超低渗油藏水平井注CO2多周期吞吐原油性质变化规律研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水平井压裂后注CO₂吞吐技术能有效改善原油性质,提高超低渗油藏采收率。结合典型超低渗透储层油藏H区地质及流体特征,采用室内实验和数值模拟相结合的手段,开展超低渗油藏水平井注CO₂多周期吞吐机理及原油性质变化规律的研究。结果表明：注入CO₂使得原油饱和压力升高、体积膨胀、黏度降低、体系变轻质;注CO₂吞吐不同阶段的主要作用机理不同,注入阶段补充地层能量、溶于原油、降低原油黏度,焖井及开井生产初期降低原油黏度,扩大CO₂波及范围,开井生产中后期萃取轻质烃和少量中间组分烃;采用定时定点的方式,分析油藏中不同距离的油相中CO₂含量,推测出H区块注入CO₂沿裂缝的横向波及半径介于24~40 m,随着吞吐周期的增多,油相中CO₂摩尔含量的增幅由第一周期的增加451倍,降到第三吞吐周期的0.44倍,注入的CO₂溶于原油的量相对减小,对原油性质的影响逐渐减小。该研究对CO₂吞吐机理的认识提供了新的分析方式,为进一步推广超低渗油藏水平井CO₂多周期吞吐技术提供一定的理论支撑。

关键词: 超低渗油藏, CO₂多周期吞吐, 原油性质, 组分变化, 数值模拟

Abstract:

CO₂ huff-n-puff after fracturing of horizontal wells can effectively improve the properties of crude oil and increase the oil recovery of ultra-low permeability reservoirs. Combined with the geology and fluid characteristics of a typical ultra-low permeability reservoir, Block H, the mechanism of multi-cycle CO₂ injection in horizontal wells and the variation of crude oil properties in ultra-low permeability reservoirs are studied by means of laboratory experiment and numerical simulation. The results show that after CO₂ injection, the saturated pressure of crude oil increases, the volume expands, the viscosity decreases, and the system becomes lighter. And the main action mechanism of different stages of CO₂ huff-n-puff are different: in the injection stage, the main mechanism is to supplement the formation energy, dissolve in crude oil, and reduce the crude oil viscosity; in the soaking and the initial stage of production, the main mechanism is to reduce the crude oil viscosity and expand the scope of CO₂; in the middle and late period of well opening production, the light hydrocarbons and a small amount of intermediate component hydrocarbons in the oil phase are extracted. The CO₂ content in oil phases at different distances in the reservoir is analyzed by the method of fixed time and fixed point, and it is deduced that the lateral sweep radius of CO₂ injection along the fracture in H block is 24~40 m. With the increase of the huff-n-puff cycle, the increase of molar content of CO₂ in the oil phase decreased from 451 times in the first cycle to 0.44 times in the third cycle. The dissolved amount of injected CO₂ in crude oil decreases relatively, and the effect on the properties of crude oil also gradually decreases. The above research provides a new analysis method for understanding the mechanism of CO₂ huff-n-puff, and provides some theoretical support for further popularizing the multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff technology of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoirs.

Key words: ultra-low permeability reservoir, CO₂ multi-cycle huff-n-puff, crude oil properties, component change, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TE341

廖松林,夏阳,崔轶男等. 超低渗油藏水平井注CO₂多周期吞吐原油性质变化规律研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.

Songlin LIAO,Yang XIA,Yinan CUI, et al. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.

