彭水地区龙马溪组页岩甲烷等温吸附模型对比研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究不同等温吸附模型对等温吸附实验的模拟效果,更好地描述页岩甲烷吸附规律,对川东南PY1井的7块岩心样品开展了等温吸附实验。结果表明,最大过剩吸附量与有机质含量呈现明显正相关,相关系数最大为0.859 4,而与黏土矿物呈现负相关。分别采用不同模型对实验结果进行了模拟分析,不同模型所得到的模拟结果差异较大,其中以Langmuir模型拟合相关系数表现最好,而SDR模型所得到的最大过剩吸附量最大,其次为定密度修正的Langmuir模型。SDR模型和修正的Langmuir模型均对实验结果进行了过剩吸附量的修正,但修正结果表明,SDR模型所得到的吸附相密度最为合理。最后综合考虑认为定密度修正的Langmuir模型和SDR模型对页岩中甲烷的吸附规律描述更为精确,能够更好地指导页岩吸附气含量的计算。

关键词: 彭水地区, 龙马溪组, 页岩气, 等温吸附, Langmuir, SDR模型

Abstract:

In order to study the simulation effects of different isothermal adsorption models on isothermal adsorption experiments and better describe the adsorption rule of shale methane, isothermal adsorption experiments were carried out on seven core samples from well PY1 in southeast of Sichuan Basin. The experimental results showed that the maximum excess adsorption amount was positively correlated with the organic matter content, and the maximum correlation coefficient was 0.859 4, while it was negatively correlated with clay minerals. The experimental results were simulated by different models. The simulation results of different models were quite different. Among them, the correlation coefficient fitted by the Langmuir model was the best, while the maximum excess adsorption amount obtained by the SDR model was the largest. Followed by that was the fixed Langmuir model. Both the SDR model and the modified Langmuir model had corrected the excess adsorption amount of the experimental results, but from the correction results, the adsorption phase density obtained by the SDR model was the most reasonable. Finally, the fixed density correction Langmuir model and the SDR model were considered to describe the adsorption of methane in the shale more accurately, which could guide the calculation of the shale adsorption gas content better.

Key words: Pengshui area, Longmaxi formation, shale gas, isothermal adsorption, langmuir, SDR model

中图分类号:

TE311

唐建信. 彭水地区龙马溪组页岩甲烷等温吸附模型对比研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(4): 73-78.

Jianxin TANG. Comparative studies on methane isothermal adsorption models of shale of Longmaxi formation in Pengshui area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 73-78.

