通道压裂过程中主裂缝支撑剂铺置影响因素实验研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

由于聚合物易滞留于支撑剂颗粒间的间隙,导致均匀铺砂的常规水力压裂技术对低渗透、超低渗透和页岩气气藏的改造存在局限性。通道水力压裂技术通过非均匀铺砂形成高导流通道,可有效提高油气产量。评价通道压裂技术的效果主要取决于所形成砂堤的通道率大小。利用相似准则,建立可视化通道压裂模拟实验方法,系统研究了压裂液黏度、支撑剂浓度、纤维加量、布孔方式、脉冲时间和施工排量等多因素对通道压裂支撑剂铺置形态和通道率的影响。利用偏最小二乘回归和变量投影重要性分析方法研究了各因素对通道率的影响程度。在实验条件下,研究表明,现场施工排量为4 ~ 6 m ³/min、压裂液黏度为150 ~ 250 mPa·s时,支撑剂浓度越低、纤维加量越大、脉冲时间越短、射孔簇数越多,通道率越高。通过偏最小二乘回归、变量投影重要性分析和皮氏积矩相关系数等方法分析表明,各通道率影响程度依次为：压裂液黏度>射孔方式>脉冲时间>支撑剂浓度>纤维浓度>排量。

关键词: 通道压裂, 通道率, 可视化, 偏最小二乘回归, 变量投影

Abstract:

The polymer is easily trapped in the gap between the proppant particles, so the conventional hydraulic fracturing technology of the uniform sand production has limitation for the transformation of the low permeability, ultra-low permeability and shale gas reservoirs. The channel hydraulic fracturing technology can effectively increase the oil and gas production by forming a high diversion channel by non-uniform sand deposition. The effects of channel fracturing technique are mainly determined by the channel size of the formed sand embankment. By the similarity criterion, we established the experimental method of visual simulation system of channel fracturing to systematically analyzed the influence of the fracturing fluid viscosity, proppant concentration, fiber addition, pore arrangement, pulse time and construction displacement on the proppant placement pattern and channel ratio. Then we used the methods of the partial least squares regression and the importance of variable projection to analyze the influence degree of various factors on the channel rate. Under the experimental conditions, it is indicated that when the injecting volume is 4 ~ 6 m ³/min and the viscosity of fracturing fluid is 150 ~ 250 mPa·s, the concentration of proppant is lower, the concentration of fiber is higher, the pulse time is shorter, the perforation methods is more, and the higher viscosity is better. By means of partial least squares regression, importance analysis of variable projection, and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, the influence degree of each channel rate is in a descending order as: viscosity of fracturing fluid > perforation methods > pulse time > concentration of fracturing proppant > concentration of fiber > injecting volume.

Key words: channel fracturing, channel ratio, visualization, partial least squares regression, variable projection

中图分类号:

TE377

刘平礼,李珍明,宋雨纯等. 通道压裂过程中主裂缝支撑剂铺置影响因素实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(5): 42-47.

Pingli Liu,Zhenming Li,Yuchun Song, et al. Experimental study on influence factors of proppant placement in main fracture of channel fracturing process[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 42-47.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 18

