苏里格致密砂岩气田效益开发技术对策研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.03.017

Abstract

Abstract:

At present Sulige Gas Field holds the distinction of being the largest in terms of natural gas reserves and annual production among tight sandstone gas reservoirs in China. However, as development progresses, there is a noticeable decline in the quality of gas field reserves and an increasing fragmentation of untapped reserves, escalating the uncertainties surrounding future development. This study builds upon a deepened geological and gas reservoir engineering comprehension acquired during earlier phases of gas field development. It methodically identifies the factors influencing the advantageous development of the gas field and formulates technical countermeasures to ensure its sustainable development. Key findings from the research include: ① An empirical analysis, centered on economic production, evaluates the economic benefits of each block within the gas field. This model assesses the current benefit status and directs future overall development strategies. ② To foster the continued advancement of the tight gas industry within the field, the study evaluates the benefits of individual blocks and explores supportive measures for effective development. These measures include classified management and specific technical strategies, derived from geological and gas reservoir engineering perspectives. This approach culminates in the formulation of technical countermeasures aimed at enhancing the effective development of Sulige Gas Field, thereby ensuring its continued economic viability.

Key words: Sulige Gas Field, tight gas, open flow, internal rate of return, beneficial development

CLC Number:

TE37

Minhua CHENG,Danfeng LEI,Lianqun ZHANG, et al. Technical strategy for beneficial development of tight sand gas in Sulige Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 475-483.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 4

