龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.05.011

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 636-646.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.05.011

龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究

侯大力^1,^2,³(),韩鑫^2,⁵,唐洪明¹,郭建春⁴,龚凤鸣²,孙雷⁴,强贤宇²

1.西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院，四川成都 610500
2.成都理工大学能源学院，四川成都 610059
3.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室（成都理工大学），四川成都 610059
4.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室（西南石油大学），四川成都 610500
5.中国石油长庆油田第四采油厂，陕西榆林 718599

收稿日期:2022-08-10 出版日期:2023-10-26 发布日期:2023-11-01
作者简介:侯大力（1983—），男，博士，副教授，主要从事油气藏流体相态、注CO₂提高采收率及CO₂埋存、油气藏数值模拟等方面研究。地址：四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号，邮政编码：610059。E-mail：houdali08@163.com
基金资助:
中国博士后基金项目“高温高压下CO₂-近临界原油-地层水三相相平衡表征模型”(2017M612995);四川省科技厅应用基础研究项目“储层条件超临界CO₂压裂液-页岩气-页岩多相相互作用复杂机理研究”(2021YJ0352);油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室自由探索项目“储层条件超临界CO₂-地层水-页岩气-页岩多相相互作用复杂机理研究”(CZ201910)

Primary research on expression of kerogen in Longmaxi Shale and its adsorption characteristics

HOU Dali^1,^2,³(),HAN Xin^2,⁵,TANG Hongming¹,GUO Jianchun⁴,GONG Fengming²,SUN Lei⁴,QIANG Xianyu²

1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
4. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
5. No.4 Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield, Petrochina, Yulin, Shaanxi 718599, China

Received:2022-08-10 Online:2023-10-26 Published:2023-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

吸附气是页岩气赋存在页岩中的主要方式之一，而且吸附气是页岩气后期产量的主要来源。吸附气主要赋存在页岩有机质干酪根和黏土矿物中，而有机质干酪根中吸附比例较大。因此，研究页岩有机质干酪根的特征及其吸附机理对页岩气开发有重要作用。以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩干酪根为研究对象，通过固体核磁共振谱分析实验、傅里叶变换红外光谱（FTIR）分析实验、X射线光电子能谱（XPS）实验相结合的方法表征干酪根的微观结构，构建了干酪根的分子结构模型。利用磁悬浮重量法实验、巨正则系综蒙特卡洛（GCMC）和分子动力学（MD）的分子模拟方法，分析CH₄在龙马溪组页岩干酪根的吸附机理及特征。研究结果表明：龙马溪组页岩实验样品干酪根的分子式为C₂₃₇H₂₁₉O₂₁N₅S₄；CH₄在干酪根中的超额吸附量随着压力的增加先升高后降低；相同孔径和压力条件下，随着温度的升高，CH₄的超额吸附量和总气量逐渐变小；干酪根中的C原子和S原子是造成CH₄吸附的主要原因；靠近干酪根孔壁的CH₄呈现吸附态，远离干酪根孔壁的CH₄呈现游离态，随着孔径的增加，CH₄密度的两峰之间的距离逐渐变宽，峰值逐渐下降。

关键词: 页岩干酪根, 分子结构, 吸附特征, 分子模拟, 龙马溪组

Abstract:

Adsorbed gas represents a primary mode of shale gas occurrence and is a major source of shale gas production in the later stages of development. It primarily resides within the organic kerogen and clay minerals of shale formations, with organic kerogen being the dominant host. Consequently, the study of organic kerogen characteristics and its adsorption mechanisms is crucial for understanding shale gas development. In this paper, the kerogen of Longmaxi Shale in the Sichuan Basin is taken as the research object. The microstructure of kerogen is expressed by combining methods through the solid-state NMR experiment, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy experiment, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy experiment, and the molecular structure model of kerogen is constructed. The adsorption mechanism and characteristics of CH₄ in kerogen of Longmaxi Shale are analyzed by magnetic levitation weight experiment, molecular simulation methods of the Grand Canonical Monte Carlo（GCMC）, and Molecular Dynamics（MD）. The results show that the molecular formula of the kerogen of shale experimental sample of Longmaxi Formation is C₂₃₇H₂₁₉O₂₁N₅S₄. The excess adsorption gas volume of CH₄ in kerogen increase first and then decreased with the increase of pressure. Under the same pore size and pressure, the excess adsorption gas volume and total gas volume of CH₄ decrease with the increase in temperature. The C and S atoms in kerogen are the main cause of CH₄ adsorption. The CH₄ near the kerogen pore wall presents an adsorption state, while the CH₄ far from the kerogen pore wall presents a free state. As the pore size increase, the distance between the two peaks of CH₄ density gradually increases, and the peak value decreases gradually.

