咸化断陷湖盆典型页岩剖面地质特征——以东营凹陷为例

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.01.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于丰富的岩心、测井、地震资料,综合运用层序地层学、矿物学、沉积学等研究方法,宏观与微观分析相结合,对东营凹陷沙四上—沙三下亚段页岩剖面进行了系统解剖。研究表明：①咸化湖盆页岩矿物组成以富含碳酸盐为特征,主要发育富灰质页岩相和灰质页岩相为主的剖面相组合;②断陷湖盆深水页岩层序具有淹没不整合型层序特点,东营凹陷沙四上—沙三下亚段页岩剖面可以划分出2个三级层序、4个四级层序（体系域）、8个五级层序（准层序组）;③页岩岩相发育分布与层序具有明显的耦合关系,湖晚期湖扩体系域和早期高位体系域是富灰质页岩相有利发育段。研究认识对咸化断陷湖盆页岩层序划分及岩相分布预测具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 页岩剖面, 碳酸盐, 岩相, 层序, 东营凹陷

Abstract:

Based on the abundant core, logging curves, seismic data, sequence stratigraphy, mineralogy, sedimentology and other research methods, the systematic dissection of shales in the upper and lower member of The Fourth and third member of the Shahejie formation in Dongying Sag was carried out by combining macro and micro analysis. The research results show that: ① The mineral composition of shale in saline lacustrine basin is characterized by rich carbonate, and there are mainly high content carbonate shale facies and calcareous shale facies. ② The deep-water shale sequence of the lacustrine rift basin is characterized by inundation unintegrated sequence. The shale section of the Upper Es₄ - Lower Es₃ sub-member in Dongying Sag can be divided into two third-order sequences, four fourth-order sequences （system tracts） and eight fifth-order sequences （parasequence groups）. ③ There is an obvious coupling relationship between shale lithofacies and sequence. The late lacustrine extensional system tract and early high system tract are the favorable stages of high content carbonate shale facies. The research and understanding have certain guiding significance for the division of shale sequence and the prediction of lithofacies distribution in saline lacustrine rift basins.

Key words: shale profile, carbonate, lithofacies, sequence stratigraphy, Dongying Sag

中图分类号:

TE132

王永诗,唐东. 咸化断陷湖盆典型页岩剖面地质特征——以东营凹陷为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 181-191.

Yongshi WANG,Dong TANG. Geological characteristics of typical shale profile in a saline lacustrine rift basin: A case study of Dongying sag[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 181-191.

