新场J2s2致密砂岩气藏水平井采收率主控因素研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.06.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

新场沙溪庙组沙二气藏储层致密、自然产能低,水平井作为气藏有效开发的手段之一,其采收率主控因素尚不明确。利用Eclipse数值模拟软件,研究水平井采收率主控因素并定量评价其影响程度,为利用水平井进一步开发提供理论依据。结果表明：①致密砂岩气藏不同储量区水平井采收率主控因素不同,Ⅰ类、Ⅲ类和Ⅳ类储量区水平井采收率主控因素为含水饱和度,Ⅱ类储量区水平井采收率主控因素为有效厚度。②主控因素对水平井采收率影响程度不同,Ⅰ~Ⅳ类储量区主控因素对采收率的影响幅度分别为91.14 %、54.33 %、61.82 %和45.18 %,由单一因素影响转变为多因素共同影响。③储层物性好的Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类储量区,水平井采收率受物性影响较小,采收率影响幅度不超过1 %;物性较差的Ⅲ类和Ⅳ类储量区,水平井采收率受物性影响高达17 %。所以,对于致密砂岩气藏利用水平井有效开发,需分储量区进行对策优化。物性较好区域,应加强水平井工程设计优化,例如提高水平段长度、精细造缝等;物性较差区域,应优选含水饱和度低、储层有效厚度大、渗透率高区域部署水平井。

关键词: 致密砂岩气藏, 水平井, 采收率, 含水饱和度, 有效厚度

Abstract:

The gas reservoir in 2^nd member of Shaximiao Formation of Xinchang Gas Field is tight, and its natural productivity is low. As one of the effective development methods, the horizontal wells has unclear main controlling factors of recovery factor. By the numerical simulation software, ECLIPSE, this problem has been analyzed and its influence has been quantitatively evaluated, so as to provide a favorable theoretical basis for the further development by horizontal wells. The results show that: 1）The main controlling factors of tight sandstone gas reservoir changes with the different reserves. For the class Ⅰ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ, it is mainly controlled by the water saturation, while for the class Ⅱ, effective thickness contributes most. 2）The influence of main controlling factors on the recovery factor of horizontal wells are different, with a degree of 91.14 %, 54.33 %, 61.82 % and 45.18 % respectively for class Ⅰ~Ⅳ and multiple factors instead of single factor. 3）The physical properties of reservoir have great influence on the recovery factor of horizontal wells. For the class Ⅰ and Ⅱ reservoir with good properties, the influence degree is less than 1 %, while that of the class Ⅲ and Ⅳ reservoir with poor properties is up to 17 %. Therefore, effective development of horizontal wells depend on the classification of reservoir by different reserves. For the areas with good properties, the optimization of engineering design should be strengthened, like increasing the length of horizontal section and fine fracturing; on the contrary, for that of poor properties, the deployment location of horizontal wells should be chosen in the areas with low water saturation, large effective reservoir thickness and high permeability.

Key words: tight sandstone gas reservoir, horizontal well, recovery factor, water saturation, effective thickness

中图分类号:

TE377

刘露,王勇飞,詹泽东,解金凤. 新场J₂s₂致密砂岩气藏水平井采收率主控因素研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 890-896.

LIU Lu,WANG Yongfei,ZHAN Zedong,XIE Jinfeng. Main control factors of horizontal wells in J₂s₂ tight sandstone gas reservoir of Xinchang Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 890-896.

