Intelligent Evaluation

Big data method for evaluating reservoir damage degree of fuzzy ball drilling fluid

  • Xiangchun WANG ,
  • Hao LIU ,
  • Chao WANG ,
  • Bugao CHEN ,
  • Peng ZHANG
Expand
  • 1. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
    2. Luming Company, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

Received date: 2021-04-08

  Online published: 2021-08-19

Abstract

The epidermal coefficient is mostly used to describe the reservoir damage degree of drilling fluid, but cannot quantitatively characterize the relation between the specific performance index and the reservoir damage degree, and effectively guide the optimization and adjustment of field drilling fluid performance. However, for the big data method, it has obvious advantages in multi-factor analysis. Based on this, a multi-parameter drilling fluid reservoir injury model is established to realize the working fluid optimization to protect the reservoir. To this end, the on-site data of nine completion wells withe fuzzy ball drilling fluid and six other adjacent completion wells are collected. The average daily output difference is took as the target function, with seven parameters of drilling fluid density, apparent viscosity, plastic viscosity, funnel viscosity, dynamic plastic ratio, dynamic shear force, and pH value as the independent variables. Firstly, the multiple regression method is used to establish a multi-parameter model. Then the mathematical model of drilling fluid on reservoir damage is established by the main controlling factors found by cocoon stripping algorithm. Finally, the quantitative relationship between the fluid performance and the average daily yield is defined. The study found that the regression coefficients of apparent viscosity, density, dynamic plastic ratio, and pH value are -1.561, 0.428, -0.535, 1.60, respectively, indicating that the apparent viscosity of fuzzy ball drilling fluid caused greater damage to the reservoir, density, dynamic plastic ratio, while the density and pH value have the protection effect of reservoir. In the case of the adjustment of drilling fluid performance of the horizontal section in Well-Yan5-V1 guided by the regression model, the average daily production after commissioning is increased by nearly 800 m3. In conclusion, compared with the on-site evaluation methods such as well testing, the big data method can only accurately diagnose the damage degree but also provide theoretical basis for the optimization of site drilling fluid performance. Meanwhile, it also provide a method for evaluating reservoir damage, and the application effect on site is obvious.

Cite this article

Xiangchun WANG , Hao LIU , Chao WANG , Bugao CHEN , Peng ZHANG . Big data method for evaluating reservoir damage degree of fuzzy ball drilling fluid[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021 , 11(4) : 605 -613 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.04.017

References

[1] 郑力会, 刘皓, 曾浩, 等. 流量替代渗透率评价破碎性储层工作流体伤害程度[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(12):74-80.
[1] ZHENG Lihui, LIU Hao, ZENG Hao, et al. Evaluation of working fluid damage in fractured reservoirs using flow rate instead of permeability[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(12):74-80.
[2] 刘波涛, 王新海, 王钊. 储层损害定量评价软件研制与应用[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2014, 35(4):1439-1446.
[2] LIU Botao, WANG Xinhai, WANG Zhao. Development and application of reservoir damage quantitative evaluation sottware[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2014, 35(4):1439-1446.
[3] 张鹏, 牛纪颖, 王相春. 利用常规测井信息计算储层伤害表皮系数初探[J]. 油气井测试, 2010, 19(2):32-35.
[3] ZHANG Peng, NIU Jiling, WANG Xiangchun. Preliminary study on calculation of formation damage skin factor by conventional well-logging data[J]. Well Testing, 2010, 19(2):32-35.
[4] 刘晓华, 邹春梅, 姜艳东, 等. 现代产量递减分析基本原理与应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(5):50-54.
[4] LIU Xiaohua, ZOU Chunmei, JIANG Yandong, et al. Theory and application of modern production decline analysis[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(5):50-54.
[5] 郑力会, 鄢捷年, 陈勉, 等. 油气井工作液成本控制优化模型[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(4):102-105.
[5] ZHENG Lihui, YAN Jienian, CHEN Mian, et al. Optimization model of working fluid cost control in oil and gas wells[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2005, 26(4):102-105.
[6] 任宜伟, 楼宣庆, 段宝江, 等. 工程参数对L区煤层气直井产量影响的定量研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(4):487-493.
[6] REN Yiwei, LOU Xuanqing, DUAN Baojiang, et al. Quantitative analysis on the effect of engineering parameters on production rate of CBM vertical well in Block L[J]. Oil Drilling& Production Technology, 2016, 38(4):487-493.
[7] 陶杉, 余星, 宋海, 等. 大数据方法寻找顺北碳酸盐岩储层开采过程中井壁坍塌主控因素[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(5):627-631.
[7] TAO Shan, YU Xing, SONG Hai, et al. Using big data method to find the main controlling factors of wellbore collapse in the production process of Shunbei carbonate reservoir[J]. Petroleum drilling and production technology, 2020, 42(5):627-631.
[8] 郑力会. 仿生绒囊钻井液煤层气钻井应用效果与发展前景[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(3):78-81.
[8] ZHENG Lihui. Application state and prospects of bionic fuzzy-ball drilling fluids for coalbed methane drilling[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(3):78-81.
[9] 郑力会, 曹园, 韩子轩. 含绒囊结构的新型低密度钻井液[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3):490-493.
[9] ZHENG Lihui, CAO Yuan, HAN Zixuan. Novel low-density drilling fluid containing fuzzy ball structure[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(3):490-493.
[10] 包凤达, 翁心真. 多元回归分析的软件求解和案例解读[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2000, 19(5):56-61.
[10] BAO Fengda, WENG Xinzhen. The software solving of multiple regression and correlat ion analysis and case explanation[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2000, 19(5):56-61.
[11] 王娟, 梁登星. 岭回归在修正多重共线性中的应用[J]. 四川理工学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 26(3):98-100.
[11] WANG Juan, LIANG Dengxing. Application of ridge regression on revising multicollinearity[J]. Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 26(3):98-100.
Outlines

/