Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2): 216-223.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.02.007
• Volcanic Gas Reservoir • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Min(),CAO Yue,LI Wancai,ZHAO Wenqi,WANG Wenyong,SONG Yuying
Received:
2023-11-29
Online:
2024-04-26
Published:
2024-05-07
CLC Number:
WANG Min,CAO Yue,LI Wancai,ZHAO Wenqi,WANG Wenyong,SONG Yuying. Establishing classification standards for volcanic reservoirs based on pore structure and nuclear magnetic logging: A case study of Chaganhua Gas Field in Songnan Fault Depression[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 216-223.
Table1
High-pressure mercury injection experimental data for the Huoshiling Formation in Chaganhua Gas Field with 2.5% to 3.5% porosity"
孔隙度/% | 渗透率/10-3μm2 | 平均孔喉半径/μm |
---|---|---|
3.467 | 0.011 | 0.012 |
2.597 | 0.023 | 0.012 |
3.642 | 0.032 | 0.021 |
3.109 | 0.015 | 0.016 |
3.075 | 0.014 | 0.016 |
3.481 | 0.019 | 0.015 |
3.735 | 0.035 | 0.037 |
3.145 | 0.039 | 0.016 |
3.515 | 0.021 | 0.017 |
2.951 | 0.015 | 0.013 |
2.785 | 0.014 | 0.012 |
3.678 | 0.017 | 0.011 |
3.530 | 0.014 | 0.012 |
2.518 | 0.012 | 0.013 |
3.328 | 0.016 | 0.014 |
平均 | 0.020 | 0.015 |
Table 2
Reservoir classification criteria for Huoshiling Formation in Chaganhua Gas Field"
参数 | A类 | B类 | C类 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
微观 参数 | 均值系数 | [0.3,0.4] | [0.2,0.3) | <0.2 |
分选系数 | [1.2,1.7] | (1.7,2.5] | >2.5 | |
歪度系数 | 整体大于0 以粗歪度为主 | 整体小于0 以细歪度为主 | 整体小于0 以细歪度为主 | |
最大孔喉半径/μm | [0.30,1.00] | [0.05,0.30) | <0.05 | |
最大汞饱和度/% | >80 | (45,65] | [30,45] | |
排驱压力/MPa | [0.6,2.7] | [2.7,13.8] | >13.8 | |
孔喉半径中值/μm | >0.050 | [0.004,0.050] | <0.004 | |
汞饱和度中值压力/MPa | <60 | [60,97) | [97,200] | |
渗透率分布峰值/% | (50,60] | (38,50] | [25,38] | |
孔隙分布峰值/% | (15,31] | (8,15] | [4,8] | |
退汞饱和度/% | (30,50] | (20,30] | [10,20] | |
核磁 参数 | T2谱 | 频谱较宽、谱峰靠后 | 谱峰中等 | 谱峰较窄 |
T2谱孔隙分布 | 64 ms后谱占比大于40% | 32 ms后谱占比大于40% | 16 ms后谱占比大于40% | |
离心饱和度/% | >30 | [10,30] | <10 | |
常规 测井 参数 | 孔隙度/% | ≥6 | [4,6) | [2.9,4) |
渗透率/10-3μm2 | >0.1 | (0.05~0.1] | (0.01~0.05] | |
含气饱和度/% | >50 | (40~50] | (30~40] | |
黏土含量/% | ≤20 | >20 | >20 | |
声波时差/(μs/m) | ≥200 | [191,200) | [184,191) | |
岩性密度/(g/cm3) | ≤2.55 | (2.55,2.59] | (2.59,2.62] | |
电阻率/(Ω·m) | ≥183 | ≥274 | ≥315 |
[1] | 徐永强, 何永宏, 卜广平, 等. 基于微观孔喉结构及渗流特征建立致密储层分类评价标准[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 3(41): 451-460. |
XU Yongqiang, HE Yonghong, BU Guangping, et al. Establishment of classification and evaluation criteria for tight reservoirs based on characteristics of microscopic pore throat structure and percolation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 3(41): 451-460. | |
[2] | 萧高健. 鄂尔多斯盆地红河油田长8段致密裂缝砂岩储层表征及“甜点油层”综合评价研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2022. |
XIAO Gaojian. Characterization and comprehensive evaluation of ‘Sweet Spots’in the Chang 8 tight fractured sandstone reservoir in Honghe Oilfield,Ordos Basin, China[D]. Beijing: A Dissertation Submitted to China University of Geosciences, 2022. | |
[3] | 胡芸冰. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长7致密油储层评价及分类[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2017. |
HU Yunbing. Research on tight oil reservoirs geological evaluation and classification of the Chang7 member in southern Ordos Basin[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2017. | |
[4] | 田夏荷. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部本溪组-山西组致密气储层分类评价研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2016. |
TIAN Xiahe. Research on tight gas reservoirs evaluation and classification of Benxi formation-Shanxi formation in eastern Ordos Basin[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2016. | |
[5] | 王跃祥, 谢冰, 赖强, 等. 基于核磁共振测井的致密气储层孔隙结构评价与分类[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38(2): 759-767. |
WANG Yuexiang, XIE Bing, LAI Qiang, et al. Evaluation of pore structure and classification in tight gas reservoir based on NMR logging[J]. Progress in Geophysics. 2023, 38(2): 759-767. | |
[6] |
金国文, 王堂宇, 刘忠华, 等. 基于核磁共振测井的砂砾岩储层分类与产能预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 648-657.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202205006 |
