超临界CO2萃取致密油的数值模拟研究

Abstract

Abstract:

The huff and puff operation by CO₂ extraction can overcome the production and development problems of tight reservoirs which are difficult to form effective displacement. Crude oil fractions were divided by PVTi module, and the pseudo-component properties of formation crude oil could be obtained by combining with the expansion experimental data of CO₂ injection. Relevant factors affecting the extraction of tight oil by CO₂ were studied by CFD simulation. The results showed that supercritical CO₂ mainly extracted the light components of crude oil in porous media, especially those below C₁₅₊. The higher injection pressure was, and the more CO₂ was injected, the stronger the solubility of crude oil would be, and it could enhance the extraction of heavy components. Meanwhile, the increase of CO₂ injection could also promote the retention of CO₂ in porous media, which was conducive to CO₂ storage. With the increase of porosity, the extraction effect of CO₂ increased first and then decreased, and was still 44 % under the condition of lower porosity. The extraction of tight oil by CO₂ has a certain application prospect.

Key words: tight oil, CO₂, extraction, porous media, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

TE348

Leiting Shi,Shijie Zhu,Jie Ma, et al. Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 25-31.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 4

Fig. 3

Table 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 6

References 16

[1]	贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠 , 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(3):5-12.
[2]	王高峰, 郑雄杰, 张玉 , 等. 适合二氧化碳驱的低渗透油藏筛选方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(3):358-363.
[3]	郭冀隆 . 二氧化碳地质封存过程中CO₂—水—岩相互作用实验研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2017.
[4]	李孟涛, 单文文, 刘先贵 , 等. 超临界二氧化碳混相驱油机理实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006,27(3):80-83.
[5]	王鉴, 张楠, 武芹 , 等. 超临界CO₂溶解性能的研究进展[J]. 炼油与化工, 2011,22(5):1-5.
[6]	Okamoto Ikuo, Li Xiaochun, Ohsumi Takashi . Effect of supercritical CO₂ as the organic solvent on cap rock sealing performance for underground storage[J]. Energy, 2005,30(11):2344-2351. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2003.10.025
[7]	Cuiyu dong, BTodd Hoffman . Modeling gas injection into shale oil reservoirs in the Sanish Field, North Dakota[C]// paper URTEC-1581998-MS presented at the Technology ConferenceSource SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 12-14 August 2013, Denver, Colorado, USA.
[8]	Chengyao Song, Daoyong Yang . Performance evaluation of CO₂ huff-n-puff processes in tight oil formations[C]// paper SPE-167217-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, 5-7 November 2013, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
[9]	Yousefi S, Atrens A D, Sauret E . CFD convective flow simulation of the varying properties of CO₂-H₂O mixtures in geothermal systems[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2015: 1-8.
[10]	Qianlin zhu, Qianlong Zhou, Xiaochun Li . Numerical simulation of displacement characteristics of CO₂ injectedin pore-scale porous media[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016,8(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.08.004
[11]	Elena Fernandez, Deirdre Hugi-Cleary , M Victoria López-Ramón. Adsorption of phenol from dilute and concentrated aqueous solutions by activated carbons[J]. Langmuir, 2003,19(23):9719-9723. doi: 10.1021/la030137d
[12]	徐艳梅 . CO₂在多孔介质中的非平衡扩散理论与实验研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2008.
[13]	孙扬, 孟英峰, 练章华 , 等. 重馏分特征化对油气藏流体相态特征模拟计算的影响[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2009,2(2):39-43.
[14]	姜凤光, 胡永乐 . 二氧化碳驱地下流体相态特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014,21(6):90-92.
[15]	Karen Schou Pedersen, Peter L Christensen, Jawad Azeem Shaikh. Phase behavior of petroleum reservoir fluids[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
[16]	Ruina Xu, Peixue Jiang . Numerical simulation of fluid flow in microporous media[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008,29(5):1447-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.05.005

原油性质变化	物理变化	其他
降低原油黏度	原油体积膨胀	溶解气驱作用
改善原油与水的流度比	轻组分萃取、萃取作用	混相效应
降低油水间界面张力	分子扩散作用	提高地层渗透率

组分	摩尔组成/（mol%）	质量分数,%
C₅₊	30.264	5.128 1
C₁₀₊	14.222	5.455 3
C₁₅₊	9.850	6.045 9
C₂₀₊	14.488	11.601 0
C₂₅₊	17.432	24.599 0
C₃₀₊	13.744	47.170 7

组分	分子量	临界压力/MPa	临界温度/K	方程系数Ω_a	方程系数Ω_b	偏心因子	等张比容
CO₂	44.01	7.39	304.70	0.43	0.09	0.23	78.00
C₅₊	16.04	4.60	190.60	0.43	0.09	0.01	77.00
C₁₀₊	36.32	4.60	334.13	0.43	0.09	0.12	126.86
C₁₅₊	58.12	3.73	417.46	0.43	0.09	0.19	186.10
C₂₀₊	75.82	3.27	478.13	0.43	0.09	0.26	241.47
C₂₅₊	133.63	2.54	616.64	0.43	0.09	0.43	389.78
C₃₀₊	325.00	1.04	839.84	0.43	0.09	1.04	828.33

