An investigation into the effects of weak interfaces on fracture height containment in hydraulic fracturing[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(17): 3245. doi: 10.3390/en12173245
[14]	张丰收, 吴建发, 黄浩勇, 等. 提高深层页岩裂缝扩展复杂程度的工艺参数优化[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 125-135.
	ZHANG Fengshou, WU Jianfa, HUANG Haoyong, et al. Technological parameter optimization for improving the complexity of hydraulic fractures in deep shale reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 125-135.
[15]	CHONG Z, KAREKAL S, LI X, et al. Numerical investigation of hydraulic fracturing in transversely isotropic shale reservoirs based on the discrete element method[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 46: 398-420. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.021
[16]	杨兆中, 张丹, 易良平, 等. 多层叠置煤层压裂裂缝纵向扩展模型与数值模拟[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(10): 3268-3277.
	YANG Zhaozhong, ZHANG Dan, YI Liangping, et al. Longitudinal propagation model of hydraulic fracture and numerical simulation in multi-layer superimposed coalbed[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(10): 3268-3277.
[17]	SUN C, ZHENG H, LIU W D, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of vertical propagation of hydraulic fracture in bedding plane[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 232: 107056. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107056
[18]	TANG H Y, LIANG H P, ZHANG L H, et al. Fully 3D simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs using displacement discontinuity method[J]. SPE Journal, 2022, 27(3): 1648-1670. doi: 10.2118/209219-PA
[19]	李明耀, 贺甲元, 苏业旺. 页岩油气水力压裂的关键力学问题和数值计算方法[J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(23): 32-42.
	LI Mingyao, HE Jiayuan, SU Yewang. Key mechanical problems and numerical methods of hydraulic fracture in shale[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2016, 34(23): 32-42.
[20]	CUNDALL P A. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part I. A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1988, 25(3): 107-116.
[21]	HART R, CUNDALL P A, LEMOS J. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part II. Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks[J]. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & Geomechanics abstracts, 1988, 25(3): 117-125.
[22]	路艳军. 煤岩体积压裂机理研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015.
	LU Yanjun. Mechanism researches of stimulated reservoir volume in coal seams[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[23]	HOU B, ZHANG R X, ZENG Y J, et al. Analysis of hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation in deep shale formation with high horizontal stress difference[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 170: 231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.060
[24]	HENG S, LI X Z, LIU X, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical properties of bedding planes in shale[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 76: 103161. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103161
[25]	周彤, 王海波, 李凤霞, 等. 层理发育的页岩气储集层压裂裂缝扩展模拟[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 1039-1051. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.05.18
	ZHOU Tong, WANG Haibo, LI Fengxia, et al. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in laminated shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 1039-1051. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.05.18

基于离散元法的压裂裂缝特征研究

Fracture characteristics based on discrete element method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	姚红生, 王伟, 何希鹏, 郑永旺, 倪振玉. 南川复杂构造带常压页岩气地质工程一体化开发实践 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	李京昌, 卢婷, 聂海宽, 冯动军, 杜伟, 孙川翔, 李王鹏. 威荣地区WY23平台页岩气层裂缝地震检测可信度评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[3]	夏海帮, 韩克宁, 宋文辉, 王伟, 姚军. 页岩气藏多尺度孔缝介质压裂液微观赋存机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[4]	侯大力, 韩鑫, 唐洪明, 郭建春, 龚凤鸣, 孙雷, 强贤宇. 龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 636-646.
[5]	韩克宁, 王伟, 樊冬艳, 姚军, 罗飞, 杨灿. 基于产量递减与LSTM耦合的常压页岩气井产量预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[6]	张家伟, 刘向君, 熊健, 梁利喜, 任建飞, 刘佰衢. 双井同步压裂裂缝扩展规律离散元模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 657-667.
[7]	薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发——以四川盆地东南缘地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[8]	崔传智, 李怀亮, 吴忠维, 张传宝, 李弘博, 张营华, 郑文宽. 考虑压驱注水诱发裂缝影响的注水井压力分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 686-694.
[9]	楼章华, 张欣柯, 吴宇辰, 高玉巧, 张培先, 金爱民, 朱蓉. 四川盆地南川地区及邻区页岩气保存差异的流体响应特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[10]	胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[11]	林魂, 孙新毅, 宋西翔, 蒙春, 熊雯欣, 黄俊和, 刘洪博, 刘成. 基于改进人工神经网络的页岩气井产量预测模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[12]	刘洪林,周尚文,李晓波. PCA-OPLS联合法快速评价页岩气井储量动用程度 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[13]	卢比,胡春锋,马军. 南川页岩气田压裂水平井井间干扰影响因素及对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[14]	邱小雪,钟光海,李贤胜,陈猛,凌玮桐. 不同井斜页岩气水平井流动特征的CFD模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[15]	聂云丽, 高国忠. 基于随机森林的页岩气“甜点”分类方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.