致密油水平井温度剖面影响规律研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.05.015

Abstract

Abstract:

The challenge of reliably predicting temperature profiles in horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs, coupled with an incomplete understanding of the factors influencing these profiles, has hindered the quantitative interpretation of tight oil horizontal well production using distributed optical fiber technology. To address this issue, a comprehensive model has been developed to estimate temperature profiles in horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs, accounting for various microthermal effects. The temperature profiles of horizontal wells in tight oil reservoir under different single factors were simulated and analyzed. Then, through orthogonal experiment analysis, it demonstrates that the sensitivity of different factors from strong to weak is production rate, fracture half-length, reservoir permeability, wellbore diameter, horizontal inclination angle, fracture conductivity, and total reservoir thermal conductivity（Q>x_f>K>D>θ>F_CD>K_t）. It is worth noting that fracture half-length and formation permeability emerged as the primary factors influencing the temperature profile of horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs. The research results provide available basic models and theoretical support for quantitative interpretation of production profile and artificial fracture parameters for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoir.

Key words: temperature profile, influence law, temperature profile prediction model, horizontal well in tight oil reservoir, distributed tempreture sensing（DTS）

CLC Number:

TE355

Hongwen LUO,Qin ZHANG,Haitao LI, et al. Influence law of temperature profile for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 676-685.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 3

Table 4

References 22

[1]	李海涛, 罗红文, 向雨行, 等. DTS/DAS技术在水平井压裂监测中的应用现状与展望[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2021, 17(4): 62-73.
	LI Haitao, LUO Hongwen, XIANG Yuxing, et al. The application status and prospect of DTS/DAS in fracturing monitoring of horizontal wells[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2021, 17(4): 62-73.
[2]	朱世琰. 基于分布式光纤温度测试的水平井产出剖面解释理论研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016.
	ZHU Shiyan. Theoretical study on the interpretation of inflow profile based on the distributed optical fiber temperature sensing[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[3]	YOSHIDA N. Modeling and interpretation of downhole temperature in a horizontal well with multiple fractures[D]. Texas: Texas A&M University, 2016.
[4]	蔡珺君. 水平井井筒温度预测及解释模型研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016.
	CAI Junjun. Study on prediction and interpretation model of wellbore temperature for a horizontal well[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[5]	谭先红, 梁斌, 王帅, 等. 一种低渗储层凝析气藏气井产能评价方法研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 724-729.
	TAN Xianhong, LIANG Bin, WANG Shuai, et al. A productivity evaluation method of gas wells in condensate gas reservoirs with low permeability[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 724-729.
[6]	罗红文, 李海涛, 安树杰, 等. 致密气藏压裂水平井温度剖面影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 150-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.021
	LUO Hongwen, LI Haitao, AN Shujie, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of temperature profile of fractured horizontal well in tight gas reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(4): 150-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.021
[7]	UGUETO G A, HUCKABEE P T, MOLENAAR M M. Challenging assumption about fracture stimulation placement effectiveness using fiber optic distributed sensing diagnostics: Diversion, stage isolation and overflushing[C]// Paper SPE-173348-MS presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, February 2015.
[8]	SOOKPRASONG P A, HURT R S, GILL C C. Downhole monitoring of multicluster, multistage horizontal well fracturing with fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing(DAS) and distributed temperature sensing(DTS)[C]// Paper IPTC-17972-MS presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 2014.
[9]	罗红文, 李海涛, 刘会斌, 等. 低渗气藏两相渗流压裂水平井温度剖面预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 389-399.
	LUO Hongwen, LI Haitao, LIU Huibin, et al. Temperature profile prediction of two-phase percolation fractured horizontal well in low permeability gas reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(3): 389-399.
[10]	罗红文, 李海涛, 李颖, 等. 低渗透气藏压裂水平井产出剖面与裂缝参数反演解释[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 936-947. doi: 10.7623/syxb202107008
	LUO Hongwen, LI Haitao, LI Ying, et al. Inversion interpretation of production profile and fracture parameters of fractured horizontal Wells in low permeability gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 936-947. doi: 10.7623/syxb202107008
[11]	李亚辉. 基于DTS数据的底水气藏水平井产出剖面解释模型及实现[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
	LI Yahui. Production profile interpretation model and realization of horizontal well in bottom water gas reservoir based on DTS data[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
[12]	YOSHIOKA K, ZHU D, HILL A D, et al. Prediction of temperature changes caused by water or gas entry into a horizontal well[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2007, 22(4): 425-433.
[13]	LI Z Y, ZHU D. Predicting flow profile of horizontal well by downhole pressure and distributed-temperature data for water drive-reservoir[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2010, 25(3): 296-304.
[14]	YOSHIOKA K, ZHU D, Hill A D. A new inversion method to interpret flow profiles from distributed temperature and pressure measurements in horizontal wells[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2009, 24(4): 510-521.
[15]	李军. 致密油藏储量升级潜力不确定性评价方法及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 755-764.
	LI Jun. Non-deterministic method for tight oil reserves up grade potential assessment and its application[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 755-764.
[16]	刘传喜, 方文超, 秦学杰. 非常规油气藏压裂水平井动态缝网模拟方法及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 696-702.
	LIU Chuanxi, FANG Wenchao, QIN Xuejie. Simulation of dynamic fracture network in fractured horizontal well for unconventional reservoirs: Theory and application[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 696-702.
[17]	BIRD R B, STEWART W E, LIGHTFOOT E N, et al. Transport phenomena[J]. John Wiley & Sons, 1960, 28(2): 338-359.
[18]	OLDENBURG C M. Joule-Thomson cooling due to CO₂ injection into natural gas reservoirs[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2007, 48(6): 1808-1815.
[19]	LUO H W, LI Y, LI H T, et al. Simulated annealing algorithm-based inversion model to interpret flow rate profiles and fracture parameters for horizontal wells in unconventional gas reservoirs[J]. SPE Journal, 2021, 26(4): 1679-1699. doi: 10.2118/205010-PA
[20]	LUO H W, LI H T, LU Y, et al. Inversion of distributed temperature measurements to interpret the flow profile for a multistage fractured horizontal well in low-permeability gas reservoir[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 77: 360-377. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.07.047
[21]	LUO H W, LI H T, TAN Y S, et al. A novel inversion approach for fracture parameters and inflow rates diagnosis in multistage fractured horizontal wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 184: 106585. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106585
[22]	李海涛, 罗红文, 李颖, 等. 基于DTS的页岩气藏压裂水平井产出剖面解释[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5): 66-75.
	LI Haitao, LUO Hongwen, LI Ying, et al. Production profile interpretation of fractured horizontal Wells in shale gas reservoirs based on DTS[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 66-75.

