深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究——以塔里木盆地富满油田为例

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.04.004

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4): 549-559.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.04.004

深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究——以塔里木盆地富满油田为例

薛一帆¹(),文志刚¹,黄亚浩¹(),张银涛²,乔占峰³,张天付³,李梦勤²,王彭²

1.长江大学油气地球化学与环境湖北省重点实验室，湖北武汉430100
2.中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院，新疆库尔勒841000
3.中国石油杭州地质研究院，浙江杭州310023

收稿日期:2024-02-19 出版日期:2024-08-26 发布日期:2024-09-10
通讯作者: 黄亚浩（1990—），男，博士，副教授，主要从事油气成藏机理研究。地址：湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学城路111号长江大学，邮政编码：430100。E-mail：hyhtr08916@163.com
作者简介:薛一帆（2003—），男，在读硕士研究生，主要从事油气成藏机理研究。地址：湖北省武汉市蔡甸区大学城路111号长江大学，邮政编码：430100。E-mail：xyf257248@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“深层碳酸盐岩储层流体活动示踪油气差异成藏效应研究——以塔里木盆地富满油田为例”(42302154);中国石油碳酸盐岩储层重点实验室开放基金项目“深层走滑断裂带储层流体活动差异性及对油气成藏响应研究——以塔里木盆地富满地区为例”(RIPED-2022-JS-2382)

Study on reservoir fluid source and hydrocarbon accumulation process in deep to ultra-deep strike-slip fault zone: A case study of Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin

XUE Yifan¹(),WEN Zhigang¹,HUANG Yahao¹(),ZHANG Yintao²,QIAO Zhanfeng³,ZHANG Tianfu³,LI Mengqin²,WANG Peng²

1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry and Environment, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
3. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China

Received:2024-02-19 Online:2024-08-26 Published:2024-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以富满油田北部走滑断裂带深部储层孔洞缝充填脉体为研究对象，基于脉体的岩相学特征、微区稀土元素和Sr（锶）同位素、油包裹体荧光光谱、显微热力学和碳酸盐岩U-Pb同位素定年进行分析。结果表明：富满油田北部走滑断裂带发育2期方解石脉体，脉体来源于中下奥陶统海源地层水，未见氧化性流体侵入，表明深层—超深层油气晚期具有良好的封闭性。通过包裹体测温投点埋藏史结合碳酸盐岩低U-Pb同位素定年技术，厘定塔里木盆地富满油田北部走滑断裂带深层奥陶系存在3期油气充注过程，分别对应于距今（459±7.2） Ma（加里东中期）、（348±18） Ma（海西早期）和268 Ma（海西晚期），富满油田北部深层—超深层碳酸盐岩油气成藏关键期为海西早期，且油气充注与断裂活动有较好的对应关系。

关键词: 塔里木盆地, 富满油田, 油气成藏, 流体包裹体, U-Pb同位素定年, 流体演化

Abstract:

The study of the filling veins in deep reservoirs within the strike-slip fault zone in the north of Fuman Oilfield utilizes a range of methods including petrographic characteristics, analysis of rare earth elements andSr（strontium） isotopes, fluorescence spectra of oil inclusions, microscopic thermodynamics, and U-Pb isotopic dating of carbonate rocks. The findings reveal two stages of calcite vein formation in this area. These veins originate from the formation water of the middle and Lower Ordovician sources, with no evidence of oxidizing fluid intrusion, suggesting that the deep to ultra-deep oil and gas reserves have maintained good sealing properties in later stages. Furthermore, based on the burial history deduced from inclusions and low U-Pb isotope dates from carbonate rocks, it has been determined that there are three distinct stages of hydrocarbon charging in the deep Ordovician strata of the northern strike-slip fault zone in the Tarim Basin. These stages correspond to （459±7.2） Ma（middle Caledonian）, （348±18） Ma（early Hercynian）, and 268 Ma（late Hercynian）. It is noted that the early Hercynian period was the key phase for hydrocarbon accumulation in the deep and ultra-deep carbonate rocks in the north of Fuman Oilfield, with a significant correlation observed between oil and gas charging and fault activity.

