超临界CO2对碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀作用研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.03.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究CO₂地质封存条件下碳酸盐岩储层的物化反应规律，以四川盆地震旦系灯影组碳酸盐岩储层为研究对象，开展储层条件下的碳酸盐岩与超临界CO₂反应室内模拟实验。采用压力脉冲衰减法、扫描电镜法和核磁共振法分析了碳酸盐岩孔隙度、渗透率、孔隙结构对超临界CO₂环境的响应特征，实验后碳酸盐岩孔隙度、渗透率增大，孔隙度变化率最大为32.35 %，渗透率扩大11倍，而且实验后产生了微裂缝，20~50 μm的孔径占比增大；采用X射线衍射法、接触角法分析碳酸盐岩的矿物组分和润湿性，主要矿物石英平均含量增加了12.6 %，方解石平均含量减少了22.3 %，亲水性增强；采用巴西劈裂法测试超临界CO₂浸没前后碳酸盐岩的岩石力学特性，发现其抗拉强度下降了18.28 %，造成了碳酸盐岩损伤，载荷-位移曲线经历更长的压实阶段。该文揭示了超临界CO₂溶蚀作用对碳酸盐岩孔隙度、渗透率、矿物组分、岩石力学性质的影响，为CO₂在碳酸盐岩储层中的地质封存提供理论支持。

关键词: 超临界CO₂, 碳酸盐岩, 溶蚀, 渗透率, 岩石力学性质

Abstract:

In order to study the physicochemical reaction law of carbonate rock reservoirs under the condition of CO₂ geological storage, lab experiments on the reaction of carbonate rocks and supercritical CO₂ under reservoir conditions were carried out with the carbonate reservoir of the Sinian Dengying Formation reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin as the research object. The response characteristics of carbonate porosity, permeability, and pore structure to supercritical CO₂ environment were investigated by the pressure pulse attenuation method, scanning electron microscopy method, and nuclear magnetic resonance method. The test resulted in an increase both in the porosity and permeability of the carbonate rock. The maximum porosity change rate is 32.35 % and the permeability increases by eleven times. Additionally, micro-fractures appear after the test, and the proportion of the micro-fractures with the aperture of 20~50 μm increases. By using X-ray diffraction and contact angle techniques, the mineral makeup and wetability of carbonate rocks were examined. The average content of main minerals quartz increased by 12.6 %, the average content of calcite decreased by 22.3 %, and the hydrophilicity increased. Brazilian splitting technique was used to examine the mechanical characteristics of carbonate rocks both before and after supercritical CO₂ immersion. The tensile strength of carbonate rocks was discovered to have fallen by 18.28 %, causing damage to the rocks, and the compaction stage of the load-displacement curve was longer. This work examines the effects of supercritical CO₂ dissolution on the porosity, permeability, mineral composition, and rock mechanical characteristics of carbonate rocks, and provides theoretical evidence for the geological storage of CO₂ in carbonate reservoirs.

Key words: supercritical CO₂, carbonate rock, dissolution, permeability, rock mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TE357

李颖, 马寒松, 李海涛, GANZER Leonhard, 唐政, 李可, 罗红文. 超临界CO₂对碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀作用研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.

LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.

