东海低渗透储层水平井分段压裂实施及效果评价

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.05.017

Abstract

Abstract:

Staged fracturing technology for offshore horizontal wells is still in an exploratory phase due to operational limitations. The effectiveness of fracturing horizontal wells has a significant impact on their productivity. Therefore, evaluating the fracturing effect and guiding the fracturing development of horizontal wells is a pressing concern. This paper firstly introduced the geological situation of low permeability reservoir in the East China Sea in detail, and the process of stage fracturing of the first open hole horizontal well was described. Then the fracturing effect of the multi-stage fractured horizontal well was evaluated successfully using the latest fracturing effect evaluation method of SPEE（Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers）. By analyzing the fracturing operation parameters of the well and comparing EUR（Estimated Ultimate Recovery） before and after fracturing, the fracturing effect evaluation method is verified to prove the correctness and reliability. Finally, it is concluded that the gas recovery rate of this horizontal well after fracturing is increased by 9.3 % and the oil recovery rate is increased by 6.6 %. The successful implementation of staged fracturing and the subsequent evaluation of its effects on the first horizontal well in the East China Sea set the stage for future development of horizontal well staged fracturing in offshore low-permeability reservoirs.

Key words: offshore, low permeability reservoir, staged fracturing, horizontal wells, fracturing effect evaluation

CLC Number:

TE348

Fengxi ZHANG,Congcong NIU,Yichi ZHANG. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 1

Table 2

$A_{c}\sqrt{k_{m}}$ summary of Well-XS"

参数	压裂模拟软件TP-FracSim						TP-FracEva	误差/%
参数	第1段	第2段	第3段	第4段	均值	4段$A_{c}\sqrt{k_{m}}$	4段$A_{c}\sqrt{k_{m}}$	误差/%
裂缝半长/m	75.00	103.00	72.60	118.00	92.15
$A c k m / m 2 10 - 3 ? μ m 2$	21 904	26 285	10 677	20 113	19 744	78 979	73 825	6.5

Table 2

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Table 3

Table 4

References 19

[1]	徐文江, 肖茂林, 孙兴旺, 等. 海上低渗透油田水平井多级压裂先导试验[J]. 中国海上油气, 2017, 29(6): 108-114.
	XU Wenjiang, XIAO Maolin, SUN Xingwang, et al. Pilot test of multi-stage fracturing technology for horizontal wells in offshore low permeability reservoirs[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(6): 108-114.
[2]	杜福云, 黄杰, 阮新芳, 等. 海上水平井分段压裂技术现状与展望[J]. 海洋石油, 2021, 41(1): 22-26.
	DU Fuyun, HUANG Jie, RUAN Xinfang, et al. Status and prospect of offshore horizontal well staged fracturing technology[J]. Offshore Oil, 2021, 41(1): 22-26.
[3]	FISHER M K, WRIGHT C A, DAVIDSON B M, et al. Integrating fracture-mapping technologies to improve stimulations in the Barnett Shale[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 2005, 20(2): 85-93.
[4]	赵博雄, 王忠仁, 刘瑞, 等. 国内外微地震监测技术综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(4): 1882-1888.
	ZHAO Boxiong, WANG Zhongren, LIU Rui, et al. Review of microseismic monitoring technology research[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(4): 1882-1888.
[5]	张晓林, 张峰, 李向阳, 等. 水力压裂对速度场及微地震定位的影响[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(10): 3552-3560.
	ZHANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Feng, LI Xiangyang, et al. The influence of hydraulic fracturing on velocity and microseismic location[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(10): 3552-3560.
[6]	SHENG G L, SU Y L, WANG W D, et al. Application of fractal geometry in evaluation of effective stimulated reservoir volume in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Fractals, 2017, 25(4): 62-69.
[7]	温庆志, 王淑婷, 高金剑, 等. 复杂缝网导流能力实验研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(5): 116-121.
	WEN Qingzhi, WANG Shuting, GAO Jinjian, et al. Research on flow conductivity experiment in complex fracture network[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(5): 116-121.
[8]	QU H Y, ZHOU F J, PENG Y, et al. ESRV and production optimization for the naturally fractured Keshen Tight Gas Reservoir[C]// Paper presented at the International Field Exploration and Development Conference, Chengdu, China, September 2017.
[9]	修乃岭, 严玉忠, 管保山, 等. 基于物质平衡原理对页岩气压裂储层有效改造体积进行估算方法研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(6): 103-105.
	XIU Nailing, YAN Yuzhong, GUAN Baoshan, et al. A method to estimate the effective stimulation volume in shale gas reservoir based on material balance equations[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2018, 32(6): 103-105.
[10]	杜军社, 李培俊, 万文胜, 等. 试井资料在压裂效果评价中的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(4): 433-435.
	DU Junshe, LI Peijun, WAN Wensheng, et al. Application of well test data to evaluation of hydraulic fracturing performance[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(4): 433-435.
[11]	王军磊, 位云生, 程敏华, 等. 页岩气压裂水平井生产数据分析方法[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2014, 37(1): 102-109.
	WANG Junlei, WEI Yunsheng, CHENG Minhua, et al. A method of production data analysis for multi-fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2014, 37(1): 102-109.
[12]	武男, 陈东, 孙斌, 等. 基于分类方法的煤层气井压裂开发效果评价[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1694-1700.
	WU Nan, CHEN Dong, SUN Bin, et al. Evaluation on fracturing effect based on classification method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1694-1700.
[13]	虞绍永. 页岩及致密油气藏工程方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2018.
	YU Shaoyong. Shale and tight reservoirs engineering[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[14]	SONG B, ECONOMIDES C E. Rate-normalized pressure analysis for determination of shale gas well performance[C]// Paper SPE-144031-MS presented at the SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition held in the Woodlands, Texas, USA, June 2011.
[15]	YU Shaoyong, 刘玉慧. 页岩及致密地层油气井的生产特征及可采储量计算方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 12-19.
	YU Shaoyong, LIU Yuhui. Production performance and EUR forecast of wells producing from tight/shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 12-19.
[16]	El-BANBI A H, WATTENBARGER R A. Analysis of linear flow in gas well production[C]// Paper SPE-39972-MS presented at the 199S SPE Gas Technology Symposium held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 1998.
[17]	WATTENBARGER R A, El-BANBI A H, VILLEGAS M E, et al. Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas wells[C]// Paper SPE-39931-MS presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, USA, April 1998.
[18]	刘能强. 实用现代试井解释方法(第五版)[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008.
	LIU Nengqiang. Practical modern well test interpretation method[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008.
[19]	BLASINGAME T A, LEE W J. The variable-rate reservoir limits testing of gas wells[C]// Paper SPE-17708-MS Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, held in Dallas, TX, USA, June 1986.

