钻遇断层阵列侧向测井响应特性正演研究

Abstract

Abstract:

Firstly, we established a 3D forward model of the vertical well when drilling in faults, the response of the array lateral logging was numerically simulated by the finite element method. And then, we analyzed the effects of different fault dip angles, fault distances, and surrounding rock conductivity on the characteristics of array lateral logging response in the drilling process of fault. The results showed that when in the drilling process of the fracture zone, the larger the fault dip angle was, the smaller the width of the fracture zone would be reflected by the apparent resistivity. As the array lateral logging equipment went deeper and the fault distance（≤4 meters） got greater, the measured apparent resistivity would be closer to the resistivity of the fractured zone and surrounding rocks. When under the same detection mode, the apparent resistivity would increase with the increasing of the resistivity of lower surrounding rocks. When the detection mode and the surrounding rock resistivity were the same, the apparent resistivity would decrease with the increase of the resistivity of the surrounding rock while drilling the footwall of fault.

Key words: array lateral logging, fault, finite element, 3D geological modeling

CLC Number:

TE132.1

Yong Yang,Heng Li,Duo Yang, et al. Forward simulation of response characteristics of the array lateral logging in drilling process of fault[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 50-55.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References 19

[1]	毛凤鸣, 陈安定, 严元锋 , 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油气成藏特征及地震识别技术[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006,27(6):827-840. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060614
[2]	关富佳, 刘德华, 颜明 . 复杂小断块油藏立体井网开发模式研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2010,17(2):213-215.
[3]	尤启东, 周方喜, 张建良 . 复杂小断块油藏水驱开发效果评价方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(1):82-85+120.
[4]	苏爱芹, 郑宇霞, 魏广仁 , 等. 复杂小断块综合研究技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2011,18(4):472-474.
[5]	刘振华, 胡启 . 阵列侧向测井响应的计算及其特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2002,17(1):53-57.
[6]	仵杰, 谢尉尉, 解茜草 , 等. 阵列侧向测井仪器的正演响应分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,23(1):73-76.
[7]	邓少贵, 李智强 . 裂缝性储层裂缝的阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J]. 地球科学, 2009,34(5):841-847.
[8]	邓少贵, 徐悦伟, 蒋建亮 . 倾斜井非均匀地层的阵列侧向测井响应研究[J]. 测井技术, 2010,34(2):130-134.
[9]	冯琳伟, 汪德刚, 贺飞 , 等. 薄互层和倾斜地层阵列侧向测井响应计算分析[J]. 测井技术, 2013,37(1):80-84.
[10]	仵杰, 李宇腾, 付晨东 , 等. 钻遇断层水平井地层模型的阵列感应测井响应特性数值模拟[J]. 测井技术, 2017,41(3):266-271.
[11]	潘克家, 王文娟, 汤井田 , 等. 高分辨率阵列侧向测井的数学模型及有限元快速正演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013,56(9):3197-3211. doi: 10.6038/cjg20130932
[12]	潘克家, 汤井田, 杜华坤 , 等. 轴对称地层中高分辨率阵列侧向测井信赖域反演法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016,59(8):3110-3120.
[13]	李智强, 邓少贵, 范宜仁 , 等. 裂缝性储层阵列侧向测井响应反演研究[J]. 测井技术, 2010,34(2):138-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2010.02.008
[14]	范宜仁, 蒋建亮, 邓少贵 , 等. 高分辨率阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J]. 测井技术, 2009,33(4):333-336.
[15]	李少华, 王利, 王军 , 等. 断层破碎带的建模方法和意义[J]. 断块油气田, 2014,21(4):409-412.
[16]	崔廷主, 马学萍 . 三维构造建模在复杂断块油藏中的应用——以东濮凹陷马寨油田卫95块油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010,31(2):198-205. doi: 10.11743/ogg20100210
[17]	周密, 梁景伟, 郭显赋 , 等. 断块油藏水平井压力动态模型[J]. 断块油气田, 2011,18(1):74-78.
[18]	万效国, 邬光辉, 谢恩 , 等. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩断层破碎带地震预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016,37(5):786-791. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160519
[19]	金强, 周进峰, 王端平 , 等. 断层破碎带识别及其在断块油田开发中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(1):82-89.