图/表 14

表1

表2

表3

图1

表4

表5

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表6

参考文献 39

[1]	胡文瑞, 魏漪, 鲍敬伟. 中国低渗透油气藏开发理论与技术进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):646-656.
	HU Wenrui, WEl Yi, BAO Jingwei. Development of the theory and technology for low permeability reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 646-656.
[2]	胡永乐, 郝明强, 陈国利, 等. 中国CO₂驱油与埋存技术及实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):1-12. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)30001-1
	HU Yongle, HAO Mingqiang, CHEN Guoli, et al. Technologies and practice of CO₂ flooding and sequestaion in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 1-12. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)30001-1
[3]	田巍. 老油田注CO₂开发提高注气能力的方法[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(3):72-77.
	TIAN Wei. A method of improving gas injection capacity by CO₂ injection for old oilfield[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2020, 49(3): 72-77.
[4]	MERCHANT D. Enhanced oil recovery-the history of CO₂ conventional wag injection techniques developed from lab in the 1950’s to 2017[C]// Paper CMTC-502866-MS presented at the Carbon Management Technology Conference, 17-20 July 2017, Houston, Texas, USA.
[5]	ZHOU X, YUAN Q W, ZHANG Y Z. Performance evaluation of CO₂ flooding process in tight oil reservoir via experimental and numerical simulation studies[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236(15): 730-746. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.035
[6]	田巍. CO₂驱提高采收率方法在深层低渗透油藏的应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(4):50-54.
	TIAN Wei. Application of CO₂-EOR in the deep low permeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(4): 50-54.
[7]	吴捷. 低渗稠油化学剂辅助二氧化碳吞吐技术研究与应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(3):59-62.
	WU Jie. Research and application of chemical agent assisted CO₂ huff and puff technology for heavy oil reservoir with low permeability[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(3): 59-62.
[8]	何应付, 赵淑霞, 伦增珉, 等. 液态CO₂流变特性与滤失性能分析[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(3):38-41. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.03.12
	HE Yingfu, ZHAO Shuxia, LUN Zengmin, et al. Analysis of rheological and filtration properties of supercritical CO₂[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(3): 38-41. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.03.12
[9]	狄伟. 注CO₂对超低渗储层的渗透性伤害研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(2):53-56. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.02.14
	DI Wei. Study on the damage of CO₂ injection to permeability of ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(2): 53-56. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.02.14
[10]	孙丽丽, 李治平, 窦宏恩, 等. 超低渗油藏CO₂吞吐室内评价及参数优化[J]. 油田化学, 2018, 35(2):82-86.
	SUN Lili, LI Zhiping, DOU Hong'en, et al. Laboratory evaluation and parameter optimization of CO₂ huff-n-puff in ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2018, 35(2): 82-86.
[11]	钱坤, 杨胜来, 马轩, 等. 超低渗透油藏CO₂吞吐利用率实验研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(6):77-81.
	QIAN Kun, YANG Shenglai, MA Xuan, et al. CO₂ utilization ratio simulation during a CO₂ huff-and-puff process in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(6): 77-81.
[12]	邹建栋, 廖新维, 张可, 等. 不同油藏压力下CO₂驱最小混相压力实验研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1):36-44.
	ZOU Jiandong, LIAO Xinwei, ZHANG Ke, et al. Study on minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂ flooding at different reservoir pressures[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 36-44.
[13]	史英, 盖长城, 颜菲, 等. 稠油油藏CO₂吞吐合理吞吐轮次[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(1):129-133.
	SHI Ying, GAI Changcheng, YAN Fei, et al. The reasonable CO₂ huff-n-puff rounds of heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36(1): 129-133.
[14]	张智, 宋闯, 窦雪锋, 等. CO₂吞吐井套管腐蚀规律及极限吞吐轮次研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4):135-143.
	ZHANG Zhi, SONG Chuang, DOU Xuefeng, et al. Study of the patterns of well casing corrosion by the CO₂ huff-and-puff process and the maximum number of huff-and-puff cycles[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science ＆ Technology Edition), 2019, 41(4): 135-143.
[15]	刘刚. 致密油体积压裂水平井CO₂吞吐注采参数优化[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(2):90-93.
	LIU Gang. Optimization of injection and production parameters of CO₂ huff and puff by horizontal wells with volume fracturing in tight oil[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(2): 90-93.
[16]	董炳阳. 低渗挥发性油藏CO₂驱注入时机室内实验研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(3):81-84.
	DONG Bingyang. Laboratory test on the timing of CO₂ flooding in low permeability volatile reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(3): 81-84.
[17]	SONG Z J, LI Y Z, SONG Y L, et al. A critical review of CO₂ enhanced oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs of North America and China[C]// Paper SPE-196548-MS presented at the SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, Indonesia, October 2019.
[18]	TANG Y, SU Z Y, HE J B, et al. Numerical simulation and optimization of enhanced oil recovery by the in situ generated CO₂ huff-n-puff process with compound surfactant[J]. Journal of Chemistry, 2016: 1-13.
[19]	高军, 闫治东, 魏本兴, 等. 青西油田多元复合吞吐研究与应用——以柳5X井为例[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(4):43-46. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.04.12
	GAO Jun, YAN Zhidong, WEI Benxing, et al. Research and Application of Multiple Composite Steam Stimulation in Qingxi Oilfield-Taking Well Liu 5X as an Example[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(4): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.04.12
[20]	何应付, 赵淑霞, 刘学伟. 致密油藏多级压裂水平井CO₂吞吐机理[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(6):752-756.