Key words: Tarim Basin, Fuman Oilfield, hydrocarbon accumulation process, fluid inclusion, U-Pb isotope dating, fluid evolution

中图分类号:

TE122

薛一帆, 文志刚, 黄亚浩, 张银涛, 乔占峰, 张天付, 李梦勤, 王彭. 深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究——以塔里木盆地富满油田为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 549-559.

XUE Yifan, WEN Zhigang, HUANG Yahao, ZHANG Yintao, QIAO Zhanfeng, ZHANG Tianfu, LI Mengqin, WANG Peng. Study on reservoir fluid source and hydrocarbon accumulation process in deep to ultra-deep strike-slip fault zone: A case study of Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 549-559.

图/表 10

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 34

[1]	杨率, 邬光辉, 朱永峰, 等. 塔里木盆地北部地区超深断控油藏关键成藏期[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(2): 249-261. doi: 10.11698/PED.2022.02.04
	YANG Shuai, WU Guanghui, ZHU Yongfeng, et al. Key oil accumulation periods of ultra-deep fault-controlled oil reservoir in northern Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(2): 249-261. doi: 10.11698/PED.2022.02.04
[2]	杨学文, 田军, 王清华, 等. 塔里木盆地超深层油气地质认识与有利勘探领域[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4): 17-28.
	YANG Xuewen, TIAN Jun, WANG Qinghua, et al. Geological understanding and favorable exploration fields of ultra-deep formations in Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4): 17-28.
[3]	田军, 杨海军, 朱永峰, 等. 塔里木盆地富满油田成藏地质条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8): 971-985. doi: 10.7623/syxb202108001
	TIAN Jun, YANG Haijun, ZHU Yongfeng, et al. Geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(8): 971-985. doi: 10.7623/syxb202108001
[4]	宋兴国, 陈石, 谢舟, 等. 塔里木盆地富满油田东部走滑断裂发育特征与油气成藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 335-349.
	SONG Xingguo, CHEN Shi, XIE Zhou, et al. Strike-slip faults and hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern part of Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 335-349.
[5]	王清华, 杨海军, 张银涛, 等. 塔里木盆地富满油田富东1井奥陶系重大发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(1): 47-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.01.005
	WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, ZHANG Yintao, et al. Great discovery and its significance in the Ordovician in Well Fudong 1 in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(1): 47-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.01.005
[6]	汪如军, 王轩, 邓兴梁, 等. 走滑断裂对碳酸盐岩储层和油气藏的控制作用——以塔里木盆地北部坳陷为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(3): 10-20.
	WANG Rujun, WANG Xuan, DENG Xingliang, et al. Control effect of strike-slip faults on carbonate reservoirs and hydrocarbon accumulation: A case study of the northern depression in the Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(3): 10-20.
[7]	汪洋, 张哨楠, 刘永立. 塔里木盆地塔河油田走滑断裂活动对油气成藏的控制作用——以托甫39断裂带为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(3): 394-401.
	WANG Yang, ZHANG Shaonan, LIU Yongli. Controls of strike-slip fault activities on hydrocarbon accumulation in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin: A case study of TP 39 fault zone[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(3): 394-401.
[8]	王斌, 赵永强, 何生, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号断裂带北段奥陶系油气成藏期次及其控制因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 965-974.
	WANG Bin, ZHAO Yongqiang, HE Sheng, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages and their controlling factors in the northern Ordovician Shunbei 5 fault zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 965-974.
[9]	桂丽黎, 卓勤功, 鲁雪松, 等. 基于原位方解石U-Pb定年与包裹体分析技术恢复储集层成岩-成藏过程——以准噶尔盆地南缘高泉地区白垩系清水河组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1209-1220. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230363
	GUI Lili, ZHUO Qingong, LU Xuesong, et al. Restoration of reservoir diagenesis and hydrocarbon accumulation process by calcite in-situ U-Pb dating and fluid inclusion analysis: A case study on Cretaceous Qingshuihe Formation in Gaoquan, southern Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6): 1209-1220. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230363
[10]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 陈玮岩, 等. 激光原位碳酸盐岩U-Pb定年实验方法改进与石油地质应用[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 53(12): 2953-2968.
	LU Xuesong, GUI Lili, CHEN Weiyan, et al. Improvement of in situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating method for carbonate minerals and its application in petroleum geology[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Terrae, 2023, 53(12): 2953-2968.
