渝东南地区南川区块膝折构造模式解析

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.03.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，南川区块逆冲推覆构造带下志留统龙马溪组页岩气勘探开发取得重大突破。截至2022年底，南川区块已完钻170口井，累计产气量51.6×10⁸ m³。随着滚动开发的逐步推进，开发区域也由主体构造简单区向两翼构造复杂区过渡，前期的构造解释方案将南川区块各构造单元解释为大断距逆断层夹持的断背斜，并没有深入分析整个构造带的构造变形特征，因此，近年部署的几口扩边评价井存在较大的井震矛盾，造成了多口井的钻探失利，限制了页岩气开发产建的进程。综合前期钻探认识及正演模拟分析，认为南川区块龙马溪组地震剖面上显示的大断距高角度逆冲断层多为构造假象，断裂区多为高陡膝折构造，断距小、地层陡。通过高陡构造假象分析与识别，结合断层相关褶皱理论完善解释成果，井震联合构造建模逐步落实了南川区块龙马溪组气藏的构造特征，进而提出了高陡膝折带是龙马溪组页岩气勘探开发的潜在有利目标,在此基础上部署的5口评价井，均取得了较好的测试效果。

关键词: 井震矛盾, 断展褶皱, 膝折带, 构造假象, 地震正演

Abstract:

Significant progress has been made in the exploration and development of shale gas within the Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation of the thrust-nappe tectonic belt in the Nanchuan block. By the end of 2022, this area saw the drilling of 170 wells, achieving a cumulative gas production of 51.6 billion cubic meters. As development has progressed, the focus has shifted from the structurally simpler main area to the more complex peripheral regions. Previously, the structural interpretation of the Nanchuan block primarily identified faulted anticlines constrained by major reverse faults, without adequately addressing the structural deformation across the entire belt. Recent evaluations have revealed significant discrepancies between well data and seismic interpretations, leading to numerous drilling failures and hindering further shale gas development. This study revisits these challenges using advanced drilling insights and forward modeling analysis. It suggests that the apparent thrust faults with large displacements and high angles in the seismic profiles of the Longmaxi formation are likely structural misinterpretations, rather than true geological features. Instead, the fault areas are characterized by high-steep knee-fold structures with smaller fault distances and steeply inclined strata. By integrating high and steep structural illusion analysis with fault-related fold theory, the well-seismic joint structural modeling has been refined to better represent the structural characteristics of the Longmaxi formation gas reservoir in the Nanchuan block. This improved understanding has identified the high-steep knee fold zone as a potentially favorable target for further exploration and development, supported by positive results from five recently deployed evaluation well groups.

Key words: well-seismic contradiction, faulted fold, knee fold belt, structural illusion, seismic forward modeling

中图分类号:

TE377

倪锋,朱峰,孟庆利. 渝东南地区南川区块膝折构造模式解析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 373-381.

NI Feng,ZHU Feng,MENG Qingli. Analysis of knee fold structure model in Nanchuan Block of southeastern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 373-381.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

