下扬子区孤峰组—大隆组露头剖面特征与岩相变化

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.01.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中上二叠统孤峰组和大隆组是华南地区重要的烃源岩勘探目的层位。然而,由于两者在时空分布上都存在明显的岩相变化,使得其在区域地层划分及对比中仍存在较大争议,制约了油气资源勘探及潜力评价工作。因此,本文对下扬子区孤峰组及大隆组的6条典型野外剖面进行详细梳理并总结其岩石地层特征,进一步通过区域地质资料对比,分析其垂向及平面的岩相展布及变化,结合总有机碳含量（TOC）等参数来探讨其页岩油气的勘探潜力。研究结果表明：下扬子区孤峰组岩性厚度变化较大,呈厚薄相间的变化特征,其沉积中心大体位于繁昌—芜湖及句容—溧水一带;孤峰组岩性基本上可分为三段,其中中部硅质岩—泥岩段在区域上稳定发育且厚度较大。大隆组在区域上厚度变化不大,但受古地理格局影响,在区域上岩性分异较明显,其硅质岩段主要发育在皖南地区,而在苏北地区则相变为泥页岩。下扬子地区孤峰组和大隆组TOC高,有机质类型好,成熟度总体上处于生气范围内,具有较大的页岩气资源潜力。孤峰组及大隆组中上段TOC最高,是页岩气有利勘探层位。区域上,无为盆地、句容—南陵盆地、常州—宣广盆地及无锡—苏州地区是页岩气有利勘探地区;而宣广—煤山盆地、句容丹阳—黄桥—泰州地区页岩成熟度较低,具有一定的页岩油勘探前景。

关键词: 孤峰组, 大隆组, 岩相, 页岩油气, 下扬子区

Abstract:

The Middle-Upper Permian Gufeng Formation and Dalong Formation are the important target horizons for the source rock exploration in South China. However, due to the obvious lithologic changes in both spatial and temporal distributions, there is still great controversy in the division and comparison of the regional stratigraphy, which restricts the exploration and potential evaluation of oil and gas resources. Thus here we analyzed six typical field outcrops of the Gufeng and Dalong Formations in the Lower Yangtze region and summarized their lithostratigraphic characteristics. By the regional comparison, we further analyzed their vertical and lateral lithofacies distribution. Combined with the geochemical parameters such as total organic carbon（TOC） content, the exploration potential of shale oil and gas is discussed. The results show that the lithological thickness of the Gufeng Formation in the Lower Yangtze region varies greatly, showing the characteristics of alternating thick and thin, and its deposition center is generally located in the areas of Fanchang-Wuhu and Jurong-Lishui. The Gufeng Formation can be basically divided into three members, among which the middle member with interbedded chert and siliceous mudstone is regionally stable and thick. The thickness of the Dalong Formation does not change much regionally, but it is affected by the paleogeographical setting. The lithological differentiation of the Dalong Formation is obvious in the region, and its chert and siliceous mudstone is mainly developed in the southern Anhui area, while in the northern Jiangsu area, it changes to shale. Based on the previous studies, it is suggested that the Gufeng and Dalong Formations of the Lower Yangtze region have high TOC contents, good organic matter types, and their maturity is generally within the gas generation range, indicating that they have great shale gas potential. The vertical distribution characteristics of the TOC in the Gufeng and Dalong Formations indicate that their middle-upper member is a more favorable horizon for shale gas exploration. Regionally, the Wuwei Basin, Jurong-Nanling Basin, Changzhou-Xuanguang Basin and Wuxi-Suzhou area are the relatively favorable areas for shale gas exploration; the Xuanguang-Meishan Basin and the Jurong Danyang-Huangqiao-Taizhou area have shale oil exploration prospects due to their low maturity.

Key words: Gufeng Formation, Dalong Formation, lithofacies, shale oil and gas, Lower Yangtze region

中图分类号:

TE122

姚素平,吴聿元,余文端等. 下扬子区孤峰组—大隆组露头剖面特征与岩相变化[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 215-232.

Suping YAO,Yuyuan WU,Wenduan YU, et al. Outcrop characteristic and lithofacies changes of both Gufeng and Dalong Formations in lower Yangtze Region[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 215-232.

