注水井解调联作选井选层方法研究与应用

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 54-57.

注水井解调联作选井选层方法研究与应用

赵立强¹,鲜超¹,罗志锋¹,兰夕堂²

^1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500
^2. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司,天津塘沽 300450

收稿日期:2017-01-22 发布日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2018-02-26
作者简介:赵立强（1957—）,男,教授、博士生导师,油气藏增产改造理论与技术、采油气工程。

Research and application of candidate injection well and layer selection method for acidizing-water shutoff joint operation

Zhao Liqiang¹,Xian Chao¹,Luo Zhifeng¹,Lan Xitang²

^1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
^2. Tianjin Branch Company, CNOOC, Tanggu, Tianjin 300450, China

Received:2017-01-22 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-02-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

解调联作是强非均质性油藏受伤害注水井解除污染堵塞,控制高渗层吸水强度,改善注水效果的有效手段。影响解调联作效果的因素很多,且各个因素之间具有复杂的非线性关系,传统的统计方法应用受到诸多限制。在对注水井解调联作效果影响因素分析的基础上,采用皮尔逊相关系数法计算各因素与增注比的相关系数,以此为依据确定各因素间的相对重要度,结合模糊层次分析法确定各因素的权重,进而达到优化选井选层的目的。应用新方法对渤海油田X区块注水井进行了实例计算,决策值大小与现场作业效果吻合度高,验证了该方法可靠性,且计算简单快速,为提高解调联作的成功有效率提供了有力保障。

关键词: 解调联作, 选井选层, 相关系数, 层次分析

Abstract:

The acidizing-water shutoff joint operation technology is an effective method to resolve the plugging, control the water injection profile, and improve the injection effect of the damaged injection wells with the strong heterogeneity. There are many factors affecting the effectiveness of the acidizing-water shutoff joint operation. Due to the complex nonlinear relations of the various factors, the traditional statistical methods is limited. To solve this problem, and based on the analysis of the effect of the acidizing-water shutoff joint operation for the water injection wells, we calculate the correlation coefficients between the factors and the increasing injection ratio by the pearson correlation coefficient method. And according to the correlation coefficient, the relative importance of each factor is determined. Then, the weight of each factor is decided by the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. This new method is used to calculate the injection wells in the Bohai Oilfield, and the decision value is consistent with the results of the field operation. This method is reliable and simples and provide the powerful guarantee for improving the success rate of acidizing-water shutoff joint operation for injection wells.

Key words: acidizing-water shutoff joint operation, Well and layer selection, correlation coefficient, hierarchical analysis

中图分类号:

TE357

赵立强,鲜超,罗志锋等. 注水井解调联作选井选层方法研究与应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(1): 54-57.

Liqiang Zhao,Chao Xian,Zhifeng Luo, et al. Research and application of candidate injection well and layer selection method for acidizing-water shutoff joint operation[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(1): 54-57.

图/表 6

表1

重要程度标度"

标度	定义	说明	对应相关系数
0.5	同等重要	两元素相比,同等重要	[0,0.2]
0.6	稍微重要	两元素相比,一元素比另一元素稍微重要	[0.2,0.4]
0.7	明显重要	两元素相比,一元素比另一元素明显重要	[0.4,0.6]
0.8	重要得多	两元素相比,一元素比另一元素重要得多	[0.6,0.8]
0.9	极端重要	两元素相比,一元素比另一元素极端重要	[0.8,1]
0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4	反比较	若元素 $a i$ 比 $a j$ 得到判断矩阵 $r ij$ ,则元素 $a j$ 比 $a i$ 得到判断矩阵 $r ji$ =1- $r ij$ 。

表1

表2

12口注水井的特征数据"