参数类型	参数名称	参数取值
储层参数	储层长度/m	1 500
	储层宽度/m	500
	储层厚度/m	20
	储层中深/m	2 150
	孔隙度/%	15
	水平渗透率/10^-3μm²	12
	垂向渗透率/10^-3μm²	1
	地面温度/℃	20
	地温梯度/(℃ /m)	0.03
	储层温度/℃	80
	地层压力/MPa	20
储层岩石热力学参数	岩石密度/(kg/m³⁾	2 380
	岩石热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	845
	总导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	3.46
井筒参数	水平长度/m	810
	井筒直径/m	0.2
	套管外径/m	0.14
	套管内径/m	0.12
	井壁粗糙度/m	0.001 5
	套管导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	12
	水泥环导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	6.9
流体物性	原油密度/[ kg/m³]	900
	原油黏度/MPa·s	2
	原油热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	2 000
	原油膨胀系数/(10^-4/℃)	4
	原油体积系数/(m³/m³)	1.37
	原油热导率/[W/(m·℃)]	0.14
	地层水密度/[kg/m³]	1 000
	地层水黏度/MPa·s	0.1
	地层水热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	4230
	地层水热膨胀系数/(10^-4/℃)	2
	地层水体积系数/(m³/m³)	1.02

参数类型	参数名称	参数取值
储层参数	储层长度/m	1 000
	储层宽度/m	500
	储层厚度/m	20
	储层中深/m	1 350
	孔隙度/%	15
	水平渗透率/10^-3μm²	20
	垂向渗透率/10^-3μm²	2
	地面温度/℃	20
	地温梯度/(℃ /m)	0.03
	储层温度/℃	80
	地层压力/MPa	20
储层岩石热力学参数	岩石密度/(kg/m³⁾	2 380
	岩石热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	845
	总导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	3.46
井筒参数	水平长度/m	700
	井筒直径/m	0.2
	套管外径/m	0.14
	套管内径/m	0.12
	井壁粗糙度/m	0.001 5
	套管导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	12
	水泥环导热系数/[J/(m·s·℃)]	6.9
流体物性	原油密度/[ kg/m³]	900
	原油黏度/mPa·s	2
	原油热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	2 000
	原油膨胀系数/(10^-4/℃)	4
	原油体积系数/(m³/m³)	1.37
	原油热导率/[W/(m·℃)]	0.14
	地层水密度/[kg/m³]	1 000
	地层水黏度/mPa·s	0.1
	地层水热容/[J/(kg·℃)]	4 230
	地层水热膨胀系数/(10^-4/℃)	2
	地层水体积系数/(m³/m³)	1.02