Key words: shale kerogen, molecular structure, adsorption characteristics, molecular simulation, Longmaxi Formation

中图分类号:

TE377

侯大力, 韩鑫, 唐洪明, 郭建春, 龚凤鸣, 孙雷, 强贤宇. 龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 636-646.

HOU Dali, HAN Xin, TANG Hongming, GUO Jianchun, GONG Fengming, SUN Lei, QIANG Xianyu. Primary research on expression of kerogen in Longmaxi Shale and its adsorption characteristics[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 636-646.

图/表 18

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

长宁地区龙马溪组页岩干酪根骨架参数"

骨架参数	物理意义	定义	小数
$f a l$	脂化度	$f a l M + f a l A + f a l B + f a l H + f a l D + f a l O$	0.153 6
$f a r$	芳香度	$f a r A + f a r H + f a r B + f a r C + f a r O$	0.673 6
$X B P$	桥周比	$f a r B / f a r A + f a r H + f a r C + f a r O$	0.160 0
BI	脂肪分支系数	$f a l D + C H - O / f a l$	0.140 0
δ	芳香取代度	$1 - f a r H / f a r$	0.270 0

表2

图4

图5

表3

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

参考文献 29

[1]	张金川, 徐波, 聂海宽, 等. 中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(6): 136-140.
	ZHANG Jinchuan, XU Bo, NIE Haikuan, et al. Exploration potential of shale gas resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(6): 136-140.
[2]	刘伟新, 卢龙飞, 叶德燎, 等. 川东南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气异常压力封存箱剖析与形成机制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 804-814.
	LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, YE Deliao, et al. Significance and Formation mechanism of abnormally pressured compartments of shale gas in the Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 804-814.
[3]	胡凯. 川西南威远地区五峰—龙马溪组页岩储层特征及甜点分布规律研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, 8(5): 34-44.
	HU Kai. Reservoir and sweet pot distribution characteristics of shale gas in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, southwest of Sichuan Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(5): 34-44.
[4]	CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1921-1938.
[5]	LIU Y, LIU S M, ZHANG R, et al. The molecular model of Marcellus shale kerogen: Experimental characterization and structure reconstruction[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2021, 246: 1-18.
[6]	王擎, 程枫, 潘朔. 油页岩干酪根化学键浓度与能量密度研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017, 45(10): 1209-1218.
	WANG Qing, CHENG Feng, PAN Shuo. Chemical bond concentration and energy density of oil shale kerogen[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(10): 1209-1218.
[7]	黄亮. 基于分子模拟的页岩气多组分竞争吸附机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.
	HUANG Liang. Molecular simulation study on competitive adsorption mechanism of multi-components in shale gas reservoir[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2020.
[8]	WANG X Y, HAN X X, YOU Y L, et al. Molecular characterization of Dachengzi oil shale kerogen by multidimensional solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy[J]. Fuel, 2021, 303(6): 1-9.
[9]	CHAREONSUPPANIMIT P, MOHAMMAD S A, ROBINSON R L, et al. High-pressure adsorption of gases on shales: Measurements and modeling[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 95: 34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.02.005
[10]	闫建萍, 张同伟, 李艳芳, 等. 页岩有机质特征对甲烷吸附的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5): 805-811.
	YAN Jianping, ZHANG Tongwei, LI Yanfang, et al. Effect of the organic matter characteristics on methane adsorption in shale[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5): 805-811.
[11]	RAJPUT V, ERTEKIN T. Thermodynamically-consistent modeling of adsorption in liquid-rich shales[C]// Paper SPE-169589-MS presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, April 2014.
[12]	翟常博, 邓模, 曹清古, 等. 川东地区上二叠统龙潭组泥页岩基本特征及页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 921-932.
	ZHAI Changbo, DENG Mo, CAO Qinggu, et al. Basic characteristics and exploration potential of shale gas in Longtan Formation of Upper Permian in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 921-932.
[13]	李腾飞, 田辉, 肖贤明, 等. 样品粒径对高过成熟度页岩低压气体吸附实验结果的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1271-1284.
	LI Tengfei, TIAN Hui, XIAO Xianming, et al. The effect of particle size on low pressure gas adsorption experiments for high-maturity shale[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(9): 1271-1284.
[14]	CHEN L, LIU K Y, JIANG S, et al. Effect of adsorbed phase density on the correction of methane excess adsorption to absolute adsorption in shale[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 420: 1-13.
[15]	KATTI D, THAPA K, KATTI K S. Modeling molecular interactions of sodium montmorillonite clay with 3D kerogen models[J]. Fuel, 2017, 199: 641-652. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.021
