天然气水合物藏开发品质评价研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.03.014

Abstract

Abstract:

The development of the natural gas hydrate reservoirs has the typical characteristics of high risk, high difficulty and high investment, so the correct evaluation of development quality is a prerequisite and the key to the issue. In order to solve the problems that the evaluation index has limitations and the evaluation results has ambiguity for the development of the natural gas hydrate reservoirs, the factor set is chosen based on the main controlling factors, and the scoring criteria of main controlling factors are defined. The weight set is established by the comprehensive weight calculated by analytic hierarchy process, and then fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of development quality of natural gas hydrate reservoir is further completed. This method is used to evaluate the development quality of Messoyakha and other typical natural gas hydrate reservoirs, and the applicability and feasibility of the method are verified, so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the efficient development of the natural gas hydrate reservoirs.

Key words: natural gas hydrate, development quality, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, qualitative evaluation, analytic hierarchy process

CLC Number:

TE37

Qiannan YU,Han ZHANG,Ning LI, et al. Development quality evaluation of natural gas hydrate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 385-392.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Sensitivity analysis results of factors of development of natural gas hydrate reservoir"

分类	参数	符号	典型值	敏感度
工程地质参数	储层埋深/m	$D r$	600	1.73
	储层资源量/m³	$R r$	2.0×10¹⁰	9.79 $× 10 - 2$
	上覆水深/m	$D w$	1 000	6.12 $× 10 - 2$
	距海岸距离/m	$L r$	1 000	8.91 $× 10 - 3$
	储层倾角/（°）	$A r$	10	7.85 $× 10 - 4$
储层物性参数	原始地层温度/K	$T i$	283	10.35
	原始水合物饱和度	$S h i$	0.5	5.31
	地层岩石导热系数/[W/（m·K）]	$K r$	1	2.55
	原始地层压力/MPa	$p i$	20	1.03
	地层岩石孔隙度	$φ 0$	0.45	0.97
	地层渗透率/ $μ m 2$	$K$	2.0	9.01 $× 10 - 2$
	地层与井底压差/MPa	$? P g p$	2.0	5.08 $× 10 - 2$
	原始含水饱和度	$S w i$	0.5	4.65 $× 10 - 2$
	地层与井底温差/K	$T g p$	10	3.09 $× 10 - 2$
	地层岩石比热容/[J/（kg·K）]	$C r$	1 000	7.63 $× 10 - 3$
流体性质参数	水合物相平衡压力/MPa	$p e q$	8	7.24
	水合物比热容/[J/（kg·K）]	$C h$	1 900	3.88
	水合物分解速率常数/[kg/（m²·Pa·s）]	$k d$	3×10^-14	1.08
	甲烷比热容/[J/（kg·K）]	$C v g$	2.227×10³	5.12 $× 10 - 2$
	水密度/（kg/m³）	$ρ w$	0.997×10³	4.07 $× 10 - 2$
	甲烷黏度/（mPa·s）	$μ g$	11×10^-3	2.75 $× 10 - 2$
	气水毛管力/Pa	$p c$	2.0×10⁴	2.72 $× 10 - 2$
	水黏度/（mPa·s）	$μ w$	2.98	1.29 $× 10 - 2$
	水比热容/[J/（kg·K）]	$C w$	4.2×10³	9.65 $× 10 - 3$
	水合物密度/（kg/m³）	$ρ h$	0.9×10³	1.56 $× 10 - 3$
	水合物导热系数/[W/（m·K）]	$K h$	2.3	2.24 $× 10 - 4$
	水导热系数/[W/（m·K）]	$K w$	0.59	9.68 $× 10 - 5$
	甲烷导热系数/[W/（m·K）]	$K g$	0.025	3.23 $× 10 - 5$

Table 1

Table 2

Score of main control factors for development of natural gas hydrate reservoir"