表1

参考文献 28

[1]	贾小乐, 何登发. 川东南褶皱带西山背斜构造解析与运动学模拟[J]. 新疆石油地质(自然科学版), 2014, 35(6): 652-658.
	JIA Xiaole, HE Dengfa. Structural analysis and kinematics simulation of Xishan anticline in southeast folded belt, Sichuan Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 35(6): 652-658.
[2]	张旭亮, 刘珠江, 陈超, 等. 高陡复杂构造带深层页岩气保存条件差异性分析——以川东南綦江高陡复杂构造带为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(6): 1121-1131.
	ZHANG Xuliang, LIU Zhujiang, CHEN Chao, et al. Differences in preservation conditions of deep shale gas in high-steep complex tectonic belt: Taking Qijiang high-steep complex tectonic belt in southeast Sichuan as an example[J]. Petroleum geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(6): 1121-1131.
[3]	庹秀松, 陈孔全, 罗顺社, 等. 四川盆地东南缘齐岳山断裂构造特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027.
	TUO Xiusong, CHEN Kongquan, LUO Shunshe, et al. Structural characteristics of Qiyueshan Fault and shale gas preservation at the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027.
[4]	李楠, 洪海涛, 李国辉, 等. 四川盆地高陡构造区凉高山组页岩油气地质特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(4): 86-95. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.04.011
	LI Nan, HONG Haitao, LI Guohui, et al. Geological characteristics of shale oil and gas of Lianggaoshan Formation in high-steep structural zone, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(4): 86-95. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.04.011
[5]	郭卫星, 唐建明, 欧阳嘉穗, 等. 四川盆地南部构造变形特征及其与页岩气保存条件的关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5): 11-19.
	GUO Weixing, TANG Jianming, OUYANG Jiasui, et al. Characteristics of structural deformation in the southern Sichuan Basin and its relationship with the storage condition of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 11-19.
[6]	杨玉娟. 南川地区QQ-1井龙马溪组下部页岩储层有机质发育特征精细表征[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(6): 44-52.
	YANG Yujuan. Fine characterization of organic matter development characteristics of shale reservoir in the lower Longmaxi Formation in well QQ-1, Nanchuan Area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(6): 44-52.
[7]	孙斌, 张培先, 高全芳, 等. 川东南南川地区茅口组一段碳酸盐岩储层特征及富集模式[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(3): 21-31.
	SUN Bin, ZHANG Peixian, GAO Quanfang, et al. Reservoir properties and accumulation mode of carbonate rocks in Mao1 Member of Nanchuan Area in southeast Sichuan[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(3): 21-31.
[8]	蒋晓光, 李雅彬, 杨智仁. 川东高陡构造的深度偏移应用研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2003, 23(6): 73-76.
	JIANG Xiaoguang, LI Yabin, YANG Zhiren. Application research on depth migration of the steeply-folded structure in east Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2003, 23(6): 73-76.
[9]	王立德, 王小卫, 周辉, 等. 一种基于改进共轭梯度法的弹性波全波形反演速度分层建模方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 61-69.
	WANG Lide, WANG Xiaowei, ZHOU Hui, et al. A layered velocity modeling method for elastic wave full waveform inversion based on improved conjugate gradient method[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4): 61-69.
[10]	梁顺军, 彭更新, 杨洪德, 等. 库车与川东高陡复杂构造地震勘探的可比性[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2005, 10(5): 28-35.
	LIANG Shunjun, PENG Gengxin, YANG Hongde, et al. Comparison of seismic exploration for steep-dipping complex structure in Kuqa area with eastern Sichuan area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2005, 10(5): 28-35.
[11]	刘明, 李彦婧, 潘兰, 等. 南川地区页岩储层构造裂缝特征及其定量预测[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(3): 8-14.
	LIU Ming, LI Yanjing, PAN Lan, et al. Structural fracture characteristics and quantitative prediction of shale reservoir in Nanchuan Area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(3): 8-14.
[12]	梁顺军, 梁顺彬. 高陡背斜地震剖面高点偏离问题分析及其校正[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2001, 36(1): 105-114.
	LIANG Shunjun, LIANG Shunbin. Analysis of height departure and its correction in seismic section with high dipping anticline[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2001, 36(1): 105-114.
[13]	梁顺军, 谢会文, 皮学军, 等. 高陡构造地震勘探圈闭要素畸变分析[J]. 石油物探, 2001, 40(4): 34-42.
	LIANG Shunjun, XIE Huiwen, PI Xuejun, et al. Analysis of trap factor distortions in seismic survey in areas with steep dip structures[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2001, 40(4): 34-42.
[14]	符力耘, 肖又军, 孙伟家, 等. 库车坳陷复杂高陡构造地震成像研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(6): 1985-2001.
	FU Liyun, XIAO Youjun, SUN Weijia, et al. Seismic imaging studies of complex high and steep structures in Kuqa depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(6): 1985-2001.
[15]	梁顺军, 梁霄, 陈江力, 等. 山地复杂构造倒转背斜地震剖面反射特征及油气成藏分析[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(3): 377-390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.03.011
	LIANG Shunjun, LIANG Xiao, CHEN Jiangli, et al. Seismic reflection features and analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation of reversed anticlines in complicated mountainous areas[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(3): 377-390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.03.011