图/表 11

表1

表2

表3

表4

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表5

参考文献 22

[1]	孙腾民, 刘世奇, 汪涛. 中国二氧化碳地质封存潜力评价研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(11): 10-20.
	SUN Tengmin, LIU Shiqi, WANG Tao. Research progress on the evaluation of carbon dioxide geological storage potential in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(11): 10-20.
[2]	王敬霞, 雷磊, 于青春. 我国碳酸盐岩储层CO₂地质储存潜力与适宜性[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(2): 101-108.
	WANG Jingxia, LEI Lei, YU Qingchun. Geological storage potential and suitability of CO₂ in carbonate reservoirs in China[J]. China Karst, 2015, 34(2): 101-108.
[3]	WANG J, ZHAO Y, AN Z Z, et al. CO₂ storage in carbonate rocks: An experimental and geochemical modeling study[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 234: 106942. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106942
[4]	唐凡, 朱永刚, 张彦明, 等. CO₂注入对储层多孔介质及赋存流体性质影响实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(01): 72-76.
	TANG Fan, ZHU Yonggang, ZHANG Yanming, et al. Experimental study on the effect of CO₂ injection on the properties of porous media and host fluids in reservoirs[J]. Petroleum and Natural Gas Chemical, 2021, 50(1): 72-76.
[5]	杨俊杰, 黄思静, 张文正, 等. 表生和埋藏成岩作用的温压条件下不同组成碳酸盐岩溶蚀成岩过程的实验模拟[J]. 沉积学报, 1995, 13(4): 49-54.
	YANG Junjie, HUANG Sijing, ZHANG Wenzheng, et al. Experimental simulation of the dissolution and diagenesis process of carbonate rocks of different compositions under the temperature and pressure conditions of epigenetic and burial diagenesis[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1995, 13(4): 49-54.
[6]	范明. 不同温度条件下CO₂水溶液对碳酸盐岩的溶蚀作用[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25(6): 825-830.
	FAN Ming. Dissolution of carbonate rocks by CO₂ aqueous solution at different temperatures[J]. Chinese Journal of Sedimentology, 2007, 25(6): 825-830.
[7]	高建文. 酸性溶液对碳酸盐岩溶蚀实验[J]. 辽宁化工, 2016 45(3): 254-256.
	GAO Jianwen. Experiment on the dissolution of carbonate rock by acidic solution[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2016, 45(3): 254-256.
[8]	李骞, 张钰祥, 李滔, 等. 基于数字岩心建立的评价碳酸盐岩完整孔喉结构的方法——以川西北栖霞组为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(3): 53-61.
	LI Qian, ZHANG Yuxiang, LI Tao, et al. A method for evaluating complete pore-throat structure of carbonate rocks based on digital cores: A case study of Qixia Formation in Northwest Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(3): 53-61.
[9]	刘大伟, 康毅力, 何健, 等. 碳酸盐岩储层水敏性实验评价及机理探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 27(2): 32-35.
	LIU Dawei, KANG Yili, HE Jian, et al. Experimental evaluation and mechanism evaluation of water sensitivity in carbonate reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(2): 32-35.
[10]	李天太, 王清华, 张喜凤, 等. 塔中奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层敏感性实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2005, 12(4): 79-82.
	LI Tiantai, WANG Qinghua, ZHANG Xifeng, et al. Experimental study on the sensitivity of Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tazhong[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2005, 12(4): 79-82.
[11]	郭冀隆. 二氧化碳地质封存过程中CO₂—水—岩相互作用实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017.
	GUO Jilong. Experimental study on CO₂-water-rock interaction in the geological storage process of carbon dioxide[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2017.
[12]	SUN Y P, WEI L N, DAI C L, et al. The carbonic acid-rock reaction in feldspar/dolomite-rich tightsand and its impact on CO₂-water relative permeability during geological carbon storage[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 584: 120527. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120527
[13]	李新勇, 吴恒川, 房好青, 等. 微观结构差异对碳酸盐岩酸蚀损伤的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 188-193.
	LI Xinyong, WU Hengchuan, FANG Haoqing, et al. Effects of microstructural differences on acid erosion damage of carbonate rocks[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2): 188-193.
[14]	兰天庆, 马媛媛, 贡同, 等. 超临界状态CO₂封存技术研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2019, 48(6): 1451-1455.
	LAN Tianqing, MA Yuanyuan, GONG Tong, et al. Research progress on supercritical CO₂ storage technology[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2019, 48(6): 1451-1455.
[15]	IGLESIAS R S, KETZER J M, MARASCHIN A J, et al. Characterization and modeling of CO₂-water-rock interactions in Hygiene Sandstones(Upper Cretaceous), Denver Basin, aimed for carbon dioxide geological storage[J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2018, 8(4): 781-795. doi: 10.1002/ghg.2018.8.issue-4
[16]	JIA B, CHEN Z L, XIAN C G. Investigations of CO₂ storage capacity and flow behavior in shale formation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109659. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109659
[17]	李会元. 废弃油气藏CO₂埋存过程中盖层完整性的评价[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2015.
	LI Huiyuan. Evaluation of caprock integrity during CO₂ burial of abandoned oil and gas reservoirs[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2015.
[18]	IZGEC O, DEMIRAL B, BERTIN H, et al. CO₂ injection into saline carbonate aquifer formations Ⅰ: Laboratory investigation[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2008, 72(1): 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11242-007-9132-5
[19]	张星, 毕义泉, 汪庐山, 等. 黏土矿物膨胀机理及防膨研究现状[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2014, 15(5): 39-43.
	ZHANG Xing, BI Yiquan, WANG Lushan, et al. Research status of clay mineral expansion mechanism and expansion prevention[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemical Industry, 2014, 15(5): 39-43.
[20]	李四海, 马新仿, 张士诚, 等. CO₂-水-岩作用对致密砂岩性质与裂缝扩展的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3): 312-318.
	LI Sihai, MA Xinfang, ZHANG Shicheng, et al. Effects of CO₂-water-rock action on properties and fracture propagation of tight sandstone[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3): 312-318.
[21]	吴春正, 薛海涛, 卢双舫, 等. 几种常见矿物的油-水-矿物接触角测量及其讨论[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(4): 842-849.
	WU Chunzheng, XUE Haitao, LU Shuangfang, et al. Oil-water-mineral contact angle measurement and discussion of several common minerals[J]. Modern Geology, 2018, 32(4): 842-849.
[22]	崔强, 程永锋, 鲁先龙, 等. 强风化岩中挖孔基础抗拔试验及荷载位移曲线模型参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4597-4604.
	CUI Qiang, CHENG Yongfeng, LU Xianlong, et al. Uplift test of excavated foundation in strongly weathered rock and study on load displacement curve model parameters[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4597-4604.

