模糊相似法对页岩气选区评价的应用——以四川盆地海相页岩气为例

Abstract

Abstract:

At present, the optimizing evaluation indexes of the existing favorable target areas of shale gas, is not comprehensive, and the evaluation methods are not taking full advantage of the uncertain information indexes. Therefore, the enrichment, accumulate, and storage of the shale gas, and the surface condition of the exploration and development are analyzed. On this base, by combining the successful exploring experience of the shale gas aboard with the characteristics of the domestic marine shale gas accumulation, we selected 13 comprehensive evaluation indexes, including the netshale thickness and the organic carbon content of the shale gas favorable target areas, and proposed the corresponding classified evaluation standards. Because of the thick shale gas reservoir, the heterogeneity and the lack of the geological awareness of the evaluation parameters, the interval value of the evaluation indexes replaced the average value of the uncertain information evaluation index, and the fuzzy similarity evaluation method based on the fuzzy similar theory was established. The calculation results show that, compared with the comprehensive information superposition method, this method is more reasonable, effective, simple and useful. It can provide reliable evidences for the optimal of the favorable target areas of shale gas.

Key words: fuzzy similarity method, fuzzy similarity coefficient, marine shale gas, target area of shale gas

CLC Number:

P618

Sihang Wang,Xiaolin Tian,Chuke Wang, et al. Application of fuzzy similarity methods for evaluating the district of shale gas: A case of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(1): 71-75.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Table 3

References 10

[1]	张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生 . 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004,24(7):15-18.
[2]	王世谦, 陈更生, 董大忠 , 等. 四川盆地下古生界页岩气藏形成条件与勘探前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2009,29(5):51-58. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.05.010
[3]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教 , 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010,37(6):641-653.
[4]	王玉满, 董大忠, 李建忠 , 等. 川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(4):551-561. doi: 10.7623/syxb201204003
[5]	黄金亮, 邹才能, 李建忠 , 等. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012,39(1):69-75.
[6]	David G Hill, Tracy E Lombardi, John P Martin . Fractured shale gas potential in New York[J]. Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, 2004,26(1/2):57-78.
[7]	王世谦, 王书彦, 满玲 , 等. 页岩气选区评价方法与关键参数[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,40(6):609-620.
[8]	李延钧, 刘欢, 张烈辉 , 等. 四川盆地南部下古生界龙马溪组页岩气评价指标下限[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2013,43(7):1 087-1 095.
[9]	聂海宽, 张金川 . 页岩气聚集条件及含气量计算——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 地质学报, 2012,86(2):349-361.
[10]	郭秀英, 陈义才 . 区间数指标权重确定的一种离差方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2013,29(20):61-63.

评价等级	有效厚度/m	有机碳含量,%	有机质类型	成熟度,%	孔隙度,%	含气量/（m³·t^-1）	脆性矿物含量,%	断层类型	压力系数	埋深/m	封盖层	地表条件	地面设施
有利区	≥30	≥3	Ⅰ~Ⅱ₁	1.6~2.5	≥4	≥2	40~60	微型~小型	≥1.3	1 500 ~ 3 000	膏盐岩	平原、丘陵	管网、设施齐全
较有利区	10~30	1~3	Ⅱ₂~Ⅲ₂	1.0~1.6或2.5~5	2~4	1~2	30~40	中型	0.7~1.3	500 ~ 1 500或3 000 ~ 4 000	致密砂岩、灰岩、泥岩	高原、低山	有一定管网、设施
不利区	≤10	≤0.5	Ⅲ₃	≥5或≤1.0	≤2	≤1	≤30	大型	≤0.7	200~500或4 000~5 000	一般砂岩	高山、戈壁、湖沼	少有管网、设施或无

评价指标			有效厚度/m	有机碳含量,%	有机质类型	成熟度,%	孔隙度,%	含气量/（m³·t^-1）	脆性矿物含量,%	裂缝发育程度	压力系数	埋深/ m	盖层	地表条件
页岩气评价区块	JY1井区	龙马溪组	90 ~ 100	1.5 ~ 5.89	Ⅰ	2.3 ~ 3.13	3 ~ 7.89	2 ~ 5.5	33.9 ~ 60	小型	1.41 ~ 1.45	2 300 ~ 2 800	泥岩	平原、丘陵
	W201井区	筇竹寺组	47 ~ 57	1.9 ~ 3.9	Ⅰ	2.5 ~ 4.5	1.2 ~ 3.2	1.1 ~ 2.8	40 ~ 50	小型	1.1 ~ 1.2	2 652 ~ 2 704	泥岩	丘陵
	N201井区	筇竹寺组	41 ~ 51	2 ~ 4.5	Ⅰ	2.8 ~ 3.2	3 ~ 6	1.7 ~ 3.5	40 ~ 50	小型	1.18 ~ 2.1	2 479 ~ 2 525	泥岩	丘陵
	N203井区	筇竹寺组	60 ~ 70	2.5~4.2	Ⅰ	2.8 ~ 3.2	2 ~ 6	3.5 ~ 6.5	35 ~ 45	小型	1.3~1.5	2 230 ~ 2 293	泥岩	丘陵
	Y1井区	龙马溪组	30 ~ 40	1.5 ~ 2.2	Ⅱ₁	1.7 ~ 1.9	1.5 ~ 2.5	0.8 ~ 1.8	42 ~ 50	小型	1.1 ~ 1.2	2 000 ~ 2 500	泥质砂岩	丘陵

评价区	理想有利区	理想较有利区				不利区
评价区	S_i₇	S_i₈	S_i₉	S_i₁₀	S_i₁₁	S_i₁₂	S_i₁₃	S_i₁₄	S_i₁₅
JY1井区龙马溪组	0.986 3	0.963 8	0.964 3	0.964 7	0.965 2	0.945 4	0.945 6	0.945 3	0.945 5
W201井区筇竹寺组	0.968 1	0.984 1	0.984 5	0.986 2	0.986 9	0.971 3	0.971 8	0.969 4	0.969 8
N201井区筇竹寺组	0.967 8	0.978 8	0.979 2	0.979 9	0.980 4	0.961 1	0.961 2	0.960 3	0.960 4
N203井区筇竹寺组	0.978 7	0.967 7	0.967 7	0.968 8	0.968 9	0.949 9	0.949 7	0.949 2	0.948 9
Y1井区龙马溪组	0.961 1	0.989 1	0.979 1	0.987 8	0.987 8	0.981 1	0.980 8	0.983 2	0.982 9

Application of fuzzy similarity methods for evaluating the district of shale gas: A case of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 10

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Yue,WANG Liya,LI Guofu,ZHANG Lin,YANG Fu,MA Zhuoyuan,GAO Zheng. Prediction of favorable areas for low-rank coalbed methane based on Random Forest algorithm [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 596-603.
[2]	JIN Da. Prediction of mudstone distribution on top of middle Triassic Xiaotangzi formation in Puguang area [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 6-11.
[3]	Li Danlu,Li Lin,Ma Jingfeng,Wang Haofan. Study on AVO model of time-lapse seismic monitoring for CO₂ flooding and storage: Taking low porosity and low permeability reservoir in Ordos basin as an example [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 82-88.