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 27

[1]	ZHANG T, ELLIS G S, RUPPEL S C , et al. Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale-gas systems[J]. Organic geochemistry, 2012,47(6):120-131.
[2]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣 . 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(4):561-74.
[3]	张金川, 薛会, 张德明 , 等. 页岩气及其成藏机理[J]. 现代地质, 2013,17(4):466.
[4]	腾格尔, 申宝剑, 俞凌杰 , 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气形成与聚集机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017,44(1):69-78.
[5]	周秦, 田辉, 陈桂华 , 等. 页岩孔隙水中溶解气的主控因素与地质模型[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013,38(5):800-804.
[6]	陈铭, 胥云, 翁定为 . 页岩气藏游离气量和解吸气量计算方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015,35(29):33-38.
[7]	PAN L, XIAO X, TIAN H , et al. Geological models of gas in place of the Longmaxi shale in Southeast Chongqing, South China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016,73:433-444.
[8]	高和群, 曹海虹, 丁安徐 , 等. 海相页岩和陆相页岩等温吸附特性及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013,24(6):1290-1297.
[9]	陈元千, 汤晨阳, 陈奇 . 等温吸附量计算方法的推导及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(6):56-62.
[10]	TIAN H, LI T, ZHANG T , et al. Characterization of methane adsorption on overmature Lower Silurian—Upper Ordovician shales in Sichuan Basin, southwest China: Experimental results and geological implications[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016,156:36-49.
[11]	张帆, 李相臣 . 不同吸附模型对容量法,重量法测定页岩吸附等温曲线的拟合分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016,41(S1):164-168.
[12]	端祥刚, 胡志明, 高树生 , 等. 页岩高压等温吸附曲线及气井生产动态特征实验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(1):119-127.
[13]	赵天逸, 宁正福, 何斌 , 等. 页岩等温吸附理论模型对比分析[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2014,16(6):55-58.
[14]	武景淑, 于炳松, 李玉喜 . 渝东南渝页1井页岩气吸附能力及其主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,34(4):40-48.
[15]	张志英, 杨盛波 . 页岩气吸附解吸规律研究[J]. 实验力学, 2012,27(4):492-497.
[16]	李武广, 杨胜来, 徐晶 , 等. 考虑地层温度和压力的页岩吸附气含量计算新模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012,23(4):791-796.
[17]	朱汉卿, 贾爱林, 位云生 , 等. 蜀南地区富有机质页岩孔隙结构及超临界甲烷吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2018,39(4):391-401.
[18]	沈瑞, 郭和坤, 胡志明 , 等. 页岩气高压吸附特征及其对储采规律的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2018,25(2):204-209.
[19]	汪周华, 李赟, 郭平 , 等. 考虑过剩吸附量修正的页岩气超临界吸附模型[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2016,6(4):79-86.
[20]	周尚文, 王红岩, 薛华庆 , 等. 页岩过剩吸附量与绝对吸附量的差异及页岩气储量计算新方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2016,36(11):12-20.
[21]	BAE J S, BHATIA S K . High-pressure adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2006,20(6):2599-2607.
[22]	MURATA K, EL-MERRAOUI M, KANEKO K . A new determination method of absolute adsorption isotherm of supercritical gases under high pressure with a special relevance to density-functional theory study[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2001,114(9):4196-4205.
[23]	MURATA K, MIYAWAKI J, KANEKO K . A simple determination method of the absolute adsorbed amount for high pressure gas adsorption[J]. Carbon, 2002,40(3):425-428.
[24]	杨峰, 宁正福, 孔德涛 , 等. 页岩甲烷吸附等温线拟合模型对比分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2013,41(11):86-89.
[25]	PINI R, OTTIGER S, BURLINI L , et al. Sorption of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen in dry coals at high pressure and moderate temperature[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010,4(1):90-101.
[26]	刘圣鑫, 钟建华, 马寅生 , 等. 柴东石炭系页岩微观孔隙结构与页岩气等温吸附研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,39(1):33-42.
[27]	周理, 吕昌忠, 王怡林 , 等. 述评超临界温度气体在多孔固体上的物理吸附[J]. 化学进展, 1999,11(3):221.

样品编号	层位	深度/m	TOC,%	黏土矿物,%	石英,%
PY1-2	龙一段	2 076.90	1.01	52.8	29.8
PY1-52	龙一段	2 084.85	1.80	49.3	27.7
PY1-62	龙一段	2 113.46	1.21	28.6	34.2
PY1-8	龙一段	2 129.21	1.35	41.6	32.6
PY1-76	龙一段	2 138.13	2.38	23.0	39.6
PY1-84	龙一段	2 153.42	3.58	25.1	57.6
PY1-85	龙一段	2 155.14	4.25	20.7	61.1

样品编号	SDR				Langmuir			密度修正的Langmuir				定密度修正的Langmuir
样品编号	n₀/ （cm³·g^-1）	ρ_abs/ （mg·cm^-3）	D/ （mol²·kJ^-2）	R²	n₀/ （cm³·g^-1）	p_l/ MPa	R²	n₀/ （cm³·g^-1）	ρ_abs/ （mg·cm^-3）	p_l /MPa	R²	n₀/ （cm³·g^-1）	p_l/ MPa	R²
PY1-2	1.78	249.43	0.014 2	0.98	1.33	1.81	0.972	1.76	332.55	2.83	0.981	1.64	2.54	0.98
PY1-52	2.65	175.55	0.013 6	0.952	1.88	1.02	0.928	2.54	230.57	1.76	0.962	2.18	1.35	0.954
PY1-62	2.51	288.26	0.010 1	0.947	1.91	1.14	0.963	1.98	1 766.52	1.22	0.963	2.23	1.53	0.958
PY1-8	1.23	441.91	0.009	0.994	0.95	1.43	0.999	0.95	79 955.61	1.43	0.999	1.17	2.11	0.987
PY1-76	2.98	304.32	0.011 5	0.978	2.30	1.61	0.981	2.41	1 467.52	1.75	0.982	2.76	2.19	0.979
PY1-84	3.59	378.54	0.011 7	0.983	2.85	2.18	0.984	2.88	7 019.91	2.22	0.984	3.49	3.00	0.981
PY1-85	4.01	413.06	0.009 3	0.971	3.13	1.49	0.965	3.13	46 058.05	1.49	0.965	3.77	2.09	0.958