胜利油田CCUS技术及应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.06.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Climate change centering on carbon dioxide（CO₂） emissions and energy security centering on the shortage of oil resources are two major problems restricting the sustainable development of China's social economy. In order to solve the bottleneck of both the CO₂ capture and the great improvement of recovery factor of low permeability reservoir, the related technology researches have been carried out in Shengli Oilfield, forming the supporting technologies such as CO₂ capture, safe long-distance transmission, reservoir engineering optimization design, the injection-production process design, design of surface gathering and oil displacement and environmental monitoring, and building an industrial-scale demonstration project for flue gas CO₂ capture, oil displacement and underground storage of coal-fired power plants. The industrial tests show that the cost of the new MSA technology is 35 % lower than that of the traditional MEA technology. Over 31×10⁴ t of CO₂ have successfully been injected into the reservoir, with the cumulative oil increment of 8.6×10⁴ t, and 28×10⁴ t of CO₂ storaged in G89-1 block. The central well area has increased the recovery rate by 9.5 %, and the recovery rate is expected to reach 17.2 %.

Key words: CO₂ emissions, CO₂ capture, CO₂ flooding, CO₂ storage, enhance oil recovery（EOR）

CLC Number:

TE357

Zonglin ZHANG,Guangzhong LYU,Jie WANG. CCUS and its application in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 812-822.

Figures/Tables 15

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References 20

[1]	程耀华, 杜尔顺, 田旭, 等. 电力系统中的碳捕集电厂:研究综述及发展新动向[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2020, 3(4):339-343.
	CHENG Yaohua, DU Ershun, TIAN Xu, et al. Carbon capture power plants in power systems: review and latest research trends[J]. Journal of Global Energy interconnection, 2020, 3(4):339-343.
[2]	张九天, 张璐. 面向碳中和目标的碳捕集、利用与封存发展初步探讨[J]. 热力发电, 2021, 50(1):1-6.
	ZHANG Jiutian, ZHANG Lu. Preliminary discussion on development of carbon capture, utilization and storage for carbon neutralization[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2021, 50(1):1-6.
[3]	时飞, 李奕帆. 混合基质膜在碳捕集领域的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(6):2453-2462.
	SHI Fei, LI Yifan. Advances of mixed matrix membrane for CO₂ capture, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress 2020, 39(6):2453-2462.
[4]	余子炎. 燃煤电厂CO₂捕集、利用和封存与“捕集预留”分析[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2019, 33(11):8-10.
	YU Ziyan. Coal-fired power plant carbon capture, use and storage and "trap set aside" analysis[J]. Total Corrosion Control, 2019, 33(11):8-10.
[5]	杨胜, 张显娟, 逯鹏, 等. PBI膜在CO₂捕集方面的研究进展[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2019, 39(6):150-156.
	YANG Sheng, ZHANG Xianjuan, LU Peng, et al. Recent advances in polybenzimidazole(PBI) membranes for CO₂ capture[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2019, 39(6):150-156
[6]	秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾. 美国CO₂驱油技术应用及启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2):209-216.
	QIN Jishun, HAN Haishui, LIU Xiaolei. Application and enlightenment ofcarbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):209-216.
[7]	李士伦, 周守信, 杜建芬, 等. 国内外注气提高石油采收率技术回顾与展望[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2002, 9(2):1-5.
	LI Shilun, ZHOU Shouxin, DU Jianfen, et al. Review and prospects for the development of EOR by gas injection at home and abroad[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2002, 9(2):1-5.
[8]	TABER J J, MARTIN F D, SERIGHT R S. EOR screening criteria revisited - Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1997, 12(3):189-198. doi: 10.2118/35385-PA
[9]	Jarrell P M, Fox C, Michael H. Stein, PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CO₂ FLOODING. Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., 2002.
[10]	张本艳, 周立娟, 何学文, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田长3储层注CO₂室内研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(3):87-90.
	ZHANG Benyan, ZHOU Lijuan, HE Xuewen, et al. A laboratory study on CO₂ injection of Chang 3 reservoir of Weibei oilfield in Ordosbasin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2018, 32(3):87-90.
[11]	廖洪. S油藏注CO₂提高采收率技术[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017.
	LIAO Hong. The EOR study of CO₂ injection in S reservoir[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[12]	李孟涛, 杨广清, 李洪涛. CO₂混相驱驱油方式对榆树林油田采收率影响研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2007, 21(4):52-54.
	LI Mengtao, YANG Guangqing, LI Hongtao. Study of the influence of CO₂ miscible displacement on enhanced oil recovery in Yushulin oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2007, 21(4):52-54.
[13]	杨勇. 胜利油田特低渗透油藏CO₂驱技术研究与实践[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(6):41-46.
	YANG Yong. Research and application of CO₂ flooding technology in extra-low permeability reservoirs of Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1):11-19.
[14]	曹绪龙, 吕广忠, 王杰, 等. 滩坝砂特低渗透油藏CO₂驱油技术及应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3):41-46.
	CAO Xulong, LYU Guangzhong, WANG Jie, et al. Technology and application of CO₂ flooding in ultra-low permeability beach-bar sand reservoir[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3):41-46.
[15]	曹绪龙, 吕广忠, 王杰, 等. 胜利油田CO₂驱油技术现状及下步研究方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3):51-59.
	CAO Xulong, LYU Guangzhong, WANG Jie, et al. Present situation and further research direction of CO₂ flooding technology in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3):51-59.
[16]	陆诗建, 孟晓锋, 高丽娟, 等. 压缩式热泵回收CO₂捕集解吸塔废热节能工艺研究[J]. 山东化工, 2019, 48(13):213-217.
	LU Shijian, MENG Xiaofeng, GAO Lijuan, et al. Study on energy-saving technology for recovering waste heat from CO₂ capture and desorption tower by compressed heat pump[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2019, 48(13):213-217.
[17]	李志鹏. 东营凹陷高89地区CO₂驱油及封存过程中断层纵向安全性评价体系[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(6):41-46.
	LI Zhipeng. Evaluation on vertical safety of fault during carbon dioxide flooding and sequestration in the Gao89 area of Dongying sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(6):41-46.
[18]	国殿斌, 徐怀民. 深层高压低渗油藏 CO₂驱室内实验研究——以中原油田胡96块为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(1):102-105.
	GUO Dianbin, XU Huaimin. Laboratory experiments of CO₂ flooding in deep-buried high-pressure low-permeability reservoirs: Acase study of block Hu96 in Zhongyuan Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(1):102-105.
[19]	姜洪福, 雷友忠, 熊霄, 等. 大庆长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层CO₂非混相驱油试验研究[J]. 现代地质, 2008, 22(4):659-663.
	JIANG Hongfu, LEI Youzhong, XIONG Xiao, et al. An CO₂ immiscible displacement experimental study aiming at fuyang extra-low permeability layer at peripheral of daqing placanticline[J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(4):659-663.
[20]	邓瑞健, 田巍, 李中超, 等. CO₂驱动用储层微观界限研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(3):133-137.
	DENG Ruijian, TIAN Wei, LI Zhongchao, et al. Microscopic limits of reservoir producing for carbon dioxide flooding[J]. Special Oil& Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(3):133-137.

