新疆油田中深层稠油CO2驱/吞吐实验研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.01.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对新疆油田中深层稠油油藏的“中等偏强—强”速敏伤害以及“强—极强”水敏伤害引起的注水开发效果不理想的问题，基于CO₂独特的物理和化学性质，借助高温高压PVT实验仪和长岩心驱替装置，开展CO₂-原油高压物性测定和CO₂驱/吞吐提高采收率可行性研究，结合气相色谱和高温高压流变仪表征产出油的组成及黏度变化。实验结果表明，57.345%摩尔分数的CO₂能将溶解气油比（GOR）从32 m³/m³增大至149.3 m³/m³、泡点压力（p_b）从6.8 MPa增大至15.7 MPa，原油体积系数从1.06增大至1.27，原油密度从0.896 5 g/cm³降低至0.854 8 g/cm³，原油黏度从419.3 mPa·s降低至253.4 mPa·s，因此CO₂能有效补充地层能量，增大原油弹性能，减小渗流阻力。第一轮次0.95 PV（孔隙体积）的CO₂驱的原油采出程度为32.8%，焖井24 h后多孔介质中的流体重新分布，第二轮次0.5 PV的CO₂驱能提高原油采出程度17.9%。而5轮次CO₂吞吐的原油采出程度为63.5%。产出油的黏度呈降低的趋势，主要原因是原油中的沥青质在多孔介质中发生沉积。实验结果明确了CO₂驱/吞吐在新疆油田中深层稠油提高采收率的可行性。

关键词: CO₂驱, CO₂吞吐, 溶胀抽提, 提高采收率, 稠油油藏

Abstract:

Addressing the challenges of moderate to strong velocity sensitivity damage and strong to extremely strong water sensitivity damage in the medium and deep heavy oil reservoirs of Xinjiang oilfields, which lead to suboptimal waterflooding outcomes, a study was conducted leveraging the unique physical and chemical properties of CO₂. Utilizing high-temperature, high-pressure PVT apparatus and long core displacement equipment, the feasibility of enhancing oil recovery through CO₂ flooding/huff and puff was explored by determining the high-pressure physical properties of CO₂-crude oil and analyzing the composition and viscosity changes of the produced oil with gas chromatography and high-temperature, high-pressure rheometry. The experimental results show that 57.345% mole fraction of CO₂ can increase the dissolved gas-oil ratio（GOR） from 32 m³/m³ to 149.3 m³/m³, the bubble point pressure（p_b） from 6.8 MPa to 15.7 MPa, the volume coefficient of crude oil from 1.06 to 1.27, the density of crude oil from 0.896 5 g/cm³ to 0.854 8 g/cm³, and the viscosity of crude oil from 419.3 mPa·s to 253.4 mPa·s. Therefore, CO₂ can effectively supplement the formation energy, increase the elastic energy of crude oil and reduce the seepage resistance. The first round of 0.95 PV（pore volume） CO₂ flooding has a crude oil recovery of 32.8%, and the fluid in the porous medium is redistributed after 24 hours of shut-in. The second round of 0.5 PV CO₂ flooding can increase the crude oil recovery by 17.9%. The crude oil recovery of five rounds of CO₂ huff and puff is 63.5%. The viscosity of the produced oil tends to decrease, mainly due to the deposition of asphaltenes in crude oil in porous media. The experimental results have confirmed the feasibility of CO₂ flooding/huff and puff in the recovery of heavy oil in the middle and deep layers of Xinjiang Oilfield.

Key words: CO₂ flooding, CO₂huff and puff, swelling extraction, enhance oil recovery, heavy oil reservoir

中图分类号:

TE38

石彦,谢俊辉,郭小婷等. 新疆油田中深层稠油CO₂驱/吞吐实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.

Yan SHI,Junhui XIE,Xiaoting GUO, et al. Experimental study on CO₂ flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.