图/表 11

表1

表2

图1

图2

表3

图3

图4

图5

图6

表4

表5

参考文献 18

[1]	刘正中, 吴铬, 黎华继, 等. 新场气田上沙溪庙组气藏储层表征及建模[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(3):52-55.
	LIU Zhengzhong, WU Luo, LI Huaji, et al. Characterizing and modelling of Upper Shaximiao Formation Gas Reservoirs in Xinchang Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(3):52-55.
[2]	杨克明, 朱宏权. 川西叠覆型致密砂岩气区地质特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(1):1-8.
	YANG Keming, ZHU Hongquan. Geological characteristics of superposed tight sandstone gas-bearing areas in western Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Experimental Geology, 2013, 35(1):1-8.
[3]	青淳, 唐红君, 卜淘. 川西坳陷新场气田浅层气藏开发技术难点及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(3):55-58.
	QING Chun, TANG Hongjun, BU Tao. Technical difficulties in developing the shallow gas reservoirs in Xinchang field in west Sichuan depression and their countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(3):55-58.
[4]	王勇飞, 刘成川, 刘露. 川西坳陷致密砂岩气藏差异性开发实践与认识—以新场气藏J₂s₂为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(S1):174-178.
	WANG Yongfei, LIU Chengchuan, LIU Lu. Practice and Understanding of differential development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Western Sichuan Depression—A Case study of Xinchang J₂s₂[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(S1):174-178.
[5]	杨建, 刘露, 卜淘. 川西低渗致密气藏水平井开发动态差异性分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(5):79-81.
	YANG Jian, LIU Lu, BU Tao. Dynamic difference analysis of horizontal well development in low permeability and tight gas reservoirs in western Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2018, 32(5):79-81.
[6]	王国勇. 致密砂岩气藏水平井整体开发实践与认识:以苏里格气田苏53区块为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(5):153-157.
	WANG Guoyong. Practice and recognition of horizontal well development in tight sandstone gas reservoirs——A case study from Block Su53[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012, 34(5):153-157.
[7]	陈军, 张烈辉, 冯国庆, 等. 低渗透气藏Ⅲ类储层对产能的贡献研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(10):108-110.
	CHEN Jun, ZHANG Liehui, FENG Guoqing, et al. Contribution of third class reservoirs to productivity of low permeable gas pools[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(10):108-110.
[8]	刘露, 刘成川, 卜淘, 等. 含水饱和度对川西致密气藏水平井开发效果和经济效益的影响[J]. 油田化学, 2019, 36(1):120-124.
	LIU Lu, LIU Chengchuan, BU Tao, et al. Effect of water saturation on development and economic limit of horizontal well in tight sandstone gas reservoir of Western Sichuan[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36(1):120-124.
[9]	高树生, 刘华勋, 叶礼友, 等. 致密砂岩气藏井网密度优化与采收率评价新方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8):58-64.
	GAO Shusheng, LIU Huaxun, YE Liyou, et al. A new method for well pattern density optimization and recovery factor evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8):58-64.
[10]	陈冠旭, 程顺有, 刘森, 等. 低渗透气藏水平井开发产能影响因素分析[J]. 地下水, 2012, 34(3):163-165.
	CHEN Guanxu, CHENG Shunyou, LIU Sen, et al. Analysis of factors influencing productivity of horizontal well development in low permeability gas reservoirs[J]. Groundwater, 2012, 34(3):163-165.
[11]	ZHANG H, ZHONG Y, KURU E, et al. Impacts of permeability stress sensitivity and aqueous phase trapping on the tight sandstone gas well productivity——A case study of the Daniudi gas field[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 177:261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.02.044
[12]	赵振峰, 吴晓东, 黄伟, 等. 特低渗透油藏压裂水平井产能影响因素分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 4(33):81-83.
	ZHAO Zhenfeng, WU Xiaodong, HUANG Wei, et al. Influencing factor analysis of the productivity of fractured horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir[J]. Oil drilling & production technology, 2011, 4(33):81-83.
[13]	MIN W, SHENG N C, MENG L L. Enhancing recovery and sensitivity studies in an unconventional tight gas condensate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Science, 2018, 15(2):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s12182-018-0220-7
[14]	吴则鑫. 苏里格气田致密气井产能主控因素分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2018, 5(5):66-71.
	WU Zexin. Analysis of production capacity control factors of low-permeability tight gas reservoir[J]. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2018, 5(5):66-71.
[15]	SHU S G, HUA X L, LI Y Y. A new method for well pattern density optimization and recovery efficiency evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2020, 7(2):133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2019.08.003
[16]	李华昌. 川西致密气藏压裂水平井生产动态预测研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2015, 38(3):63-65.
	LI Huachang. Production performance prediction of fractured horizontal well in Chuanxi tight gas reservoir[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2015, 38(3):63-65.
[17]	魏修平, 胡向阳, 李浩, 等. 致密砂岩气藏水平井测井评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田X井区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):1084-1092.
	WEI Xiuping, HU Xiangyang, LI Hao, et al. An evaluation on logging data of horizontal wells in tight sand gas reservoir A case study of drilling sector X in Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):1084-1092.
[18]	张箭, 李华昌, 刘成川. 新场气田低渗致密沙二气藏数值模拟研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(3):58-61.
	ZHANG Jian, LI Huachang, LIU Chengchuan. Numerical simulation research on the low permeability tight J₂s₂ gas reservoir in Xinchang Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(3):58-61.

储层类别	地层系数（10^-3μm²·m）	储能系数（m）	含水饱和度（%）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）
Ⅰ类为主	> 2.5	> 1.2	< 45	> 0.25
Ⅱ类为主	1.5~2.5	0.6~1.2	45~50	0.15~0.25
Ⅲ类为主	1~1.5	0.4~0.6	50~65	0.1~0.15
Ⅳ类为主	< 1	< 0.4	> 65	< 0.1

储量区	孔隙度（%）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	含水饱和度（%）	有效厚度（m）	地层系数（10^-3μm²·m）	储能系数（m）
Ⅰ	13	0.3	35	25.2	7.56	2.13
Ⅱ	11	0.18	50	16.4	2.46	0.90
Ⅲ	9	0.12	57	10.5	1.26	0.41
Ⅳ	8	0.06	68	8.4	0.50	0.22