气源	CO₂含量（%）	捕集/分离方法	捕集分离后体积摩尔分数（mol%）
燃煤电厂烟道气	8.0~12.0	复合胺吸收	99.50
高含CO₂气藏	93.0	低温精馏法	99.00
石化炼厂尾气	16.6	胺吸收	99.99

筛选参数	CO₂混相驱	CO₂近混相驱	CO₂非混相驱	对应因素
油藏条件下原油黏度（mPa·s）	0~10	0~50	0~600	混相特征,注入能力
油藏条件下原油密度（10³kg/m³）	<0.876	<0.922	<0.980	混相能力
剩余油饱和度（%）	>30	>30	>40	EOR潜力
油层深度（m）	>1 000	>1 000	>600	混相能力
地层温度（℃）	<120	<120	<120	混相能力
油藏压力（MPa）	p≥p_MMP	p=0.8~1 p_MMP	p<0.8 p_MMP	混相条件
储量规模（10⁴t）	>50	>50	>50	封存能力

一级评价因素		二级评价因素	三级评价因素			级别
断层活动期次	断层延伸与盖层配置关系	断层断距与直覆盖层厚度配置关系	盖层黏结段厚度（m）	断层岩泥质含量（%）	断层倾角（°）	级别
一期	嵌入式	顶部完整型				很高
同生	下断式	盖层见面型	>100		≤45	高
			50~100		45~75	较高
			0~50		>75	中等
		盖层相隔型		≥50	≤45	较低
		盖层相隔型		<50	>45	低
多期	断穿式	盖层见面型	>200		≤45	较高
			100~200		45~75	中等
			0~100		>75	较低
		盖层相隔型		≥50	≤45	低
		盖层相隔型		<50	>45	很低

