水平井油水两相流阵列电磁波持水率计算方法及应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.04.012

Abstract

Abstract:

The accurate calculation of the water holdup and the inversion of fluid distribution for multi-phase flow play a crucial role in understanding the development performance in horizontal wells. This study builds upon the array electromagnetic wave holdup instrument and proposes a novel method for calculating water holdup. The method is based on the weight of the mid-point tangential area of the probe's radial projection. Additionally, inversion methods for oil-water phase distribution in horizontal wells, considering high, middle, and low water content, were developed by comparing them with existing quantitative calculation methods of the array holdup instrument. The results demonstrated that the new method exhibited an average absolute error of 4.43 % and relative errors of 16.34 %. These values were significantly better than those obtained using the weight coefficient method and the radial contour area method. For the inversion of fluid distribution in horizontal wells with high, middle, and low water cut conditions, the Gaussian Radial Basis method and multivariate linear method provided the best matches. This research lays a solid foundation for evaluating the production performance of multi-phase flow in horizontal wells.

Key words: horizontal well, water and oil phase, array electromagnetic wave water holdup, array water holdup calculation methods, flowing image

CLC Number:

TE33

Meng CHEN,Weifeng XIE,Yu ZHANG, et al. Methods and application for water holdup calculation and flowing image based on array electromagnetic wave instrument in horizontal water-oil wells[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 505-512.

Figures/Tables 14

Table 1

Comparison of different water holdup calculation methods"

计算方法	表达式	优点	适用范围
平均插值法	$Y w = ∑ i = 1 12 Y w i / 12$	简洁，高效，只考虑持水率探头测量值	层流，适用于低流量
分层界面法	$Y w = a r c c o s 1 - n / 6 - 1 - n / 6 n / 3 - n 2 / 36 π$	考虑油水分界面影响，适用于大斜井、水平井	层流，适用于低流量
成像法	式（5）—式（8）	直观反映流体分布状态	精确度与成像算法有关
权系数法	$Y w = ∑ W i Y w i$	考虑权重与探头距离、顶部距离有关	层流
径向等高面积法	A1∶A2∶A3∶A4∶A5= 0.142∶0.231∶0.253∶0.231∶0.142	准确度与面积细分程度和划分方式有关	层流