井号	H/m	$K ?$ /10^-3μm²	$K V$	$J ?$	$W ?$	$W V$	LT	Unp	WCUT	QZ	$I w$	S	P
A1	22.3	418.1	0.6	1.8	0.3	0.3	0.3	0.8	0.7	0.2	0.8	10.0	0.4
A2	47.1	1 279.7	1.0	1.4	0.3	0.7	0.4	0.8	0.4	0.8	0.8	12.0	5.2
A3	33.3	785.4	1.0	1.2	0.5	1.0	0.8	0.8	0.3	0.2	1.0	38.0	10
A4	44.3	1 875.4	0.8	0.5	0.5	0.6	0.4	0.7	0.4	0.2	0.5	22.0	2.5
A5	40.0	886.0	0.7	1.5	0.4	0.8	0.4	0.6	0.5	0.0	0.6	12.0	0.5
A6	40.9	642.3	0.9	1.3	0.4	1.0	0.6	0.8	0.9	0.5	0.4	29.0	10
A7	12.7	283.2	0.9	1.3	0.7	0.5	0.7	0.7	0.0	0.1	0.4	8.0	1.8
A8	47.1	1 279.7	1.0	0.9	0.3	0.7	0.5	0.8	0.7	0.4	0.5	14.0	5.8
A9	40.9	642.3	0.9	1.4	0.4	0.5	0.6	0.8	0.9	0.3	0.4	15.0	5.1
A10	5.1	288.6	0.4	1.2	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.4	0.8	0.7	38	0.5
A11	28.3	1080.9	0.6	1.5	0.4	1.0	0.7	0.6	0.5	0.5	0.4	15	2.8
A12	21.8	867.9	0.7	1.3	0.5	0.6	0.6	0.7	0.5	0.3	0.6	18	2.6

表2

表3

各影响因素与增注比的相关性"

因素	H	$K ?$	$K V$	$J ?$	$W ?$	$W V$	LT	Unp	WCUT	QZ	$I w$	S
相关系数	0.33	0.01	0.74	0.19	0.01	0.79	0.67	0.69	0.25	0.42	0.16	0.86

表3

表4

区块解调联作选井各因素权重"

因素	H	$K$	$K V$	$J ?$	$W ?$	$W V$	LT	Unp	WCUT	QZ	$I w$	S
权重	0.075	0.058	0.108	0.058	0.058	0.075	0.108	0.108	0.075	0.092	0.058	0.125

表4

表5

图1

参考文献 11

[1]	黄波, 刘福海, 刘义刚 , 等. 调剖技术在渤海油田的应用[C]// 中国石油学会全国油田注水技术研讨会. 2005.
[2]	Song Q, Sun Y, Zhou J . Quantifying the reservoir heterogeneity: A case study of clastic reservoirs, Bohai Bay Basin, China[C]// paper SEG-2009-1760 presented at the 2009 SEG Annual Meating, 25-30 October 2009, Houston, Texas, USA.
[3]	刘晓光 . 渤海油田酸化工艺技术[J]. 中国海上油气:工程, 1995,7(4):50-56.
[4]	彭雪飞, 冯浦涌, 黄雷 , 等. 海上高温低渗油田酸化技术应用研究[J]. 海洋石油, 2008,28(2):73-76.
[5]	刘平礼, 张璐, 潘亿勇 , 等. 海上油田注水井单步法在线酸化技术[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2014(5):148-154.
[6]	吴建发, 郭建春, 赵金洲 . 模糊分析方法优选压裂井层[J]. 天然气工业, 2005,25(2):84-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2005.02.027
[7]	位云生, 胡永全, 赵金洲 , 等. 人工神经网络方法在水力压裂选井评层中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2005,12(4):42-44.
[8]	谢润成, 周文, 高雅琴 , 等. 应用偏相关+灰关联方法进行致密砂岩气藏压裂地质选层[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008,29(6):797-800. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2008.06.014
[9]	张吉军 . 模糊层次分析法(FAHP)[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2000,14(2):80-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7402.2000.02.016
[10]	黄晶, 李年银, 刘平礼 , 等. 基于模糊物元的注水井酸化井层选择[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(8):133-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2013.08.031
[11]	刘文超. 调剖(驱)施工设计和决策系统研究[D]. 黑龙江大庆:东北石油大学, 2012.