储量区	孔隙度（%）		含水饱和度（%）		有效厚度（m）		渗透率（10^-3 μm²）
储量区	倍数	储能系数（m）	倍数	储能系数（m）	倍数	储能系数（m）	倍数	范围（10^-3 μm²）
Ⅰ	0.8、1、1.2、1.4	1.67~2.97	0.85、0.95、1.1	1.80~2.33	0.6、0.85、1.1	1.27~2.33	0.85、1.2、1.5	0.26~0.45
Ⅱ	0.75、0.9、1.2	0.68~1.08	0.9、1、1.1	0.81~0.99	0.8、1.1、1.3	0.72~.170	0.83、1、1.38	0.15~0.25
Ⅲ	0.98、1.15、1.45	0.40~0.60	0.98、1.05、1.14	0.40~0.47	0.98、1.2、1.45	0.40~0.60	0.83、1、1.25	0.10~0.15
Ⅳ	0.87、1.2、1.5、1.87	0.19~0.41	0.95、1、1.05	0.21~0.23	0.5、0.9、1.3、1.7	0.11~0.37	0.5、0.9、1.3、1.6	0.03~0.10

储量区	含水饱和度（%）		有效厚度（m）		渗透率（10^-3 μm²）		孔隙度（%）
储量区	范围（%）	变化幅度（%）	范围（%）	变化幅度（%）	范围（%）	变化幅度（%）	范围（%）	变化幅度（%）
Ⅰ	61.52~61.68	0.16	61.59~61.6	0.01	61.58~61.59	0.01	61.59~61.6	0.004
Ⅱ	50.7~51.12	0.42	50.55~51.34	0.79	50.7~51.12	0.42	50.86~50.9	0.04
Ⅲ	31.32~48.2	16.88	37.66~44.1	6.44	38.51~41.95	3.43	40.22~40.65	0.43
Ⅳ	6.03~18.69	12.66	8.63~16.38	7.75	8.23~15.68	7.40	12.23~12.75	0.52

参数	Ⅰ、Ⅱ类储量区		Ⅲ、Ⅳ类储量区
参数	关系式	相关系数	关系式	相关系数
含水饱和度	y = 0.180 4x^-0.953	R² = 0.036 1	y =0.026 6x^-4.561	R² = 0.316 5
孔隙度	y = 3 023.1x^-1.925	R² = 0.021 5	y = 60.401x^-0.323	R² = 0.001 9
渗透率	y = 20.489e^3.862^x	R² = 0.089 2	y = 86.945x + 20.996	R² = 0.065 7
有效厚度	y = 9.204e^{0.064 6}^x	R² = 0.217 3	y = 7.053 5e^{0.111 3}^x	R² = 0.292 6
水平段长度	y = 5.158e^{0.002 5}^x	R² = 0.577 5	y = 20.845e^{0.000 4}^x	R² = 0.020 3
压裂段数	y = 8.304 4e^{0.185 7}^x	R² = 0.373 3	y = 29.875e^-0.007^x	R² = 0.002

新场J₂s₂致密砂岩气藏水平井采收率主控因素研究

Main control factors of horizontal wells in J₂s₂ tight sandstone gas reservoir of Xinchang Gas Field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张连锋,张伊琳,郭欢欢,李洪生,李俊杰,梁丽梅,李文静,胡书奎. 近废弃油藏延长生命周期开发调整技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[2]	唐建东, 王智林, 葛政俊. 苏北盆地江苏油田CO₂驱油技术进展及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[3]	张志超,柏明星,杜思宇. 页岩油藏注CO₂驱孔隙动用特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[4]	石彦, 谢俊辉, 郭小婷, 吴通, 陈德全, 孙琳, 杜代军. 新疆油田中深层稠油CO₂驱/吞吐实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.
[5]	罗红文, 张琴, 李海涛, 向雨行, 李颖, 庞伟, 刘畅, 于皓, 王亚宁. 致密油水平井温度剖面影响规律研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 676-685.
[6]	张凤喜, 牛丛丛, 张一弛. 东海低渗透储层水平井分段压裂实施及效果评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[7]	胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[8]	陈猛,谢韦峰,张煜,杨国锋,刘向君. 水平井油水两相流阵列电磁波持水率计算方法及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 505-512.
[9]	杨冰, 傅强, 官敬涛, 李林祥, 潘昊宇, 宋宏斌, 秦婷婷, 朱志伟. 特高含水油藏不同井网流场调整模拟与驱油效率 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 519-524.
[10]	邱小雪,钟光海,李贤胜,陈猛,凌玮桐. 不同井斜页岩气水平井流动特征的CFD模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[11]	姚红生,云露,昝灵,张龙胜,邱伟生. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段断块型页岩油定向井开发模式及实践 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[12]	张锦宏. 中国石化页岩油工程技术新进展 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 1-8.
[13]	王晓强,赵立安,王志愿,修春红,贾国龙,董研,卢德唐. 基于水锤效应与倒谱变换的停泵压力分析方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 108-116.
[14]	王高峰, 廖广志, 李宏斌, 胡志明, 魏宁, 丛连铸. CO₂驱气机理与提高采收率评价模型 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 734-740.
[15]	郭德明,潘毅,孙扬,巢忠堂,李晓楠,程诗胜. 低渗稠油油藏降黏剂-CO₂复合驱提高采收率机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.