评分	工程地质参数 $D r$ /m	储层物性参数					流体性质参数
评分	工程地质参数 $D r$ /m	$T i$ /K	$p i$ /MPa	$S h i$	$K r$ /[W/（m·K）]	$φ 0$	$C h$ /[J/（kg·K）]	$p e q$ /MPa	$k d$ /[kg/（m²·Pa·s）]
60	﹥900	﹤274	﹤5	﹤0.1	﹤0.2	﹤0.25	﹥2 100	﹥10	﹤10^-16
70	600~900	274~278	5~10	0.1~0.3	0.2~0.4	0.25~0.35	1 900~2 000	8~10	10^-16~10^-15
80	300~600	278~283	10~20	0.3~0.5	0.4~1.0	0.35~0.45	1 800~1 900	6~8	10^-15~10^-14
90	150~300	283~288	20~30	0.5~0.7	1~2	0.45~0.55	1 700~1 800	4~6	10^-14~10^-13
100	﹤150	﹥288	﹥30	﹥0.7	﹥2	﹥0.55	﹤1 700	﹤4	﹥10^-13

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Judgment matrix of physical parameters of natural gas hydrate reservoir"

参数	$T i$	$p i$	$S h i$	$K r$	$φ 0$	权重
$T i$	1	7	2	5	7	0.506 5
$p i$	0.143	1	0.333	2	1	0.019 7
$S h i$	0.5	3	1	3	3	0.247 0
$K r$	0.2	0.5	0.333	1	2	0.085 4
$φ 0$	0.143	1	0.333	0.5	1	0.069 5

Table 5

Table 6

Judgment matrix of fluid property parameters of natural gas hydrate reservoir"

参数	$C h$	$p e q$	$k d$	权重
$C h$	1	0.5	3	0.309 0
$p e q$	2	1	5	0.581 6
$k d$	0.333 3	0.2	1	0.109 5

Table 6

Table 7

Comprehensive weight of main control factors for development of natural gas hydrate reservoir"

参数	工程地质参数 $D r$		储层物性参数						流体性质参数
参数	工程地质参数 $D r$		$T i$	$p i$	$S h i$	$? ? K r$	$φ 0$		$C h$	$p e q$	$k d$
权重	0.090 9		0.230 2	0.041 7	0.112 2	0.038 8	0.031 6		0.140 4	0.264 3	0.049 8

Table 7

Table 8

Main control factors for development quality evaluation of typical natural gas hydrate reservoir"

天然气水合物藏	工程地质参数 $D r$ /m	储层物性参数					流体性质参数
天然气水合物藏	工程地质参数 $D r$ /m	$T i$ /K	$p i$ /MPa	$S h i$	$K r$ /[W/（m·K）]	$φ 0$	$C h$ /[J/（kg·K）]	$p e q$ /MPa	$k d$ /[kg/（m²·Pa·s）]
Messoyakha	750	282.25	7.8	0.45	0.56	0.25	1 800	6.8	2.9×10^-14
Mallik	950	282.95	11.2	0.40	0.89	0.35	2 000	10.2	3.7×10^-14
Alaska	650	282.65	7.5	0.40	0.72	0.27	1 800	6.6	2.5×10^-14
Nankai Trough	300	283.75	13.5	0.35	1.37	0.35	2 000	10.0	1.2×10^-13
神狐	150	283.15	8.9	0.30	1.58	0.38	2 000	8.5	9.8×10^-12

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Evaluation results of single factor of typical natural gas hydrate reservoirs"

天然气水合物藏	工程地质参数 $D r$	储层物性参数					流体性质参数			评价结果 Q	开发品质等级
天然气水合物藏	工程地质参数 $D r$	$T i$	$p i$	$S h i$	$K r$	$φ 0$	$C h$	$p e q$	$k d$	评价结果 Q	开发品质等级
Messoyakha	70	80	80	80	80	70	80	80	80	78.77	Ⅱ级
Mallik	60	80	70	80	80	80	70	60	80	70.61	Ⅲ级
Alaska	70	80	70	80	80	70	80	80	80	76.95	Ⅱ级
Nankai Trough	90	90	80	80	90	80	70	70	90	80.04	Ⅰ级
神狐	90	90	70	80	90	80	70	70	100	81.63	Ⅰ级