	HE Yingfu, ZHAO Shuxia, LIU Xuewei. Mechanism of CO₂ huff & puff of multi-stage fractured horizontal well in tight oil reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(6): 752-756.
[21]	段炼, 马妮莎, 李鼎一. 致密油藏多级压裂水平井CO₂吞吐开发方式研究[J]. 能源与环保, 2018, 40(3):77-80.
	DUAN Lian, MA Nisha, LI Dingyi. Study on development methods of CO₂ huff and puff for multi-stage fracture horizontal well in tight oil reservoirs[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2018, 40(3): 77-80.
[22]	张娟, 周立发, 张晓辉, 等. 浅薄层稠油油藏水平井CO₂吞吐效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(4):485-491.
	ZHANG Juan, ZHOU Lifa, ZHANG Xiaohui, et al. Effects of CO₂ huff and puff in horizontal wells in shallow-burial thin heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(4): 485-491.
[23]	侯广. 致密油体积压裂水平井CO₂吞吐实践与认识[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 37(3):166-170.
	HOU Guang. Practice and understanding of the CO₂ huff-puff for the volume fractured horizontal well in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2018, 37(3): 166-170.
[24]	樊建明, 屈雪峰, 王冲, 等. 超低渗透油藏水平井注采井网设计优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 40(2):115-128.
	FAN Jianming, QU Xuefeng, WANG Chong, et al. Optimization study of the horizontal well and injection-production pattern in an ultra-low-permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 40(2): 115-128.
[25]	DING M, WANG Y, WANG Y, et al. Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery via CO₂ soaking and huff and puff injection: Effects of miscibility and bypassed-oil size[J]. Fuel, 2019, 248(15): 152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.088
[26]	刘建仪, 李牧, 刘洋, 等. 注CO₂吞吐微观机理可视化实验[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(2):230-232.
	LIU Jianyi, LI Mu, LIU Yang, et al. Visualization experiment on micro mechanism of CO₂ huff and puff[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(2): 230-232.
[27]	陈举民, 李进, 曹红燕, 等. 浅薄稠油油藏水平井CO₂吞吐机理及影响因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4):515-520.
	CHEN Jumin, LI Jin, CAO Hongyan, et al. Mechanism and influence factors for CO₂ huff and puff of horizontal flooding in shallow and thin heavy oil reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 515-520.
[28]	SUN R, YU W, XU F, et al. Compositional simulation of CO₂ huff-n-puff process in Middle Bakken tight oil reservoirs with hydraulic fractures[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236(15): 1446-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.113
[29]	陈祖华, 吴公益, 钱卫明, 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油藏注CO₂提高采收率技术及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1):152-162.
	CHEN Zuhua, WU Gongyi, QIAN Weiming, et al. EOR technology and application of CO₂ injection for small complex fault block reservoirs in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 152-162
[30]	陈龙龙, 白远, 云彦舒, 等. 气体示踪在非均质特低渗透油藏二氧化碳驱气窜监测中的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(3):56-59. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.03.17
	CHEN Longlong, BAI Yuan, YUN Yanshu, et al. Application of CO₂ channeling monitoring for using gas tracer in ultra-low-permeability reservoirs CO₂ flooding[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(3): 56-59. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.03.17
[31]	师瑞东. JN低渗小断块油藏CO₂/CH₄吞吐提高采收率机理研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
	SHI Ruidong. Study on the Mechanism of CO₂/CH₄ huff and puff enhanced oil recovery in JN low permeability small fault block reservoir[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
[32]	HAO M Q, LIAO S L, YU G M, et al. Performance optimization of CO₂ huff-n-puff for multifractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Geofluids, 2020(3):1-13.
[33]	孙焕泉, 王海涛, 吴光焕, 等. 稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率影响因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6):1009-1013.
	SUN Huanquan, WANG Haitao, WU Guanghuan, et al. CO₂ EOR factors in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(6): 1009-1013.
[34]	杨胜来, 王亮, 何建军, 等. CO₂吞吐增油机理及矿场应用效果[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 19(6):23-26.
	YANG Shenglai, WANG Liang, HE Jianjun, et al. Oil production enhancing mechanism and field applying result of carbon dioxide huff-puff[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 19(6): 23-26.
[35]	韩倩, 徐骞, 张宏录, 等. 草舍油田CO₂驱防气窜调驱体系研究及性能评价[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(2):67-71.
	HAN Qian, XU Qian, ZHANG Honglu, et al. Research and performance evaluation of CO₂ flooding gas channeling prevention and profile control flooding system in Caoshe oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(2): 67-71.
[36]	钱卫明, 林刚, 王波, 等. 底水驱稠油油藏水平井多轮次CO₂吞吐配套技术及参数评价[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(1):107-111.
	QIAN Weiming, LIN Gang, WANG Bo, et al. Multi-cycle CO₂ huff and puff matching technology and parameter evaluation for horizontal wells in heavy oil reservoirs with bottom water drive[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(1): 107-111.
[37]	刘小杰, 黄帅帅, 美合日阿依·穆泰力普, 等. CO₂与混合烷烃最小混相压力的界面张力法实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(3):87-92.
	LIU Xiaojie, HUANG Shuaishuai, MUTAILIPU Meiheriayi, et al. Experiments on the minimum mixing pressure of CO₂ and mixed alkane by using the interfacial tension regression method[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2020, 49(3): 87-92.
[38]	唐凡, 朱永刚, 张彦明, 等. CO₂注入对储层多孔介质及赋存流体性质影响实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(1):72-76.
	TANG Fan, ZHU Yonggang, ZHANG Yanming, et al. Experimental research of the effect of CO₂ injection on porous media and fluid property in reservoir[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2021, 50(1): 72-76.
[39]	蒋永平. CO2复合驱油分子动力学模拟及微观机理研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(2):274-279.
	JIANG Yongping. Molecular dynamics simulation and microscopic mechanism of CO₂ composite flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(2): 274-279.

