多因素下多级交替注入酸液指进实验研究

Abstract

Abstract:

The evolution characteristics and the final shape of acid viscosity fingering are influenced by many engineering and geological factors. So that, we used the visual experimental device to explore the change rules under the multifactor. Six factors were considered, those are the concentration of acid, the injection series, the temperature, the construction displacement, the viscosity ratio of the liquid, and the inclination of crack. The fractal dimension and multifractal spectrum width were used to describe the morphological of fingering. It is concluded that the influence degree of each factor on fractal dimension from high to low is in the order of: viscosity ratio, injection series, temperature, acid concentration, construction displacement, and crack inclination. The influence degree of each factor on the multifractal spectrum width from high to low is in the order of: viscosity ratio, crack inclination, construction displacement, acid concentration, injection series, and temperature. In order to achieve the viscosity fingering of acid fracturing, the viscosity ratio should be increased to the value between 100∶1 and 150∶1, the controlled injection series are at level 2 to level 3, and the designed acid dosage is about 0.3. Meanwhile, a large number of pre-liquid was injected to reduce the crack wall's temperature before the acid injection.

Key words: acid fracturing, acid's fingering, physical simulation, fractal dimension, multifractal spectrum width

CLC Number:

TE319

Zhifeng Luo,Yang Yu,Liqiang Zhao, et al. Multifactorial experiment of acid's fingering phenomenon in the multi-stage alternating injection of acid fracturing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(4): 36-41.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 4

Fig. 7

Table 5

References 15

[1]	刘建坤, 蒋廷学, 周林波 , 等. 碳酸盐岩储层多级交替酸压技术研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2017,45(1):104-111. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201701018
[2]	Schafroth D, Goyal N, Meiburg E . Miscible displacements in Hele-Shaw cells: Nonmonotonic viscosity profiles[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 2007,26(3):444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2006.09.001
[3]	Nagatsu Y, Matsuda K, Kato Y , et al. Experimental study on miscible viscous fingering involving viscosity changes induced by variations in chemical species concentrations due to chemical reactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007,571:475-493. doi: 10.1017/S0022112006003636
[4]	Toussaint R, Løvoll G, Méheust Y , et al. Influence of pore-scale disorder on viscous fingering during drainage[J]. Euro Physics Letters, 2005,71(4):583-589. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2005-10136-9
[5]	Chen C Y, Wu H J . Fingering instabilities of a miscible magnetic droplet on a rotating Hele-Shaw cell[J]. Journal of Magnetism & Magnetic Materials, 2005,289:339-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.096
[6]	Muggeridge A H, Jackson M D, Agbehi O R , et al. Quantifying bypassed oil in the vicinity of discontinuous shales during gravity dominated flow[M]. 2002.
[7]	Obernauer S, Drazer G, Rosen M . Stable-unstable crossover in non-Newtonian radial Hele-Shaw flow[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2000,283(1):187-192.
[8]	Davies D R, Bosma M G R, De W. Development of field design rules for viscous fingering in acid fracturing treatments: A large-scale model study[C]// paper SPE-15772-MS presented at the Middle East Oil Show, 7-10 March 1987, Bahrain.
[9]	李小刚 . 酸压过程酸液指进模拟及分形特征研究[D]. 西南石油大学, 2006.
[10]	李小刚, 杨兆中, 陈锐 , 等. 前置液酸压缝中酸液指进的物模与分形研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,29(6):105-108. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2007.06.025
[11]	杨兆中, 李小刚, 蒋海 , 等. 指进现象模拟研究的回顾与展望[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,32(1):85-88. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.01.015
[12]	王洋, 袁清芸, 周珺 . 不同类型酸液指进可视化研究及应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2017,40(4):50-52.
[13]	李小刚, 宋瑞, 张汝生 , 等. 大尺寸可视化酸液指进模拟装置研制及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,39(2):153-162.
[14]	屈世显, 张建华 . 分形与分维及在地球物理学中的应用[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1991,33(2):8-13.
[15]	辛厚文 . 分形理论及其应用[M].中国科学技术大学出版社, 1993.

指标名称	符号	单位	定义	物理意义
分形维数	Daf	无因次	图像标度变换下的不变量	表征酸液填充裂缝空间的能力和整体的无序性、复杂性
多重分形谱宽度	Waf	无因次	多重分形奇异性指数极值之差	表征指进区域酸液分布不均匀程度,刻画不同层次、不同区域特性

模拟参数	酸压典型参数	室内试验参数
裂缝宽度/mm	5	1
裂缝高度/m	50	33
裂缝长度/m	100	1
流体黏度/（mPa·s）	10 ~ 250	10 ~ 250
酸液浓度,%	15 ~ 20	1 ~ 5
流体密度/（kg·m^-3）	1 050	1 050
实验排量/（m³·min^-1）	3 ~ 7	45 ~ 105 mL/min
实验温度/℃	150	30 ~ 90
射孔数/（孔/m）	16	15
注入级数	2 ~ 3	1 ~ 5