[11]	何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉通内古隆起的成因机制与构造类型[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(2): 207-221.
	HE Dengfa, ZHOU Xinyuan, YANG Haijun, et al. Formation mechanism and tectonic types of intracratonic paleo-uplifts in the Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2): 207-221.
[12]	田方磊, 何登发, 陈槚俊, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带北—中段构造特征与多期构造叠加演化时—空序列[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(6): 2117-2135.
	TIAN Fanglei, HE Dengfa, CHEN Jiajun, et al. Northern and Central Segments of Shunbei No.5 Strike-Slip Fault Zone in Tarim Basin: Structural Characteristics and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Process[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(6): 2117-2135.
[13]	邬光辉, 陈鑫, 马兵山, 等. 塔里木盆地晚新元古代-早古生代板块构造环境及其构造-沉积响应[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(8): 2431-2441.
	WU Guanghui, CHEN Xin, MA Binshan, et al. The tectonic environments of the Late Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic and its tectono-sedimentary response in the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(8): 2431-2441.
[14]	刘强, 张银涛, 陈石, 等. 塔里木盆地走滑断裂发育演化特征精细解析及其地质意义: 以富满油田F_Ⅰ17断裂为例[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1-17.
	LIU Qiang, ZHANG Yintao, CHEN Shi, et al. Development and evolution characteristics of strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and its geological significance: A case study of FⅠ17 Fault in Fuman Oilfield[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5): 1-17.
[15]	宋兴国, 陈石, 杨明慧, 等. 塔里木盆地富满油田F_Ⅰ16断裂发育特征及其对油气分布的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
	SONG Xingguo, CHEN Shi, YANG Minghui, et al. Development characteristics of FⅠ 16 fault in Fuman oilfield of Tarim Basin and its influence on oil and gas distribution[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 99-109.
[16]	王清华. 塔里木盆地17号走滑断裂带北段差异变形与演化特征[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1136-1145.
	WANG Qinghua. Differential deformation and evolution characteristics of the No. 17 strike-slip fault zone in the Tarim Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5): 1136-1145.
[17]	韦东晓, 沈安江, 王莹, 等. 塔北地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩缝洞充填方解石的阴极发光特征及对成岩环境的指示意义[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(4): 54-58.
	WEI Dongxiao, SHEN Anjiang, WANG Ying, et al. Cathodoluminescence features of the calcite filling in the Ordovician carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoir and its significance to instructions of diagenetic environment in Northern Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(4): 54-58.
[18]	邓宾, 吴娟, 李文正, 等. 烃类包裹体赋存碳酸盐矿物 U-Pb 定年及其在油气成藏期次研究中的应用——以川中震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(11): 1887-1898. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.07.007
	DENG Bin, WU Juan, LI Wenzheng, et al. U-Pb dating and trapped hydrocarbon inclusions in carbonate for petroleum accumulation: Case study from the Sinian Dengying Formation in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34 (11): 1887-1898. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.07.007
[19]	HUANG Y H, LUO T, TAO Z, et al. Fluid evolution and petroleum accumulation in the precambrian gas reservoirs of the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2023, 150(7-8): 106171.
[20]	HUANG Y H, HE S, GUO X W, et al. Pressure-temperature-time-composition (p-t-t-x) of paleo-fluid in permian organic-rich shale of lower yangtze platform, china: Insights from fluid inclusions in fracture cements[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 126(79): 104936.
[21]	胡文瑄, 陈琪, 王小林, 等. 白云岩储层形成演化过程中不同流体作用的稀土元素判别模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(6): 810-818.
	HU Wenxuan, CHEN Qi, WANG Xiaolin, et al. REE models for the discrimination of fluids in the formation and evolution of dolomite reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(6): 810-818.
[22]	高键, 李慧莉, 何治亮, 等. 川东南平桥地区寒武系洗象池群多元复合成藏过程及其勘探启示[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(6): 263-276. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.2.20
	GAO Jian, LI Huili, HE Zhiliang, et al. Multi-stage hydrocarbon accumulation in Cambrian Xixiangchi Group, Pingqiao area, southeastern Sichuan and its implications for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 263-276. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.2.20
[23]	刘秀岩, 陈红汉, 肖雪薇, 等. 页岩气成气过程的流体包裹体证据——以重庆秀山剖面下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(3): 165-180. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.5.42