因素名	Q/（m³/d）	K/10^-3μm²	K_t/[J/(m·s·℃)]	x_f/m	F_CD/（μm²·cm）	D/m	θ/（°）
水平1	18	20	3.0	40	10	0.10	1
水平2	20	30	3.5	60	15	0.15	3
水平3	22	40	4.0	80	20	0.20	5

实验编号	Q	K	K_t	x_f	F_CD	D	θ	平均温度差，℃
实验1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0.294
实验2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	0.287
实验3	1	3	3	3	3	3	3	0.281
实验4	2	1	1	2	2	3	3	0.314
实验5	2	2	2	3	3	1	1	0.341
实验6	2	3	3	1	1	2	2	0.323
实验7	3	1	2	1	3	2	3	0.309
实验8	3	2	3	2	1	3	1	0.271
实验9	3	3	1	3	2	1	2	0.274
实验10	1	1	3	3	2	2	1	0.318
实验11	1	2	1	1	3	3	2	0.261
实验12	1	3	2	2	1	1	3	0.253
实验13	2	1	2	3	1	3	2	0.331
实验14	2	2	3	1	2	1	3	0.315
实验15	2	3	1	2	3	2	1	0.269
实验16	3	1	3	2	3	1	2	0.293
实验17	3	2	1	3	1	2	3	0.369
实验18	3	3	2	1	2	3	1	0.308
均值1	0.302	0.31	0.297	0.282	0.003	0.295	0.307
均值2	0.281	0.307	0.305	0.315	0.295	0.313	0.303
均值3	0.319	0.285	0.3	0.305	0.306	0.290	0.289
极差（R）	0.041	0.030	0.007	0.035	0.011	0.020	0.015

Influence law of temperature profile for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 22

Related Articles 10

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LU Cong, LI Qiuyue, GUO Jianchun. Research progress of distributed optical fiber sensing technology in hydraulic fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 618-628.
[2]	REN Hongda, DONG Jingfeng, GAO Jing, LIU Kaixin, ZHANG Jingchun, YIN Shuli. Field test of self-suspending proppant at Mahu sandstone reservoir in Xinjiang Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 513-518.
[3]	PENG Kai,WANG Hao,QI Jingguo. Optimization of interval production working system based on continuous liquid level curve [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 254-259.
[4]	XIA Yun,ZHANG Liping,CHU Haoyuan,LI Jiaqi,MA Shaoyun. Low-cost technology of Jimsar shale oil: A case study of lower “sweet spot” [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 536-541.
[5]	HUANG Bo,LEI Lin,TANG Wenjia,XU Ningwei,XIONG Wei. Stimulation mechanism of self suspension proppant in sand-carrying fracturing by water [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 459-464.
[6]	LIU Shuangxing,PENG Bo,LIU Qi,LI Xingchun,XUE Ming. Study on impact of particle size of CO₂ foam system for flooding on its performance [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 33-38.
[7]	WANG Leilei,LIANG Zhiyan,QIU Zhenjun,JIANG Lei,ZHAO Zhongwen. Optimization and application of tail pipe suspension device installed on electric submersible pump for super heavy oil [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 107-110.
[8]	LIANG Zhiyan,WANG Leilei,TANG Zhaoxing. Technology of heavy oil recovered by screw pump combined with water soluble viscosity in Tahe Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 111-115.
[9]	GENG Yudi,ZHOU Linbo,WANG Yang,LI Chunyue. High conductivity acid fracturing technology in ultra-deep carbonate reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 56-60.
[10]	Wang Yuhai,Xia Haibang,Bao Kai,Qiu Weidong. Research and application of jet pump technology in drainage gas recovery of shale gas at atmospheric pressure [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 80-84.