Table 10

References 24

[1]	魏纳, 白睿玲, 周守为, 等. 碳达峰目标下中国深海天然气水合物开发战略[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(2): 156-165.
	WEI Na, BAI Ruiling, ZHOU Shouwei, et al. China's deepwater gas hydrate development strategies under the goal of carbon peak[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(2): 156-165.
[2]	SAHU C, KUMAR R, SANGWAI J S. Comprehensive review on exploration and drilling techniques for natural gas hydrate reservoirs[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(10): 11813-11839. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02202
[3]	黄满, 吴亮虹, 宁伏龙, 等. 天然气水合物储层改造研究进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(7): 160-174.
	HUANG Man, WU Lianghong, NING Fulong, et al. Research progress in natural gas hydrate reservoir stimulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(7): 160-174.
[4]	ZHAO J F, LIU Y L, GUO X W, et al. Gas production behavior from hydrate-bearing fine natural sediments through optimized step-wise depressurization[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 260(2): 114275. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114275
[5]	ZHAO J F, ZHU Z H, SONG Y C, et al. Analyzing the process of gas production for natural gas hydrate using depressurization[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 142: 125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.071
[6]	LI X S, XU C G, ZHANG Y, et al. Investigation into gas production from natural gas hydrate: A review[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 172: 286-322. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.101
[7]	LI G, MORIDIS G J, KENI Z, et al. Evaluation of gas production potential from marine gas hydrate deposits in Shenhu area of South China Sea[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(11): 6018-6033. doi: 10.1021/ef100930m
[8]	吴能友, 黄丽, 苏正, 等. 海洋天然气水合物开采潜力地质评价指标研究: 理论与方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(7): 11-17.
	WU Nengyou, HUANG Li, SU Zheng, et al. A study of geological evaluation indicators for the exploitation potential of marine natural gas hydrates: Theory and methodology[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(7): 11-17.
[9]	ZATSEPINA O, POOLADI-DARVISH M, HONG H. Behavior of gas production from type Ⅲ hydrate reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2011, 3(3): 496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2011.05.005
[10]	业渝光. 天然气水合物实验探测和测试技术[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2011, 27(6): 37-43.
	YE Yuguang. Detection and testing techniques in gas hydrate experiments[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2011, 27(6): 37-43.
[11]	王英梅, 张梦迪, 吴青柏, 等. 水合物一次分解压力对记忆效应的影响[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(4): 66-72.
	WANG Yingmei, ZHANG Mengdi, WU Qingbai, et al. Influence of primary decomposition pressure of hydrate on memory effect[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2021, 50(4): 66-72.
[12]	刘昌岭, 孙运宝. 海洋天然气水合物储层特性及其资源量评价方法[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(5): 44-57.
	LIU Changling, SUN Yunbao. Characteristics of marine gas hydrate reservoir and its resource evaluation methods[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(5): 44-57.
[13]	罗东坤, 汪华. 运用模糊综合评价法评估油气开发投资风险[J]. 国际石油经济, 2004, 12(2): 38-40.
	LUO Dongkun, WANG Hua. Assessment of investment risk in oil and gas development using fuzzy integrated evaluation method[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2004, 12(2): 38-40.
[14]	于倩男, 刘义坤, 于洋. 基于层次分析的精控压裂井层模糊评价研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(3): 107-114.
	YU Qiannan, LIU Yikun, YU Yang. Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of fine controlled fracturing wells and layers based on analytical hierarchy process[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(3): 107-114.
[15]	袁永真, 裴发根, 张鹏辉, 等. 利用模糊统计法进行天然气水合物靶区预测—以青海木里地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(6): 1281-1286.
	YUAN Yongzhen, PEI Fagen, ZHANG PengHui, et al. Fuzzy statistic method used to prediction of gas hydrate target area: A case study of Muli area in Qinghai Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017, 41(6): 1281-1286.
[16]	魏纳, 周守为, 崔振军, 等. 南海北部天然气水合物物性参数评价与分类体系构建[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(8): 59-67.
	WEI Na, ZHOU Shouwei, CUI Zhenjun, et al. Evaluation of physical parameters and construction of a parameter classification system for natural gas hydrate in the northern South China Sea[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(8): 59-67.
[17]	刘振坤, 王晖, 王盘根, 等. 加拿大油砂SAGD开发储量品质评价关键参数研究[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2019, 35(12): 55-61.
	LIU Zhenkun, WANG Hui, WANG Pangen, et al. Key parameters of reserve quality evaluation for oil sand SAGD development in Canada[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2019, 35(12): 55-61.
[18]	李淑霞, 刘亚平, 陈月明, 等. 天然气水合物藏品质评价的多级模糊综合评价[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(3): 463-466.
	LI Shuxia, LIU Yaping, CHEN Yueming, et al. Evaluating the quality of natural gas hydrate reservoir by hierarchy fuzzy assessment[J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(3): 463-466.
[19]	徐立涛, 何玉林, 石万忠, 等. 琼东南盆地深水区天然气水合物成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5):598-610. doi: 10.7623/syxb202105004
	XU Litao, HE Yulin, SHI Wanzhong, et al. Main controlling factors and patterns of gas hydrate accumulation in the deep water area of Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 598-610. doi: 10.7623/syxb202105004
[20]	史斗, 郑军卫. 世界天然气水合物研究开发现状和前景[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(4): 330-339. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.04.0330
	SHI Dou, ZHENG Junwei. The status and prospects of research and exploitation of natural gas hydrate in the world[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 1999, 14(4): 330-339. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.04.0330
[21]	COLLETT T S. Energy resource potential of natural gas hydrates[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1971-1992.
[22]	MORIDIS G J, COLLETT T S, BOSWELL R, et al. Toward production from gas hydrates: Current status, assessment of resources, and simulation-based evaluation of technology and potential[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2009, 12(5): 745-771.
[23]	刘建辉, 李占东, 赵佳彬. 神狐海域天然气水合物研究新进展[J]. 矿产与地质, 2021, 35(3): 596-602.
	LIU Jianhui, LI Zhandong, ZHAO Jiabin. New progress in the study of natural gas hydrate in Shenhu area[J]. Mineral Resources and Geology, 2021, 35(3): 596-602.
[24]	付强, 周守为, 李清平. 天然气水合物资源勘探与试采技术研究现状与发展战略[J]. 中国工程科学, 2015, 17(9): 123-132.
	FU Qiang, ZHOU Shouwei, LI Qingping. Research status and development strategy of gas hydrate resource exploration and development technologies[J]. Engineering Science, 2015, 17(9): 123-132.