	LIU Xiuyan, CHEN Honghan, XIAO Xuewei, et al. Characterization of the shale gas formation process based on fluid in-clusion evidence:An example of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang shale formation,Xiushan section,southeastern Chongqing[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(3): 165-180. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.5.42
[24]	高键, 李慧莉, 何治亮, 等. 渝东彭水地区常压页岩气压力演化与富集保存[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(8): 124-135.
	GAO Jian, LI Huili, HE Zhiliang, et al. Pressure evolution, enrichment and preservation of normal-pressure shale gas in the Pengshui area of eastern Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8): 124-135.
[25]	陈家旭, 王斌, 郭小文, 等. 应用方解石激光原位U-Pb同位素定年确定多旋回叠合盆地油气成藏绝对时间——以塔里木盆地塔河油田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1365-1375.
	CHEN Jiaxu, WANG Bin, GUO Xiaowen, et al. Application of laser in-situ U-Pb dating of calcite to determination of the absolute time of hydrocarbon accumulation in polycyclic superimposed basins: A case study on Tahe oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(6): 1365-1375.
[26]	尤兵, 倪智勇, 王学军, 等. 东营凹陷沙河街组三段储层流体包裹体特征与油气成藏期次[J]. 地球化学, 2020, 49(4): 450-463.
	YOU Bing, NI Zhiyong, WANG Xuejun, et al. Characteristics of fluid inclusions and the hydrocarbon accumulation period in the reservoir of the third member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression[J]. Geochimica, 2020, 49(4): 450-463.
[27]	赵彦彦, 李三忠, 李达, 等. 碳酸盐(岩)的稀土元素特征及其古环境指示意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(1): 141-167.
	ZHAO Yanyan, LI Sanzhong, LI Da, et al. Rare earth element geochemistry of carbonate and its paleoenvironmental implications[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2019, 43(1): 141-167.
[28]	黄思静, 刘树根, 李国蓉, 等. 奥陶系海相碳酸盐锶同位素组成及受成岩流体的影响[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(1): 1-7.
	HUANG Sijing, LIU Shugen, LI Guorong, et al. Strontium isotope composition of marine carbonate and the influence of diagenetic fluid on it in Ordovician[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science ＆Technology Edition), 2004, 31(1): 1-7.
[29]	王东, 王国芝, 刘树根, 等. 塔东地区英东2井寒武系-奥陶系储层流体地球化学示踪[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(6): 867-876.
	WANG Dong, WANG Guozhi, LIU Shugen, et al. Geochemical tracing of the Cambrian-Ordovician reservoir fluid in Well Yingdong-2, eastern Tarim Basin[J]. Oil ＆ Gas Geology, 2012, 33(6): 867-876.
[30]	陈睿倩, 柳广弟, 孙明亮, 等. 冀北坳陷中元古界流体包裹体与油气成藏期次研究[J]. 高校地质学报, 2022, 28(1): 64-72.
	CHEN Ruiqian, LIU Guangdi, SUN Mingliang, et al. Fluid inclusions and hydrocarbon accumulation stages of mesoproterozoic reservoirs in the Jibei Depression[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2022, 28(1): 64-72.
[31]	徐豪, 郭小文, 曹自成, 等. 运用方解石中流体包裹体最小均一温度确定塔河油田奥陶系油气成藏时间: 来自激光原位方解石U-Pb年龄的证据[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(10): 3535-3548.
	XU Hao, GUO Xiaowen, CAO Zicheng, et al. Application of minimum homogenization temperatures of aqueous inclusions in calcite veins to determine time of hydrocarbon accumulation in ordovician of Tahe Oilfield: Evidence from in-situ calcite U-Pb dating by laser ablation[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(10): 3535-3548.
[32]	郭小文, 陈家旭, 袁圣强, 等. 含油气盆地激光原位方解石U-Pb年龄对油气成藏年代的约束——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 284-291. doi: 10.7623/syxb202003003
	GUO Xiaowen, CHEN Jiaxu, YUAN Shengqiang, et al. Constraint of in-situ calcite U-Pb dating by laser ablation on geochronology of hydrocarbon accumulation in petroliferous basins: A case study of Dongying sag in the Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(3): 284-291. doi: 10.7623/syxb202003003
[33]	李斌, 张欣, 郭强, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武系超深层含油气系统盆地模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 804-815. doi: 10.7623/syxb202206005
	Ll Bin, ZHANG Xin, GUO Qiang, et al. Basin modeling of Cambrian ultra-deep pe-troleum system in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 804-815. doi: 10.7623/syxb202206005
[34]	王斌, 杨毅, 曹自成, 等. 塔河油田中下奥陶统储层裂缝方解石脉U-Pb同位素年龄及油气地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(9): 3203-3216.
	WANG Bin, YANG Yi, CAO Zicheng, et al. U-Pb dating of calcite veins developed in the middle-lower ordovician reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield and its petroleum geologic significance in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(9): 3203-3216.

