基于交替条件期望变换的凝析气藏露点压力预测模型

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.04.017

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4): 107-112.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.04.017

基于交替条件期望变换的凝析气藏露点压力预测模型

孙博文¹(),郭平¹(),伍轶鸣²,汪周华¹,周代余²,刘志良²

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500
2.中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2019-05-13 出版日期:2020-08-26 发布日期:2020-08-07
通讯作者: 郭平 E-mail:178558944@qq.com;guopingswpi@vip.sina.com
作者简介:孙博文（1990 —）,男,在读博士研究生,主要从事油气相态、气田开发理论与方法研究工作。通讯地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,邮政编码：610500。E-mail: 178558944@qq.com
基金资助:
“十三五”国家科技重大专项“塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油气田提高采收率关键技术示范工程”(2016ZX05053);中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“塔里木盆地大油气田增储上产关键技术研究与应用”(2018E-1804)

Dew point pressure prediction model of condensate gas reservoir based on alternating conditional expectation transform

SUN Bowen¹(),GUO Ping¹(),WU Yiming²,WANG Zhouhua¹,ZHOU Daiyu²,LIU Zhiliang²

1.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China

Received:2019-05-13 Online:2020-08-26 Published:2020-08-07
Contact: GUO Ping E-mail:178558944@qq.com;guopingswpi@vip.sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

凝析气藏的高效开发需要准确的流体相态性质数据,其中准确预测露点压力是凝析气藏开发过程中的重要问题。针对凝析气藏露点压力传统预测方法精度较低的问题,基于最优化理论和应用统计分析,通过实测数据资料拟合,提出了一种利用交替条件期望变换方法（ACE）确定的凝析气藏露点压力非参数回归模型,获取了具有统计意义的凝析气藏露点压力显式关联式。在皮尔逊（Pearson）关联性分析基础上,该模型自变量选取气藏温度、（C₁、C₂-C₆、C₇₊）摩尔分数、C₇₊相对分子质量、C₇₊相对密度。采用公开发表的27组露点压力数据探索自变量和因变量之间的潜在函数关系,并对9组TLM油田实测露点压力数据进行预测。结果表明：该模型精度较高,具有良好的泛化能力,模型回归的平均绝对相对误差（AARD）为2.16 %,模型预测AARD仅为4.8 %,其中最大绝对相对误差（ARD）为9.21 %,最小ARD为0.34 %,本研究为凝析气藏露点压力预测提供了一种参考方法。

关键词: 交替条件期望变换, 凝析气藏, 露点压力, 预测, 模型

Abstract:

The efficient development of condensate gas reservoirs requires accurate fluid phase properties data, among which accurate prediction of dew point pressure is an important issue in the development of condensate gas reservoirs. In order to solve the problem of low accuracy of traditional prediction methods for dew point pressure of condensate gas reservoirs, based on optimization theory and applied statistical analysis, and by fitting measured data, a non-parametric regression model determined by alternating conditional expectation transformation（ACE） is proposed, and an explicit correlation of dew point pressure with statistical significance is obtained. Based on Pearson correlation analysis, the independent variables of the model are gas reservoir temperature, mole fraction of （C₁, C₂-C₆, C₇₊）, and molecular weight and relative density of C₇₊. The potential function relation between independent and dependent variables is analyzed by 27 sets of experimental data for published dew point pressure, and 9 groups of measured dew point pressure data of TLM oilfields are predicted. The results show that the model has high precision and good generalization ability. The average absolute relative deviation（AARD） of model regression is 2.16 %, and the predicted AARD is only 4.8 %. The maximum absolute relative deviation（ARD） is 9.21 % and the minimum is 0.34 %. This study provides a reference method for dew point pressure prediction of condensate gas reservoirs.

Key words: alternating conditional expectation, condensate gas reservoir, dew point pressure, prediction, model

中图分类号:

TE319

孙博文,郭平,伍轶鸣,汪周华,周代余,刘志良. 基于交替条件期望变换的凝析气藏露点压力预测模型[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 107-112.