[1]	李庆辉, 陈勉, 金衍 , 等. 新型压裂技术在页岩气开发中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012,19(6):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2012.06.001
[2]	刘向军 . 高速通道压裂工艺在低渗透油藏的应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015,22(2):122-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2015.02.023
[3]	卞晓冰, 张士诚, 马新仿 , 等. 考虑非达西流的低渗透油藏水力压裂优化研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,36(3):115-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2012.03.019
[4]	钟森, 任山, 黄禹忠 , 等. 高速通道压裂技术在国外的研究与应用[J]. 中外能源, 2012,17(6):39-42.
[5]	吕杨, 陆佳春, 张林 , 等. 苏里格东区高速通道压裂技术应用与探讨[C]. 宁夏回族自治区科学技术协会. 创新·质量·低碳·可持续发展——第十届宁夏青年科学家论坛石化专题论坛论文集. 宁夏回族自治区科学技术协会, 2014.
[6]	杨晓鹏, 曾芮 . 高速通道压裂技术机理研究与应用[J]. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2015,25(1):8-13.
[7]	Rhine T, Loayza M P, Kirkham B, et al. Channel fracturing in horizontal wellbores: the new edge of stimulation techniques in the eagle ford formation[C]// paper SPE-145403-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 October-2 November 2011, Denver, Colorado,USA.
[8]	Ajayi B T, Walker K J, Wutherich K, et al. Channel hydraulic fracturing and its applicability in the marcellus shale[C]// paper SPE-149426-MS presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 17-19 August 2011, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
[9]	Samuelson M L, Stefanski J, Downie R, et al. Field development study: channel hydraulic fracturing achieves both operational and productivity goals in the Barnett shale[C]// paper SPE-155684-MS presented at the SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, 5-7 June 2012, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,USA.
[10]	Sadykov A, Yudin A V, Oparin M, et al. Channel fracturing in the remote Taylakovskoe oil field: reliable stimulation treatments for significant production increase[C]// paper SPE-160767-MS presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Technical Conference and Exhibition, 16-18 October 2012, Moscow, Russia.
[11]	徐兵祥, 李相方, Haghighi Manouchehr, 等. 页岩气产量数据分析方法及产能预测[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,37(3):119-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2013.03.021
[12]	Gillard M R, Medvedev O O, Hosein P R, et al. A new approach to generating fracture conductivity[C]// paper SPE-135034-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 19-22 September 2010, Florence, Italy.
[13]	Viswanathan A, Altman R M, Oussoltsev D, et al. Completion evaluation of the eagle ford formation with heterogeneous proppant placement[C]// paper SPE-149390-MS presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, 15-17 November 2011, Calgary, Alberta,Canada.
[14]	Altman R M, Viswanathan A, Xu J, et al. Understanding the impact of channel fracturing in the eagle ford shale through reservoir simulation[C]// paper SPE-153728-MS presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 16-18 April 2012, Mexico City, Mexico.
[15]	Medvedev A V, Kraemer C C, Pena A A, et al. On the mechanisms of channel fracturing[C]// paper SPE-163836-MS presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 4-6 February 2013, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
[16]	温庆志, 高金剑, 黄波 , 等. 通道压裂砂堤分布规律研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014,21(4):89-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2014.04.021
[17]	朱洵, 荣起国 . 基于偏最小二乘回归的基因网络数学建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009,21(4):1148-1154.
[18]	王佩珊, 赵立强, 罗志锋 , 等. 基于偏最小二乘回归的快速产能评估方法[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014,36(7):126-129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2014.07.027

编号	排量/ （m³·h^-1）	黏度/（mPa·s）	支撑剂浓度/（kg·m^-3）	脉冲时间/s	纤维浓度/（kg·m^-3）	射孔簇数/簇	通道率,%
1	1.2	30	360	15	5	3	9.45
2	1.2	50	360	15	5	3	15.04
3	1.2	70	360	15	5	3	20.13
4	1.2	100	360	15	5	3	28.89
5	1.2	150	360	15	5	3	19.07
6	1.2	200	360	15	5	3	24.88
7	1.2	240	360	15	5	3	27.24
8	1.2	270	360	15	5	3	21.43
9	1.2	300	360	15	5	3	11.13
10	1.2	200	360	15	5	1	10.75
11	1.2	200	360	15	5	2	19.15
12	1.2	200	360	15	5	4	36.79
13	1.2	200	360	15	5	5	43.81
14	1.2	200	360	15	1	3	11.23
15	1.2	200	360	15	3	3	18.25
16	1.2	200	360	15	5	3	24.88
17	1.2	200	360	15	6	3	22.18
18	1.2	200	360	15	5	3	24.88
19	1.2	200	360	20	5	3	20.15
20	1.2	200	360	25	5	3	14.31
21	1.2	200	360	10	5	3	42.34
22	1.2	200	60	15	5	5	68.33
23	1.8	200	200	15	5	5	49.96
24	1.8	200	360	15	5	5	43.81
25	1.8	200	420	15	5	5	30.13
26	1.8	200	600	15	5	5	24.67
27	1.8	200	720	15	5	5	17.71
28	1.8	200	900	15	5	5	12.57
29	1.8	200	1 020	15	5	5	9.72
30	1.8	200	1 260	15	5	5	2.45
31	0.9	200	200	15	5	3	16.45
32	2.4	200	200	15	5	3	32.55
33	3.0	200	200	15	5	3	11.32

R_ab	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆
X₁	1	-0.56	-0.449	-0.688	-0.646	-0.777
X₂		1	-0.083	-0.106	0.056	-0.05
X₃			1	0.591	-0.861	-0.519
X₄				1	-0.527	-0.962
X₅					1	-0.548
X₆						1