图/表 10

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表2

图7

图8

参考文献 30

[1]	焦方正, 邹才能, 杨智. 陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6):1067-1078.
	JIAO Fangzheng, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi. Geological theory and exploration & development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1067-1078.
[2]	赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):1-10.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1):1-10.
[3]	金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):451-458.
	JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):451-458.
[4]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
	ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[5]	杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
	DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):560-568.
[6]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):569-575.
	SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of Sinopec shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):569-575.
[7]	马永生, 冯建辉, 牟泽辉, 等. 中国石化非常规油气资源潜力及勘探进展[J]. 中国工程科学, 2012, 14(6):22-30.
	MA Yongsheng, FENG Jianhui, MU Zehui, et al. The potential and exploring progress of unconventional hydrocarbon resources in SINOPEC[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2012, 14(6):22-30.
[8]	胡素云, 赵文智, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4):819-828.
	HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al. Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):819-828.
[9]	孙龙德. 古龙页岩油(代序)[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(3):1-7.
	SUN Longde. Gulong shale oil(preface)[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39(3):1-7.
[10]	王广昀, 王凤兰, 蒙启安, 等. 古龙页岩油战略意义及攻关方向[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(3):8-19.
	WANG Guangyun, WANG Fenglan, MENG Qi’an, et al. Strategic significance and research direction of Gulong shale oil[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39(3):8-19.
[11]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征:以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9):1013-1029.
	ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: A case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9):1013-1029.
[12]	宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2):225-235.
	SONG Mingshui, LIU Huimin, WANG Yong, et al. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2):225-235.
[13]	姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5):776-783.
	YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5):776-783.
[14]	胡东风, 魏志红, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地拔山寺向斜泰页1井页岩油气重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2):21-32.
	HU Dongfeng, WEI Zhihong, LIU Ruobing, et al. Major breakthrough of shale oil and gas in Well Taiye 1 in Bashansi Syncline in the Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(2):21-32.
[15]	何海清, 支东明, 唐勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷康探1井重大突破及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(2):1-11.
	HE Haiqing, ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, et al. A great discovery of Well Kangtan 1 in Fukang Sag in the Junggar Basin and its significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(2):1-11.
[16]	付金华, 刘显阳, 李士祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段页岩油勘探发现与资源潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(5):1-11.
	FU Jinhua, LIU Xianyang, LI Shixiang, et al. Discovery and resource potential of shale oil of Chang 7 member, Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(5):1-11.
[17]	金强, 朱光有, 王娟. 咸化湖盆优质烃源岩的形成与分布[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 32(4):19-23.
	JIN Qiang, ZHU Guangyou, WANG Juan. Deposition and distribution of high-potential source rocks in saline lacustrine environments[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2008, 32(4):19-23.
[18]	孔凡仙, 张林晔, 周文, 等. 济阳坳陷优质烃源岩层地球化学特征及成烃潜力[J]. 复式油气田, 2000, 7(3):13-16.
	KONG Fanxian, ZHANG Linye, ZHOU Wen, et al. Geochemical characteristic and hydrocarbon generating potential of good source rocks in Jiyang depression[J]. Muliple Oil-Cas Field, 2000, 7(3):13-16.
[19]	姜在兴, 梁超, 吴靖, 等. 含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039.
	JIANG Zaixing, LIANG Chao, WU Jing, et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039.
[20]	SCHLAGER W. The paradox of drowned reefs and carbonate platforms[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1981, 92(4):197-211.
[21]	GOLDHAMMER R K, DUNN P A, HARDIE L A. Depositional cycles, composite sea-level changes, cycle stacking patterns, and the hierarchy of stratigraphic forcing: Examples from Alpine Triassic platform carbonates[J]. GSA Bulletin, 1990, 102(5):535-562.
[22]	梅冥相. 淹没不整合型碳酸盐三级旋回层序——兼论碳酸盐台地的“凝缩作用”[J]. 岩相古地理, 1996, 16(6):24-33.
	MEI Mingxiang. The third-order carbonate cyclic sequences of drowned unconformity type with discussions on “condensation” of carbonate platforms[J]. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 1996, 16(6):24-33.
[23]	符颖, 韩林. 淹没不整合型层序——一种特殊的加深淹没[J]. 海相油气地质, 2007, 12(3):15-20.
	FU Ying, HAN Lin. Drowned unconformity sequence: A special type of deepened submerge sequence interface[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2007, 12(3):15-20.
[24]	杜学斌, 刘辉, 刘惠民, 等. 细粒沉积物层序地层划分方法初探:以东营凹陷樊页1井沙三下—沙四上亚段泥页岩为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(4):1-11.
	DU Xuebin, LIU Hui, LIU Huimin, et al. Methods of sequence stratigraphy in the fine-grained sediments: A case from the upper fourth sub-member and the lower third sub-member of the Shahejie Formation in well Fanye 1 of Dongying depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(4):1-11.
[25]	王勇. 济阳陆相断陷湖盆泥页岩细粒沉积层序初探[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(6):61-69.
	WANG Yong. A study on fine sedimentary sequence of shale in the continental rift basin of Jiyang Depression[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(6):61-69.
[26]	朱德燕, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 等. 东营凹陷泥页岩层序地层划分[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(2):52-56.
	ZHU Deyan, WANG Xuejun, HAO Xuefeng, et al. Study on sequence stratigraphic division of oil shale in Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(2):52-56.
[27]	张顺, 刘惠民, 陈世悦, 等. 中国东部断陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相划分方案探讨—以渤海湾盆地南部古近系细粒沉积岩为例[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(5):1108-1109.
	ZHANG Shun, LIU Huimin, CHEN Shiyue, et al. Classification scheme for lithofacies of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in faulted basins of eastern China: Insights from the fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Paleogene, Southern Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(5):1108-1109.
[28]	刘惠民, 孙善勇, 操应长, 等. 东营凹陷沙三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征及其分布模式[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(1):1-10.
	LIU Huimin, SUN Shanyong, CAO Yingchang, et al. Lithofacies characteristics and distribution model of fine-grained sedimentary rock in the lower Es₃ member, Dongying sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(1):1-10.
[29]	逄淑伊, 操应长, 梁超. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段—沙三下亚段岩相特征及沉积环境——以樊页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4):799-809.
	PANG Shuyi, CAO Yingchang, LIANG Chao. Lithofacies characteristics and sedimentary environment of Es4U and Es3L: A case study of Well FYI in Dongying sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4):799-809.
[30]	徐伟, 陈开远, 曹正林, 等. 咸化湖盆混积岩成因机理研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(6):1804-1816.
	XU Wei, CHEN Kaiyuan, CAO Zhenglin, et al. Original mechanism of mixed sediments in the saline lacustrine basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(6):1804-1816.

井号	层位	取心长度(m)
Fy1	沙三中、沙三下、沙四上亚段	403.63
Ny1	沙三下、沙四上亚段	185.22
Ly1	沙三下、沙四上亚段	200.05
Fyp1	沙四上亚段	23.90

准层序组	数量 (个)	黏土矿物（%）	石英（%）	斜长石（%）	方解石（%）	白云石（%）	菱铁矿（%）	碳酸盐（%）	硬石膏（%）	黄铁矿（%）
P2ss4	214	31	21	3	34	6	2	42	1	3
P2ss3	308	24	25	3	36	8	1	45	1	3
P2ss2	159	21	24	4	41	8	0	49	0	4
P2ss1	96	15	24	3	49	7	0	56	0	2
P1ss4	166	13	26	3	49	7	0	56	0	2
P1ss3	156	19	29	3	37	8	1	46	0	3
P1ss2	256	18	24	3	36	14	2	52	0	3
P1ss1	162	14	18	6	34	25	0	57	0	3