图/表 12

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

图4

图5

表5

图6

图7

参考文献 27

[1]	夏春正, 赵健, 刘锋, 等. 吐哈探区稠油油藏注气吞吐适应性评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(3): 341-346.
	XIA Chunzheng, ZHAO Jian, LIU Feng, et al. Adaptability evaluation of gas huff-n-puff in heavy oil reservoirs in Tuha exploration area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(3): 341-346.
[2]	郭臣, 解慧, 聂延波, 等. 塔河碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏超稠油注氮气实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017, 7(4): 22-26.
	GUO Cheng, XIE Hui, NIE Yanbo, et al. Research on nitrogen gas injection in super heavy oil of Tahe carbonate fracture-cave type reservoir[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017, 7(4): 22-26.
[3]	王晓燕, 章杨, 张杰, 等. 稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐提高采收率机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6): 102-111.
	WANG Xiaoyan, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Jie, et al. EOR mechanisms of CO₂ huff and puff process for heavy oil recovery[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(6): 102-111.
[4]	郭省学. 高温高压条件下CO₂驱稠油微观运移特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(3): 99-104.
	GUO Xingxue. Study on microscopic migration characteristics of heavy oil by CO₂ flooding at high temperature and high pressure[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(3): 99-104.
[5]	ZHOU X, LI X L, SHEN D H, et al. CO₂ huff-n-puff process to enhance heavy oil recovery and CO₂ storage: An integration study[J]. Energy, 2022, 239: 122003. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122003
[6]	ZHOU X, YUAN Q W, RUI Z H, et al. Feasibility study of CO₂ huff ‘n’ puff process to enhance heavy oil recovery via long core experiments[J]. Applied energy, 2019, 236: 526-539. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.007
[7]	FIROUZ A Q, TORABI F. Utilization of carbon dioxide and methane in huff-and-puff injection scheme to improve heavy oil recovery[J]. Fuel, 2014, 117(B): 966-973.
[8]	邓丹. 稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐三维物理模型实验及参数优化[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017
	DENG Dan. Three dimensional physical model experiment and parameter optimization of CO₂ huff and puff in heavy oil reservoir[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[9]	张丽雅, 宋兆杰, 马平华, 等. 稠油油藏注超临界二氧化碳驱油影响因素分析[J]. 地质与勘探, 2017, 53(4): 801-806.
	ZHANG Liya, SONG Zhaojie, MA Pinghua, et al. Analysis on influential factors of supercritical carbon dioxide flooding in heavy-oil reservoirs[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2017, 53(4): 801-806.
[10]	罗瑞兰, 程林松, 李春兰, 等. 稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐适应性研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(1): 43-46.
	LUO Ruilan, CHEN Linsong, LI Chunlan, et al. Research on the adaptability of cyclic CO₂ injection for heavy oil reservoir[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 20(1): 43-46.
[11]	孙焕泉, 王海涛, 吴光焕, 等. 稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率影响因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6): 1009-1013.
	SUN Huanquan, WANG Haitao, WU Guanghuan, et al. CO₂ EOR factors in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(6): 1009-1013.
[12]	蒲万芬, 孙波帅, 李一波, 等. 塔河缝洞型超稠油油藏二氧化碳驱实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(4): 123-126.
	PU Wanfen, SUN Boshuai, LI Yibo, et al. CO₂ Flooding experiment of super-heavy oil reservoir in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23(4): 123-126.
[13]	曹亚明, 郑家朋, 孙蓉, 等. 冀东油田浅层非均质油藏CO₂驱数值模拟与方案设计[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(5): 125-127.
	CAO Yaming, ZHENG Jiapeng, SUN Rong, et al. Numerical simulation and scheme design of CO₂ flooding in shallow heterogeneous reservoirs of Jidong Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(5): 125-127.
[14]	武玺, 张祝新, 章晓庆, 等. 大港油田开发中后期稠油油藏CO₂吞吐参数优化及实践[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 80-85.
