油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 713-725.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.06.002

• 专家论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于层次分析法的地热资源评价体系研究——以河北省曹妃甸地区中深层水热型砂岩储层为例

何东博1(),任路1,2,郝杰1(),刘小平2,曹倩3   

  1. 1.中国石油冀东油田公司,河北 唐山 063000
    2.中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京 102249
    3.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-13 出版日期:2023-12-26 发布日期:2024-01-03
  • 通讯作者: 郝杰(1983—),女,硕士,高级工程师,从事地热资源评价工作。地址:河北省唐山市路北区新华西道101号,邮政编码:063000。E-mail: haojie2008@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:何东博(1972—),男,博士,正高级工程师,从事储集层评价、天然气开发、新能源开发综合研究与管理工作。地址:河北省唐山市路北区新华西道101号,邮政编码:063000。E-mail: 311@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油前瞻性基础性技术攻关项目“东部油区地热成因机制与开发潜力研究”(2021DJ5501);中国石油油气与新能源分公司科技项目“地热开发利用技术研究与试验”(2022KT2601)

Quantitative evaluation system of geothermal resources based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of middle-deep hydrothermal sandstone reservoir in Caofeidian of Hebei Province

HE Dongbo1(),REN Lu1,2,HAO Jie1(),LIU Xiaoping2,CAO Qian3   

  1. 1. Petroleum Jidong Oilfield Company, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, China
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2023-04-13 Online:2023-12-26 Published:2024-01-03

摘要:

为定量评价目标区域中深层水热型地热资源品质,以沉积盆地内中深层水热型地热资源为研究对象,以地热资源品质评价为主要内容,深入分析地热地质条件、地热资源量和地热流体质量3个部分。选择对地热资源影响较大的16项指标,使用层次分析法对每项指标进行权重赋值,将中深层水热型地热资源划分为三级7类。Ⅰ级区域为资源优势区,可进行高效开发;Ⅱ级区域为资源富集区,满足工业开发要求;Ⅲ级区域为资源不富集区,最终形成一套可量化评价的资源评价体系,为地热资源是否可进行利用提供数据分析结论。通过河北省唐山市曹妃甸区地热供暖项目的实际应用效果作为案例,验证了评价体系的针对性、实用性。

关键词: 地热资源评价, 中深层水热型, 层次分析法, 砂岩热储, 曹妃甸地区

Abstract:

To quantitatively assess the quality of deep hydrothermal geothermal resources in the target area, with a focus on middle-deep hydrothermal resources in sedimentary basins, a comprehensive analysis is conducted. This analysis delves into the effects of geothermal geological conditions, the nature of the geothermal resources themselves, and the quality of geothermal fluids on the overall resource quality. For this assessment, sixteen indicators that significantly impact the quality of geothermal resources are identified. These indicators are then incorporated into an Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) framework, which assigns weights to each indicator, facilitating a quantitative evaluation. The middle-deep hydrothermal geothermal resources are divided into three levels and seven categories. Level Ⅰ areas are resource advantage areas that can be efficiently developed; Level Ⅱ areas are resource rich areas that meet the requirements of industrial development; Level Ⅲ areas are resource non enriched areas. Ultimately, a quantifiable resource evaluation system is formed to provide data analysis conclusions on whether geothermal resources can be utilized. The relevance and practicality of this evaluation system are demonstrated through its application in a case study. The example of geothermal development and usage in the Caofeidian District of Tangshan City, Hebei Province, serves as a testament to the system's effectiveness in guiding decision-making processes for geothermal resource utilization.

Key words: evaluation of geothermal resources, middle-deep hydrothermal type, analytic hierarchy process, thermal energy storage for sandstone, Caofeidian District

中图分类号: 

  • TE122