[16]	许晨曦, 薛海涛, 李波宏, 等. 页岩气在矿物孔隙中的微观吸附机理差异性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 79-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.04.012
	XU Chenxi, XUE Haitao, LI Bohong, et al. Microscopic adsorption mechanism difference in the mineral pore of shale gas reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoir, 2020, 27(4): 79-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.04.012
[17]	任俊豪, 任晓海, 宋海强, 等. 基于分子模拟的纳米孔内甲烷吸附与扩散特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1366-1375. doi: 10.7623/syxb202011006
	REN Junhao, REN Xiaohai, SONG Haiqiang, et al. Adsorption and diffusion characteristics of methane in nanopores based on molecular simulation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(11): 1366-1375. doi: 10.7623/syxb202011006
[18]	BABATUNDE K A, BEGASH B, MOJID M R, et al. Molecular simulation study of CO₂/CH₄ adsorption on realistic heterogeneous shale surfaces[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 543(3): 1-11.
[19]	石钰, 杨晓娜, 李树刚, 等. 含水量对干酪根中多组分气体吸附和扩散的影响: 分子模拟研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 36(4): 50-57.
	SHI Yu, YANG Xiaona, LI Shugang, et al. Effect of moisture on adsorption and diffusion of multi-component gas in kerogen: A molecular simulation study[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 36(4): 50-57.
[20]	石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会. 沉积岩中干酪根分离方法: GB/T 19144—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010: 1-3.
	Professional Standardization Committee of Petroleum Geology Exploration. Isolation method for kerogen from sedimentary rock: GB/T 19144—2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2010: 1-3.
[21]	国家能源局. 透射光—荧光干酪根显微组分鉴定及类型划分方法: SY/T 5125-2014[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2014.
	National Energy Administration.Method of identification microscopically the maceral of kerogen and indivision the kerogen type by transmitted-light and fluorescence: SY/T 5125—2014[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2014.
[22]	JACOB H. Classification, structure, genesis and practical importance of natural solid oil bitumen (“migrabitumen”)[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1989, 11(1): 65-79. doi: 10.1016/0166-5162(89)90113-4
[23]	谢国梁, 刘树根, 焦堃, 等. 受显微组分控制的深层页岩有机质孔隙: 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组有机质组分分类及其孔隙结构特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(9): 23-34.
	XIE Guoliang, LIU Shugen, JIAO Kun, et al. Organic pores in deep shale controlled by macerals: Classification and pore characteristics of organic matter components in Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(9): 23-34.
[24]	王笑奇. 长宁地区五峰—龙马溪组页岩气成藏过程及富集机制研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2021.
	WANG Xiaoqi. Study on shale gas accumulation process and enrichment mechanism of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Changning area[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2021.
[25]	吴小奇, 周小进, 陈迎宾, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组烃源岩分子地球化学特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 854-865.
	WU Xiaoqi, ZHOU Xiaojin, CHEN Yingbin, et al. Molecular characteristics of source rocks in Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation, western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 854-865.
[26]	邹雨, 王国建, 卢丽, 等. 纳米孔隙中页岩气扩散模拟实验和数学模型分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 844-854.
	ZOU Yu, WANG Guojian, LU Li, et al. Simulation experiment and mathematical model analysis for shale gas diffusion in nano-scale pores[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 844-854.
[27]	李鹏飞. 基于分子模拟研究深部煤储层孔隙结构和吸附特征——以大宁—吉县地区煤层为例[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019.
	LI Pengfei. Pore structural characterization and adsorption properties of deep coal reservoir based on molecular simulation: A case study from Daning-Jixian District coalbed[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2019.
[28]	鲁中灯, 刘岩, 陈祖林, 等. 烃源岩抽提物中藿烷分子碳同位素分析新方法及指示意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 288-294.
	LU Zhongdeng, LIU Yan, CHEN Zulin, et al. An improved method and indications for the compound specific isotopic analysis of hopanes in source rock extracts[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 288-294.
[29]	陈彦鄂, 张志荣, GREENWOOD Paul. 油气包裹体分子组成的热释—色谱—质谱分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 915-920.
	CHEN Yan'e, ZHANG Zhirong, GREENWOOD Paul. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses of oil-bearing fluid inclusions composition[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 915-920.