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 3

Fig. 5

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig. 6

References 32

[1]	宋红伟, 郭海敏, 郭帅, 等. 水平井油水两相分层流分相流量测量方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3): 573-582. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.03.13
	SONG Hongwei, GUO Haimin, GUO Shuai, et al. Partial phase flow rate measurements for stratified oil-water flow in horizontal wells[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3): 573-582. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.03.13
[2]	邸德家, 毛军, 张同义, 等. 涪陵页岩气水平井产出剖面测试技术分析与应用[J]. 测井技术, 2016, 40(6): 731-735.
	DI Dejia, MAO Jun, ZHANG Tongyi, et al. Production profile testing analysis and its application in Fuling shale gas horizontal wells[J]. Well logging Technology, 2016, 40(6): 731-735.
[3]	林日亿, 于程浩, 杨恒林, 等. 超深水平井钻井液循环温度场模拟计算与分析[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2022, 51(3): 91-97.
	LIN Riyi, YU Chenghao, YANG Henglin, et al. Temperature field simulation and analysis of drilling fluid circulation in super deep horizontal wells[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2022, 51(3): 91-97.
[4]	庞伟, 邸德家, 张同义, 等. 页岩气井产出剖面测井资料分析及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(2): 700-706.
	PANG Wei, DI Dejia, ZHANG Tongyi, et al. Analysis and application of production logging data in shale gas well[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(2): 700-706.
[5]	TRALLERO J L. Oil-water flow patterns in horizontal pipes[D]. Tulsa: The University of Tulsa, 1995: 112-126.
[6]	TRALLERO J L. A study of oil-water flow patterns in horizontal pipes[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 1997, 12(3): 165-172.
[7]	WEI Y, YU H Q, CHEN Q, et al. Measurement of water holdup in oil-water two-phase flows using coplanar microstrip transmission lines sensor[J]. IEEE sensors journal, 2019, 19(23): 11289-11300. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.7361
[8]	张振远, 张兴凯, 王文雄, 等. 油水两相螺旋流状态下射频法测量原油含水率的方法[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(1): 101-107.
	ZHANG Zhenyuan, ZHANG Xingkai, WANG Wenxiong, et al. Water content measurement by radio frequency method under the condition of oil-water two-phase spiral flow[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2021, 50(1): 101-107.
[9]	胡金海, 刘兴斌, 张玉辉, 等. 阻抗式含水率计及其应用[J]. 测井技术, 1999(S1): 511-514.
	HU Jinhai, LIU Xingbin, ZHANG Yuhui. Impedance type moisture content meter and its application[J]. Well Logging Technology, 1999, 23(S1): 511-514.
[10]	成云丽. 阵列式电阻持水率仪器研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2017.
	CHENG Yunli. Research of the array water holdup log tool based on resistance[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2017.
[11]	BURRUS B. Determination of oil and water volumes by the capacitance method[C]// Paper SPE-1373-MS presented at the SPE Automation Symposium, Hobbs, New Mexico, April 1966.
[12]	RYAN N D, HAYES D. A new multiphase holdup tool for horizontal wells[C]// Paper SPWLA-2001-V presented at the SPWLA 42nd Annual Logging Symposium, Houston, Texas, June 2001.
[13]	张海博, 郭海敏, 戴家才, 等. 电容阵列仪在大斜度井中的实验研究[J]. 测井技术, 2008, 32(4): 304-306.
	ZHANG Haibo, GUO Haimin, DAI Jiacai, et al. Experimental study of capacitance array imaging logging tool in high angle wells[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2008, 32(4): 304-306.
[14]	LIU W X, JIN N D, WANG D Y, et al. A parallel-wire microwave resonant sensor for measurement of water holdup in high water-cut oil-in-water flows[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2020, 74(21): 101760. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101760
[15]	王进旗, 强锡富, 陈建明, 等. 相位法测量油井含水率的研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2002, 34(2): 245-247.
	WANG Jinqi, QIANG Xifu, CHEN Jianming, et al. Phase measurement of water content in oil well[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2002, 34(2): 245-247.
[16]	王进旗, 强锡富, 于英华. 基于相位法原油含水率仪的实验研究[J]. 计量学报, 2004, 25(4): 366-368.
	WANG Jinqi, QIANG Xifu, YU Yinghua. Test study of water cut tool in oil well based on phase method[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2004, 25(4): 366-368.
[17]	余厚全, 魏勇, 汤天知, 等. 基于同轴传输线电磁波检测油水介质介电常数的理论分析[J]. 测井技术, 2012, 36(4): 361-364.
	YU Houquan, WEI Yong, TANG Tianzhi, et al. Theoretical analysis of measuring dielectric constant of oil-water mixture based on electromagnetic wave on coaxial line[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(4): 361-364.
[18]	陈强. 电磁波持水率计的电路设计[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2012.
	CHEN Qiang. Circuit design of the electromagnetic wave water holdup meter[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2012.
[19]	魏勇, 余厚全, 鲁保平, 等. 矿化度对电磁波相移法测量原油持水率的影响与校正研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自然版), 2015, 12(7): 30-33.
	WEI Yong, YU Houquan, LU Baoping, et al. The effect of salinity on electromagnetic wave method to measure water holdup of crude oil and correction research[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(7): 30-33.
[20]	魏勇, 余厚全, 戴家才, 等. 基于CPW的油水两相流持水率检测方法研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2017, 38(6): 1506-1515.
	WEI Yong, YU Houquan, DAI Jiacai, et al. Water holdup measurement of oil-water two-phase flow based on CPW[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2017, 38(6): 1506-1515.
[21]	谢韦峰, 陈猛, 刘向君, 等. 温度和矿化度对电磁波持水率计响应的影响与校正[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2021, 18(2): 229-236.
	XIE Weifeng, CHEN Meng, LIU Xiangjun, et al. Impact analysis and correction of the temperature and salinity for electromagnetic wave water holdup meter[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2021, 18(2): 229-236.
[22]	秦昊, 戴家才, 秦民君, 等. 低产水平井油水两相流阵列持水率计实验研究[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41(6): 637-641.
	QIN Hao, DAI Jiacai, QIN Minjun, et al. Experimental study on oil-water two-phase flow array water holdup tool in horizontal well[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2017, 41(6): 637-641.
[23]	史航宇, 宋红伟, 郭海敏, 等. 低产水平井油水两相阵列持水率仪数据处理方法比较[J]. 中国科技论文, 2021, 16(1): 12-19.
	SHI Hangyu, SONG Hongwei, GUO Haimin, et al. Comparative study on data processing methods of oil-water two-phase array water holdup instrument in low-yield horizontal well[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2021, 16(1): 12-19.
[24]	朱绍武, 杨国峰, 戴家才. 水平井阵列持率仪测井资料成像算法研究[C]. 成都: 油气田勘探与开发国际会议论文集, 2017: 127-134.
	ZHU Shaowu, YANG Guofeng, DAI Jiacai. Research on imaging algorithm for logging data of array holdup instrument in horizontal well[C]. Chengdou: IFEDC, 2017: 127-134.
[25]	FRISCH G, PERKINS T, QUIREIN J. Integrating wellbore flow images with a conventional production log interpretation method[C]// Paper SPE-77782-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 2002.
[26]	LIAO L, ZHU D, YOSHIDA N, et al. Interpretation of array production logging measurements in horizontal wells for flow profile[C]// Paper SPE-166502-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, September 2013.
[27]	黄志洁, 马焕英, 郭海敏, 等. 大斜度井电容阵列仪测井解释方法实验研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(2): 107-110.
	HUANG Zhijie, MA Huanying. GUO Haiming, et al. Experimental study on capacitance array tool(CAT) logging interpretation in highly deviated wells[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(2): 107-110.
[28]	刘再斌, 吴锡令. 阵列电磁传感器测量气水层状流持水率实验研究[J]. 测井技术, 2011, 35(4): 303-307.
	LIU Zaibin, WU Xiling. Experimental study on measuring gas-water stratified flow water holdup with array electromagnetic sensor[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2011, 35(4): 303-307.
[29]	吴锡令, 赵亮, 刘迪军. 多相流动电磁波成像测井基础研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2000, 27(2): 79-82.
	WU XiLing, ZHAO Liang, LIU Dijun. A fundamental study on electromagnetic wave imaging logging in multiphase flow[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2000, 27(2): 79-82.
[30]	戴家才, 郭海敏, 刘恒, 等. 电容阵列仪测井资料流动成像算法研究[J]. 测井技术, 2010, 34(1): 27-30.
	DAI Jiacai, GUO Haimin, LIU Heng, et al. The flow imaging algorithm study on logging data of capacitor array tool[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2010, 34(1): 27-30.
[31]	董勇, 郭海敏, 李梦霞. 基于改进高斯权重的多相流动成像算法[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(1): 35-38.
	DONG Yong, GUO Haimin, LI Mengxia. An oil-gas-water three-phase flow imaging algorithm based on modified Gaussian weighted interpolation[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(1): 35-38.
[32]	董勇, 郭海敏, 李梦霞, 等. 基于CAT的水平管油水两相流动成像算法改进[J]. 测井技术, 2014, 38(3): 262-266.
	DONG Yong, GUO Haimin, LI Mengxia, et al. Modification of imaging algorithm for oil-water flow in a horizontal tube based on CAT data[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2014, 38(3): 262-266.