参数名称	解释结果
参数名称	第1段（趾端）	第2段	第3段	第4段
裂缝闭合应力/MPa	57.50	58.40	62.00	59.60
平方根曲线净压力估算/MPa	2.68	6.44	3.95	6.40
G-函数曲线净压力估算/MPa	3.10	5.98	3.47	6.26
双对数曲线净压力估算/MPa	3.00	6.73	4.21	5.33
净压力拟合值/MPa	3.14	7.02	4.16	5.80
裂缝半长/m	75.00	103.00	72.00	118.00
裂缝高度/m	28.00	34.60	52.00	38.90
裂缝无因次导流能力	0.25	0.36	0.52	0.32

方法	压裂前		压裂后
方法	气EUR/ 10? m3	油EUR/ 10? m3	气EUR/ 10? m3	油EUR/ 10? m3
Duong+双曲递减	0.176 5	0.769 4	0.353 9	1.224 0
YM-SEPD+双曲递减	0.166 0	0.734 1	0.204 6	0.926 9
修正双曲递减	0.165 7	0.733 3	0.217 1	1.004 0
归一化产量/累产量	0.192 4	0.820 7	0.262 4	1.121 5
双曲递减	0.194 0	0.825 7	0.225 8	0.939 8

概率	压裂前		压裂后
概率	气可采储量EUR/ 10? m3	油可采储量EUR/ 10? m3	气可采储量EUR/ 10? m3	油可采储量EUR/ 10? m3
P??	0.128 0	0.675 4	0.120 9	0.714 6
P??	0.146 8	0.719 2	0.163 8	0.829 6
P??	0.173 5	0.776 9	0.237 7	0.996 2
P??	0.205 1	0.839 2	0.345 0	1.196 4
P?	0.235 1	0.893 6	0.467 5	1.389 0
P??/P??	1.397 1	1.166 9	2.106 2	1.442 1
统计平均值	0.175 0	0.778 3	0.248 0	1.006 5
Swanson（斯万森）平均值	0.175 0	0.778 3	0.247 8	1.006 3

Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 19

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG Le, LIU Changlong, KOU Lei, CHEN Zheng, ZHANG Lu, XU Yuande, WANG Sheng, XUE Dedong. Research and application of intelligent polymer injection technology with cable control for high angle wells in offshore oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 133-137.
[2]	SUN Yili. Mechanism of CO₂ injection to improve the water injection capacity of low permeability reservoir in Shuanghe Oilfield in Henan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 55-63.
[3]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[4]	GUO Deming,PAN Yi,SUN Yang,CHAO Zhongtang,LI Xiaonan,CHENG Shisheng. EOR mechanism of viscosity reducer-CO₂ combined flooding in heavy oil reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.
[5]	ZHAO Baoyin,ZHANG Ming. Application of facies-controlled prestack geostatistical inversion method in high quality reservoir prediction of low permeability reservoir: A case study of V Oil Formation of Es₃³ in Block A [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 666-676.
[6]	JI Bingyu,HE Yingfu. Practice and understanding about CO₂ flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs by Sinopec [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 805-811.
[7]	WU Gongyi,ZHAO Ziping,WU Bo. CO₂ flooding development models and economic benefit evaluation of different types of reservoirs in Subei basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 864-870.
[8]	WANG Rui. Fracturing well productivity of low permeability reservoir with taking the oil-water two phase flow into consideration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 760-765.
[9]	TANG Mingguang,LIU Qinghua,XUE Guoqing,ZHANG Jiqiang,LU Ruibin. Key parameter limits of water injection quality in offshore low permeability reservoir: A case study of Liushagang Formation in Weizhou 11-4N Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 709-715.
[10]	XIA Haibang,BAO Kai,WANG Rui. Pilot test of new infinite stage and full-bore sliding sleeve fracturing technology in shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 390-394.
[11]	CHEN Xiang,ZHAO Liqiang,LI Xiaofan,HU Binghua,HU Zhongtai,YAO Fengsheng. Volumetric acid fracturing technology of offshore tight sandstone gas reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 120-126.
[12]	JIN Zhongkang,WANG Zhilin,MAO Chaoqi. Dominant mechanism and application of CO₂ immiscible flooding in M block with low permeability [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 68-74.
[13]	CAO Xulong, LYU Guangzhong, WANG Jie, ZHANG Dong, REN Min. Present situation and further research direction of CO₂ flooding technology in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 51-59.
[14]	XIA Haibang. Research and application of soluble bridge plug in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 79-82.
[15]	Tang Yong,Liao Songlin,Lei Xinhui,Yu Guangming,Kang Xingmei. Study on improving the sweep efficiency of CO₂ flooding in low permeability fractured reservoirs in Huang-3 block [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 9-13.