Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3): 45-50.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.03.007
• Methodological and Theory • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xin,LI Min
Received:
2020-03-24
Online:
2020-07-03
Published:
2020-06-26
CLC Number:
Xin WANG,Min LI. Establishment of the characteristic chart for CO2 near-miscible flooding of peripheral oilfields in Daqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 45-50.
Table 2
Computing miscibility of different types for CO2 flooding models %"
混相系数 | 驱替类型 | 初期 | 0.04 HCPV | 0.2 HCPV | 0.4 HCPV | 0.6 HCPV | 1.5 HCPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全混相体积系数 | 混相驱 | 55.3 | 63.2 | 62.9 | 60.5 | 61.2 | 50.4 |
近混相驱 | 4.5 | 9.6 | 11.0 | 10.1 | 9.6 | 9.2 | |
非混相驱 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
半混相体积系数 | 混相驱 | 44.7 | 36.8 | 37.2 | 39.5 | 38.6 | 49.7 |
近混相驱 | 84.4 | 74.0 | 76.2 | 88.4 | 78.5 | 31.6 | |
非混相驱 | 100 | 96.3 | 63.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | |
非混相体积系数 | 混相驱 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
近混相驱 | 11.1 | 16.3 | 12.8 | 1.5 | 11.9 | 59.2 | |
非混相驱 | 0 | 3.8 | 36.8 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 99.9 |
Table 3
Errors between calculated and simulated values of oil recovery by CO2 flooding characteristic curve method"
气驱特征曲线类型 | 驱替类型 | 特征曲线法计算采收率/% | 数模计算采收率/% | 误差/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
含碳率-累产油关系曲线 | 混相驱 | 26.0 | 26.2 | 0.7 |
近混相驱 | 23.2 | 23.8 | 2.4 | |
非混相驱 | 18.9 | 19.4 | 2.2 | |
A型气驱特征曲线 | 混相驱 | 25.6 | 26.2 | 2.2 |
近混相驱 | 23.1 | 23.8 | 2.3 | |
B型气驱特征曲线 | 混相驱 | 25.5 | 26.2 | 2.3 |
近混相驱 | 23.1 | 23.8 | 2.7 | |
非混相驱 | 16.3 | 19.4 | 15.9 |
[1] | 李剑, 段景杰, 姚振杰, 等. 低渗透油藏水驱后注CO2驱提高采收率影响因素分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2017,4(6):45-52. |
LI J, DUAN J J, YAO Z J, et al. Analysis on influence factors of enhanced oil recovery in CO2 flooding after water flooding in low permeability reservoir[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2017,4(6):45-52. | |
[2] | 李立峰, 滕世婷, 冯绪波, 等. 基于水驱开发全过程的新型水驱特征曲线[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019,26(3):85-88. |
LI L F, TENG S T, FENG X B, et al. A new water-flooding characteristic curve based on the whole water-flooding process[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019,26(3):85-88. | |
[3] | 杨艳. 低渗透油田童氏参数改进及应用分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2018,25(3):350-353. |
YANG Y. Modification of Tongrs parameter of low permeability reservoir and its application[J]. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field, 2018,25(3):350-353. | |
[4] | 张本艳, 周立娟, 何学文, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田长3储层注CO2室内研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018,32(3):87-90. |
ZHANG B Y, ZHOU L J, HE X W, et al. A laboratory study on CO2 injection of Chang 3 reservoir of Weibei oilfield in Ordos basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2018,32(3):87-90. | |
[5] | 商琳琳. 龙虎泡油田高台子致密油层CO2驱实验研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018,32(5):60-62. |
SHANG L L. Experimental study on CO2 flooding of Gaotaizi tight oil layers in Longhupao oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2018,32(5):60-62. | |
[6] | 鞠斌山, 于金彪, 吕广忠, 等. 低渗透油藏CO2驱油数值模拟方法与应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):126-133. |
JU B S, YU J B, LYU G Z, et al. Numerical simulation method and application of CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):126-133. | |
[7] | 陈祖华, 吴公益, 钱卫明, 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油藏注CO2提高采收率技术及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):152-162. |
CHEN Z H, WU G Y, QIAN W M, et al. EOR technology and application of CO2 injection for small complex fault block reservoirs in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):152-162. | |
[8] | 贾凯锋, 计董超, 高金栋, 等. 低渗透油藏CO2驱油提高原油采收率研究现状[J]. 非常规油气, 2019,6(1):107-114. |
JIA K F, JI D C, GAO J D, et al. The exisiting state of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019,6(1):107-114. | |
[9] | 王海妹. CO2驱油技术适应性分析及在不同类型油藏的应用——以华东油气分公司为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018,32(5):63-65. |
WANG H M. Adaptive analysis of CO2 flooding technology and its application in different types of reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2018,32(5):63-65. | |
[10] | 王世璐, 王玉霞, 贾凯锋. 低渗透油藏岩心注CO2驱油效率物理模拟[J]. 非常规油气, 2019,6(2):85-90. |
WANG S L, WANG Y X, JIA K F. Physical simulation of CO2 flooding efficiency in low permeability reservoir core[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019,6(2):85-90. | |
[11] | 杨勇. 胜利油田特低渗透油藏CO2驱技术研究与实践[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):11-19. |
YANG Y. Research and application of CO2 flooding technology in extra-low permeability reservoirs of Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):11-19. | |
[12] | 史云清, 贾英, 潘伟义, 等. 低渗致密气藏注超临界CO2驱替机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017,38(3):610-616. |
SHI Y Q, JIA Y, PAN W Y, et al. Mechanism of supercritical CO2 flooding in low-permeability tight gas reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017,38(3):610-616. | |
[13] | 吕成远, 王锐, 赵淑霞, 等. 低渗透油藏CO2非混相驱替特征曲线研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017,24(5):111-114. |
LYU C Y, WANG R, ZHAO S X, et al. Study on displacement characteristic curve in CO2 immiscible flooding for low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017,24(5):111-114. | |
[14] |
孙雷, 冯乔, 陈国利, 等. CO2混相驱拟含气率与采出程度图版的建立[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,36(1):83-88.
doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.10.14.06 |
SUN L, FENG Q, CHENG G L, et al. Establishment of the chart of equivalent gas ratio-recovery degree for CO2 miscible flooding[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2014,36(1):83-88.
doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.10.14.06 |
|
[15] | 李阳. 低渗透油藏CO2驱提高采收率技术进展及展望[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):1-10. |
LI Y. Technical advancement and prospect for CO2 flooding enhanced oil recovery in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):1-10. | |
[16] | 丁妍. 濮城油田低渗高压注水油藏转CO2驱技术及应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019,33(6):73-76. |
DING Y. Technology and application of CO2 flooding in low-permeability and high-pressure water injection reservoirs in Pucheng oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019,33(6):73-76. |
[1] | LI Jianshan, GAO Hao, YAN Changhao, WANG Shitou, WANG Liangliang. Molecular dynamics simulation on interaction mechanisms of crude oil and CO2 [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 26-34. |
[2] | SHI Yan, XIE Junhui, GUO Xiaoting, WU Tong, CHEN Dequan, SUN Lin, DU Daijun. Experimental study on CO2 flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 76-82. |
[3] | ZHANG Zhisheng, WU Xiangyang, WU Qian, WANG Jixing, LIN Hanchi, GUO Junhong, WANG Rui, LI Jinhua, LIN Qianguo. Risk management system and application of CO2 flooding and sequestration leakage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 91-101. |
[4] | CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO2 sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304. |
[5] | WANG Gaofeng, LIAO Guangzhi, LI Hongbin, HU ZhiMing, WEI Ning, CONG Lianzhu. Mechanism and calculation model of EOR by CO2 flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 734-740. |
[6] | CUI Chuanzhi,YAN Dawei,YAO Tongyu,WANG Jian,ZHANG Chuanbao,WU Zhongwei. Prediction method of migration law and gas channeling time of CO2 flooding front: A case study of G89-1 Block in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 741-747. |
[7] | DENG Jiasheng,WANG Ziyi,HE Wangda,PENG Dongyu,YU Bo,TANG Hongming. Experimental study on reaction of chlorite with CO2 aqueous solution [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 777-783. |
[8] | JI Bingyu,HE Yingfu. Practice and understanding about CO2 flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs by Sinopec [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 805-811. |
[9] | LI Yang,HUANG Wenhuan,JIN Yong,HE Yingfu,CHEN Zuhua,TANG Yong,WU Gongyi. Different reservoir types of CO2 flooding in Sinopec EOR technology development and application under “dual carbon” vision [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 793-804. |
[10] | ZHANG Zonglin,LYU Guangzhong,WANG Jie. CCUS and its application in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 812-822. |
[11] | TANG Liangrui,JIA Ying,YAN Jin,LI Guanghui,WANG Yong,HE Youwei,QING Jiazheng,TANG Yong. Study on calculation method of CO2 storage potential in depleted gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 858-863. |
[12] | WU Gongyi,ZHAO Ziping,WU Bo. CO2 flooding development models and economic benefit evaluation of different types of reservoirs in Subei basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 864-870. |
[13] | LIU Xueli,ZHENG Xiaojie,TAN Tao,DOU Lian,XIE Shuang. Experiments on CO2 flooding mechanism for Tahe sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 115-120. |
[14] | HE San,XIANG Sulin,XIA Xingyu,SUN Yinjuan,BAI Jianjun,HE Junyi,LI Feiran,YANG Xi,QIU Yunpeng. Preliminary evaluation for corrosion resistance of non-metallic pipes by CO2 flooding [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 86-91. |
[15] | CHEN Zuhua. Challenges and countermeasures of EOR by CO2 injection in North Jiangsu Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 60-67. |
|