不同期次样品	La（镧）	Ce（铈）	Pr （镨）	Nd（钕）	Sm（钐）	Eu（铕）	Gd（钆）	Tb（铽）	Dy（镝）	Y （钇）	Ho（钬）	Er （铒）	Tm（铥）	Yb（镱）	Lu（镥）	Fe/ Mn	ΣREE	δCe	δEu	LREE/HREE
C1	0.344	1.796	0.262	0.241	0.312	0.179	0.143	0.120	0.124	1.027	0.118	0.096	0.068	0.059	0.068	7.405	4.936	5.932	0.786	3.942
C1	0.132	0.842	0.141	0.130	0.109	0.077	0.087	0.032	0.029	0.421	0.033	0.054	0.037	0.033	0.023	6.985	2.172	6.165	0.790	4.350
C1	0.126	1.022	0.180	0.139	0.142	0.181	0.100	0.059	0.062	0.539	0.069	0.061	0.030	0.025	0.031	6.219	2.528	6.674	1.501	4.097
围岩	0.161	1.156	0.189	0.180	0.172	0.180	0.118	0.099	0.062	0.528	0.062	0.049	0.049	0.048	0.036	17.370	2.889	6.604	1.244	3.906
围岩	0.124	0.848	0.146	0.132	0.108	0.044	0.049	0.058	0.048	0.351	0.029	0.014	0.010	0.026	0.032	13.764	2.032	6.282	0.567	5.277
C2	0.013	0.080	0.017	0.010	0.014	0	0.007	0.003	0.006	0.037	0.004	0.005	0	0.003	0.001	2.535	0.205	5.168	0	4.609
C2	0.060	0.295	0.041	0.034	0.023	0.004	0.012	0.010	0.002	0.055	0.006	0.007	0.003	0.004	0.005	2.822	0.636	5.837	0.250	9.303
C2	0.018	0.108	0.024	0.015	0.019	0.009	0.009	0.003	0.004	0.040	0.008	0.003	0.005	0.007	0.002	2.861	0.266	5.183	0.661	4.748
围岩	0.008	0.056	0.011	0.007	0.002	0.021	0.009	0.013	0.008	0.046	0.006	0.004	0.004	0.004	0	19.146	0.168	5.807	3.806	2.197
围岩	0.008	0.058	0.007	0.012	0.003	0.005	0.013	0.005	0.004	0.045	0.006	0.002	0.011	0.003	0.007	21.908	0.175	7.846	0.635	1.816

深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究——以塔里木盆地富满油田为例

Study on reservoir fluid source and hydrocarbon accumulation process in deep to ultra-deep strike-slip fault zone: A case study of Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 34

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	胡文革, 马龙杰, 汪彦, 鲍典, 张云. 关于塔里木盆地深层油气藏高效开发的实践与思考 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 519-528.
[2]	罗少辉,王蓉英,岳勇,李斌,魏华动,金仙梅,姜忠正,曹杨. 塔里木盆地西南部寒武系充填层序及沉积样式演化 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 284-296.
[3]	唐磊,王建峰,曹敬华,杨敏,李双贵. 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深断溶体油藏地质工程一体化模式探索 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 329-339.
[4]	魏三妹. 金马—鸭子河地区构造演化特征分析及与油气藏关系 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 130-134.