油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 773-787.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.05.007

• 油气勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

平湖组砂层组级别沉积演化及主控因素——以东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷W井区为例

王健伟(), 吕鹏(), 王泽群, 严曙梅, 潘潞, 林立新, 王瑞, 徐晨, 刘舒, 黄小娟   

  1. 中国石化上海海洋油气分公司勘探开发研究院,上海 200120
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-19 发布日期:2025-09-19 出版日期:2025-10-26
  • 通讯作者: 吕鹏(1994—),男,硕士,助理研究员,从事沉积微相描述与储层综合评价方向研究。地址:上海市浦东新区商城路1225号,邮政编码:200120。E-mail:lvpeng.shhy@sinopec.com
  • 作者简介:王健伟(1979—),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事油气田开发工程研究。地址:上海市浦东新区商城路1225号,邮政编码:200120。E-mail:wjw.shhy@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化先导项目“西部斜坡带南部地质综合评价和目标优选”(YTBXD-QTKF-2022-001-004)

Sedimentary evolution and main controlling factors of sand group levels in Pinghu Formation: A case study of well block W in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

WANG Jianwei(), PENG Lyu(), WANG Zequn, YAN Shumei, PAN Lu, LIN Lixin, WANG Rui, XU Chen, LIU Shu, HUANG Xiaojuan   

  1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Shanghai Offshore Oil & Gas Company, Shanghai 200120, China
  • Received:2024-12-19 Online:2025-09-19 Published:2025-10-26

摘要:

西湖凹陷W井区平湖组下段(以下简称平下段)是重要的含油气层系,准确认识其沉积演化特征和储层分布对指导下一步勘探开发具有重要意义。综合利用岩心、钻井和地球物理等资料,研究了该区平下段沉积微相、演化过程和主控因素。研究表明:平下段(P12—P9砂层组)可划分为三级层序,主要发育受潮汐影响的三角洲与潮坪沉积。P12砂层组位于低位域,海平面相对较低,以三角洲沉积为主,潮汐沉积为辅。P11—P10砂层组沉积时期属海侵域,物源供给减弱,三角洲的发育受到限制,研究区主体演变为潮坪环境。P9砂层组位于高位域,物源供给增强,潮坪沉积逐渐萎缩,三角洲再次向盆地方向推进。通过对沉积演化过程的分析,明确了物源供给、海平面升降和古地貌等因素对W井区沉积微相迁移和演化的控制作用。研究区三角洲与潮汐作用的相对强弱受相对海平面与物源供给的控制:在P12、P9砂层组沉积期,强物源供给、相对海平面处于相对低位,以三角洲沉积为主;反之,在P11—P10砂层组对应的海侵期,物源供给减弱、相对海平面上升,三角洲沉积易遭受破坏,有利于潮汐沉积的发育。但是,三角洲与潮坪沉积随相对海平面与物源变化的此消彼长还受古地貌的控制,表现为:在P12砂层组沉积期,由于研究区中部古鼻隆的存在,一定程度限制了西部三角洲向东推进,造成P12砂层组沉积期沿古鼻隆东西两翼沉积相类型存在差异,在西部断槽带以三角洲沉积为主,而在东部断阶带潮汐作用明显;在P11—P9砂层组沉积期,古鼻隆的影响减弱,研究区空间上的沉积相类型相对单一(P11—P10砂层组主要为潮坪沉积,P9砂层组主要为三角洲沉积)。该研究对进一步认识研究区及其外围区带有利储层的时空分布特征提供了一定的借鉴意义。在P12砂层组西部断槽带以及P9砂层组,以河道、河口坝、席状砂等三角洲成因砂体为优势砂体类型,应优先以三角洲模式指导勘探与开发;在P12砂层组东部断阶带以及P11—P10砂层组,优势砂体类型为平行岸线向海方向的潮汐砂坝或潮道砂体,应优先以潮汐沉积模式指导勘探开发。

关键词: 西湖凹陷, 开发井区, 河潮联控, 沉积微相, 主控因素

Abstract:

The lower member of the Pinghu Formation (hereinafter referred to as the lower Pinghu member) in the well block W of the Xihu Sag is an important oil and gas-bearing system. An accurate characterization of its sedimentary evolution patterns and reservoir distribution is critical for guiding future exploration and development. Based on core, drilling, and geophysical data, this study analyzed the sedimentary microfacies, evolution processes, and dominant controlling factors of the lower Pinghu member. The results showed that the lower Pinghu member (sand groups P12~P9) could be divided into third-order sequences, mainly comprising deltaic and tidal flat deposits influenced by tidal processes. The P12 sand group, deposited during a lowstand system tract with relatively low sea level, was primarily composed of deltaic deposits, issueed by tidal deposits. During deposition of the P11 and P10 sand groups in the transgressive system tract, sediment supply weakened and delta development was curtailed. Thus, tidal flat environments became dominant in the study area. The P9 sand group, deposited during the highstand system tract, experienced increased sediment supply, tidal flat deposition reduction, and delta progradation towards the basin. Analysis of the sedimentary evolution process clarified that sediment supply, sea level fluctuations, and the paleogeomorphology controlled the microfacies migration and evolution in the well block W. Firstly, paleogeomorphology directly controlled the depositional accommodation and determined the spatial distribution of sedimentation. Secondly, abundant sediment supply and relatively lower sea level promoted deltaic development, leading to the formation of distributary channel and mouth bar sand bodies. On the contrary, the reduction of sediment supply and rising relative sea level restricted deltaic propagation while enhancing tidal power, resulting in the development of tidal flats, tidal channels, and tidal sand bars. In the study area, the relative intensity of deltaic and tidal processes was controlled by changes in relative sea level and sediment supply. During deposition of the P12 and P9 sand groups, sufficient sediment supply and relatively low sea levels favored delta development. On the contrary, during marine transgression stage corresponding to the P11-P10 sand groups, the sediment supply weakened and the relative sea levels rose. Under such conditions, deltaic deposits were vulnerable to damage, which favored the development of tidal sediments. However, the development of deltaic and tidal flat deposits in response to changes in relative sea level and sediment supply was also controlled by paleogeomorphology. During deposition of the P12 sand group, the presence of a nose-shaped paleo-uplift in the central part of the study area limited eastward progradation of the western delta. This resulted in differences in sedimentary facies types between the east and west sides of the nose-shaped paleo-uplift during deposition of the P12 sand group. The western fault trough zone was dominated by deltaic deposits, while the eastern fault step zone was dominated by tidal deposits. During deposition of the P11-P9 sand groups, the influence of the nose-shaped paleo-uplift weakened, and the sedimentary facies types in the study area were relatively uniform (P11-P10 was mainly dominated by tidal flat deposits; P9 was mainly dominated by deltaic deposits). This study offers insights into the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of favorable reservoirs in the study area and adjacent zones. In the western fault trough zone of the P12 sand group and in the P9 sand group, deltaic sand bodies such as channels, mouth bars, and sheet sands are the favorable sand body types, and their exploration and development should be primarily guided by the deltaic depositional model. In eastern fault step zone of the P12 sand group and in the P11-P10 sand groups, the dominant sand bodies are tidal sand bars or tidal channels extending seaward and parallel to the shoreline, and their exploration and development should follow the tidal depositional model.

Key words: Xihu Sag, development well block, river-tide joint control, sedimentary microfacies, main controlling factor

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2