CO2驱最小混相压力预测模型研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the factors influencing the minimum miscibility pressure in CO₂ flooding and 36 groups of tubule experimental data, the correlation degree of each factor influencing the minimum miscibility pressure in CO₂flooding of crude oil is calculated by the grey correlation method. The prediction model of minimum miscible pressure in CO₂ flooding for crude oil is fitted by the MATLAB （Matrix Laboratory） software, which is related to the reservoir temperature, relative molecular weight of C₅₊, volatile hydrocarbon component （N₂+CH₄） content and intermediate hydrocarbon component （CO₂+H₂S+C₂—C₄） content. The fitting correlation coefficient reaches 0.900 9. The data of the minimum miscible pressure test of three wells in an oilfield are used to verify the new prediction model. The average error of calculation is 3.57 %, which can be used to guide the field development of the reservoirs.

Key words: CO₂flooding, minimum miscible pressure, grey correlation method, prediction model, tubule experiment

CLC Number:

TE341

PAN Yi,ZHAO Qiuxia,SUN Lei,LIU Jiang,WANG Tao,GUO Deming. Prediction model of minimum miscible pressure in CO₂ flooding[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 748-753.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1

Table 1

Data of influencing factors of minimum miscible pressure[17⇓⇓⇓⇓-22]"

序号	t（℃）	M_C5+	M_C7+	X_vol（%）	X_int（%）	X_C2—C4（%）	X_C2—C6（%）	MMP（MPa）
1	96.60	217.00	224.00	0.04	7.39	6.99	10.96	26.62
2	103.00	222.30	233.10	0.08	4.45	3.95	9.89	29.23
3	110.00	262.40	269.70	0.10	1.05	1.05	4.37	29.34
4	84.00	202.90	208.40	0.18	2.18	0.85	5.85	22.11
5	107.00	284.50	320.60	0.18	10.02	8.67	13.30	29.54
6	101.60	301.00	310.00	1.77	4.35	3.72	7.19	31.30
7	99.00	254.00	265.00	1.97	11.78	11.44	15.39	22.30
8	108.00	283.00	293.00	2.13	6.80	6.32	9.52	27.90
9	101.00	265.00	275.00	0.48	13.64	6.47	9.95	24.10
10	66.00	380.00	391.00	1.63	11.84	11.46	13.37	20.00
11	106.00	224.00	233.00	2.34	6.20	7.04	10.69	26.00
12	42.80	204.00	222.00	17.00	26.31	25.31	28.80	10.69
13	32.20	188.00	206.00	11.00	16.24	15.26	25.00	7.58
14	110.00	181.00	185.00	33.00	32.15	30.12	36.00	20.20
15	71.10	221.00	227.00	41.00	6.84	6.25	7.00	23.44
16	102.20	205.00	210.00	51.00	7.56	6.99	10.00	28.17
17	67.80	204.00	210.00	31.00	22.15	21.30	23.00	16.89
18	112.20	214.00	220.00	33.00	18.26	16.23	28.00	24.15
19	80.00	241.00	245.00	53.00	8.12	2.36	9.00	26.75
20	31.10	205.00	240.00	12.00	19.45	15.23	24.20	8.10
21	73.30	210.00	218.00	49.00	6.89	6.25	8.84	24.13
22	40.00	202.00	221.00	24.00	25.46	23.54	30.70	9.07
23	54.40	169.00	190.00	30.00	30.14	28.46	37.30	11.78
24	48.90	214.00	227.00	16.00	25.16	24.13	31.00	10.58
25	40.00	191.00	205.00	9.30	21.05	14.26	31.00	8.78
26	78.90	265.02	279.88	31.68	22.15	4.62	5.81	23.11
27	112.00	274.16	280.25	17.28	15.26	8.26	10.62	25.21
28	43.60	230.76	265.48	8.73	9.23	5.43	7.31	13.56
29	97.00	213.20	225.40	9.97	14.23	5.12	6.88	19.96
30	68.00	203.12	214.83	14.89	6.25	3.15	7.73	17.29
31	103.30	195.04	202.69	45.29	28.47	16.24	20.15	22.70
32	80.00	168.23	197.00	13.00	45.50	13.24	14.12	23.45
33	121.10	241.00	245.38	26.58	30.25	7.45	8.56	23.60
34	72.90	214.00	220.98	55.18	10.39	3.21	4.26	40.50
35	120.80	302.15	319.00	30.67	18.89	6.58	10.24	41.15
36	92.60	187.64	198.00	57.13	24.23	7.16	9.95	34.20

