Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 324-331.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.02.017
• Engineering Techniques • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-07-22
Online:
2025-04-01
Published:
2025-04-26
CLC Number:
HUANG Yaoqi,XIA Yufeng. Parameter optimization for low-temperature catalytic pyrolysis in oil-based drilling cuttings treatment[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(2): 324-331.
Table 3
CCD experimental results and their RSM model predicted values"
编号 | 药剂量/g | 温度/℃ | 时间/min | 处理后含油量/(mg/kg) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
实际值 | 预测值 | ||||
1 | 3.00 | 225.00 | 75.00 | 69 473 | 68 930.60 |
2 | 3.00 | 225.00 | 105.00 | 47 218 | 42 037.70 |
3 | 3.00 | 275.00 | 75.00 | 34 835 | 33 819.10 |
4 | 3.00 | 275.00 | 105.00 | 13 680 | 11 408.30 |
5 | 5.00 | 225.00 | 75.00 | 41 820 | 40 142.60 |
6 | 5.00 | 225.00 | 105.00 | 26 419 | 23 485.70 |
7 | 5.00 | 275.00 | 75.00 | 13 729 | 14 960.10 |
8 | 5.00 | 275.00 | 105.00 | 6 192 | 2 785.31 |
9 | 2.27 | 250.00 | 90.00 | 38 312 | 41 593.80 |
10 | 5.73 | 250.00 | 90.00 | 7 237 | 9 233.23 |
11 | 4.00 | 206.75 | 90.00 | 52 301 | 56 347.60 |
12 | 4.00 | 293.25 | 90.00 | 6 839 | 8 070.38 |
13 | 4.00 | 250.00 | 64.05 | 48 985 | 48 217.30 |
14 | 4.00 | 250.00 | 115.95 | 8 378 | 14 423.70 |
15 | 4.00 | 250.00 | 90.00 | 9 128 | 9 192.51 |
16 | 4.00 | 250.00 | 90.00 | 9 214 | 9 192.51 |
17 | 4.00 | 250.00 | 90.00 | 9 273 | 9 192.51 |
Table 4
Changes of components before and after OBDC treatment"
检测类别 | 含油率/% | pH值 | 含水率/% | COD/(mg/L) | 砷/(mg/L) | 汞/(mg/L) | 铜/(mg/L) | 铅/(mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
限值(A类) | 0.45 | 6.0~9.0 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.50 | 1.00 | ||
处理前 | 14.76 | 7.4 | 3.54 | 321 876 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 2.17 | 3.78 |
处理后 | 0.18 | 8.2 | 0.47 | 106 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.35 | |
检测类别 | 总铬/(mg/L) | 六价铬/(mg/L) | 镍/(mg/L) | 镉/(mg/L) | 锌/(mg/L) | 锰/(mg/L) | 钡/(mg/L) | 苯并[a]芘/(mg/kg) |
限值(A类) | 1.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 100.00 | 1.50 |
处理前 | 1.12 | 2.45 | 0.06 | 7.42 | 4.83 | 126.57 | 2.79 | |
处理后 | 0.74 | 0.28 | 1.26 | 1.71 | 73.43 |
[1] | 吕柏林, 马鹏, 卢迎波, 等. 风城浅层超稠油油藏原位催化改质降黏技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(5): 632-637. |
Bailin LYU, MA Peng, LU Yingbo, et al. In-situ catalytic modification and viscosity reduction technology in shallow ultra-heavy oil reservoirs in Fengcheng[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(5): 632-637. | |
[2] | 王广财, 刘万成, 陈向明, 等. 深层页岩油水平井复合盐弱凝胶钻井液技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(6): 675-682. |
WANG Guangcai, LIU Wancheng, CHEN Xiangming, et al. Technology of compound salt weak gel drilling fluid for long horizontal wells in deep shale oil reservoirs[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(6): 675-682. | |
[3] | 徐贵勤, 谢水祥, 任雯, 等. 废弃聚磺钻井液固相资源化绿色处理剂[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(6): 683-689. |
XU Guiqin, XIE Shuixiang, REN Wen, et al. Green treatment agent for waste polysulfonate drilling fluid solid phase resourceful utilization[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(6): 683-689. | |
[4] | BALL A S, STEWART R J, SCHLIEPHAKE K. A review of the current options for the treatment and safe disposal of drill cuttings[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2012, 30 (5): 457-473. |
[5] | XIA Z, YANG H, SUN J, et al. Co-pyrolysis of waste polyvinyl chloride and oil-based drilling cuttings: pyrolysis process and product characteristics analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021 318: 128521. |
[6] | JIANG G B, YU J L, JIANG H S, et al. Physicochemical characteristics of oil-based cuttings from pretreatment in shale gas well sites[J]. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 2020. |