岩样系列号		岩样干重/g	饱和岩样重量/g	孔隙度/%	渗透率/10^-3μm²	孔隙度变化率/%	渗透率变化率/%
1	盐水浸没前	45.339	45.755	2.57	0.261 6	－2.33	－7.60
1	盐水浸没后	45.325	45.731	2.51	0.241 7	－2.33	－7.60
2	盐水浸没前	44.987	45.273	1.64	0.012 4	－13.41	－0.41
2	盐水浸没后	44.913	45.161	1.42	0.008 3	－13.41	－0.41
3	CO₂浸没前	47.214	47.485	1.54	0.010 3	20.78	2.24
3	CO₂浸没后	46.658	46.985	1.86	0.032 7	20.78	2.24
4	CO₂浸没前	45.219	45.510	1.65	0.011 8	27.27	2.57
4	CO₂浸没后	44.522	44.892	2.10	0.037 5	27.27	2.57
5	CO₂浸没前	46.516	46.874	2.04	0.014 0	32.35	1 001.42
5	CO₂浸没后	46.489	46.992	2.70	0.154 2	32.35	1 001.42

岩样系列号		矿物含量							矿物比
岩样系列号		黏土总量	石英	钾长石	斜长石	方解石	白云石	黄铁矿	方解石/白云石	石英/长石	石英/黏土
1	盐水浸没前	5.2	34.8	0	0	56.2	3.8	0
1	盐水浸没后	3.9	35.2	0	0	56.9	4.0	0
2	盐水浸没前	3.8	31.5	5.5	0.8	54.3	4.1	0
2	盐水浸没后	2.7	31.8	5.7	0.9	54.6	4.3	0
平均变化量		-1.2	0.4	0.1	0.1	0.5	0.2	0
3	CO₂浸没前	12.1	29.6	2.4	5.7	42.8	5.0	2.4	8.6	3.7	2.4
3	CO₂浸没后	16.8	40.7	4.2	6.5	18.5	6.5	6.8	2.8	3.8	2.5
4	CO₂浸没前	9.7	38.1	3.2	4.4	36.9	4.8	2.9	7.7	5.0	3.9
4	CO₂浸没后	10.9	52.2	4.1	5.5	16.7	5.6	5.0	3.0	5.3	4.3
5	CO₂浸没前	7.4	37.1	4.5	2.1	42.2	4.2	2.5	10.0	5.6	5.0
5	CO₂浸没后	9.5	49.7	5.5	3.4	19.7	5.3	6.9	3.7	5.7	5.2