	Wu Xi, Zhang Zhuxin, Zhang Xiaoqing, et al. Optimization and practice of CO₂ huff and puff parameters of heavy oil reservoir in the middle and late development stage in Dagang Oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 80-85.
[15]	BANK G C, RIESTENBERG D, KOPERNA G J. CO₂-enhanced oil recovery potential of the appalachian basin[C]// Paper SPE-111282-MS presented at the Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexingtong, Kentucky, USA, October 17-19, 2007.
[16]	SPIVAK A, KARAOGUZ D, ISSEVER K. Simulation of immiscible CO₂ injection in a fractured carbonate reservoir, Bati Raman Field, Turkey[C]// Paper SPE-18765-MS presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, April 5-7, 1989.
[17]	刘家军, 李立峰, 高庙. 低渗透油藏中CO₂与原油的相互作用[J]. 油田化学, 2021, 38(3): 464-469.
	LIU Jiajun, LI Lifeng, GAO Miao. Interaction between CO₂ and crude oil in low permeability reservoir[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2021, 38(3): 464-469.
[18]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 等. 非均质多层储层中CO₂驱替方式对驱油效果及储层伤害的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 875-884. doi: 10.7623/syxb202007009
	WANG Qian, YANG Shenglai, BAI Jie, et al. Influence of CO₂ flooding mode on oil displacement effect and reservoir damage in heterogeneous multi-layer reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(7): 875-884. doi: 10.7623/syxb202007009
[19]	ZHU W Y, MA Q P, SONG Z Y, et al. The effect of injection pressure on the microscopic migration characteristics by CO₂ flooding in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 2022, 44(1): 1459-1467. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1644399
[20]	LI Y B, PU W F, WEI B, et al. The feasibility of CO₂ and N₂ injection for the Tahe fracture-cavity carbonate extra-heavy oil reservoir: An experimental study[J]. Fuel, 2018, 226: 598-606. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.056
[21]	ZHENG S X, LI H Z, YANG D Y. Pressure maintenance and improving oil recovery with immiscible CO₂ injection in thin heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2013, 112: 139-152. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2013.10.020
[22]	邢钰, 吴艳华, 郭继香, 等. 稠油致黏关键组分微观性质[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(5): 1833-1838.
	XING Yu, WU Yanhua, GUO Jixiang, et al. Microscopic properties of viscous key components in heavy crude oils[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 1833-1838.
[23]	郭永伟, 闫方平, 王晶, 等. 致密砂岩油藏CO₂驱固相沉积规律及其储层伤害特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
	GUO Yongwei, YAN Fangping, WANG Jing, et al. Characteristics of solid deposition and reservoir damage of CO₂flooding in tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(3): 153-161.
[24]	赵长虹, 孙新革, 卢迎波, 等. 薄层超稠油驱泄复合开发蒸汽腔演变物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 161-168.
	ZHAO Changhong, SUN Xinge, LU Yingbo, et al. Physical simulation experiment of steam chamber evolution in compound development of thin-layer ultra-heavy oil flooding And drainage[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 161-168.
[25]	蔡耀荣, 武瑞明, 赵悦, 等. 重质油沥青质致粘机理研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2018, 47(5): 1033-1037.
	CAI Yaorong, WU Ruiming, ZHAO Yue, et al. Research progress on viscosity-mechanism from asphaltenes of heavy oil[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2018, 47(5): 1033-1037.
[26]	赵文学, 韩克江, 曾鹤, 等. 稠油降粘方法的作用机理及研究进展[J]. 当代化工, 2015, 44(6): 1365-1367.
	ZHAO Wenxue, HAN Kejiang, ZENG He, et al. Mechanisms and research progress of heavy oil viscosity reduction methods[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2015, 44(6): 1365-1367.
[27]	汪双清, 沈斌, 林壬子. 辽河超稠油的化学组成特征及其致黏因素探讨[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2010, 26(6): 894-900.
	WANG Shuangqing, SHEN Bin, LIN Renzi. Investigation on the composition of the extra heavy oil in Liaohe Oilfield and the cause of its high viscosity[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2010, 26(6): 894-900.

