页岩气井产能表征方法研究

Abstract

Abstract:

The productivity of gas wells in conventional gas reservoirs is mainly measured by open flow rate. The open flow rate is determined by gas test and production test data to evaluate the productivity of gas wells. Because of the particularity of geological characteristics and seepage mechanism, it is controversial to use which indexes to characterize the productivity of shale gas wells. Combined with the testing and production data of actual shale gas wells in China, it is proposed that the productivity of shale gas wells in different development stages can be characterized by three kinds of indexes—unhindered flow rate, recoverable reserves and gas production. When the productivity of shale gas wells is characterized by open flow, the empirical formula of “one point method” in Fuling main area is established, and the reservoir capacity（α） is 0.25. For the production capacity test of multiple work systems, the multi-flow method has better adaptability in Fuling. When the productivity of shale gas wells is characterized by recoverable reserves, before shale gas wells enter the decline stage, the unsteady productivity evaluation method of shale gas fractured horizontal wells is selected; while after entering the decline stage, the recoverable reserves of shale gas wells can be predicted by empirical decline method. For shale gas wells with fixed production, the gas test production of the same oil nozzle can be optimized to characterize the productivity of shale gas wells. The research results lay a foundation for the dynamic analysis of shale gas well production and the formulation of development technology policy.

Key words: shale gas, productivity evaluation, open flow, recoverable reserves, empirical decline analysis

CLC Number:

TE37

LIU Hua,WANG Weihong,WANG Yanyan,GU Hongtao,JIN Bingyao. Productivity characterization method of shale gas wells[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 63-69.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 16

[1]	董大忠, 邹才能, 李建忠 , 等. 页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景[J]. 地质通报, 2011,30(2-3):324-336.
[2]	李治平, 李智锋 . 页岩气纳米级孔隙渗流动态特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2012,32(4):50-53. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.04.012
[3]	刘华, 王卫红, 陈明君 , 等. 页岩储层多尺度渗流实验及数学模型研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报, 2018,33(4):66-71.
[4]	刘华, 胡小虎, 王卫红 , 等. 页岩气压裂水平井拟稳态阶段产能评价方法研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报, 2016,31(2):76-81.
[5]	段永刚, 魏明强, 李建秋 , 等. 页岩气藏渗流机理及压裂井产能评价[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2011,34(4):62-65.
[6]	徐兵祥, 李相方 , HAGHIGHI M, 等. 页岩气产量数据分析方法及产能预测[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):119-124.
[7]	谢亚雄, 刘启国, 王卫红 , 等. 页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能预测模型[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016,35(5):163-169.
[8]	BELLO R O, WATTENBARGER R A.Modelling and analysis of shale gas production with a skin effect[C]// paper PETSOC-2009-082 presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference,16-18 June 2009,Calgary, Alberta,Canada.
[9]	AHMADI H A, ALMARZOOQ A M, WATTERNBARGER R A. Application of linear flow analysis to shale gas wells—field cases[C]// paper SPE-130370-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference,23-25 February 2010,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
[10]	ANDERSON D M, NOBAKHT M, MOGHADAM S, et al. Analysis of production data from fractured shale gas well [C]// paper SPE-131787-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference,23-25 February 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
[11]	JOHNSON N L, CURRIE S M, ILK D , et al. A simple methodology for direct estimation of gas-in-place and reserves using rate-time data[C] // paper SPE-123298-MS presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference,14-16 April 2009,Denver, Colorado, USA.
[12]	CURRIE S M, ILK D, BLASINGAME T A, et al. Application of the “continuous estimation of ultimate recovery” methodology to estimate reserves in unconventional reservoirs[C]// paper SPE-138155-MS presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference,19-21 October 2010,Calgary, Alberta,Canada.
[13]	ILK D, RUSHING J A, PEREGO A D, et al. Exponential vs. hyperbolic decline in tight gas sands—understanding the origin and implications for reserves estimates using Arps’ decline curves[C]// paper SPE-116731-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,21-24 September 2008, Denver, Colorado, USA.
[14]	MCBANE R A, THOMPSON T W. Exploration/production studies of the dovonian gas shales[C]// paper SPE-12833-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium,13-15 May 1984, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
[15]	VALKO P P, LEE W J. A better way to forecast production from unconventional gas wells[C]// paper SPE-134231-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,19-22 September 2010, Florence, Italy.
[16]	DUONG A N , An unconventional rate decline approach for tight and fractured-dominated gas wells[C]// paper SPE-137748-MS presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference,19-21 October 2010,Calgary, Alberta,Canada.

井号	α	二项式评价结果/ （10⁴ m³·d^-1）	“一点法”（12 mm油嘴）评价结果/（10⁴ m³·d^-1）
A1	0.32	58.82	59.91
A2	0.25	56.57	58.93
A3	0.26	43.17	43.28
A4	0.18	92.58	100.22
A5	0.25	63.73	69.10
平均值	0.25	61.40	63.79

Productivity characterization method of shale gas wells

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	QIU Yixin. Research and application of productivity equation correction method for tight volcanic gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 190-196.
[2]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[3]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[4]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[5]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[6]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[7]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[8]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[9]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[10]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[11]	LU Bi,HU Chunfeng,MA Jun. Influencing factors and countermeasures of inter-well interference of fracturing horizontal wells in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[12]	QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[13]	NIE Yunli, GAO Guozhong. Classification of shale gas “sweet spot” based on Random Forest machine learning [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[14]	ZHANG Longsheng,WANG Weiheng. Study and application of a high temperature foaming agent in anionic-nonionic system namely HDHP: A case study of shale gas wells in Dongsheng Block, Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[15]	ZHAO Renwen,XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,ZHOU Nengwu. Comparison of reservoir characteristics between continental shale from faulted basin and marine shale under high-over mature stage: Taking Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi faulted basin and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin as an example [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 52-63.