井段序号	不同井眼位置
1	仪器经上围岩穿过断层的下盘到达下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点15 m
2	仪器经上围岩,并穿过小段的破碎带,又经一小段上围岩,再到断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点6 m
3	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘一角、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点3 m
4	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点2 m
5	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点1 m
6	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器垂直穿过破碎带中心点
7	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点1 m
8	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、破碎带、断层下盘及下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点2 m
9	仪器经上围岩、断层上盘、下围岩、穿过一小段破碎带穿到下围岩;仪器水平距离断层破碎带中心点6 m
10	仪器经过上围岩、断层上盘到下围岩;水平距离断层破碎带中心点15 m

Forward simulation of response characteristics of the array lateral logging in drilling process of fault

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 19

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HE Faqi, LI Junlu, GAO Yilong, WU Jinwei, BAI Xingying, GAO Dun. Development characteristics and potential of fault-fracture reservoir in southwest margin of Ordos Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 667-677.
[2]	SHU Qinglin, WANG Yanan, HAN Zhiying, YAO Xiutian, XIA Jian, CHEN Yumao, LI Weizhong. Strategies and methods of 3D geological multi-level modeling for oilfields: A case study of an integrated oilfield, Gudao Oilfield, in Bohaiwan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 779-787.
[3]	ZHU Ziheng, REN Zhongxin, WANG Zhaozhou, GUO Shangtao, WANG Chaoguo, LIU Yujian, YANG Tao, WEI Bing. Sealing evaluation of Liuzhuang UGS in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 805-813.
[4]	CHENG Hai,ZHANG Yiqun,WANG Yin,LIU Chao. Progress and understanding on geology-drilling engineering-mechanics coupling mechanism of ultra-deep directional wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 593-599.
[5]	NI Feng,ZHU Feng,MENG Qingli. Analysis of knee fold structure model in Nanchuan Block of southeastern Chongqing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 373-381.
[6]	LIANG Xiaobai, JU Wei. Fault connectivity evaluation based on topological structure analysis: A case study of multi-stage faults of deep shale gas reservoirs in central Luzhou Block, southern Sichuan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 446-457.
[7]	GAO Quanfang,ZHANG Peixian,GUAN Linlin,LI Yanjing,NI Feng. Influence of lower-level reverse faults on shale gas enrichment and high yield: A case study of Pingqiao Dong-1 Fault in Nanchuan area, southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 458-467.
[8]	MA Daixin,REN Xianjun,ZHAO Mifu,HAN Jiaoyan,LIU Yuhu. Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 167-175.
[9]	REN Xianjun,SHI Yunqian,JING Wei. Characteristics and development model of underwater eruptive volcanic reservoirs in continental lacustrine basin: A case study of Chaganhua Subsag in Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 176-189.
[10]	WANG Min,CAO Yue,LI Wancai,ZHAO Wenqi,WANG Wenyong,SONG Yuying. Establishing classification standards for volcanic reservoirs based on pore structure and nuclear magnetic logging: A case study of Chaganhua Gas Field in Songnan Fault Depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 216-223.
[11]	TANG Jiandong, WANG Zhilin, GE Zhengjun. CO₂ flooding technology and its application in Jiangsu Oilfield in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[12]	XU Yandong, TAO Shan, HE Hui, WAN Xiaoyong, ZOU Ning, YUAN Hongfei. Well test model of vertical double-hole channeling considering gravity [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 827-833.
[13]	YAO Hongsheng,YUN Lu,ZAN Ling,ZHANG Longsheng,QIU Weisheng. Development mode and practice of fault-block oriented shale oil well in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[14]	LI Guoyong. Key technology of fine description of complex fault block reservoir and its application [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 152-162.
[15]	ZHANG Jie,ZENG Cheng,LI Yanze,LI Minglin,LUO Hongmei,LI Jinghua. New evaluation method of water flooding reserve control degree in complex fault block reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 200-205.