轻质原油注空气热特征及氧化动力学研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.04.018

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to deeply analyze the thermal oxidation behavior of crude oil during air injection process in reservoir and further develop air injection enhance oil recovery technology, the TG/DTG-DTA analysis methods were used for study. Based on the classical Arrhenius kinetic model, the effects of oil chemical composition and reservoir rock on the oxidation activity of tested samples were quantitatively characterized. Crude oil undergoes three completely different chemical reactions during the whole heating process: low-temperature oxidation, fuel deposition and high-temperature oxidation. The oxidation of crude oil at low temperature shows a certain endothermic phenomena. Because of different hydrocarbon composition, crude oil with three samples added show different mass loss rates in each reaction area. Compared with that only contains crude oil, the addition of reservoir rocks reduces the activation energy of low temperature and high temperature oxidation. Researches show that: the higher the content of heavier components, the quicker the reaction of crude oil in LTO stage, the more fuel is deposited, and the higher the heat released from the combustion in HTO stage. The activation energy of crude oil in the high temperature stage is greater than that in the low temperature stage. High content of heavy components make the activation energy of oxidation reaction increase. The catalytic properties and specific surface area of reservoir rock reduce the activation energy of crude oil, playing an important role in the heterogeneous catalytic oxidation.

Key words: light crude oil, thermal behavior, kinetic analysis, SARA component, rock minerals

CLC Number:

TE357

HOU Jianfeng,LIU Penggang,CAO Tingyi. Thermal characteristics and oxidation kinetics study of light crude oil during air injection process[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 113-118.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 3

References 14

[1]	蒲万芬, 袁成东, 金发扬 , 等. 轻质油藏高压注空气技术应用前景分析[J]. 科技导报, 2013,31(17):72-79.
	PU W F, YUAN C D, JIN F Y , et al. High pressure air injection technique for light oil reservoir: Its development history and application prospect[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2013,31(17):72-79.
[2]	KÖK M V . Characterization of medium and heavy crude oils using thermal analysis techniques[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011,92(5):1026-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.027
[3]	KÖK M V . Thermal behavior and kinetics of crude oils at low heating rates by differential scanning calorimeter[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2012,96(12):123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.12.027
[4]	GUNDOGAR A S, KÖK M V . Thermal characterization, combustion and kinetics of different origin crude oils[J]. Fuel, 2014,123(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.01.058
[5]	LIU P G, PU W F, NI J H , et al. Thermal investigation on crude oil oxidation kinetics through TG/DTG and DTA tests[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2016,34(7):685-692.
[6]	刘鹏刚, 蒲万芬, 贾虎 , 等. 岩屑存在下油藏注空气原油的氧化热解分析[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2015,21(5):464-470.
	LIU P G, PU W F, JIA H , et al. Oil oxidation pyrolysis analysis of oil reservoir air injection in the presence of cutting[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2015,21(5):464-470.
[7]	张永刚, 罗懿, 刘岳龙 , 等. 红河油田轻质原油低温氧化实验及动力学研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2013,3(6):43-47.
	ZHANG Y G, LUO Y, LIU Y L , et al. LTO experiment and kinetics analysis of light crude in Honghe oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2013,3(6):43-47.
[8]	FAN C, ZAN C, ZHANG Q , et al. The oxidation of heavy oil: thermogravimetric analysis and non-isothermal kinetics using the distributed activation energy model[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014,119(6):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.10.020
[9]	KÖK M V, ACAR C . Kinetics of crude oil combustion[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2006,83(2):445-449. doi: 10.1007/s10973-005-7152-3
[10]	GREENSFELDER B S, VOGE H H, GOOD G M . Catalytic and thermal cracking of pure hydrocarbons: mechanisms of reaction[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1949,41(11):2573-2584. doi: 10.1021/ie50479a043
[11]	MOTHÉ M G, CARVALHO C H M, SÉRVULO E F C , et al. Kinetic study of heavy crude oils by thermal analysis[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2013,111(11):663-668. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2574-1
[12]	FASSIHI M R, MEYERS K O, BASILE P F . Low-temperature oxidation of viscous crude oils[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1990,5(4):609-616. doi: 10.2118/15648-PA
[13]	PU W F, LIU P G, JIA H , et al. Comparative study of light and heavy oils oxidation using thermal analysis methods[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2015,13(33):1357-1365.
[14]	NI J H, JIA H, PU W F , et al. Thermal kinetics study of light oil oxidation using TG/DTG techniques[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2014,117(3):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s10973-014-3854-8

