溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段储层测井解释方法及应用初探

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.03.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了提高测井解释精度,提升解释模型区带适用性,以苏北盆地溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段储层为对象,开展了区带孔隙度、饱和度评价模型研究。对实验分析孔隙度和测井资料进行统计分析发现,经泥质校正后的声波时差曲线与实验分析孔隙度较好地满足声波地层因素关系,确定本区岩石骨架声波时差为189.39 μs/m,骨架岩性系数x为1.472,建立了区带孔隙度解释模型;分析了地层因素F与孔隙度的关系,明确了胶结指数m随岩心孔隙度的变化规律,即中孔储层随着孔隙度增大,m值较为稳定,高-特高孔储层随着孔隙度增大,m值有增大趋势;实现了由测井资料计算可变胶结指数m,进而可准确计算储层含油饱和度。应用结果表明,利用建立的孔隙度和饱和度模型在本区的解释成果与实验分析吻合性好。

关键词: 溱潼凹陷, 测井解释, 孔隙度, 饱和度, 复杂砂岩, 声波地层因素关系

Abstract:

In order to improve the accuracy of log interpretation and the applicability of interpretation model for zones, the suitable porosity and saturation models are established for analysis of the 3rd member of Funing Formation in the west slope of Qintong sag, North Jiangsu basin. After the statistics and analysis of the experimental porosity and well logs, it is found that interval transit time after shale correction and the porosity of the experimental analysis can satisfy the relation among acoustic formation factors. The interval transit time for the rock matrix in this area is determined to be 189.39 μs/m, the matrix lithology coefficient（x） is 1.472, and the interpretation model for the porosity in the zone is established. And then, the relation between formation factor（F） and porosity is analyzed. Meanwhile, the variation rule of cementation index（m） with core porosity is determined, that is, with the increase of porosity in mesoporous reservoirs, m is relatively stable, while with the increase of porosity in high-extra-high pore reservoirs, m tends to increase. Therefore, the variable cementation index（m） can be calculated from well logs, and then the oil saturation of reservoir can be calculated accurately. The interpretation results of the established porosity and saturation models in this area agree well with the experimental analysis.

Key words: Qintong sag, logging interpretation, porosity, saturation, complex sandstone, relation among acoustic formation factors

中图分类号:

P631.84

孙伟. 溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段储层测井解释方法及应用初探[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 121-125.

SUN Wei. Log interpretation method and application for 3rd member of Funing Formation in west slope of Qintong sag[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 121-125.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 21

