基于通量监测-CFD模拟的CO2驱油封存地表泄漏大气扩散研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.06.009

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 885-891.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.06.009

基于通量监测-CFD模拟的CO₂驱油封存地表泄漏大气扩散研究

瞿常青¹(), 林千果²^,³()

1.上海交通大学智慧能源创新学院，上海 200240
2.上海交通大学碳中和发展研究院，上海 200030
3.上海交通大学机动学院，上海 200240

收稿日期:2023-12-14 发布日期:2024-12-10 出版日期:2024-12-26
通讯作者: 林千果 E-mail:changqingqu999@sjtu.edu.cn;qianguo.lin@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:瞿常青（1999—），男，在读硕士研究生，从事碳封存监测研究。地址：上海市闵行区东川路800号，邮政编码：200240。E-mail：changqingqu999@sjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目“区域二氧化碳捕集与封存关键技术研发与示范”(2022YFE0206800)

Atmospheric diffusion study of surface leakage from CO₂ enhanced oil recovery with carbon capture and storage based on flux monitoring-CFD simulation

QU Changqing¹(), LIN Qianguo²^,³()

1. College of Smart Energy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. Research Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2023-12-14 Online:2024-12-10 Published:2024-12-26
Contact: LIN Qianguo E-mail:changqingqu999@sjtu.edu.cn;qianguo.lin@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

CO₂驱油封存项目兼有提高石油采收率和封存CO₂的双重效益，是目前最有经济活力的碳封存形式。然而，驱油封存项目通常含有多个井场，这些井场由于井筒的高CO₂泄漏风险导致对区域有较大的安全和环境影响。针对以往基于井场点源泄漏大气扩散研究的不足，建立了一种基于井场面源通量监测的驱油封存项目地表泄漏大气CO₂扩散研究方法。基于情景分析的华东某油田案例应用表明：采用基于涡度相关法的CO₂泄漏通量监测可以获得整个井场的面源泄漏通量，为大范围CFD（计算流体力学）的模拟提供准确数据；多井场的CFD扩散模拟能够反映区域复杂的地形和多井场的泄漏，支撑来自井场泄漏的区域安全和环境风险管理。

关键词: CO₂驱油封存, CO₂泄漏, 涡度相关, 数值模拟, 大气扩散

Abstract:

CO₂ enhanced oil recovery（EOR） with carbon capture and storage（CCS） projects offer dual benefits of increasing oil recovery and CO₂ storage, making it one of the most economically viable carbon sequestration methods nowadays. However, EOR-CCS projects typically involve multiple well sites, and the high risk of CO₂ leakage from wellbores poses significant safety and environmental challenges over large areas. To address the limitations of previous atmospheric diffusion studies based on point-source leakage at well sites, a new method for studying surface CO₂ leakage and atmospheric diffusion in EOR-CCS projects based on area-source flux monitoring at well sites was developed. A case study of an oilfield in East China, based on scenario analysis, demonstrated that CO₂ leakage flux monitoring using the eddy covariance method could provide accurate data on area-source leakage fluxes for entire well sites, enabling large-scale computational fluid dynamics（CFD） simulations. Multi-well-site CFD diffusion simulations effectively captured the impact of complex regional topography and multiple well sites on CO₂ leakage, supporting regional safety and environmental risk management for well site leakage.

Key words: CO₂ EOR-CCS, CO₂ leakage, eddy covariance, numerical simulation, atmospheric diffusion

中图分类号:

TE38

瞿常青,林千果. 基于通量监测-CFD模拟的CO₂驱油封存地表泄漏大气扩散研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 885-891.

QU Changqing,LIN Qianguo. Atmospheric diffusion study of surface leakage from CO₂ enhanced oil recovery with carbon capture and storage based on flux monitoring-CFD simulation[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 885-891.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 24