阶段		特点	泄漏路径	控制因素	地质安全界限
阶段		特点	泄漏路径	控制因素	距离断层一个井距以内	距离断层一个井距以外
CO₂驱油阶段			开启断层破裂盖层	断层的重开启压力盖层的破裂压力	p_气注<p_断启 p_气注<p_盖破	p_气注<p_盖破
CO₂ 注入封存阶段	CO₂ 注入阶段		开启断层破裂盖层断层岩盖层	断层的重开启压力盖层的破裂压力断层岩纵向封堵压力盖层封堵压力	p_气注<Min（p_断启,p_盖破）且 p<Min（p_断纵封,p_盖破）	p_气注<Min（p_盖破,p_盖封）
CO₂ 注入封存阶段	CO₂ 封存阶段		开启断层破裂盖层断层岩盖层溢出点	断层的重开启压力盖层的破裂压力断层岩纵向封堵压力盖层封堵压力油藏最大容量	p<Min（p_断启,p_盖封）且 p<Min（p_断纵封,p_盖封）且 Q_存<Q_孔

CCUS and its application in Shengli Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	TANG Jiandong, WANG Zhilin, GE Zhengjun. CO₂ flooding technology and its application in Jiangsu Oilfield in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[2]	LI Jianshan, GAO Hao, YAN Changhao, WANG Shitou, WANG Liangliang. Molecular dynamics simulation on interaction mechanisms of crude oil and CO₂ [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 26-34.
[3]	SHI Yan, XIE Junhui, GUO Xiaoting, WU Tong, CHEN Dequan, SUN Lin, DU Daijun. Experimental study on CO₂ flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.
[4]	ZHANG Zhisheng, WU Xiangyang, WU Qian, WANG Jixing, LIN Hanchi, GUO Junhong, WANG Rui, LI Jinhua, LIN Qianguo. Risk management system and application of CO₂ flooding and sequestration leakage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 91-101.
[5]	YANG Yu,XU Qilin,LIU Ronghe,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping,WANG Jianmeng. Phase equilibrium law of CO₂ storage in depleted gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 280-287.
[6]	CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO₂ sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[7]	WANG Jianmeng,CHEN Jie,JI Lidong,LIU Ronghe,ZHANG Qian,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping. Research progress and prospect of state equation in CO₂ storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 305-312.
[8]	WANG Gaofeng, LIAO Guangzhi, LI Hongbin, HU ZhiMing, WEI Ning, CONG Lianzhu. Mechanism and calculation model of EOR by CO₂ flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 734-740.
[9]	CUI Chuanzhi,YAN Dawei,YAO Tongyu,WANG Jian,ZHANG Chuanbao,WU Zhongwei. Prediction method of migration law and gas channeling time of CO₂ flooding front: A case study of G89-1 Block in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 741-747.
[10]	ZHANG Lisong,JIANG Menggang,LI Wenjie,ZHANG Shiyan,CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,SUN Zhixue. Mathematical model and numerical analysis for leakage of fluid along geological fault during CO₂ storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 754-763.
[11]	DENG Jiasheng,WANG Ziyi,HE Wangda,PENG Dongyu,YU Bo,TANG Hongming. Experimental study on reaction of chlorite with CO₂ aqueous solution [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 777-783.
[12]	JI Bingyu,HE Yingfu. Practice and understanding about CO₂ flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs by Sinopec [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 805-811.
[13]	LI Yang,HUANG Wenhuan,JIN Yong,HE Yingfu,CHEN Zuhua,TANG Yong,WU Gongyi. Different reservoir types of CO₂ flooding in Sinopec EOR technology development and application under “dual carbon” vision [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 793-804.
[14]	TANG Liangrui,JIA Ying,YAN Jin,LI Guanghui,WANG Yong,HE Youwei,QING Jiazheng,TANG Yong. Study on calculation method of CO₂ storage potential in depleted gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 858-863.
[15]	WU Gongyi,ZHAO Ziping,WU Bo. CO₂ flooding development models and economic benefit evaluation of different types of reservoirs in Subei basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 864-870.