[1]	周灿灿, 李潮流, 王昌学, 等. 复杂碎屑岩测井岩石物理与处理评价[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013.
	ZHOU C C, LI C L, WANG C X, et al. Petrophysics and treatment evaluation of logging complex clastic rocks[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2013.
[2]	李雄炎, 秦瑞宝, 毛志强, 等. 高精度胶结指数模型的建立与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2014,35(1):76-84.
	LI X Y, QIN R B, MAO Z Q, et al. Establishment and application of a high-precision cementation exponent model[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014,35(1):76-84.
[3]	王建功, 蔡文渊, 罗安银, 等. 二连地区复杂砂岩胶结指数m和系数a的研究[J]. 测井技术, 2010,34(5):449-452.
	WANG J G, CAI W Y, LUO A Y, et al. On sandstone cementation exponent m and factor a in erlian area[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2010,34(5):449-452.
[4]	韩双, 潘保芝. 孔隙储层胶结指数m的确定方法及影响因素[J]. 油气地球物理, 2010,8(1):43-47.
	HAN S, PAN B Z. Determination method of cementation index m of pore reservoir and influencing factors[J]. Petroleum Geophysics, 2010,8(1):43-47.
[5]	傅爱兵. 济阳坳陷碎屑岩储层胶结指数变化规律分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2011,18(3):39-42.
	FU A B. Analysis of cementation exponent of the clastic rock reservoirs in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2011,18(3):39-42.
[6]	王志文, 葛祥, 朱爱民. 洛带碎屑岩储层胶结指数计算及变化规律研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2010,22(3):83-84.
	WANG Z W, GE X, ZHU A M. Study on consolidation index calculation and variation law of detrital rock reservoir[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2010,22(3):83-84.
[7]	金力钻, 孙玉红, 周文革, 等. 低电阻率砂岩油气层的测井饱和度计算新模型[J]. 测井技术, 2020,44(1):55-60.
	JIN L Z, SUN Y H, ZHOU W G, et al. New model for the log-based saturation calculation of low-resistivity sandstone reservoirs[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2020,44(1):55-60.
[8]	吴丰, 丛林林, 姚聪, 等. 不规则条带状泥质对砂岩电阻率影响的数值模拟[J]. 测井技术, 2019,43(4):355-360.
	WU F, CONG L L, YAO C, et al. Numerical simulation to the influence of irregularly banded argillaceous composition on sandstone resistivity[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2019,43(4):355-360.
[9]	胡胜福, 周灿灿, 李霞, 等. 测井饱和度解释模型的演化历程分析与思考[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017,32(5):1992-1998.
	HU S F, ZHOU C C, LI X, et al. Analysis and prospect of logging saturation model evolutionary history[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017,32(5):1992-1998.
[10]	刘双莲, 李浩, 魏修平, 等. 含岩屑砂岩储层“甜点”测井评价技术难点与对策[J]. 石油物探, 2020,59(1):141-149.
	LIU S L, LI H, WEI X P, et al. Difficulties and strategy of logging evaluation on “sweet spots” of lithic sandstone reservoirs[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020,59(1):141-149.
[11]	陈继华, 陈政, 毛志强. 莫西庄地区低阻油层成因分析与饱和度评价[J]. 石油物探, 2011,50(3):247-251.
	CHEN J H, CHEN Z, MAO Z Q. Analysis on the forming of low-resistivity oil layer and evaluation of the water saturation in Moxizhuang area[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2011,50(3):247-251.
[12]	未晛, 王尚旭, 赵建国, 等. 致密砂岩纵、横波速度影响因素的实验研究[J]. 石油物探, 2015,54(1):9-16.
	WEI X, WANG S X, ZHAO J G, et al. Laboratory investigation of influence factors on v_P and v_S in tight sandstone[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015,54(1):9-16.
[13]	韩学辉, 郭俊鑫, 毛新军, 等. 泥质砂岩黏土附加导电强度评价指数定义及应用方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019,62(11):4462-4471.
	HAN X H, GUO J X, MAO X J, et al. Definition of clay additional conductivity intensity index for argillaceous sandstone and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019,62(11):4462-4471.
[14]	刘成川, 陈俊, 黎华继, 等. 中江气田沙溪庙组气藏致密砂岩储层测井评价[J]. 石油物探, 2020,59(1):131-140.
	LIU C C, CHEN J, LI H J, et al. Logging evaluation of the tight sandstone reservoir in the gas reservoir of the Shaximiao formation within Zhongjiang gas field, China[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2020,59(1):131-140.
[15]	吴群, 余文端, 骆卫峰, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷岩性油藏勘探成果及启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016,21(3):99-107.
	WU Q, YU W D, LUO W F, et al. Achievements and recognitions of exploration in lithologic reservoirs in Qintong sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016,21(3):99-107.
[16]	臧素华. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段沉积相研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2014,28(6):22-24.
	ZANG S H. Sedimentary facies study of 3rd member Funing formation in western slope of Qintong depression, northern Jiangsu basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2014,28(6):22-24.
[17]	卞梅. 溱潼凹陷西南斜坡阜三段滩坝沉积特征及模式[J]. 非常规油气, 2018,5(3):25-30.
	BIAN M. The beach bar sedimentary characteristics and models of the third member of Funing Formation in the southwest slope of Qintong Sag[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2018,5(3):25-30.
[18]	张航国, 昝灵. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜宁组三段油气富集规律[J]. 长江大学学报, 2016,13(35):13-17.
	ZHANG H G, ZAN L. The rules of hydrocarbon enrichment in the 3 ^rd member of Funing Formation on the west steep slope of Qintong Depression of North Jiangsu Basin [J]. Journal of Yangtze University, 2016,13(35):13-17.
[19]	张松扬. 大牛地气田致密砂岩储层测井评价[J]. 石油物探, 2010,49(4):415-420.
	ZHANG S Y. Logging evaluation technique for tight sandstone reservoir in Daniudi Gasfield[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010,49(4):415-420.
[20]	王旭影, 姜在兴. 苏北盆地海安凹陷古近系阜三段滩坝沉积特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(5):57-64.
	WANG X Y, JIANG Z X. Sedimentary characteristics of beach-bar in the 3rd member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Hai’an Sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(5):57-64.
[21]	敬晓波. 溱潼西斜坡阜三段储层特征及主控因素研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019,33(1):6-9.
	JING X B. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Fu 3 member of Qintong west slope[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2019,33(1):6-9.