压力/ MPa	溶解气油比/（m³/m³）	原油密度/ （g/cm³）	原油体积系数	膨胀系数	黏度计算值/（mPa·s）
*30.61	31.8	0.896 5	1.064	0.939 8	419.33
**6.80	31.8	0.883 7	1.084	0.922 5	351.74

组分	单脱气摩尔分数
组分	CO₂加量摩尔分数 0	CO₂加量摩尔分数 15.595	CO₂加量摩尔分数 35.762	CO₂加量摩尔分数 49.06	CO₂加量摩尔分数 57.345
C₁	98.395	97.42	93.10	85.52	88.13
C₂	0.370	0.69	2.30	6.58	7.09
C₃	0.508	0.72	1.68	2.32	1.43
iC₄	0.161	0.24	0.58	0.89	0.54
nC₄	0.301	0.51	1.21	2.02	1.28
iC₅	0.115	0.16	0.40	0.81	0.42
nC₅	0.117	0.20	0.55	1.18	0.71
C₆	0.034	0.07	0.19	0.67	0.39

组分	单脱气摩尔分数
组分	CO₂加量摩尔分数 0	CO₂加量摩尔分数 15.595	CO₂加量摩尔分数35.762	CO₂加量摩尔分数49.06	CO₂加量摩尔分数57.345
C₁—C₈	42.92	39.540	30.120	26.04	22.650
C₉—C₁₂	14.79	17.210	18.670	21.56	22.860
C₁₃—C₂₀	23.19	23.560	28.250	29.05	31.430
C₂₁—C₃₀	9.64	10.680	12.060	12.24	11.680
C₃₀₊	2.56	2.190	2.770	2.73	2.780

编号	长度/cm	宽度/cm	高度/cm	气测渗透率/10^-3 μm²	孔隙度/%	含油饱和度/%	注入速度/（mL/min）	注气方式
50-3	30.0	4.5	4.5	49.5	17.3	76.3	1	驱替
50-4	30.0	4.5	4.5	48.7	17.2	74.5	1	吞吐

	饱和分+芳香分质量分数	胶质质量分数	沥青质质量分数
样品1	50.07	30.91	19.02
样品2	45.34	41.04	13.62

新疆油田中深层稠油CO₂驱/吞吐实验研究

Experimental study on CO₂ flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	束青林,魏超平,于田田,计秉玉,张仲平,郑万刚. 稠油开发技术进展及新分类标准建立与应用实践——以胜利油田稠油开发为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 529-540.
[2]	郑懿琼, 张涛, 刘海英, 阮聪慧, 邹帅. 近废型稠油油藏火驱效益开发新思路 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 504-509.
[3]	张连锋,张伊琳,郭欢欢,李洪生,李俊杰,梁丽梅,李文静,胡书奎. 近废弃油藏延长生命周期开发调整技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[4]	唐建东, 王智林, 葛政俊. 苏北盆地江苏油田CO₂驱油技术进展及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[5]	李建山, 高浩, 鄢长灏, 王石头, 王亮亮. 原油-CO₂相互作用机理分子动力学模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 26-34.
[6]	张志升, 吴向阳, 吴倩, 王冀星, 林汉弛, 郭军红, 王锐, 李金花, 林千果. CO₂驱油封存泄漏风险管理系统及应用研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 91-101.
[7]	陈秀林, 王秀宇, 许昌民, 张聪. 基于核磁共振与微观数值模拟的CO₂埋存形态及分布特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[8]	王高峰, 廖广志, 李宏斌, 胡志明, 魏宁, 丛连铸. CO₂驱气机理与提高采收率评价模型 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 734-740.
[9]	崔传智,闫大伟,姚同玉,王建,张传宝,吴忠维. CO₂驱前缘运移规律及气窜时机预测方法——以胜利油田G89-1区块为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 741-747.
[10]	潘毅,赵秋霞,孙雷,刘江,汪涛,郭德明. CO₂驱最小混相压力预测模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 748-753.
[11]	邓家胜,王子逸,何旺达,彭东宇,余波,唐洪明. 绿泥石与CO₂溶液反应实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 777-783.
[12]	郭德明,潘毅,孙扬,巢忠堂,李晓楠,程诗胜. 低渗稠油油藏降黏剂-CO₂复合驱提高采收率机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.
[13]	李阳,黄文欢,金勇,何应付,陈祖华,汤勇,吴公益. 双碳愿景下中国石化不同油藏类型CO₂驱提高采收率技术发展与应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 793-804.
[14]	计秉玉,何应付. 中国石化低渗透油藏CO₂驱油实践与认识 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 805-811.
[15]	张宗檩,吕广忠,王杰. 胜利油田CCUS技术及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 812-822.