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Table 3

References 27

[1]	苏坤, 廖新维, 赵晓亮, 等. 基于遗传算法的CO₂驱最小混相压力预测[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(16):4524-4528.
	SU Kun, LIAO Xinwei, ZHAO Xiaoliang, et al. Prediction of minimum miscible Pressure in CO₂ Flooding based on Genetic Algorithm[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(16): 4524-4528.
[2]	谭光天. 注烃混相驱提高石油采收率机理及其在葡北油田应用研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油学院, 2005.
	TAN Guangtian. Mechanism of hydrocarbon injection miscible flooding and its application in Pubei Oilfield[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2005.
[3]	TEKLU T W, GHEDAN S G, GRAVES R M, et al. Minimum miscibility pressure determination: modified multiple mixing cell method[C]// Paper SPE-155454-MS presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, April 2012.
[4]	SHOKIR E M EL-M. CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure model for impure and pure CO₂ streams[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2006, 58(6): 176-185.
[5]	李孟涛, 单文文, 刘先贵, 等. 超临界二氧化碳混相驱油机理实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(3):80-83. doi: 10.7623/syxb200603017
	LI Mengtao, SHAN Wenwen, LIU Xiangui, et al. Experimental study of supercritical carbon dioxide miscible flooding Mechanism[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3): 80-83. doi: 10.7623/syxb200603017
[6]	AMAO A M, SIDDIQUI S, MENOUAR H, et al. A new look at the minimum miscibility pressure(MMP)determination fromslim tube measurements[C]// Paper SPE-153383-MS presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, April 2012.
[7]	WANG Y, FRANKLIN M O JR. Calculation of minimum miscibility pressure[C]// Paper SPE-39683-MS presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, April 1998.
[8]	SRIVASTAVA R K, HUANG S S. New interpretation technique for determining minimum miscibility pressure by rising bubble apparatus for enriched-gas drives[C]// Paper SPE-39566-MS presented at the SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, New Delhi, India, February 1998.
[9]	HARMON R A, GRIGG R B. Vapor-density measurement for estimating minimum miscibility pressure[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1988, 3(4): 1215-1220.
[10]	JESSEN K, FRANKLIN M O JR. On interfacial-tension measurements to estimate minimum miscibility pressures[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2008, 11(5): 933-939. doi: 10.2118/110725-PA
[11]	姚健. CO₂-原油最小混相压力实验测定及模型研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2019.
	YAO Jian. Experimental determination and modeling of minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂-crude oil[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2019.
[12]	HOLM L W, JOSENDAL V A. Effect of oil composition on miscible-type displacement by carbon dioxide[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1982, 22(1): 87-98. doi: 10.2118/8814-PA
[13]	唐凡, 朱永刚, 张彦明, 等. CO₂注入对储层多孔介质及赋存流体性质影响实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(1):72-76.
	TANG Fan, ZHU Yonggang, ZHANG Yanming, et al. Experimental research of the effect of CO₂ injection on porous media and fluid property in reservoir[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2021, 50(1): 72-76.
[14]	李媛, 刘世常, 张寅晖. H₂S与CO₂共存条件下气田地面集输系统内腐蚀影响因素分析方法研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(1):82-86.
	LI Yuan, LIU Shichang, ZHANG Yinhui. Study on analysis method of internal corrosion affecting factor under the coexistence of CO₂ and H₂S in surface gathering system[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2020, 49(1): 82-86.
[15]	曹蕾, 汤文芝. CO₂混相压裂技术在G区块的应用[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(2):69-72.
	CAO Lei, TANG Wenzhi. Application of carbon dioxide miscible fracturing technology in block G[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2020, 49(2): 69-72.
[16]	郑永旺. 苏北低渗油藏CO₂驱最小混相压力计算方法研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2017, 31(2):101-104.
	ZHENG Yongwang. Calculation method of minimum miscible pressure in CO₂ flooding of low permeability reservoirs in Northern Jiangsu[J]. Petroleum geology and engineering, 2017, 31(2): 101-104.
[17]	孙敬, 刘德华, 张亮, 等. 低渗透油藏递减影响因素的灰色关联分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(2):90-93.
	SUN Jing, LIU Dehua, ZHANG Liang, et al. Grey correlation analysis of influencing factors of low permeability reservoir decline[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(2): 90-93.
[18]	LI H Z, QIN J S, YANG D Y. An improved CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure correlation for live and dead crude oils[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(8): 3516-3523. doi: 10.1021/ie202339g
[19]	孙业恒, 吕广忠, 王延芳, 等. 确定CO₂最小混相压力的状态方程法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(1):82-84.
	SUN Yeheng, LYU Guangzhong, WANG Yanfang, et al. Equation of state method for determining minimum miscible pressure of CO₂[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(1): 82-84.
[20]	YUAN H, JOHN R T, EGWUENU A M, et al. Improved MMP correlations for CO₂ floods using analytical gas flooding theory[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2004, 8(5): 6-18.
[21]	SPENCE A S JR, WATKINS R W. The effect of microscopic core heterogeneity on miscible flood residual oil saturation[C]// Paper SPE-9229-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, September 1980.
[22]	候大力, 罗平亚, 孙雷, 等. 预测烃类气体—原油体系最小混相压力的改进模型[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2013, 34(6):684-688.
	HOU Dali, LUO Pingya, SUN Lei, et al. An improved model for predicting minimum miscible pressure in hydrocarbon gas-oil system[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013, 34(6): 684-688.
[23]	鞠斌山, 秦积舜, 李治平, 等. 二氧化碳—原油体系最小混相压力预测模[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2):274-277. doi: 10.7623/syxb201202013
	JU Binshan, QIN Jishun, LI Zhiping, et al. Prediction model of minimum miscibility pressure in carbon dioxide and crude oil system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 274-277. doi: 10.7623/syxb201202013
[24]	田巍. 老油田注CO₂开发提高注气能力的方法[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(3):72-77.
	TIAN Wei. A method of improving gas injection capacity by CO₂ injection for old oilfield[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2020, 49(3): 72-77.
[25]	刘小杰, 黄帅帅, 美合日阿依·穆泰力普, 等. CO₂与混合烷烃最小混相压力的界面张力法实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2020, 49(3):87-92.
	LIU Xiaojie, HUANG Shuaishuai, MEIHERIAYI Mutailipu, et al. Experiments on the minimum mixing pressure of CO₂ and mixed alkane by using the interfacial tension regression method[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2020, 49(3): 87-92.
[26]	仉莉. 降低CO₂驱油最小混相压力化学体系研发[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1):45-49.
	ZHANG Li. Development of chemical system for reducing minimum miscible pressure during CO₂ flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 45-49.
[27]	侯智玮, 刘勇, 叶锋, 等. 基于GPR-DE模型的CO₂-原油体系最小混相压力研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(3):126-133.
	HOU Zhiwei, LIU Yong, YE Feng, et al. Study on minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂-crude oil system based on GPR-DE model[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(3): 126-133.