模拟编号	实验条件
模拟编号	温度/ ℃	压力/ MPa	孔隙度, %	渗透率/ 10^-3μm²	CO₂注入量, %
1	72	9.85	10	0.95	10
2	72	12.00	10	0.95	20
3	72	20.80	10	0.95	40
4	72	20.80	15	2.23	40
5	72	20.80	20	3.03	40
6	72	20.80	10	0.95	20
7	72	20.80	10	0.95	55
8	72	20.80	10	0.95	70

组分名称	孔隙度为10 %的质量/kg			孔隙度为15 %的质量/kg			孔隙度为20 %的质量/kg
组分名称	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量
C₅₊	0.056 6	0.000 2	0.056 4	0.059 1	0.000 2	0.059 0	0.063 3	0.000 2	0.063 1
C₁₀₊	0.060 1	0.004 3	0.055 8	0.062 8	0.004 4	0.058 5	0.067 2	0.004 5	0.062 7
C₁₅₊	0.066 7	0.010 9	0.055 8	0.069 8	0.011 0	0.058 8	0.074 6	0.011 4	0.063 2
C₂₀₊	0.128 0	0.080 4	0.047 6	0.133 7	0.080 8	0.052 9	0.143 1	0.083 7	0.059 4
C₂₅₊	0.271 4	0.234 9	0.036 5	0.283 6	0.236 2	0.047 4	0.303 4	0.244 5	0.058 8
C₃₀₊	0.520 3	0.492 2	0.028 1	0.543 9	0.495 0	0.048 8	0.581 7	0.512 5	0.069 2
CO₂	0.000 0	0.044 1		0.000 0	0.044 4		0.000 0	0.045 9
总质量	1.103 1	0.867 0		1.153	0.872		1.233 2	0.902 7

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

模拟条件	萃取后总质量/kg	初始原油质量/kg	萃取率, %	CO₂滞留量/kg
压力9.85 MPa	0.965 6	1.103 1	18.14	0.029 5
压力12.00 MPa	0.953 7	1.103 1	23.91	0.051 1
压力20.80 MPa	0.867 0	1.103 1	44.68	0.041 1
孔隙度10 %	0.867 0	1.103 1	44.68	0.041 1
孔隙度15 %	0.872 0	1.153 0	53.37	0.044 4
孔隙度20 %	0.902 7	1.233 2	51.43	0.045 9
CO₂注入量20 %	0.908 6	1.103 1	32.92	0.027 4
CO₂注入量55 %	1.015 8	1.103 1	45.15	0.156 7
CO₂注入量70 %	1.160 5	1.103 1	46.54	0.286 8

[1]	ZHANG Yi, NING Chongru, CHEN Yazhou, JI Yulong, ZHAO Liyang, WANG Aifang, HUANG Jingjing, YU Kaiyi. Huff-n-puff technology and parameter optimization of large displacement water injection in tight oil reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 727-733.
[2]	CAO Xiaopeng, LIU Haicheng, LI Zhongxin, CHEN Xianchao, JIANG Pengyu, FAN Hao. Optimization of huff-n-puff in shale oil horizontal wells based on EDFM [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 734-740.
[3]	LIAO Kai, ZHANG Shicheng, XIE Bobo. Simulation of reasonable shut-in time for shale oil after volume fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 749-755.
[4]	CHEN Xiang, WANG Guan, LIU Pingli, DU Juan, WANG Ming, CHEN Weihua, LI Jinlong, LIU Jinming, LIU Fei. Experimental and simulation study on fracture conductivity of acid-fracturing in Dengying Formation of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 569-576.
[5]	GAI Changcheng,ZHAO Zhongxin,REN Lu,YAN Yican,HOU Benfeng. Research and application of well location deployment parameters for cluster development of medium-deep hydrothermal geothermal resources: A case study of HTC geothermal field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 638-646.
[6]	CHEN Xuezhong, ZHAO Huiyan, CHEN Man, XU Huaqing, YANG Jianying, YANG Xiaomin, TANG Huiying. Numerical simulation of multi-layer co-production in marine-continental transitional shale reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 382-390.
[7]	MA Daixin,REN Xianjun,ZHAO Mifu,HAN Jiaoyan,LIU Yuhu. Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 167-175.
[8]	WU Caifang,GAO Bin,LI Qing,CHEN Zhenlong. Research progress of gas hydrate synthesis [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 267-276.
[9]	SHU Huawen. Key engineering technologies of one-million-ton CCUS transportation-injection-extraction in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 10-17.
[10]	ZHANG Lianfeng,ZHANG Yilin,GUO Huanhuan,LI Hongsheng,LI Junjie,LIANG Limei,LI Wenjing,HU Shukui. Development adjustment technology of extending life cycle for nearly-abandoned reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[11]	TANG Jiandong, WANG Zhilin, GE Zhengjun. CO₂ flooding technology and its application in Jiangsu Oilfield in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[12]	LI Jianshan, GAO Hao, YAN Changhao, WANG Shitou, WANG Liangliang. Molecular dynamics simulation on interaction mechanisms of crude oil and CO₂ [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 26-34.
[13]	DONG Lifei, DONG Wenzhuo, ZHANG Qi, ZHONG Pinzhi, WANG Miao, YU Bo, WEI Haiyu, YANG Chao. Optimal prediction method for CO₂ solubility in saline aquifers [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 35-41.
[14]	ZHANG Zhichao,BAI Mingxing,DU Siyu. Characteristics of pore dynamics in shale reservoirs by CO₂ flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[15]	WANG Jun,QIU Weisheng. Suitable conditions for CO₂ artificial gas cap flooding-sequestration in high water cut reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 48-54.

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO2

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