SUN Bowen,GUO Ping,WU Yiming,WANG Zhouhua,ZHOU Daiyu,LIU Zhiliang. Dew point pressure prediction model of condensate gas reservoir based on alternating conditional expectation transform[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 107-112.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

ACE模型公式系数"

n	x	$β n 6$	$β n 5$	$β n 4$	$β n 3$	$β n 2$	$β n 1$	$β n 0$
1	T				2.60×10^-5	-3.09×10^-2	12.2	1.60×10³
2	C₁				-5.88×10^-5	1.47×10^-2	-1.13	26.5
3	C₂-C₆	-3.30×10^-7	2.61×10^-5	-8.00×10^-4	1.16×10^-2	-7.51×10^-2	1.08×10^-1	4.03×10^-1
4	C₇₊			8.93×10^-4	-2.00×10^-2	1.33×10^-1	-6.61×10^-3	-9.93×10^-1
5	MC₇₊			-5.91×10^-8	4.21×10^-5	-1.11×10^-2	1.31	-59.6
6	ΓC₇₊			-1.17×10⁵	3.76×10⁵	-4.54×10⁵	2.43×10⁵	-4.88×10⁴

表2

图4

表3

参考文献 16

[1]	崔书姮, 汤勇, 赵曜 , 等. 高温高压凝析气藏石蜡沉积条件预测研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017,7(3):55-58.
	CUI S H, TANG Y, ZHAO Y , et al. Study on prediction of wax deposition conditions in high temperature and high pressure condensate gas reservoir[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017,7(3):55-58.
[2]	李建奇, 杨志伦, 张春雨 , 等. 反凝析作用对苏里格气田上古生界气藏开发的影响[J]. 天然气工业, 2015,35(4):45-51.
	LI J Q, YANG Z L, ZHANG C Y , et al. Impacts of retrograde condensation on the development of Upper Paleozoic gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gasfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015,35(4):45-51.
[3]	彭松 . 致密砂岩凝析气藏反凝析伤害机理及合理开发方式研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2015.
	PENG S . Research on mechanism of condensate damage and reasonable development method in tight sand gas-condensate reservoirs[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[4]	中国石油勘探开发研究院. 油气藏流体物性分析方法: GB/T 26981-2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.
	Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development. Test method for reservoir fluid physical properties: GB/T 26981-2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012.
[5]	VALIOLLAHI S, KAVIANPOUR B, RAEISSI S , et al. A new Peng-Robinson modification to enhance dew point estimations of natural gases[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016,34:1137-1147.
[6]	HAJI-SAVAMERI M, MENAD N A, NOROUZI-APOURVARI S , et al. Modeling dew point pressure of gas condensate reservoirs: Comparison of hybrid soft computing approaches, correlations, and thermodynamic models[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020,184:1-18.
[7]	ZHONG ZHI, LIU SIYAN, KAZEMI M , et al. Dew point pressure prediction based on mixed-kernels-function support vector machine in gas-condensate reservoir[J]. Fuel, 2018,232:600-609.
[8]	张可, 李实, 廉黎明 , 等. 交替条件期望变换确定油气最小混相压力新方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2012,2(1):23-28.
	ZHANG K, LI S, LIAN L M , et al. The new method to determine the minimum miscibility pressure of oil and gas by using alternating conditional expectation transform[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2012,2(1):23-28.
[9]	江安, 雷少飞 . 基于交换条件数学期望的CO₂最小混相压力预测模型[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016,11(17):2029-2034.
	JIANG A, LEI S F . The use of alternating conditional expectation to predict CO₂ minimum miscibility pressure[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2016,11(17):2029-2034.
[10]	FENG Q H, ZHANG J Y, ZHANG X M , et al. The use of alternating conditional expectation to predict methane sorption capacity on coal[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014,121:137-147.
[11]	陶德硕, 侯健, 魏翠华 . 基于交替条件期望的油藏井间连通性定量表征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014,14(31):55-60.
	TAO D S, HOU J, WEI C H . Quantitative characterization of dynamic connectivity of reservoir well based on alternating conditional expectation[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014,14(31):55-60.
[12]	FENG Q H, ZHANG J Y, ZHANG X M , et al. Proximate analysis based prediction of gross calorific value of coals: A comparison of support vector machine, alternating conditional expectation and artificial neural network[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015,129:120-129.
[13]	蒙园, 张建华, 龙日尚 . 基于交替条件期望的短期负荷概率密度预测[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,45(1):58-65.
	MENG Y, ZHANG J H, LONG R S . Short-term load probability density forecasting based on alternating conditional expectation. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2018,45(1):58-65.
[14]	孙志道, 胡永乐, 李云娟 , 等. 凝析气藏早期开发气藏工程研究[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003.
	SUN Z D, HU Y L, LI Y J , et al. Gas reservoir engineering study of prophase condensate reservoir development[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.
[15]	杨帆, 冯翔, 阮羚 , 等. 基于皮尔逊相关系数法的水树枝与超低频介损的相关性研究[J]. 高压电器, 2014,50(6):21-25.
	YANG F, FENG X, RUAN L , et al. Correlation study of water tree and VLF tanδ based on pearson correlation coefficient[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2014,50(6):21-25.
[16]	陈丽群, 刘敏, 张建业 , 等. 新露点压力预测模型的建立与对比分析[C]// 2017年全国天然气学术年会论文集.杭州:中国石油学会天然气专业委员会, 2017: 912-921.
	CHEN L Q, LIU M, ZHANG J Y , et al. Establishment and comparison of new dew point pressure prediction model[C]// 2017 National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference. Gas Committee of CPS, Hangzhou, 2017: 912-921.