矿物类型	接触角	矿物类型	接触角
石英	16.5	方解石	42.3
钾长石	31.5	白云石	37.7
斜长石	48.0	黄铁矿	46.9

岩样系列号		加权法测定		接触角法测定
岩样系列号		接触角	变化量	接触角	变化量
1	盐水浸没前	30.95	-1.23	29.01	-2.31
1	盐水浸没后	29.72	-1.23	26.70	-2.31
2	盐水浸没前	31.83	-1.05	32.25	-3.40
2	盐水浸没后	30.78	-1.05	28.85	-3.40
3	CO₂浸没前	29.49	-7.54	30.18	-11.38
3	CO₂浸没后	21.95	-7.54	18.80	-11.38
4	CO₂浸没前	27.57	-8.04	29.15	-12.57
4	CO₂浸没后	19.53	-8.04	16.58	-12.57
5	CO₂浸没前	29.15	-7.73	30.50	-13.60
5	CO₂浸没后	21.42	-7.73	16.90	-13.60

样品编号		长度/mm	直径/mm	最大载荷/kN	平均值/kN	抗拉强度/MPa	平均值/MPa
A组岩心	1	33.93	24.40	16.5	16.45	12.90	12.53
A组岩心	2	33.81	25.40	16.4	16.45	12.16	12.53
B组岩心	3	34.08	25.38	14.1	13.90	10.38	10.24
B组岩心	4	33.93	25.45	13.7	13.90	10.10	10.24

超临界CO₂对碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀作用研究

Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张文,梁利喜,刘向君,熊健,张忆南. 酸作用下碳酸盐岩刻蚀形貌及力学性能研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 247-255.
[2]	闫建丽,李超,马栋,李卓,王鹏. 渤海复杂潜山油藏动静态特征识别方法及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 308-316.
[3]	汤勇, 唐凯, 夏光, 徐笛. BZ19-6低渗透储层反凝析污染及解除方法实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 102-107.
[4]	张志超,柏明星,杜思宇. 页岩油藏注CO₂驱孔隙动用特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[5]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[6]	胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[7]	申鑫,郭建春,王世彬. 阳离子表面活性剂遮蔽作用导致的酸化缓速研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 117-126.
[8]	石军太,李文斌,张龙龙,季长江,李国富,张遂安. 压裂过程数据对原始煤储层压力反演方法研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 564-571.
[9]	杨兆中,袁健峰,朱静怡,李小刚,李扬,王浩. 煤层气注热增产研究进展 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 617-625.
[10]	赵兰. 致密砂岩储层微裂缝发育特征及对物性的影响——以杭锦旗地区十里加汗区带为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 285-291.
[11]	王英伟,伍顺伟,覃建华,叶义平,高阳,张景. 超临界CO₂浸泡对玛湖不同黏土矿物含量砂砾岩储层渗透率影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 837-844.
[12]	户海胜,高阳,单江涛,雷现梅,张玉龙,张广超,叶仲斌. 超临界CO₂萃取致密砂砾岩中原油效果影响因素实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 845-851.
[13]	付天宇,刘启国,岑雪芳,李隆新,彭先. 碳酸盐岩三重介质气藏NPI产量递减分析研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 905-910.
[14]	陈科,张旭东,何伟,尹超,唐磊,张虎,叶仲斌. 河流相储层渗透率对水驱微观驱替效果的影响及挖潜方向研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 694-702.
[15]	区舫,杨辉廷,黄晓兵. X气田飞仙关组礁滩相储层测井解释方法应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.