[7] | CHEN Z, LI D, TONG K, et al. Static decontamination of oil-based drill cuttings with pressurized hot water using response surface methodology[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 (7): 7216-7227. |
[8] | 孙静文, 许毓, 刘晓辉, 等. 油基钻屑处理及资源回收技术进展[J]. 石油石化节能, 2016, 6(1): 30-33. |
SUN Jingwen, XU Yu, LIU Xiaohui, et al. Progress in oil-based drill cuttings treatment and resource recovery technology[J]. Energy Conservation and Measurement in Petroleum & Petrochemical Industry, 2016, 6(1): 30-33. | |
[9] | POYAI T, GETWECH C, DHANASIN P, et al. Solvent-based washing as a treatment alternative for onshore petroleum drill cuttings in Thailand[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 718: 137384. |
[10] | JIANG G, LI J, ZHAO L, et al. Insights into the deoiling efficiency of oil-based cuttings by surfactant-free microemulsions[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10: 107306. |
[11] | 林丽丽. 咪唑类离子液体的制备及其协同溶剂处理油基钻屑的研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2022. |
LIN Lili. Preparation of imidazolium ionic liquids and their synergistic solvent treatment of oil-based drill cuttings[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2022. | |
[12] | CHANG S H. Utilization of green organic solvents in solvent extraction and liquid membrane for sustainable wastewater treatment and resource recovery-a review[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020, 27(26): 32371-32388. |
[13] | KHAN M K, CAHYADI H S, KIM S M, et al. Efficient oil recovery from highly stable toxic oily sludge using supercritical water[J]. Fuel, 2019, 235: 460-472. |
[14] | YAN P, LU M, GUAN Y, et al. Remediation of oil-based drill cuttings through a biosurfactant-based washing followed by a biodegradation treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102: 10252-10259. |
[15] | PETRI I, PEREIRA M S, DOS SANTOS J M, et al. Microwave remediation of oil well drill cuttings. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 134: 23-29. |
[16] | ABNISA F, ALABA P A. Recovery of liquid fuel from fossil-based solid wastes via pyrolysis technique: a review[J]. Journal Of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9: 106593. |
[17] | 胡端义, 黎亮, 郑澜, 等. 间歇式热脱附炉炉膛结焦原因探讨和对策分析[J]. 油气田环境保护, 2023, 33(5): 37-40. |
HU Duanyi, LI Liang, ZHENG Lan, et al. Discussion on the Causes of Coking in the Furnace Chamber of Intermittent Hot Phase Desorption Furnace and Countermeasure Analysis[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields, 2023, 33(5): 37-40. | |
[18] | HU G, LIU H, CHEN C, et al. Low-temperature thermal desorption and secure landfill for oil-based drill cuttings management: pollution control, human health risk, and probabilistic cost assessment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 410: 124570. |
[19] | LYU Q, WANG L, JIANG J, et al. Catalytic pyrolysis of oil-based drill cuttings over metal oxides: the product properties and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals in char[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 159: 354-361. |
[20] | FALCIGLIA P P, GIUSTRA M G, VAGLIASINDI F G A. Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil: influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 185: 392-400. |
[21] | XIA Z, YANG H, SUN J, et al. Co-pyrolysis of waste polyvinyl chloride and oil-based drilling cuttings: pyrolysis process and product characteristics analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 318: 128521. |
[22] | YANG H, LIU Y, BAI G, et al. Study on the co-pyrolysis characteristics of oil-based drill cuttings and lees[J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2022, 160: 106436. |
[23] | ZHANG X Y, YAO A G. Pilot experiment of oily cuttings thermal desorption and heating characteristics study[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2019, 9(2): 1263-1270. |