T/K	x（C₁）/%	x（C₂-C₆）/%	x（C₇₊）/%	M（C₇₊）	Γ（C₇₊）	露点压力/MPa		ARD	AARD
T/K	x（C₁）/%	x（C₂-C₆）/%	x（C₇₊）/%	M（C₇₊）	Γ（C₇₊）	实验值	预测值	ARD	AARD
377.55	74.95	11.68	2.41	134	0.775	37.93	39.07	3.01 %	2.16 %
410.15	71.87	18.82	7.42	152	0.790	36.85	39.03	5.93 %
405.65	94.75	1.14	0.21	174	0.821	43.99	43.78	0.47 %
396.95	86.86	4.08	0.56	124	0.759	39.51	37.90	4.08 %
410.75	95.57	0.77	0.30	205	0.847	46.95	47.34	0.83 %
419.05	70.39	9.15	10.93	144	0.788	38.75	39.07	0.84 %
423.77	77.34	9.04	11.11	153	0.799	41.64	41.63	0.03 %
379.85	79.64	8.09	5.91	142	0.782	43.9	44.88	2.23 %
377.55	88.2	8.32	1.49	172	0.805	43.41	45.45	4.69 %
378.45	84.96	6.50	3.38	143	0.787	44.33	44.24	0.20 %
376.15	65.59	15.14	6.42	138	0.762	42.14	42.37	0.55 %
384.85	84.26	3.59	1.26	145	0.805	40.87	40.97	0.23 %
377.15	74.09	13.40	5.60	154	0.804	43.33	43.34	0.03 %
375.15	81.99	7.45	3.84	152	0.802	45.28	44.13	2.54 %
410.15	70.38	14.93	9.84	189	0.827	44.13	43.46	1.53 %
390.15	74.56	7.81	2.67	131	0.772	35.77	37.31	4.31 %
418.15	63.70	21.52	10.10	147	0.792	38.19	37.33	2.24 %
376.95	82.67	7.72	4.62	139	0.782	46.28	44.64	3.55 %
389.15	74.95	15.54	6.98	197	0.823	50.47	48.45	4.01 %
392.15	71.6	9.76	3.95	143	0.783	40.77	38.68	5.13 %
387.05	86.33	4.31	1.01	136	0.804	39.83	39.61	0.55 %
412.05	75.10	14.01	6.25	228	0.844	47.67	48.29	1.29 %
376.95	84.32	6.38	3.65	159	0.795	45.57	45.99	0.92 %
378.15	72.94	8.67	2.91	124	0.759	36.93	37.74	2.19 %
389.95	85.43	3.91	1.08	136	0.777	39.34	40.70	3.46 %
378.15	86.62	8.86	2.39	144	0.783	45.08	43.63	3.21 %
399.85	94.22	1.17	1.07	166	0.801	44.69	44.62	0.15 %