JIN Guowen, WANG Tangyu, LIU Zhonghua, et al. Classification and productivity prediction of glutenite reservoirs based on NMR logging[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 648-657.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202205006 |
|
[7] | 朱玉瑞. 东营凹陷沙河街组致密砂岩储层孔隙结构表征及分类评价[D]. 四川: 成都理工大学, 2021. |
ZHU Yurui. Pore structure characteristics and classification of tight sands from Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag[D]. Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021. | |
[8] | 卫弘媛, 谢然红, 王跃祥, 等. 四川盆地沙溪庙组致密砂岩储层孔隙结构与分类[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2023, 47(3): 34-43. |
WEI Hongyuan, XIE Ranhong, WANG Yuexiang, et al. Pore structure characterization and reservoir classification in tight sandstone reservoirs of the Shaximiao Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2023, 47(3): 34-43. | |
[9] | 柴晓龙, 田冷, 孟艳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密储层微观孔隙结构特征与分类[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(1): 33-59. |
CHAI Xiaolong, TIAN Leng, MENG Yan, et al. Study on characteristics and classification of micro-pore structure in tight reservoirs for Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(1): 33-59. | |
[10] | 周丽艳, 罗少成, 林伟川, 等. 基于孔隙结构综合评价指数的致密砂岩储层分类方法[J]. 测井技术, 2022, 46(6): 707-713. |
ZHOU Liyan, LUO Shaocheng, LIN Weichuan, et al. Classification method of tight sandstone reservoir based on comprehensive evaluation index of pore structure[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2022, 46(6): 707-713. | |
[11] |
MANDELBROT B B. On the geometry of homogeneous turbulence, with stress on the fractal dimension of the iso-surfaces of scalars[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 72(3): 401-416.
doi: 10.1017/S0022112075003047 |
[12] |
WANG F Y, YANG K, YUN Z. Multifractal characteristics of shale and tight sandstone pore structures with nitrogen adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Petroleum Science, 2020, 17(5): 1209-1220.
doi: 10.1007/s12182-020-00494-2 |
[13] |
ZHU H H, ZHANG T S, ZHONG D K, et al. Binary pore structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1297-1306.
doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60283-1 |
[14] |
LIU H L, YANG Y Y, WANG F Q, et al. Micro pore and throat characteristics and origin of tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members in Longdong area, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 239-250.
doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30027-2 |
[15] | XU C C, TORRES-VERDIN C. Petrophysical rock classification in the Cotton Valley tight gas sandstone reservoir with a clus-tering pore-system orthogonality matrix ore system orthogonality for rock typing[J]. Interpretation, 2014, 2(1): 13-23. |
[16] |
LI C X, LIU M, GUO B C. Classification of tight sandstone reservoirs based on NMR logging[J]. Applied Geophysics. 2019, 16(4): 549-558.
doi: 10.1007/s11770-019-0793-y |
[17] |
ZHOU D, ZHUANG X, ZUO H F. A novel three parameter Weibull distribution parameter estimation using chaos simulated annealing particle swarm optimization in civil aircraft risk assessment[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2021, 46(9): 8311-8328.
doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-05467-0 |
[18] | LIU M, XIE R H, LI J, et al. A new NMR-data-based method for predicting petrophysical properties of tight sandstone res-ervoirs[J]. Energy Geoscience, 2023, 4(2): 64-71. |
[19] |
XI KL, CAO Y C, HAILE B G, et al. How does the pore-throat size control the reservoir quality and oiliness of tight sand-stones? The case of the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the southern Songliao Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 76: 1-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.05.001 |
[20] |
NELSON P H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(3): 329-340.
doi: 10.1306/10240808059 |
[21] |
ZHANG L C, LU S F, XIAO D S, et al. Pore structure characteristics of tight sandstones in the northern Songliao Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 88: 170-180.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.08.005 |
[1] | MA Daixin,REN Xianjun,ZHAO Mifu,HAN Jiaoyan,LIU Yuhu. Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 167-175. |
|