理论持水率	径向等高面积法	相对误差	径向投影中点切分面积法	相对误差	平均插值法	相对误差	分层界面法	相对误差	权系数法	相对误差
100	100	0	100	0	100	0	100	0	100	0
90	86	4.4	92	2.2	75	16.7	20	77.8	91	1.1
70	63	10.0	67	4.2	59	15.7	39	44.3	64	8.6
50	39	22.0	36	28.0	43	14.0	61	22.0	39	22.0
30	18	40.0	24	20.0	35	16.7	29	3.3	28	6.7
10	21	110.0	16	60.0	30	200.0	20	100.0	21	110.0
0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
平均		26.6		16.3		37.6		35.3		21.2

反演算法	原理	优点
多元线性法	持水率是x、y方向的线性函数	高含水、中含水有较好层界面识别效果
距离反比加权法	与距离呈反比例关系	高含水成像均匀，低含水时效果较差
高斯径向基函数法	与距离呈指数关系	低含水时成像效果优于其他3种方法
克里金法	与距离呈变差函数关系	低含水时成像效果略低于高斯径向基函数法

探头	高含水	中含水	低含水	探头	高含水	中含水	低含水
1	1.00	0.13	0		7	0.48	0.58	0
2	1.00	0.25	0	8	1.00	0.20	0
3	1.00	0.60	0	9	0.97	0.28	0
4	1.00	0.30	0	10	1.00	0.02	0
5	1.00	0.53	0.25	11	1.00	0.02	0
6	0.22	0.60	0.04	12	1.00	0	0