因素	注入级数	黏度比	倾角/°	温度/℃	排量/（mL·min^-1）	酸液浓度,%	分形维数	多重分形谱宽度
实验1	1	150	30	40	20	1	1.981 8	0.422 5
实验2	1	10	45	50	40	2	1.992 9	0.366 3
实验3	1	50	60	60	60	3	1.971 4	0.369 2
实验4	1	100	75	70	80	4	1.9689	0.355 9
实验5	1	200	90	80	100	5	1.978 7	0.403 4
实验6	2	150	45	60	80	5	1.956 5	0.409 7
实验7	2	10	60	70	100	1	1.991 3	0.364 7
实验8	2	50	75	80	20	2	1.987 7	0.375 7
实验9	2	100	90	40	40	3	1.951 7	0.360 3
实验10	2	200	30	50	60	4	1.912 2	0.426 9
实验11	3	150	60	80	40	4	1.962 7	0.401 7
实验12	3	10	75	40	60	5	1.971 9	0.364 3
实验13	3	50	90	50	80	1	1.984 1	0.364 7
实验14	3	100	30	60	100	2	1.957 4	0.375 2
实验15	3	200	45	70	20	3	1.940 7	0.410 2
实验16	4	150	75	50	100	3	1.899 9	0.395 5
实验17	4	10	90	60	20	4	1.993 7	0.357 5
实验18	4	50	30	70	40	5	1.978 6	0.376 7
实验19	4	100	45	80	60	1	1.934 0	0.406 2
实验20	4	200	60	40	80	2	1.933 6	0.400 9
实验21	5	150	90	70	60	2	1.960 1	0.388 6
实验22	5	10	30	80	80	3	1.988 9	0.349 9
实验23	5	50	45	40	100	4	1.974 5	0.374 2
实验24	5	100	60	50	20	5	1.953 1	0.376 7
实验25	5	200	75	60	40	1	1.900 9	0.410 2

影响因素		注入级数	黏度比	裂缝倾角/°	温度/℃	排量/（mL·min^-1）	酸液浓度,%
分形维数	VIP	0.93	2.17	0.09	0.56	0.21	0.24
分形维数	影响程度	0.22	0.52	0.02	0.13	0.05	0.06
多重分形谱宽度	VIP	0.12	2.29	0.76	0.02	0.32	0.23
多重分形谱宽度	影响程度	0.03	0.61	0.20	0.004	0.09	0.06

Multifactorial experiment of acid's fingering phenomenon in the multi-stage alternating injection of acid fracturing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 15

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	FAN Xibin,PU Wanfen,SHAN Jiangtao,DU Daijun,QIN Jianhua,GAO Yang. Feasibility of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ huff-n-puff in tight conglomerate reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 831-836.
[2]	HUANG Bo,LEI Lin,TANG Wenjia,XU Ningwei,XIONG Wei. Stimulation mechanism of self suspension proppant in sand-carrying fracturing by water [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 459-464.
[3]	XIA Haibang,BAO Kai,WANG Rui,XIONG Wei. Gelling acid fracturing experiment in Maokou marl formation of Nanchuan area [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 235-240.
[4]	ZHANG Xiaojing,LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo,LIANG Limei,GUO Linlin. Research on multi-stage heterogeneous flooding based on polymer flooding [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 90-95.
[5]	LEI Lin,ZHANG Longsheng,XIONG Wei. Acid fracturing technology of Maokou Formation in well-Dashi-1HF, southeastern Chongqing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 84-90.
[6]	CHEN Xiang,ZHAO Liqiang,LI Xiaofan,HU Binghua,HU Zhongtai,YAO Fengsheng. Volumetric acid fracturing technology of offshore tight sandstone gas reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 120-126.
[7]	LI Xiaogang,SHU Dongkun,ZHANG Ping,YANG Zhaozhong. Physical simulation of proppant transportation in artificial fractures of coal seam [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 39-44.
[8]	MA Dongmin,GAO Zheng,CHEN Yue,ZHANG Hui,SHAO Kai,ZHANG Zhicang,WU Xun,YANG Fu. Differences in methane adsorption and desorption characteristics of low, medium and high rank coal reservoirs at different temperatures [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 17-24.
[9]	ZHANG Nan,LU Xiangguo,LIU Jinxiang,GE Song,LIU Yigang,ZHANG Yunbao,LI Yanyue. Physical simulation experiment study on effect of profile modification in Bohai LD5-2 reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 119-124.
[10]	ZHANG Yunbao,LU Xiangguo,LIU Yigang,LI Yanyue,CAO Weijia,BAO Wenbo. Technical index evaluation of transport ability of profile control and displacement agents [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 96-103.
[11]	Zhifeng LUO,Lin WU,Liqiang ZHAO,Nanlin ZHANG,long CHENG,Dengfeng REN. Design method and application of temporary plugging by fiber and diverting acid fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 65-71.
[12]	GENG Yudi,ZHOU Linbo,WANG Yang,LI Chunyue. High conductivity acid fracturing technology in ultra-deep carbonate reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 56-60.
[13]	Zhang Yunbao,Xu Guorui,Zou Jian,Wang Nan,Jia Yongkang,Ge Song,Liu Jinxiang. Experimental study on water plugging effect and influence factors of three phase foam system [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 44-49.
[14]	Zhao Liqiang,Miao Weijie,Luo Zhifeng,Gong Yunlei,Wang Peng,Li Qiyang. Simulation study on conductivity of closed acid cracks [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 25-32.
[15]	Cao Weijia,Lu Xiangguo,Zhang Yunbao,Xu Guorui,Li Xiang. Study on water plugging effect and mechanism of starch graft copolymer gel [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 44-50.