样品	饱和烃/%	芳香烃/%	胶质/%	沥青质/%	密度/（g·cm^-3）	黏度/（mPa·s）	API/（°）
原油-1	41.535	43.256	14.483	0.725	0.859	23.624	33.235
原油-2	47.326	41.308	10.872	0.492	0.857	21.517	33.617
原油-3	48.368	42.083	9.120	0.428	0.854	20.704	34.192

样品	低温氧化（LTO）			燃料沉积（FD）		高温氧化（HTO）			燃尽温度/℃
样品	温度/℃	峰值温度/℃	质量损失/%	温度/℃	质量损失/%	温度/℃	峰值温度/℃	质量损失/%	燃尽温度/℃
原油-1	25~129	98	5.332	129~406	61.113	406~494	453	33.562	501
原油-2	25~125	74	13.401	125~409	66.061	409~516	462	20.540	517
原油-3	25~122	97	4.234	122~414	76.694	414~579	466	19.010	594
原油-1+储层岩石	25~162	132	4.741	162~397	33.730	397~476	433	16.512	527

样品	线性拟合斜率		活化能/（kJ·mol^-1）		指前因子/min
样品	LTO	HTO	LTO	HTO	LTO	HTO
原油-1	-2 556.352	-4 595.501	48.952	87.991	67 601	575 004
原油-2	-1 447.140	-4 281.890	27.710	81.990	2.572	851.140
原油-2	-1 259.130	-3 897.054	24.114	74.623	1.480	120.235
原油-1+储层岩石	-1 481.016	-3 061.673	28.363	58.621	42.650	776.240

[1]	XU Guochen, LIU Xiaowen. Research and application of supporting technologies for improving success rate of water injection well testing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 773-780.
[2]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[3]	ZHANG Jiawei, LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, REN Jianfei, LIU Baiqu. Discrete element simulation study on fracture propagation law of dual well synchronous fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 657-667.
[4]	CUI Chuanzhi, LI Huailiang, WU Zhongwei, ZHANG Chuanbao, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Yinghua, ZHENG Wenkuan. Analysis of pressures in water injection wells considering fracture influence induced by pressure-drive water injection [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 686-694.
[5]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[6]	YAO Hongsheng,YUN Lu,ZAN Ling,ZHANG Longsheng,QIU Weisheng. Development mode and practice of fault-block oriented shale oil well in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[7]	QU Lili, LI Minglin, WU Zhimin, ZHANG Lin, FENG Linping, DENG Liping. Application of unascertained measure model in reservoir potential evaluation of Nanpu H Fault Block [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 190-199.
[8]	ZHANG Jie,ZENG Cheng,LI Yanze,LI Minglin,LUO Hongmei,LI Jinghua. New evaluation method of water flooding reserve control degree in complex fault block reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 200-205.
[9]	PEI Xiuling, LI Jiaqi, MA Xufei, ZHANG Aixiang, ZHANG Leilei, LU Xiangguo, HE Xin. Experimental study on change characteristics of fractional flow rate of each structural unit in thick oil reservoir of Daqing Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 233-239.
[10]	ZHANG Longsheng,WANG Weiheng. Study and application of a high temperature foaming agent in anionic-nonionic system namely HDHP: A case study of shale gas wells in Dongsheng Block, Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[11]	YANG Zhaozhong, ZHENG Nanxin, ZHU Jingyi, LI Xiaogang. Preparation of nanoparticle-stabilized foam fracturing fluid and its foam stabilization mechanism [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 260-268.
[12]	WANG Xiaoqiang,ZHAO Li’an,WANG Zhiyuan,XIU Chunhong,JIA Guolong,DONG Yan,LU Detang. Data analysis method of pump shutdown pressure based on water hammer effect and cepstrum transformation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 108-116.
[13]	SHEN Xin,GUO Jianchun,WANG Shibin. Acidification retardation caused by shielding of cationic surfactants [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 117-126.
[14]	CHENG Xiaojun. Enhanced oil recovery and parameter optimization of hydrocarbon injection in fractured-cavity reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 902-909.
[15]	CHENG Keyang,QI Zhilin,TIAN Jie,YAN Wende,HUANG Xiaoliang,HUANG Shiwen. Change law of reservoir property during multi-cycle steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoir: A case study of HJ Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 816-824.

Thermal characteristics and oxidation kinetics study of light crude oil during air injection process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 14

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10