[24] | LIN X S, SHI Y M, ZHENG Y, et al. Analysis of the catalytic pyrolysis of shale gas oil-based drill cuttings via TG-MS[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2023, 10: 2546-2553. |
[25] | CHENG C, GUO Q H, DING L, et al. Upgradation of coconut waste shell to value-added hydrochar via hydrothermal carbonization: Parametric optimization using response surface methodology[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 327: 120136. |
[26] | MKEL M. Experimental design and response surface methodology in energy applications: A tutorial review[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 151: 630-640. |
[27] | RAHEEM A, WAKG W A, YAP Y T, et al. Optimization of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris for syngas production using central composite design[J]. Rsc Advances, 2015, 5(88): 71805-71815. |
[28] | YUSUP S, KHAN Z, AHMAD M M, et al. Optimization of hydrogen production in in-situ catalytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2014, 60: 98-107. |
[29] | HU G J, LI J B, ZHANG X Y, et al. Investigation of waste biomass co-pyrolysis with petroleum sludge using a response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 192: 234-242. |
[30] | KAMALI A, HEIDARI S, GOLZARY A, et al. Optimized catalytic pyrolysis of refinery waste sludge to yield clean high quality oil products[J]. Fuel, 2022, 328: 125292. |
[31] | IDRIS R, CHENG T C, ASIK J A, et al. Optimization studies of microwave-induced co-pyrolysis of empty fruit bunches/waste truck tire using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 244: 118649. |
[32] | ZHUANG X Z, GAN Z Y, CHEN D Y, et al. A new insight into high quality syngas production from co-pyrolysis of light bio-oil leached bamboo and heavy bio-oil using response surface methodology[J]. Fuel, 2022, 324: 124721. |
[33] | VAN N T T, GASPILLO P, THANH H G T, NHI N H T, et al. Cellulose from the banana stem: optimization of extraction by response surface methodology (RSM) and characterization[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8: 11845. |
[34] | HASANZADEH R, MOJAVER P, AZDAST T, et al. Developing gasification process of polyethylene waste by utilization of response surface methodology as a machine learning technique and multi-objective optimizer approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48: 5873-5886. |
[35] | FAVIER L, SIMION A I, HLIHOR R M, et al. Intensification of the photodegradation efficiency of an emergent water pollutant through process conditions optimization by means of response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 328: 116928. |
[36] | LU H, ZHANG L W, XIA X L, et al. Optimization of pulse bi-directional electrolysis in-situ synthesis of tungsten carbide by response surface methodology[J]. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2023, 111: 106063. |
[37] | LV Q W, WANG L A, MA S D, et al. Pyrolysis of oil-based drill cuttings from shale gas field: Kinetic, thermodynamic, and product properties[J]. Fuel, 2022, 323(124332): 1-11. |
[38] | HU G J, LI J B, ZHANG X Y, et al. Investigation of waste biomass co-pyrolysis with petroleum sludge using a response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 192: 234-242. |
[39] | CHEN X, CHEN Y, YANG H, et al. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass: Selective deoxygenation to balance the quality and yield of bio-oil[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 273: 153-158. |
[40] | 黄维巍. 涪陵页岩气开发油基钻屑[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2017. |
HUANG Weiwei. Oil-based drill cuttings from Fuling shale gas development[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2017. | |
[41] | TANG B, XU Y X, SONG X F, et al. Numerical study on the relationship between high sharpness and configurations of the vortex finder of a hydrocyclone by central composite design[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 278: 504-516. |
