Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 292-301.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.02.004
• Tight Gas Exploration • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-09-09
Online:
2022-05-07
Published:
2022-04-26
CLC Number:
Zhaopu GAO. Sedimentary micro-facies and gas bearing property of He2+3 Member in Shiguhao gas area, northern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 292-301.
Table 1
Lithofacies types of Lower Shihezi Formation in Shiguhao gas area"
岩性 | 岩相类型 | 代码 | 特征 | 沉积相 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
砾岩 | 牵引流 | 正砾岩相 | Gms | 颗粒支撑、砂质充填、层理发育、砾石定向 | 辫流水道 |
洪水泥石流 | 副砾岩相 | Gmms | 杂基支撑;泥、砂、砾混杂堆积 | ||
含砾粗砂岩 | Scfg | 含砾粗砂,砾石含量大于15 %,常有漂砾;正反韵律,递变层理 | 心滩 | ||
中粗 砂岩 | 牵引流 | 块状层理粗砂岩相 | Sgm | 层理构造不明显、牵引流中高水流能量的特征 | 心滩 |
平行层理、牵引流高水流能量特征 | |||||
平行层理中粗砂岩相 | Sp | 平行层理、牵引流高水流能量特征 | |||
槽状交错层理发育,主要反映牵引流中高水流能量的特征 | 辫流水道、 心滩顶部 | ||||
槽状交错层理中粗砂岩相 | St | 槽状交错层理发育,主要反映牵引流中高水流能量的特征 | |||
板状交错层理中粗砂岩相 | Spl | 板状交错层理,牵引流中高水流能量 | |||
粉细砂岩 (牵引流) | 平行层理中细砂岩相 | Sh | 高流态流体越过心滩顶部,使得沙丘平面迁移,一般存在于垂向加积作用形成的心滩中 | 辫流水道、 心滩顶部 | |
块状层理细砂岩相 | Sfm | 层理不明显,以细砂岩为主,中低水流快速沉积 | |||
波状—水平层理粉细砂岩相 | Sfw、Sfh | 泥质含量较高、波状层理、部分位置发育水平层理,反映低水流能量的特征 | 辫流水道、 河漫沉积 | ||
粉砂岩相 | 水平层理泥质粉砂岩相 | Fh | 水平层理,水动力较弱 | 辫流水道、 河漫沉积 | |
沙纹层理粉砂岩、 泥质粉砂岩相 | Fl | 沙纹层理,水动力弱 | 河漫沉积 | ||
块状层理粉砂岩、 泥质粉砂岩相 | Fm | 块状层理,水动力弱 | |||
泥岩 | 泥岩相 | M | 深灰色、褐色,页理不发育,部分泥岩较为破碎 | 河漫沉积 |
Table 2
Statistical table of physical properties of different sedimentary microfacies of Lower Shihezi Formation in Shiguhao gas area"
沉积微相 | 盒2-1 | 盒2-2 | 盒3-1 | 盒2+3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3 μm2) | 孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3 μm2) | 孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3 μm2) | 孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3 μm2) | ||||
辫流水道 | 7.75 | 3.32 | 5.69 | 5.01 | 7.81 | 5.18 | 7.08 | 4.50 | |||
心滩 | 11.87 | 4.36 | 10.37 | 4.78 | 11.83 | 5.29 | 11.36 | 4.81 | |||
河漫沉积 | 1.45 | 0.27 | 1.02 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
[1] | 朱红涛, 徐长贵, 朱筱敏, 等. 陆相盆地源-汇系统要素耦合研究进展[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(11):1851-1870. |
ZHU Hongtao, XU Changgui, ZHU Xiaomin, et al. Advances of the source-to-sink units and coupling model research in Continental Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(11): 1851-1870. | |
[2] | 张占杨. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘下石盒子组盒1段心滩砂体定量刻画[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2021, 15(4):6-12. |
ZHANG Zhanyang. Quantitative characterization of channel bar sandbody in the Lower Shihezi 1 Member,northern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2021, 15(4): 6-12. | |
[3] | 倪春华, 朱建辉, 刘光祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区上古生界煤系烃源岩生烃潜力再评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5):826-834. |
NI Chunhua, ZHU Jianhui, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Re-evaluation of hydrocarbon generation potential of the Upper Paleozoic coal-measure source rocks in the Hangjinqi area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 826-834. | |
[4] | 陈彬滔, 于兴河, 王天奇, 等. 砂质辫状河岩相与构型特征--以山西大同盆地中侏罗统云冈组露头为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1):111-117. |
CHEN bintao, YU Xinghe, WANG Tianqi, et al. Lithofacies and architectural characteristics of sandy braided river deposits: A case from outcrops of the Middle Jurassic Yungang Formation in the Datong Basin, Shanxi Province[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1): 111-117. | |
[5] | 高照普. 杭锦旗锦58井区早石炭世古地貌特征对盒1段沉积作用的影响[J]. 石油化工应用, 2018, 37(9):80-83. |
GAO Zhaopu. The influence of early Carboniferous paleogeomorphology on sedimentary characteristics of HE-1 member in the Hangjinqi J58 well area[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2018, 37(9): 80-83. | |
[6] | 崔连可, 单敬福, 李浮萍, 等. 基于稀疏井网条件下的古辫状河道心滩砂体估算--以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):155-164. |
CUI Lianke, SHAN Jingfu, LI Fuping, et al. Estimating method of braided channel bar under sparse well net: A case from Su X block in Sulige Gas Field[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 155-164. | |