[1]	IEA. World Energy Outlook 2018[R]. Paris: IEA, 2018.
[2]	BERT M, OGUNLADE D, MANUELA L. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[3]	李士伦, 汤勇, 段胜才, 等. CO₂地质封存源汇匹配及安全性评价进展[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 269-297.
	LI Shilun, TANG Yong, DUAN Shengcai, et al. Progress in source-sink matching and safety evaluation of CO₂ geological sequestration[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 269-297.
[4]	张园, 张敏, 刘仁静, 等. 考虑微纳米限域效应对相平衡影响的CO₂驱油机理研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(2): 306-315. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.80
	ZHANG Yuan, ZHANG Min, LIU Renjing, et al. Investigation of CO₂ flooding considering the effect of confinement on phase behavior[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(2): 306-315. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.2.80
[5]	XING J, LIU Z Y, HUANG P, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the dispersion of carbon dioxide plume[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 256: 40-48.
[6]	LIU B, LIU X, LU C, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of carbon dioxide dispersion in a complex environment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 419-432.
[7]	WANG Z R, HU Y Y, JIANG J C. Numerical investigation of leaking and dispersion of carbon dioxide indoor under ventilation condition[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 66(4): 61-66.
[8]	MAZZOLDI A, HILL T, COLLS J. CFD and Gaussian atmospheric dispersion models: A comparison for leak from carbon dioxide transportation and storage facilities[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(34): 8046-8054.
[9]	文虎, 樊贵县, 翟小伟, 等. 神华CCS项目大气监测系统及监测分析[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2015, 22(5): 73-78.
	WEN Hu, FAN Guixian, ZHAI Xiaowei, et al. Atmospheric monitoring system and analysis of Shenhua CCS project[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2015, 22(5): 73-78.
[10]	LI S, ZHANG Y M, LIN Q G, et al. Topography modelling for potentially leaked CO₂diffusion and its application in human health risk assessment for carbon capture, utilization, and storage engineering in China[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2022, 119: 103714.
[11]	HSIEH K J, LIEN F S, YEE E. Dense gas dispersion modeling of CO₂released from carbon capture and storage infrastructure into a complex environment[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 39-127.
[12]	朱前林, 范智涵, 王闯, 等. CO₂封存泄漏大气扩散规律及监测方案: 以延长油田CO₂-EOR工程为例[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(4): 1432-1439.
	ZHU Qianlin, FAN Zhihan, WANG Chuang, et al. Dispersion features of the atmospheric monitoring program for CO₂ leakage: A case study sample of the CO₂-EOR pilot project of Yanchang Oil Field[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18(4): 1432-1439.
[13]	CORTIS A, OLDENBURG C M. Short-range atmospheric dispersion of carbon dioxide[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2009, 133: 17-34.
[14]	汪黎东, 顿小宝, 张天赢, 等. CO₂地质封存中单井源泄漏风险的评估方法及模型[J]. 化工环保, 2013, 33(1): 76-79.
	WANG Lidong, DUN Xiaobao, ZHANG Tianying, et al. Risk assessment and modeling of CO₂ leakage from single well in geological sequestration process[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2013, 33(1): 76-79.
[15]	SWINBANK W C. The measurement of vertical transfer of heat and water vapor by eddies in the lower atmosphere[J]. Journal of Meteorology. 1951, 8(3): 135-145.
[16]	沈艳, 刘允芬, 王堰. 应用涡动相关法计算水热、CO₂通量的国内外进展概况[J]. 南京气象学院学报, 2005, 28(4): 559-566.
	SHEN Yan, LIU Yunfen, WANG Yan. Progress of vortex correlation method in calculating hydrothermal and CO₂ fluxes at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 2005, 28(4): 559-566.
[17]	MIGLIAVACCA M, MERONI M, MANCA G, et al. Seasonal and interannual patterns of carbon and water fluxes of a poplar plantation under peculiar eco-climatic conditions[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2009, 149(9): 460-476.
[18]	LONG K D, FLANAGAN L B, CAI T B. Diurnal and seasonal variation in methane emissions in a northern Canadian peatland measured by Eddy covariance[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16(9): 420-435.
[19]	REYNOLDS O. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of criterion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1895, 186: 123-164.
[20]	WILCZAK J M, ONCLEY S P, STAGE S A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 2001, 99(1): 127-150.
[21]	WEBB E K, PEARMAN G I, LEUNING R. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1980, 106(447): 85-100.
[22]	ZHANG T, LI G Y, YU Y X, et al. Atmospheric diffusion profiles and health risks of typical VOC: Numerical modelling study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, (275): 122982.
[23]	KIKUMOTO H, OOKA R, SUGAWARA H, et al. Observational study of power-law approximation of wind profiles within an urban boundary layer for various wind conditions[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 164: 13-21.
[24]	朱红亚. 多源气体泄漏扩散的实验及数值模拟研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2013.
	ZHU Hongya. Experimental and numerical simulation study of multi-source gas leakage and diffusion[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2013.

基于通量监测-CFD模拟的CO₂驱油封存地表泄漏大气扩散研究

Atmospheric diffusion study of surface leakage from CO₂ enhanced oil recovery with carbon capture and storage based on flux monitoring-CFD simulation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	盖长城, 李洪达, 任路, 曹伟, 郝杰. 地热数值模拟与油藏数值模拟方法对比分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 849-856.
[2]	张益, 宁崇如, 陈亚舟, 姬玉龙, 赵立阳, 王爱方, 黄晶晶, 于凯怡. 致密油藏大排量注水吞吐技术及参数优化研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 727-733.
[3]	曹小朋, 刘海成, 李忠新, 陈先超, 江朋宇, 樊浩. 基于EDFM的页岩油水平井注水吞吐优化研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 734-740.
[4]	廖凯, 张士诚, 谢勃勃. 页岩油体积压裂后合理焖井时间模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 749-755.
[5]	陈祥, 王冠, 刘平礼, 杜娟, 王铭, 陈伟华, 李金龙, 刘金明, 刘飞. 四川盆地灯影组酸压裂缝导流能力实验和模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 569-576.
[6]	盖长城,赵忠新,任路,颜艺灿,侯本峰. 中深层水热型地热资源集群式开发井位部署参数研究与应用——以HTC地热田为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 638-646.
[7]	陈学忠, 赵慧言, 陈满, 徐华卿, 杨建英, 杨晓敏, 唐慧莹. 海陆过渡相页岩储层合层开采数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 382-390.
[8]	张连锋,张伊琳,郭欢欢,李洪生,李俊杰,梁丽梅,李文静,胡书奎. 近废弃油藏延长生命周期开发调整技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[9]	张志升, 吴向阳, 吴倩, 王冀星, 林汉弛, 郭军红, 王锐, 李金花, 林千果. CO₂驱油封存泄漏风险管理系统及应用研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 91-101.
[10]	崔玉东, 陆程, 关子越, 罗万静, 滕柏路, 孟凡璞, 彭越. 南海海域天然气水合物降压开采储层蠕变对气井产能影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[11]	何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[12]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[13]	施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 朱诗杰, 朱珊珊. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432.
[14]	李士伦,汤勇,段胜才,秦佳正,陈一诺,刘雅昕,郑鹏,赵国庆. CO₂地质封存源汇匹配及安全性评价进展 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 269-297.
[15]	陈秀林, 王秀宇, 许昌民, 张聪. 基于核磁共振与微观数值模拟的CO₂埋存形态及分布特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.