反演方法	高含水（C_w≥70 %）	中含水（30 %≤C_w<70 %）	低含水（C_w<30 %）
多元线性法
距离反比加权法
高斯径向基函数法
克里金法

成像算法	高含水	中含水	低含水
多元线性法	分层界面较清晰	分层界面较清晰	识别效果不明显
距离反比加权法	出现“牛眼”现象	分布相对均匀	出现“牛眼”现象
高斯径向基函数法	削弱油相分布	层界面波动	油水分层界面明显
克里金法	分层界面弯曲，能反映油相流体	成像结构相对均匀	界面弯曲程度大于高斯径向基法，整体均匀

Methods and application for water holdup calculation and flowing image based on array electromagnetic wave instrument in horizontal water-oil wells

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

面积法	权重
径向等高面积法	A1∶A2∶A3∶A4∶A5=0.142∶0.231∶0.253∶0.231∶0.142
径向投影中点切分面积法	A1∶A2∶A3∶A4∶A5∶A6∶A7=0.011∶0.075∶0.250∶0.327∶0.250∶0.075∶0.011

介质	1号	2号	3号	4号	5号	6号	7号	8号	9号	10号	11号	12号
气	7 793	8 217	7 877	7 952	8 290	8 166	8 094	7 924	7 840	7 956	8 039	7 924
油	9 693	10 117	9 777	9 852	10 190	10 066	9 994	9 824	9 740	9 856	9 939	9 824
水	20 382	19 227	21 247	21 267	19 042	18 270	19 433	21 446	22 593	21 983	19 987	21 227

[1]	ZHANG Yi, NING Chongru, CHEN Yazhou, JI Yulong, ZHAO Liyang, WANG Aifang, HUANG Jingjing, YU Kaiyi. Huff-n-puff technology and parameter optimization of large displacement water injection in tight oil reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 727-733.
[2]	LIU Wei, CAO Xiaopeng, HU Huifang, CHENG Ziyan, BU Yahui. Production influencing factors analysis and fracturing parameters optimization of shale oil horizontal wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 764-770.
[3]	YANG Zhaozhong, YUAN Jianfeng, ZHANG Jingqiang, LI Xiaogang, ZHU Jingyi, HE Jiangang. Research progress and understanding of fracturing fractures in horizontal wells of marine shale in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 600-609.
[4]	LI Xuebin,JIN Lixin,CHEN Chaofeng,YU Tianxi,XIANG Yingjie,YI Duo. Key technologies of horizontal well fracturing for deep coal-rock gas: A case study of Jurassic in Baijiahai area, Junggar Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 629-637.
[5]	ZHAO Haifeng, WANG Tengfei, LI Zhongbai, LIANG Wei, ZHANG Tao. Study on dynamic stress field for fracturing in horizontal well group of shale oil [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 352-363.
[6]	LUO Hongwen, ZHANG Qin, LI Haitao, XIANG Yuxing, LI Ying, PANG Wei, LIU Chang, YU Hao, WANG Yaning. Influence law of temperature profile for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 676-685.
[7]	ZHANG Fengxi, NIU Congcong, ZHANG Yichi. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[8]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[9]	QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[10]	YAO Hongsheng,YUN Lu,ZAN Ling,ZHANG Longsheng,QIU Weisheng. Development mode and practice of fault-block oriented shale oil well in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[11]	ZHANG Jinhong. Progress in Sinopec shale oil engineering technology [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 1-8.
[12]	WANG Xiaoqiang,ZHAO Li’an,WANG Zhiyuan,XIU Chunhong,JIA Guolong,DONG Yan,LU Detang. Data analysis method of pump shutdown pressure based on water hammer effect and cepstrum transformation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 108-116.
[13]	HU Depeng. Injection-production features of polymer flooding for horizontal wells and influencing factors of development effects for well groups [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 809-815.
[14]	TANG Botao,ZENG Ji,CHEN Weihua,CHEN Yixin,WANG Tao,LIU Cheng,FENG Feng. Multi cluster perforation optimization design method and its application effect of tight sandstone horizontal wells in Qiulin area, central Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 337-344.
[15]	LIU Lu,WANG Yongfei,ZHAN Zedong,XIE Jinfeng. Main control factors of horizontal wells in J₂s₂ tight sandstone gas reservoir of Xinchang Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 890-896.