图/表 22

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

图18

图19

图20

图21

图22

参考文献 21

[1]	安徽地质矿产局. 安徽地层志——二叠系分册[M]. 安徽科学技术出版社, 1962,18-23, 86-90.
	Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Anhui Province. Stratigraphic record of Anhui Province—Permian Division[M]. Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House, 1962,18-23, 86-90.
[2]	盛金章. 全国地层会议学术报告汇编——中国的二叠系[R]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1962.
	SHENG Jinzhang. Compilation of Academic Reports of National Stratigraphy Conference: Permian in China[R]. Beijing: Science Press, 1962.
[3]	江苏省地质产局. 江苏省及上海市区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984,208-209.
	Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Jiangsu Province. Regional geology of Jiangsu Province and Shanghai[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1984: 208-209.
[4]	冯增昭, 何幼斌, 吴胜和. 中下扬子地区二叠纪岩相古地理[J]. 沉积学报, 1993, 11(3):13-24.
	FENG Zengzhao, HE Youbin, WU Shenghe. Lithofacies paleogeography of Permian Middle and Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1993, 11(3):13-24.
[5]	梁狄刚, 郭彤楼, 边立曾, 等. 中国南方海相生烃成藏研究的若干新进展(三)南方四套区域性海相烃源岩的沉积相及发育的控制因素[J]. 海相油气地质, 2009, 14(2):1-19.
	LIANG Digang, GUO Tonglou, BIAN Lizeng, et al. Some progresses on studies of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation in marine sedimentary regions, Southern China (Part 3): Controlling factors on the sedimentary facies and development of Palaeozoic marine source rocks[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2009, 14(2):1-19.
[6]	胡世忠. 对孤峰组的新认识[J]. 火山地质与矿产, 2000, 21(1):63-68.
	HU Shizhong. New consideration of Gufeng Formation by stratigraphy check up[J]. Volcanology & Mineral Resources, 2000, 21(1):63-68.
[7]	董大忠, 王玉满, 黄旭楠, 等. 中国页岩气地质特征、资源评价方法及关键参数[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9):1583-1601.
	DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, HUANG Xunan, et al. Discussion about geological characteristics, resource evaluation methods and its key parameters of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9):1583-1601.
[8]	马新华, 李熙喆, 梁峰, 等. 威远页岩气田单井产能主控因素与开发优化技术对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3):555-563.
	MA Xinhua, LI Xizhe, LIANG Feng, et al. Dominating factors on well productivity and development strategies optimization in Weiyuan shale gas play, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3):555-563.
[9]	赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):1-10.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1):1-10.
[10]	石刚, 黄正清, 郑红军, 等. 下扬子地区二叠系“三气一油”钻探发现[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(2):416-417.
	SHI Gang, HUANG Zhengqing, ZHENG Hongjun, et al. Drilling discovery of “Three Gas One Oil” in the Permian strata of Lower Yangtze area[J]. Geology in China, 2018, 45(2):416-417.
[11]	石刚, 徐振宇, 郑红军, 等. 下扬子地区“三气一油”钻探发现及成藏地质条件——以皖南港地1井钻探发现为例[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(9):1564-1570.
	SHI Gang, XU Zhenyu, ZHENG Hongjun, et al. “Three-Gas-One-Oil”drilling findings and reservoir formation geological conditions in the lower Yangtze area: Exemplified by Gang Di 1 well in South Anhui[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(9):1564-1570.
[12]	陈平, 张敏强, 许永哲, 等. 下扬子巢湖—泾县地区上二叠统大隆组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(8):2923-2935.
	CHEN Ping, ZHANG Minqiang, XU Yongzhe, et al. The shale reservoir characteristic of Dalong Formation Upper Permian in Chaohu-Jingxian, Lower Yangtze area[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(8):2923-2935.
[13]	廖圣兵, 石刚, 李建青, 等. 安徽望江地区WWD1井钻遇二叠系孤峰组页岩气[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(5):1657-1658.
	LIAO Shengbing, SHI Gang, LI Jianqing, et al. Shale gas drilled by well WWD1 in the Wangjiang area of Anhui Province[J]. Geology in China, 2021, 48(5):1657-1658.
[14]	徐菲菲, 张训华, 黄正清, 等. 下扬子地区宁国凹陷大隆组—孤峰组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 46(2):180-190.
	XU Feifei, ZHANG Xunhua, HUANG Zhengqing, et al. Characteristics of the Dalong and Gufeng Formation shale reservoirs in Ningguo depression, lower Yangtze Region, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 46(2):180-190.
[15]	邱岐. 下扬子巢湖地区二叠系大隆组页岩特征及潜力分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2021, 14(2):8-14.
	QIU Qi. Shale characteristics and potential analysis of Dalong Formation in Chaohu area, lower Yangtze area[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2021, 14(2):8-14.
[16]	齐敦伦, 陈华成. 安徽巢县地区栖霞组的床板珊瑚化石分带[J]. 中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊. 1982, 3(4):89-112.
	QI Dunlun, CHEN Huacheng. Tabulata zonation of Lower Permian, Chihsia Formation Chaoxian Anhui[J]. Bulletin of Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 1982, 3(4):8-112.
[17]	KAMETAKA M, NAGAI H, ZHU S, et al. Middle Permian radiolarians from Anmenkou, Chaohu, Northeastern Yangtze platform, China[J]. Island Arc, 2009, 18:108-125.
[18]	金玉玕, 胡世忠. 安徽南部及宁镇山脉孤峰组的腕足化石[J]. 古生物学报, 1978, 17(2):102-127.
	JIN Yugan, HU Shizhong. Brachiopods of the Kuhfeng Formation in South Anhui and Nanking Hills[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 1978, 17(2):102-127.
[19]	白帆. 下扬子西部地区中二叠统孤峰组气源岩发育特征及控制因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3):468-475.
	BAI Fan. Characteristics and controlling factors of natural gas source rocks of Middle Permian Gufeng Formation in western part of Lower Yangtze Platform, China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3):468-475.
[20]	耿梓傲, 韦恒叶. 下扬子巢湖地区中二叠统孤峰组富有机质硅质岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 高校地质学报, 2019, 25(6):823-837.
	GEN Zi’ao, WEI Hengye. Organic geochemistry of organic-rich cherts in the Middle Permian Gufeng Formation in Chaohu, Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2019, 25(6):823-737.
[21]	廖志伟, 胡文瑄, 曹剑, 等. 皖南大隆组黑色岩系发育特征及油气资源潜力初探[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016, 22(1):1-14.
	LIAO Zhiwei, HU Wenxuan, CAO Jian, et al. A preliminary investigation of the development and hydrocarbon potential of the black shales in the Upper Permian Dalong Formation, Southern Anhui Province in the Lower Yangze Region, China[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016, 22(1):1-14.