组分	摩尔组成	组分	摩尔组成	组分	摩尔组成
CO₂	0.05	C₉	2.24	C₂₁	1.37
N₂	1.11		C₁₀	2.93		C₂₂	0.91
C₁	24.53		C₁₁	2.61		C₂₃	0.91
C₂	8.15		C₁₂	1.69		C₂₄	1.01
C₃	11.04		C₁₃	1.01		C₂₅	0.96
iC₄	1.59		C₁₄	5.12		C₂₆	0.82
nC₄	4.06		C₁₅	2.01		C₂₇	0.87
iC₅	2.43		C₁₆	1.78		C₂₈	0.82
nC₅	2.70		C₁₇	1.78		C₂₉	0.87
C₆	1.55		C₁₈	1.05		C₃₀	0.73
C₇	0.80		C₁₉	0.46		C₃₁₊	5.95
C₈	2.73		C₂₀	1.33

注入CO₂比例（%）	饱和压力（MPa）	膨胀系数	黏度（mPa∙s）
0	10.18	1.000	1.41
12.3	11.45	1.033	1.36
25.4	13.21	1.142	1.28
35.6	14.85	1.195	1.17
46.5	16.65	1.311	1.05
60.4	20.21	1.489	0.90
71.2	24.62	1.794	0.72

测试项目	实验值	模拟值	相对误差（%）
单脱气油比（m³/ m³）	85.210	82.410	3.24
地层原油密度（g/cm³)	0.725	0.731	0.79
脱气原油密度（g/cm³)	0.840	0.845	0.68
地层原油黏度（mPa∙s）	1.410	1.407	0.19
泡点压力（MPa）	10.180	10.410	2.30