[42] | ZHUANG X, GAN Z, CEN K, et al. Upgrading biochar by co-pyrolysis of heavy bio-oil and apricot shell using response surface methodology[J]. Fuel, 2022, 310: 122447. |
[43] | AHMADI S, MOHAMMADI L, IGWEGBE C A, et al. Application of response surface methodology in the degradation of Reactive Blue 19 using H2O2/MgO nanoparticles advanced oxidation process[J]. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 2018, 9: 241-253. |
[1] | OUYANG Yong, XIE Wenmin, DING Jiping, FENG Fuping, WANG Heyuan, YANG Donglin, MA Chi, HAICHUAN Lyu. Study on the destabilization mechanism of coal rock with cleats due to drilling fluid [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(2): 284-291. |
[2] | BAI Liangjie, ZHOU Yan, ZHANG Hao, XING Weiliang, FENG Ye. Cost reduction optimization design and field application of geothermal wells in Jidong Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 872-877. |
[3] | ZHAO Yanting,SHEN Jian,ZHAO Sumin,WEN Shuang,ZHANG Sen. Well completion technology optimization and application effect analysis of medium-deep sandstone reinjection wells: A case study of Minghuazhen Formation in Tianjin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 765-772. |
[4] | REN Hong,LI Weiqi,GUO Zhongchun,YANG Xiaoteng,XU Jian,WANG Xiao. Dynamic quantitative characterization and automatic identification of the buried hill reservoir types in Yakela block [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 789-800. |
[5] | XIE Xin,DOU Zhengdao,YANG Xiaomin,JIN Jing,WANG Yuanyuan,REN Fei. ROP enhancement technique for slimhole drilling in shale oil development [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 83-90. |
[6] | ZHANG Jinhong. Progress in Sinopec shale oil engineering technology [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 1-8. |
[7] | ZHANG Zhaofeng. Application prospects of Kenya’s high-temperature geothermal resources drilling technology in China’s dry hot rock resources [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 833-842. |
[8] | ZHANG Long,WANG Yibing,XIAN Bao’an,ZHANG Yafei,TAN Zhanglong,HAERHENG Tuersong,SUN Hao,WANG Guan,ZHANG Jintao. Applicability and mechanism of dual-tubing screen completion technology for Fukang Mining Area in Xinjiang [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 633-642. |
[9] | ZHU Huashu,WANG Xiyong,XU Xiaoling,GUO Zhiliang,HUANG Hechun. Extendability limit of engineering drilling in long horizontal section of Weirong deep shale gas [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 506-514. |
[10] | YOU Lijun,WANG Yang,KANG Yili,TANG Jirui,LIU Jiang,YANG Dongsheng. Physical properties of water-bearing tight sandstone reservoir for improving permeability by thermal stimulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 320-328. |
[11] | CHEN Liang,HU Jinke,GENG Dong,LI Ziyu. A new technology of plugging and collapse prevention with oil-based drilling fluid in Chongqing shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 527-535. |
[12] | HU Chunfeng,MEI Junwei,LI Shizhao,LU Bi,MA Jun,QIAN Jin. Analysis on geological and engineering factors of development effects on normal pressure shale gas in Nanchuan Block, eastern Suchuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 559-568. |
[13] | ZHENG Lihui,XU Yandong,QIU Ziyao,GENG Yunpeng,DONG Shengwei,YANG Xumin. Quantitative analysis on drilling and completion loss factors by all data in Shunbei Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 597-604. |
[14] | ZHANG Guorong,WANG Junfang,ZHANG Longfu,CHEN Shikui. Key technical progress in efficient development of Nanchuan normal-pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 365-376. |
[15] | WANG Yanqi,HE Qing,LONG Zhiping. Main progress and development direction of shale gas drilling and completion technologies in southeastern Chongqing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 356-364. |
|