Fig. 7

References 25

[1]	孙龙德, 邹才能, 贾爱林, 等. 中国致密油气发展特征与方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.06.01
	SUN Longde, ZOU Caineng, JIA Ailin, et al. Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.06.01
[2]	张本健, 王兴志, 张楚越, 等. 中坝气田须二气藏致密砂岩储层特征及开发潜力再认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(6): 10-15.
	ZHANG Benjian, WANG Xingzhi, ZHANG Chuyue, et al. Recognition of tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and development potential of the 2nd member of Xujiahe gas reservoir in Zhongba Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 10-15.
[3]	付强, 肖冬生. 胜北洼陷三间房组致密砂岩气藏有利储层特征与成岩相[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(1): 9-16.
	FU Qiang, XIAO Dongsheng. Favorable reservoir characteristics and diagenetic facies of tight sandstone gas reservoir of Sanjianfang Formation in Shengbei Subsag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(1): 9-16.
[4]	王继平, 张城玮, 李建阳, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏开发认识与稳产建议[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2): 100-110.
	WANG Jiping, ZHANG Chengwei, LI Jianyang, et al. Tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field: Development understandings and stable-production proposals[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 100-110.
[5]	冀光, 贾爱林, 孟德伟, 等. 大型致密砂岩气田有效开发与提高采收率技术对策——以鄂尔斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 602-612. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.03.19
	JI Guang, JIA Ailin, MENG Dewei, et al. Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight as Field: A case study of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 602-612. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.03.19
[6]	李昊远, 庞强, 魏克颖, 等. 致密砂岩储层孔隙结构分形特征对气水渗流规律的影响——以苏里格气田东南部桃2区块山1段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(2): 177-185.
	LI Haoyuan, PANG Qiang, WEI Keying, et al. Influence of pore structure fractal features of tight sandstone reservoir on gas-water seepage law: A case study of Shan 1 Member in Tao 2 block of southeastern Sulige Gas Field[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(2): 177-185.
[7]	马新华, 贾爱林, 谭健, 等. 中国致密砂岩气开发工程技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(5): 572-579.
	MA Xinhua, JIA Ailin, TAN Jian, et al. Tight sand gas development technologies and practices in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(5): 572-579.
[8]	谌丽, 王才志, 宁从前, 等. 基于机器学习的鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段岩相测井识别方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 525-536.
	SHEN Li, WANG Caizhi, NING Congqian, et al. Well-log lithofacies classification based on machine learning for Chang-7 member in Longdong area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 525-536.
[9]	杨玉斌, 肖文联, 韩建, 等. 丹凤场气田致密砂岩气水渗流特征及影响因素[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 356-364.
	YANG Yubin, XIAO Wenlian, HAN Jian, et al. Gas-water flow characteristics and influencing factors of tight sandstone in Danfengchang Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 356-364.
[10]	王国亭, 贾爱林, 郭智, 等. 苏里格气田致密气开发井网效果评价与调整对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(8): 66-79.
	WANG Guoting, JIA Ailin, GUO Zhi, et al. Effect evaluation and adjustment countermeasures of tight gas development well patterns in the Sulige Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(8): 66-79.
[11]	陈强, 李文厚, 孙娇鹏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘岐山曹家沟奥陶系剖面地层和沉积特征[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 246-254.
	CHEN Qiang, LI Wenhou, SUN Jiaopeng, et al. Ordovician stratigraphy and sedimentary characteristics of Caojiagou section in Qishan County, southern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 246-254.
[12]	赵俊峰, 刘池洋, 张东东, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘铜川地区三叠系延长组长7段剖面及其油气地质意义[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 233-245.
	ZHAO Junfeng, LIU Chiyang, ZHANG Dongdong, et al. Description and its hydrocarbon geological implications of outcrop sections of Triassic Chang-7 Member in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 233-245.
[13]	王佳营, 赵仁保, 李姝璇, 等. 一种新型泡点压力预测模型的建立和应用——以塔里木油区为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 927-934.
	WANG Jiaying, ZHAO Renbao, LI Shuxuan, et al. A new model to predict bubble point pressure: Its establishment and application in Tarim Oildom[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 927-934.
[14]	李进步, 王继平, 李娅, 等. 致密砂岩气藏逐级降压开采物理模拟实验认识与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(1): 125-132.
	LI Jinbu, WANG Jiping, LI Ya, et al. Physical simulation experiment of step-by-step depressurization production of tight sandstone gas reservoirs: Understanding and revelation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 125-132.
[15]	李玉成. 苏里格气田中北部致密储层孔隙尺度下气水渗流规律研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(5): 69-78.
	LI Yucheng. Gas-water percolation law of tight sandstone reservoirs with different pore types in the middle and northern Sulige Gasfield[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(5): 69-78.
[16]	敬季昀, 刘长龙, 兰夕堂, 等. 渗流流态分析在致密储层压裂诊断中的研究与应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(3): 307-312.
	JING Jiyun, LIU Changlong, LAN Xitang, et al. Research and application of the seepage flow pattern analysis in the fracturing diagnosis of tight reservoirs[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(3): 307-312.
[17]	胡勇, 梅青燕, 王继平, 等. 致密砂岩气藏井网加密优化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1326-1333.
	HU Yong, MEI Qingyan, WANG Jiping, et al. Optimization of well pattern infilling in tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(9): 1326-1333.
[18]	何东博, 冀光, 江乾锋, 等. 苏里格气田西区高含水致密砂岩气藏差异化开发技术对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(1): 73-82.
	HE Dongbo, JI Guang, JIANG Qianfeng, et al. Differential development technological measures for high-water-cut tight sandstone gas reservoirs in western area of Sulige Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 73-82.
[19]	王军磊, 贾爱林, 位云生, 等. 基于多井模型的压裂参数-开发井距系统优化[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 981-992. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.18
	WANG Junlei, JIA Ailin, WEI Yunsheng, et al. Optimization workflow for stimulation-well spacing design in a multiwell pad[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 981-992. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.18
[20]	郭智, 贾爱林, 冀光, 等. 致密砂岩气田储量分类及井网加密调整方法——以苏里格气田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(11): 1299-1309. doi: 10.7623/syxb201711009
	GUO Zhi, JIA Ailin, JI Guang, et al. Reserve classification and well pattern infilling method of tight sandstone gasfield: A case study of Sulige gasfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(11): 1299-1309. doi: 10.7623/syxb201711009
[21]	杨震, 孔令峰, 杜敏, 等. 国内致密砂岩气开发项目经济评价和财税扶持政策研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(7): 98-109.
	YANG Zhen, KONG Lingfeng, DU Min, et al. Economic evaluation on tight sandstone gas development projects in China and recommendation on fiscal and taxation support policies[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(7): 98-109.
[22]	朝华. 国家发展改革委、住房城乡建设部关于调整部分行业建设项目财务基准收益率的通知[J]. 化学工业, 2014, 32(4): 53-54.
	CHAO Hua. Notice on financial discount rate adjustment of some industry sectors'construction projects by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China[J]. Chemical Industry, 2014, 32(4): 53-54.
[23]	刘传喜, 姚合法, 严谨. 低渗岩性气藏开发选区评价方法研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(5): 697-702.
	LIU Chuanxi, YAO Hefa, YAN Jin. Research on the selection and evaluation of development blocks in lithologic gas reservoirs with low-permeability[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(5): 697-702.
[24]	CHENG M H, XUE W, ZHAO M, et al. Production data analysis and practical applications in the Sulige tight gas reservoir, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Geofluid, 2021, (3): 5549725.
[25]	吴正, 江乾锋, 周游, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格致密砂岩气田提高采收率关键技术及攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(6): 66-75.
	WU Zheng, JIANG Qianfeng, ZHOU You, et al. Key technologies and orientation of EGR for the Sulige tight sandstone gas field in the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 66-75.