碳官能团	面积分数/%
脂甲基	2.31
芳甲基	1.41
脂C（2）碳	2.90
亚甲基	2.47
次甲基，季sp³碳	0.77
氧—亚甲基	1.37
氧—次甲基	1.43
氧—脂肪环	2.70
氧—芳香环	1.45
质子化芳香碳	48.95
桥联芳香碳	9.13
支链芳香碳	5.36
氧—芳香碳	2.47
羧基，羰基	17.29

元素	归属	结合能/eV	面积分数/%
C1s	C—C，C—H	284.6	55.90
	C—O，C—OH	285.4	20.40
	C=O	287.1	6.60
	O—C=O	288.5	17.10
F1s	F^-	684.4	100.00
N1s	吡啶	398.8	6.50
	吡咯	400.2	64.60
	季氮	401.7	24.50
	氮氧化物	403.0	2.30
S2p	噻吩型硫	162.4	30.16
	亚砜型硫	165.4	33.47
	砜型硫	168.6	36.37

龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究

Primary research on expression of kerogen in Longmaxi Shale and its adsorption characteristics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李京昌, 卢婷, 聂海宽, 冯动军, 杜伟, 孙川翔, 李王鹏. 威荣地区WY23平台页岩气层裂缝地震检测可信度评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[2]	薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发——以四川盆地东南缘地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[3]	王典林, 杨琼, 魏兵, 戢炳鑫, 辛军, 孙琳. 甜菜碱型表面活性剂结构对CO₂泡沫液膜性质的影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 313-321.
[4]	赵仁文,肖佃师,卢双舫,周能武. 高—过成熟陆相断陷盆地页岩与海相页岩储层特征对比——以徐家围子断陷沙河子组和四川盆地龙马溪组为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 52-63.
[5]	向雪妮,黄亮,周文,邹杰,张卓雅. 基于分子模拟的气体水合物结构特征及储气特性研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 825-832.
[6]	蒋恕,李醇,陈国辉,郭彤楼,吴聿元,何希鹏,高玉巧,张培先. 中美常压页岩气赋存状态及其对可动性与产量的影响——以彭水和阿巴拉契亚为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 399-406.
[7]	刘雨林,范凌霄,房大志,彭勇民,曾联波,冯动军. 源—储分类新方法在川东地区页岩气井产量分析中的应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 429-436.
[8]	李晶辉,韩鑫,黄思婧,余洋阳,强贤宇,顾康福,侯大力. 页岩干酪根吸附规律的分子模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 455-461.
[9]	张成林,杨学锋,赵圣贤,张鉴,邓飞涌,何沅翰,张德良,王高翔,钟光海. 川南自贡区块页岩储层最佳靶体优选 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 496-505.
[10]	刘树根, 冉波, 叶玥豪, 王世玉, 杨迪, 罗超, 韩雨樾, 宋金民, 张旋. 贵州习水骑龙村奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组剖面 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 10-28.
[11]	高玉巧,刘娜娜,张培先,何贵松,高全芳. 重庆市綦江区页岩地质特征及其对页岩气勘探的启示 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 119-129.
[12]	杜伟,彭勇民,龙胜祥,聂海宽,孙川翔,塔力哈尔·叶尔哈孜. 黔北道真巴渔剖面五峰组—龙马溪组页岩地质特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 130-138.
[13]	湛小红,陈学辉,刘超,何文斌,张志平. 重庆武隆五峰组—龙马溪组一段天生剖面特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 150-159.
[14]	刘若冰,魏祥峰,刘珠江,燕继红,袁桃,魏富彬. JY1井五峰组—龙马溪组钻井地质剖面分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 47-57.
[15]	熊亮,董晓霞,赵勇,魏力民,王同,王岩. 四川盆地华蓥山五峰组—龙马溪组剖面特征及其勘探意义 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 58-67.