开发品质等级	定性评价评语	开发品质评分
Ⅰ级	开发品质优秀	>80
Ⅱ级	开发品质良好	75~80
Ⅲ级	开发品质中等	70~75
Ⅳ级	开发品质较差	<70

Development quality evaluation of natural gas hydrate reservoir

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 24

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	BI Caixia. A corrosion risk assessment method for underground gas storage ground pipeline based on data and knowledge dual drivers [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 657-666.
[2]	ZHOU Feng,HUANG Shilin,LI Xiaoming,LIAO Kaigui,LI Yong. Quantitative evaluation of tight gas reservoir classification based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Penglaizhen Formation gas reservoir in Xinchang Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 468-474.
[3]	CUI Yudong, LU Cheng, GUAN Ziyue, LUO Wanjing, TENG Bailu, MENG Fanpu, PENG Yue. Effects of creep on depressurization-induced gas well productivity in South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[4]	HE Dongbo, REN Lu, HAO Jie, LIU Xiaoping, CAO Qian. Quantitative evaluation system of geothermal resources based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of middle-deep hydrothermal sandstone reservoir in Caofeidian of Hebei Province [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 713-725.
[5]	YANG Zuoya,WU Xiaomin. Numerical simulation study on multi-layer combined exploitation of natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 393-402.
[6]	QU Lili, LI Minglin, WU Zhimin, ZHANG Lin, FENG Linping, DENG Liping. Application of unascertained measure model in reservoir potential evaluation of Nanpu H Fault Block [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 190-199.
[7]	LIU Yexuan,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,ZHOU Xin,LIANG Lixi. Evaluation method of fracability of shale oil reservoir considering influence of interlayer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[8]	ZHAO Kebin,SUN Changqing,GUO Jiaqi,WU Chuanzhi. Enrichment characteristics and accumulation mechanism of natural gas hydrate in the Gulf of Mexico: Cases study of study area WR313 and GC955 [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 669-679.
[9]	KANG Yuzhu. Exploration of accumulation conditions of natural gas hydrate reservoirs in the South China Sea Block [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 659-668.
[10]	LU Yaqiu,WANG Jin,CAO Mengxi. Evaluation method of shale gas development area selection based on improved analytic hierarchy process [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 204-211.
[11]	Zhang Yi,Shen Lei,Tian Xijun,Hu Junzhi,Liu Peng. Optimization of amount of methanol injection in gas gathering station based on water dew point analysis: A case of gas gathering station of Zizhou gas field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 60-63.