Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development >
2020 , Vol. 10 >Issue 3: 92 - 95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.03.014
Performance evaluation on CO2 flooding gas-soluble foaming agent in Caoshe Oilfield
Received date: 2019-01-22
Online published: 2020-07-03
In order to effectively solve the CO2 flooding gas channeling in Caoshe Oilfield, two kinds of gas-soluble foaming agents, fluorine-containing foaming agent(agent A) and silicon-containing foaming agent(agent B), are evaluated from three aspects: dissolution, foaming and plugging, and one of them is selected as the CO2 flooding sealing system in Caoshe Oilfield. The optimal injection concentration is 1.5 %. According to the experimental results, the solubility of agent A and agent B in supercritical CO2 under the assistance of the co-solvent, ethanol, reach 2.51 % and 1.93 % respectively, and both of them can form the dissolution conditions of stable foam. The comprehensive performance of foam produced by agent B is better than that of agent A. When the concentration of agent B reaches 1.5 %, the foaming performance is the best. Under the condition of high temperature(110 ℃) and high pressure(15 MPa), the foaming volume reaches 261 mL, and the half-life period reaches 115 min. From the aspects of dissolution and foaming, agent B is optimized as the foam sealing system of CO2 flooding in Caoshe Oilfield, and the evaluation experiments of CO2 foam sealing ability under different injection modes are carried out. When CO2 and foaming agent are injected alternately as the injection mode, the mixture is more uniform with more foam, and the resistance factor is high and can be more than 40, showing good foaming and plugging performance. The researches of sealing channeling system provide a new technical support for preventing gas channeling in CO2 flooding of Caoshe Oilfield.
Zhuang ZHANG , Haiyan WANG , Qian XU , Honglu ZHANG . Performance evaluation on CO2 flooding gas-soluble foaming agent in Caoshe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020 , 10(3) : 92 -95 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.03.014
[1] | 郝敏, 宋永臣. 利用CO2提高石油采收率技术研究现状[J]. 钻采工艺, 2010,33(4):59-63. |
[1] | HAO M, SONG Y C. Research status of CO2-EOR[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2010,33(4):59-63. |
[2] | 江怀友, 沈平平, 钟太贤, 等. 二氧化碳埋存与提高采收率的关系[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008,15(6):52-55. |
[2] | JIANG H Y, SHEN P P, ZHONG T X, et al. The relationship between CO2 storage and oil recovery enhancing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008,15(6):52-55. |
[3] | 江怀友, 沈平平, 宋新民, 等. 世界气候变暖及二氧化碳埋存现状与展望[J]. 古地理学报, 2008,10(3):323-328. |
[3] | JIANG H Y, SHEN P P, SONG X M, et al. Global warming and current status and prospect of CO2 underground storage[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008,10(3):323-328. |
[4] | 张宏录, 谭均龙, 易成高, 等. 草舍油田CO2驱高气油比井举升新技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2017,45(2):87-91. |
[4] | ZHANG H L, TAN J L, YI C G, et al. New lifting technology for CO2 flooding wells with high GOR in Caoshe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017,45(2):87-91. |
[5] | 陈祖华, 汤勇, 王海妹, 等. CO2驱开发后期防气窜综合治理方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014,26(5):102-106. |
[5] | CHEN Z H, TANG Y, WANG H M, et al. Comprehensive treatment of gas channeling at the later stage of CO2 flooding[J]. Lithologic Rservoir, 2014,26(5):102-106. |
[6] | 李春. 草舍油田弱凝胶调驱技术研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2008. |
[6] | LI C. Study on weak gel flooding technology in Caoshe Oilfield[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu Univerisity of Technology, 2008. |
[7] | 李春, 伊向艺, 刘伟, 等. 草舍油田CO2泡沫驱油起泡剂的选择[J]. 油田化学, 2007,25(3):255-257. |
[7] | LI C, YI X Y, LIU W, et al. Quarternary ammonium salt foamer YFP-1 selected for CO2 foam flood project in Caoshe Oil Field |
[8] | 熊炜, 田佳. CO2气驱油藏化学法封窜先导性试验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2014,4(3):60-63. |
[8] | XIONG W, TIAN J. Research on pilot test of chemical channeling treatment in CO2 flooding reservoir[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2014,4(3):60-63. |
[9] | 刘祖鹏, 李兆敏. CO2驱油泡沫防气窜技术实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,37(5):117-122. |
[9] | LIU Z P, LI Z M. An experimental study on anti-channeling technology with foam in CO2 flooding[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2015,37(5):117-122. |
[10] | 王璐, 单永卓, 刘花, 等. 低渗透油田CO2驱泡沫封窜技术研究与应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013,13(17):4918-4921. |
[10] | WANG L, SHAN Y Z, LIU H, et al. Study and application of CO2 flooding with foam channeling prevention technology for low permeability oilfield[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013,13(17):4918-4921. |
[11] | Lê V Q, NGUYêN Q P, SANDERS A. A novel foam concept with CO2 dissolved surfactants[C]// paper SPE-113370-MS presented at the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 20-23 April 2008, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. |
[12] | XING D, WEI B, TRICKETT K, et al. CO2-soluble surfactants for improved mobility control[C]// aper SPE-129907-MS presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 24-28 April 2010, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. |
[13] | 张营华. CO2泡沫剂的气溶性与封堵性研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017,17(21):233-235. |
[13] | ZHANG Y H. Gas solubility and plugging performance of CO2-soluble foaming agent[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017,17(21):233-235. |
[14] | 毕卫宇, 张攀锋, 章杨, 等. 低渗透油田用CO2气溶性泡沫体系研发及性能评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(6):71-77. |
[14] | BI W Y, ZHANG P F, ZHANG Y, et al. Development and performance evaluation on CO2-soluble surfactant foam system for low permeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(6):71-77. |
[15] | 王弘宇. 泡沫驱气窜规律及防气窜实验研究[D]. 东营:中国石油大学(华东), 2015. |
[15] | WANG H Y. Experimental study on gas channeling of foam flooding and gas channeling prevention[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2015. |
[16] | 武晓辉, 肖平, 邓军, 等. 泡沫交替注入参数优化设计[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2010,12(2):89-92. |
[16] | WU X H, XIAO P, DENG J, et al. Optimizing design of foam alternating injection parameters[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), 2010,12(2):89-92. |
[17] | 李爱芬, 陈凯, 赵琳, 等. 泡沫体系注入方式优化及可视化研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,26(5):49-52. |
[17] | LI A F, CHEN K, ZHAO L, et al. Optimization and visualization of the injection patterns of foam system[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2011,26(5):49-52. |
/
〈 | 〉 |