区块名称	前3年平均日产气量	平均单井累计产气量
中区	1.10	1 813.29
东区	0.96	1 151.22
西区	0.80	1 022.70

区块	内部收益率/%						区块内部收益率/%
	<0		0~6		>6
	井数/口	百分比/ %	井数/口	百分比/ %	井数/口	百分比/ %
中区	1 002	23.33	557	12.98	2 735	63.69	15.87
东区	498	46.37	177	16.48	399	37.15	5.40
西区	1 448	57.10	271	32.21	817	32.21	-1.04
合计	2 948		1 005		3 951		20.32
加权平均		42.27		20.56		44.35	6.74

井类型	井数/ 口	有效厚度/ m	储量丰度/ （10⁸m³/km²）	初始套压/ MPa	目前套压/MPa	目前日均产气量 /10⁴ m³	累计产气量 / 10⁴ m³	EUR / 10⁴ m³	泄气范围/ km²
骨架井	34	12.54	1.44	20.2	8.2	0.27	1 988	2 483	0.188
加密井	86	9.60	1.17	20.1	13.5	0.52	230	1 156	0.136

无阻流量/10⁴ m³	产水井类型	合理配产比例
>10	低产水型	1/10~1/8
	中高产水型	1/15~1/10
	大气大水型	1/25~1/20
4~10	低产水型	1/8~1/6
	中高产水型	1/12~1/8
	大气大水型	1/16~1/12
<4	低产水型	1/4~1/3
	中高产水型	1/6~1/4
	大气大水型	间歇生产

Technical strategy for beneficial development of tight sand gas in Sulige Gas Field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 25

Related Articles 8

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	QIU Yixin. Research and application of productivity equation correction method for tight volcanic gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 190-196.
[2]	YAO Hongsheng,YUN Lu,ZAN Ling,ZHANG Longsheng,QIU Weisheng. Development mode and practice of fault-block oriented shale oil well in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[3]	YANG Yubin,XIAO Wenlian,HAN Jian,GOU Ling,LI Min,ZHOU Keming,OUYANG Mukun,CHEN Li. Gas-water flow characteristics and influencing factors of tight sandstone in Danfengchang Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 356-364.
[4]	WANG Yunhai,REN Jianhua,CHEN Zuhua,MEI Junwei,HU Chunfeng,WANG Wei,LU Bi. Integrated benefit development and intelligent evaluation of normal pressure shale gas [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 487-496.
[5]	Ouyang Yong,Liu Hanbin,Bai Mingna,Duan Zhifeng,Huang Zhanying. Drilling and completion of sidetracking horizontal well with small hole casing in Sulige Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 129-134.
[6]	LIU Hua,WANG Weihong,WANG Yanyan,GU Hongtao,JIN Bingyao. Productivity characterization method of shale gas wells [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 63-69.
[7]	Wang Anlong. Comprehensive evaluation of dense sandstone gas layer in southern Yanchuan area based on conventional logging data [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 75-79.
[8]	Lei Xiao,Li Shusong,Wang Wenjuan,Zhang Fengbo,He Zhihui,Ma Shuai. Application of a well testing simulation technique in productivity evaluation of well-X1 in high temperature and high pressure reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 17-20.