[7] | 李磊, 赵永刚, 马超亚, 等. 砂质辫状河心滩及河道砂微相的识别特征与方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(2):63-69. |
LI Lei, ZHAO Yonggang, MA Chaoya, et al. Patterns and methods of sandy braided-river island and channel sand identification[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(2): 63-69. | |
[8] | 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征--以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6):73-84. |
YUAN Chun, ZHANG Huiliang, WANG Bo. Sand body configuration and reservoir characteristics of large braided river delta: A case study of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6): 73-84. | |
[9] | 于兴河, 李顺利, 谭程鹏, 等. 粗粒沉积及其储层表征的发展历程与热点问题探讨[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(5):713-736. |
YU Xinghe, LI Shunli, TAN Chengpeng, et al. Coarse-grained deposits and their reservoir characterizations:A look back to see forward and hot issues[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2018, 20(5): 713-736. | |
[10] | 张阳, 蔡明俊, 芦凤明, 等. 碎屑-牵引流控冲积扇储层构型特征及模式--以沧东凹陷小集油田为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(3):538-552. |
ZHANG Yang, CAI Mingjun, LU Fengming, et al. Reservoir architecture characteristics and mode of middle and edge alluvial fan controlled by debris flow and traction flow: A case study of Xiaoji oilfield, Cangdong sag[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(3): 538-552. | |
[11] | 马志欣, 张吉, 薛雯, 等. 一种辫状河心滩砂体构型解剖新方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(7):16-24. |
MA Zhixin, ZHANG Ji, XUE Wen, et al. A new architecture characterization method for braided river channel bar sandbody[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(7): 16-24. | |
[12] | 张可, 吴胜和, 冯文杰, 等. 砂质辫状河心滩坝的发育演化过程探讨--沉积数值模拟与现代沉积分析启示[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36(1):81-91. |
ZHANG Ke, WU Shenghe, FENG Wenjie, et al. Discussion on evolution of bar in sandy braided river: Insights from sedi-ment numerical simulation and modern bar[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(1): 81-91. | |
[13] | 单敬福, 张吉, 王继平, 等. 苏里格气田西区盒8下亚段辫状河沉积论证与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6):1597-1607. |
SHAN Jingfu, ZHANG Ji, WANG Jiping, et al. Demenstration and analysis of braided river deposition in the Lower He8 Member in western Sulige Gas Field[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6): 1597-1607. | |
[14] | 温立峰, 吴胜和, 岳大力. 粗粒辫状河心滩内部泥质夹层分布新模式--以吴官屯野外露头为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(4):5-7. |
WEN Lifeng, WU Shenghe, YUE Dali. New distribution model of argillaceous intercalation in coarse braided river center beach: Taking Wuguantun field outcrop as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016, 30(4): 5-7. | |
[15] | 牛博, 高兴军, 赵应成, 等. 古辫状河心滩坝内部构型表征与建模--以大庆油田萨中密井网区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1):89-100. |
NIU Bo, GAO XinJun, ZHAO Yingcheng, et al. Architecture characterization and modeling of channel bar in paleo-braided river: A case study of dense well pattern area of Sazhong in Daqing oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 89-100. | |
[16] | 何君毅, 蔡忠贤, 张恒, 等. 塔中隆起顺西地区良里塔格组沉积相类型及其展布特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2):24-34. |
HE Junyi, CAI Zhongxian, ZHANG Heng, et al. Sedimentary facies and distribution characteristics of Lianglitage Formation in Shunxi area of Tazhong uplift[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2018, 37(2): 24-34. | |
[17] | 李柱正, 李开建, 李波, 等. 辫状河砂岩储层内部结构解剖方法及其应用--以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(4):30-39. |
LI Zhuzheng, LI Kaijian, LI Bo, et al. An internal structure anatomy method for braided-river sandstone reservoirs and its application in the Sulige Gas Field of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(4): 30-39. | |
[18] | 孙天建, 穆龙新, 赵国良. 砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法--以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):112-120. |