T/K	x（C₁）/%	x（C₂-C₆）/%	x（C₇₊）/%	M（C₇₊）	Γ（C₇₊）	露点压力/MPa		ARD	AARD
T/K	x（C₁）/%	x（C₂-C₆）/%	x（C₇₊）/%	M（C₇₊）	Γ（C₇₊）	实验值	预测值	ARD	AARD
397.15	96.55	2.09	0.17	150.15	0.79	47.67	43.75	8.23 %	4.80 %
402.40	95.80	2.83	0.42	150.97	0.79	45.28	42.51	6.11 %
407.25	87.48	10.01	1.17	133.96	0.77	40.87	37.11	9.21 %
405.55	87.94	9.46	1.17	137.16	0.77	40.77	38.02	6.74 %
400.15	87.85	9.71	1.06	153.38	0.79	39.83	39.70	0.34 %
401.95	87.77	9.54	1.28	150.54	0.79	37.93	39.18	3.30 %
407.02	88.59	8.96	0.60	123.54	0.76	36.85	35.44	3.83 %
408.20	88.21	9.27	0.99	132.82	0.77	35.77	36.89	3.14 %
409.25	87.97	9.61	1.15	140.25	0.78	38.19	37.30	2.34 %

基于交替条件期望变换的凝析气藏露点压力预测模型

Dew point pressure prediction model of condensate gas reservoir based on alternating conditional expectation transform

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李宁,苗贺,曹开芳. 基于叠前方位各向异性的火山岩裂缝预测——以松辽盆地南部LFS地区为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 197-206.
[2]	李瑞磊,曹磊,樊薛沛,冯晓辉,李宁. 中基性火山岩多种叠前反演算法对比、优选及应用——以查干花地区火石岭组为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 207-215.
[3]	汤勇, 唐凯, 夏光, 徐笛. BZ19-6低渗透储层反凝析污染及解除方法实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 102-107.
[4]	陈洪才, 李朝瑞. 马家嘴油田戴南组薄砂岩储层地震预测技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 108-116.
[5]	于相东, 石书强, 李国良, 房金伟, 段传丽, 齐丹. 基于液膜反转的定向井临界携液模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 151-158.
[6]	董利飞, 董文卓, 张旗, 钟品志, 王苗, 余波, 韦海宇, 杨超. 咸水层中CO₂溶解性能预测方法优选 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 35-41.
[7]	张志升, 吴向阳, 吴倩, 王冀星, 林汉弛, 郭军红, 王锐, 李金花, 林千果. CO₂驱油封存泄漏风险管理系统及应用研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 91-101.
[8]	高小荣, 李红岩, 任小庆, 孙彩霞, 卢星辰, 刘林, 吕强强, 许勇, 董文斌, 王泽沐, 王荣康, 苗瑞灿. 岩土分层对中深层U型对接井换热性能的影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 703-712.
[9]	丛淑飞, 周宏, 赵艳, 靳海龙, 刘鹏, 吴荣碧, 陈元春. 大民屯凹陷沈水501中深层地热田三维地质建模技术研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 741-748.
[10]	徐燕东, 陶杉, 何辉, 万小勇, 邹宁, 袁鸿飞. 考虑重力作用的垂向双洞窜流试井模型 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 827-833.
[11]	郑公营, 吕其彪, 杨永剑, 徐守成. 资阳东峰场地区须家河组五段河道砂岩储层叠前地震预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 569-580.
[12]	钱玉贵. 机器深度学习技术在致密砂岩储层预测中的应用——以川西坳陷新场须家河组为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 600-607.
[13]	赵迪, 马森, 操延辉. 中江气田沙溪庙组地震岩石物理分析与预测模式建立 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 608-613.
[14]	夏海帮, 韩克宁, 宋文辉, 王伟, 姚军. 页岩气藏多尺度孔缝介质压裂液微观赋存机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[15]	韩克宁, 王伟, 樊冬艳, 姚军, 罗飞, 杨灿. 基于产量递减与LSTM耦合的常压页岩气井产量预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.