吞吐周期	生产时间点	距裂缝8 m处油相各组分摩尔含量
吞吐周期	生产时间点	N₂	CO₂	C₁	C₂—C₃	C₄—C₆	C₇—C₁₅	C₁₆—C₃₁₊
第一吞吐周期	开始吞吐时	0.011 1	0.000 5	0.245 4	0.192 0	0.123 3	0.211 5	0.216 3
	注CO₂结束时	0.000 9	0.716 6	0.023 8	0.026 2	0.022 8	0.077 1	0.132 7
	焖井结束时	0.000 9	0.662 3	0.025 7	0.031 7	0.029 7	0.100 6	0.149 1
	生产10 d	0.001 8	0.509 3	0.053 9	0.068 0	0.059 1	0.142 3	0.165 6
	生产1 a	0.007 0	0.226 0	0.170 4	0.148 2	0.098 9	0.172 9	0.176 6
第二吞吐周期	开始吞吐时	0.008 3	0.165 9	0.194 5	0.160 8	0.105 1	0.181 0	0.184 5
	注CO₂结束时	0.000 6	0.712 2	0.015 9	0.018 9	0.018 3	0.080 3	0.153 9
	焖井结束时	0.000 7	0.664 5	0.018 9	0.024 5	0.024 8	0.101 8	0.164 9
	生产10 d	0.001 7	0.520 5	0.049 1	0.061 1	0.054 4	0.141 6	0.1716
	生产1 a	0.005 5	0.287 5	0.141 7	0.134 3	0.093 5	0.167 2	0.1703
第三吞吐周期	开始吞吐时	0.006 6	0.229 5	0.165 0	0.147 8	0.099 8	0.174 3	0.176 9
	注CO₂结束时	0.000 3	0.710 6	0.009 5	0.013 2	0.014 6	0.083 0	0.168 8
	焖井结束时	0.000 4	0.665 9	0.013 3	0.019 0	0.021 1	0.103 6	0.176 7
	生产10 d	0.001 6	0.524 8	0.046 2	0.056 7	0.050 7	0.141 3	0.178 8
	生产1 a	0.004 5	0.329 4	0.122 2	0.124 0	0.089 6	0.163 8	0.166 4

超低渗油藏水平井注CO₂多周期吞吐原油性质变化规律研究

Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张益, 宁崇如, 陈亚舟, 姬玉龙, 赵立阳, 王爱方, 黄晶晶, 于凯怡. 致密油藏大排量注水吞吐技术及参数优化研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 727-733.
[2]	曹小朋, 刘海成, 李忠新, 陈先超, 江朋宇, 樊浩. 基于EDFM的页岩油水平井注水吞吐优化研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 734-740.
[3]	廖凯, 张士诚, 谢勃勃. 页岩油体积压裂后合理焖井时间模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 749-755.
[4]	陈祥, 王冠, 刘平礼, 杜娟, 王铭, 陈伟华, 李金龙, 刘金明, 刘飞. 四川盆地灯影组酸压裂缝导流能力实验和模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 569-576.
[5]	盖长城,赵忠新,任路,颜艺灿,侯本峰. 中深层水热型地热资源集群式开发井位部署参数研究与应用——以HTC地热田为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 638-646.
[6]	陈学忠, 赵慧言, 陈满, 徐华卿, 杨建英, 杨晓敏, 唐慧莹. 海陆过渡相页岩储层合层开采数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 382-390.
[7]	张连锋,张伊琳,郭欢欢,李洪生,李俊杰,梁丽梅,李文静,胡书奎. 近废弃油藏延长生命周期开发调整技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[8]	崔玉东, 陆程, 关子越, 罗万静, 滕柏路, 孟凡璞, 彭越. 南海海域天然气水合物降压开采储层蠕变对气井产能影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[9]	何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[10]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[11]	施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 朱诗杰, 朱珊珊. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432.
[12]	陈秀林, 王秀宇, 许昌民, 张聪. 基于核磁共振与微观数值模拟的CO₂埋存形态及分布特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[13]	候梦如,梁冰,孙维吉,刘奇,赵航. 矿物界面刚度对页岩水力压裂裂缝扩展规律的影响研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 100-107.
[14]	刘叶轩,刘向君,丁乙,周鑫,梁利喜. 考虑隔层影响的页岩油储层可压性评价方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[15]	何封,冯强,崔宇诗. W页岩气藏气井控压生产制度数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.