SUN Tianjian, MU Longxin, ZHAO Guoliang. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs: Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1): 112-120. | |
[19] | 张荣虎, 王俊鹏, 马玉杰, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层沉积微相古地貌及其对天然气富集的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(4):667-678. |
ZHANG Ronghu, WANG Junpeng, MA Yujie, et al. The sedimentary microfacies, palaeogeomorphology and their controls on gas accumulation of deep-buried cretaceous in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(4): 667-678. | |
[20] | 孙诗, 王峰, 陈洪德, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地天生桥剖面盒8下段辫状河沉积特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(1):29-40. |
SUN Shi, WANG Feng, CHEN Hongde, et al. Depositional characteristics of braided river in the lower member of He-8 in the Fugu Tianshengqiao section, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 46(1): 29-40. | |
[21] | 杨博, 王树慧, 王文胜, 等. 苏里格地区上古生界辫状河心滩定量表征影响因素探讨[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(6):941-950. |
YANG Bo, WANG Shuhui, WANG Wensheng, et al. Influencing factors of quantitative characterization of the Upper Paleozoic braided river channel bar in the Sulige Area[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 49(6): 941-950. |
[1] | WANG Xinqian, YU Wenduan, MA Xiaodong, ZHOU Tao, TAI Hao, CUI Qinyu, DENG Kong, LU Yongchao, LIU Zhanhong. Identification and application of shale lithofacies based on conventional logging curves: A case study of the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 699-706. |
[2] | GUAN Qianqian,JIANG Long,CHENG Ziyan,ZHANG Diandong,WANG Yunhe,ZHANG Fan. A new method of shale oil facies element logging evaluation and its application in Dongying Sag [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 435-445. |
[3] | WANG Xin,HAN Jianqiang,ZAN Ling,LI Xiaolong,PENG Xingping. Logging evaluation of shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation of Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 364-372. |
[4] | XIONG Liang, CAO Qinming, ZHANG Ling, WANG Linghui. Types of fine-grained sedimentary rocks assemblage and its significance for shale oil exploration: A case study of the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 548-558. |
[5] | SHEN Li,WANG Caizhi,NING Congqian,LIU Yingming,WANG Hao. Well-log lithofacies classification based on machine learning for Chang-7 member in Longdong area of Ordos Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 525-536. |
[6] | LIN Zhongkai,ZHANG Shaolong,LI Chuanhua,WANG Min,YAN Jianping,CAI Jingong,GENG Bin,HU Qinhong. Types of shale lithofacies assemblage and its significance for shale oil exploration: A case study of Shahejie Formation in Boxing Sag [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 39-51. |
[7] | LIANG Honggang,DENG Feng,MA Hongtao,SUN Li,DING Hui,YANG Junying. Application of JI-FI inversion technology to prediction of thin sandstone reservoir: A case study of K1bs 3 upper thin sandstone reservoir in XH area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 910-917. |
[8] | WANG Hongyan,DONG Dazhong,SHI Zhensheng,QIU Zhen,LU Bin,SHAO Nan,SUN Shasha,ZHANG Surong. Lithfacies and “sweet spot” interval of marine shale in southern Sichuan: A case study of Shuanghe Outcrop in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Changning [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 68-81. |
[9] | YAO Suping,WU Yuyuan,YU Wenduan,ZHANG Bailin,HU Wenxuan. Outcrop characteristic and lithofacies changes of both Gufeng and Dalong Formations in lower Yangtze Region [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 215-232. |
[10] | WANG Yongshi,TANG Dong. Geological characteristics of typical shale profile in a saline lacustrine rift basin: A case study of Dongying sag [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 181-191. |
[11] | ZHAO Kebin,SUN Changqing,GUO Jiaqi,WU Chuanzhi. Enrichment characteristics and accumulation mechanism of natural gas hydrate in the Gulf of Mexico: Cases study of study area WR313 and GC955 [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 669-679. |
|