井号	t （℃）	M_C5+	X_vol （%）	X_int （%）	实验值（MPa）	计算值（预测值）（MPa）	相对误差的绝对值（%）	相对误差绝对值的平均值（%）
1	123.62	226.59	32.05	11.22	45.85	43.18	3.52	3.57
2	115.95	255.28	52.55	8.02	47.06	45.94	0.73
3	120.76	454.01	21.46	8.71	54.08	56.59	6.46

Prediction model of minimum miscible pressure in CO₂ flooding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 27

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	ZHAO Di, MA Sen, CAO Yanhui. Seismic rock physics analysis and prediction model establishment of Shaximiao Formation in Zhongjiang Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 608-613.
[2]	LUO Hongwen, ZHANG Qin, LI Haitao, XIANG Yuxing, LI Ying, PANG Wei, LIU Chang, YU Hao, WANG Yaning. Influence law of temperature profile for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 676-685.
[3]	KONG Xiangwei,XIE Xin,WANG Cunwu,SHI Xian. Evaluation of geological engineering factors for productivity of deep CBM well after fracturing based on grey correlation method [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 433-440.
[4]	LI Wei,TANG Fang,HOU Boheng,QIAN Yin,CUI Chuanzhi,LU Shuiqingshan,WU Zhongwei. A method for oil recovery prediction of sandstone reservoirs in the eastern South China Sea based on neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 730-735.
[5]	YANG Jian,ZHAN Guowei,ZHAO Yong,REN Chunyu,QU Chongjiu. Characteristics of supercritical adsorption and desorption of deep shale gas in South Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 184-189.
[6]	YANG Zhaozhong,XIONG Junya,LIU Jun,MIN Chao,LI Xiaogang,YANG Chenxi. Identification of main controlling factors on performance of CBM well fracturing based on Apriori association analysis [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 63-69.
[7]	JIANG Yanbo. Experiment and characterization on phase behavior of CO₂ and crude oil in porous media [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 23-27.
[8]	CHEN Zuhua. Challenges and countermeasures of EOR by CO₂ injection in North Jiangsu Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 60-67.
[9]	QI Guixue. Effect of CO₂ extraction on minimum miscibility pressure [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 51-55.
[10]	Tang Yong,Zhao Xuemei,Wang Yang. Analysis of influence factor of minimum miscible pressure of CO₂ [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(4): 42-45.
[11]	Sun Lei,Zhou Fangfang,Xia Jing,Pan Yi,Luo Qiang,Leng Jie. An improved dew point pressure model for condensate gas based on genetic algorithm [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(3): 12-17.

Prediction model of minimum miscible pressure in CO2 flooding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 27

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

Prediction model of minimum miscible pressure in CO₂ flooding