[16]	曾庆才, 曾同生, 欧阳永林, 等. 盐下高陡构造成像技术——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深地区为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(6): 871-879. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.06.04
	ZENG Qingcai, ZENG Tongsheng, OUYANG Yonglin, et al. Subsalt high steep structure imaging technique: A case study of Keshen area in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(6): 871-879. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.06.04
[17]	梁瀚, 冉崎, 狄贵东, 等. 川西北地区双鱼石区块栖霞组膝折褶皱的发现及其油气意义[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(4): 1-7.
	LIANG Han, RAN Qi, DI Guidong, et al. Kink folds discovered in Qixia Formation of the buried structural belt, northwestern Sichuan Basin: Their significance to oil and gas[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(4): 1-7.
[18]	西洛郎杰, 王根厚, 曾庆高, 等. 西藏冈底斯中段南缘叶巴岩群膝折构造及其地质意义[J]. 地质力学学报, 2022, 28(3): 338-352.
	XILUO Langjie, WANG Genhou, ZENG Qinggao, et al. The kinks of the Yeba Group in the southern margin of the central Gangdese of Tibet and its geological significance[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 28(3): 338-352.
[19]	张波, 李生福, 张进江, 等. 膝褶、膝褶带、共轭膝褶带——一种可能的新型油气构造样式[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(2): 32-39.
	ZHANG Bo, LI Shengfu, ZHANG Jinjiang, et al. Kink, kink-band and conjugate kink-band: A probably potential new type of structural trap[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(2): 32-39.
[20]	裴仰文, 盛受政, 苗正硕, 等. 多滑脱层构造物理模拟试验及其对川东褶皱带形成演化的指示意义[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2): 38-49.
	PEI Yangwen, SHENG Shouzheng, MIAO Zhengshuo, et al. Sandbox physical modelling with multiple detachment layers and its implication on structural evolution of East Sichuan Fold Belt[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(2): 38-49.
[21]	张荣虎, 魏国齐, 王珂, 等. 前陆冲断带构造逆冲推覆作用与岩石响应特征——以库车坳陷东部中-下侏罗统为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2021, 37(7): 2256-2270.
	ZHANG Ronghu, WEI Guoqi, WANG Ke, et al. Tectonic thrust nappe activity and sandstone rock response characteristics in foreland thrust belt: A case study of Middle and Lower Jurassic,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(7): 2256-2270.
[22]	杨恒林, 吕嘉昕, 谭鹏, 等. 基于三维扫描技术的页岩暂堵压裂物理模拟实验[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(1): 118-123.
	YANG Henglin, LYU Jiaxin, TAN Peng, et al. Physical simulation experiment on shale temporary plugging and fracturing based on 3D scanning technology[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(1): 118-123.
[23]	耿夏童, 邢凤存, 闫海军. 四川盆地磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段储层特征及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 126-140.
	GENG Xiatong, XING Fengcun, YAN Haijun, et al. Reservoir characteristics of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation and its implications for oil and gas exploration in Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 126-140
[24]	何顺, 秦启荣, 范存辉, 等. 川东南丁山地区页岩气保存条件分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2): 24-31.
	HE Shun, QIN Qirong, FAN Cunhui, et al. Shale gas preservation conditions in Dingshan area, Southeastern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(2): 24-31.
[25]	张梦琳, 李郭琴, 何嘉, 等. 川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
	ZHANG Menglin, LI Guoqin, HE Jia, et al. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure, southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 141-151.
[26]	葛忠伟, 欧阳嘉穗, 蔡文轩, 等. 高陡复杂构造带页岩气水平井方位优选——以永川页岩气区块五峰—龙马溪组为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, 8(3): 111-117.
	GE Zhongwei, OUYANG Jiasui, CAI Wenxuan, et al. Orientation optimization of shale gas horizontal wells in high steep complex structural belt—Taking Wufeng—Longmaxi Formation in Yongchuan shale gas block as an example[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(3): 111-117.
[27]	谢格云, 胡欣, 王旭丽, 等. 龙门山北段推覆构造带—山前带构造解析及油气勘探前景[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2023, 46(1): 11-18. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2023.01.002
	XIE Geyun, HU Xin, WANG Xuli, et al. Structural analysis and exploration prospects of nappe-piedmont structural belt in northern Longmenshan area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2023, 46(1): 11-18. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2023.01.002
[28]	梁顺军, 段杰, 彭业君, 等. 逆冲断褶带大断层下盘层间褶皱特征及油气成藏——以库车克拉苏构造带和龙门山构造带北段油气勘探为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2021, 14(4): 1-8.
	LIANG Shunjun, DUAN Jie, PENG Yejun, et al. Characteristics of interlayer folds and hydrocarbon accumulation under footwall of thrust fault-fold zones: A case study of hydrocarbon exploration in the Kuqakelasu thrust-and-fold belts and northern sections of Longmen Mountain[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2021, 14(4): 1-8.

井名	有效水平段长/m	测试稳定套压/MPa	测试稳定产气量/ （10⁴ m³/d）
SY20-1HF	665	21.37	6.02
SY20-2HF	405	23.28	12.78
-3HF	961	20.94	18.53
SY20-4HF	1 192	19.40	9.30
SY1-5HF	1 443	17.16	17.50
平均值	1 753	12.33	10.91