砾岩致密油藏直井重复压裂裂缝形态分析

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.05.017

Abstract

Abstract:

Refracturing is currently one of the most used methods to rejuvenate productivity of existing wells in low-permeability reservoirs in China. Different refracturing strategies have been conducted for vertical wells in a tight conglomerate reservoir in the Xinjiang. However, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. By establishing the geomechanical model, the mechanism model of pore pressure inducing stress change based on the finite element method and the numerical model of unstructured reservoir, the researches on the fracture geometry of refracturing and the effect of different refracturing methods have been carried out. The results are as follows. Compared with the initial fracturing and conventional refracturing, the fracture geometry changes significantly after the volume refracturing. The azimuth of the in-situ stress before and after production does not change significantly, but the changes in pore pressure and in-situ stresses have a great impact on the geometry of hydraulic fractures. For the layers that have been perforated and produced, due to the strong energy loss, the propagation of fracture is more difficult, resulting in short fracture length and wide fracture width. In the case of adding new perforation in un-developed layers, as the formation can provide enough energy, it is easier to propagate fractures. The wells which are at the higher place of the new perforation layers have better productivity after the volume refracturing. The timing of refracturing also has a significant impact on oil production. A proper choice of refracturing time can effectively improve the well productivity.

Key words: refracturing, fracture geometry, numerical simulation, stress field, hydraulic-mechanical coupling, tight conglomerate reservoir

CLC Number:

TE357

LEI Yangyang,WANG Hui,WU Xin,YANG Li,SHI Le,WANG Shuai. Analysis of fracture geometry for refractured vertical wells in tight conglomerate reservoir[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 782-792.

Figures/Tables 20

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Table 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 6

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

References 23

[1]	SIEBRITS E, ELBEL J L, DETOURNAY E, et al. Parameters affecting azimuth and length of a secondary fracture during a refracture treatment [C]// Paper SPE-48928-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1998.
[2]	刘洪, 胡永全, 赵金洲, 等. 重复压裂气井三维诱导应力场数学模型[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2004, 26(2):57-61.
	LIU Hong, HU Yongquan, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. Mathematical model of 3D induced stress field in refracturing gas well[J]. Petroleum drilling technology, 2004, 26(2):57-61.
[3]	ELBEL J L, MACK M G. Refracturing: Observations and theories[C]// Paper SPE-25464-MS presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, March 1993.
[4]	杨丽娜, 陈勉. 水力压裂中多裂缝间相互干扰力学分析[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 27(3):43-45.
	YANG Lina, CHEN Mian. Mechanism of multi-fracture interaction in multi-layer hydraulic fracturing[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Natural Science), 2003, 27(3):43-45.
[5]	ROUSSEL N P, SHARMA M M. Role of stress reorientation in the success of refracture treatments in tight gas sands[J]. SPE Production and Operations, 2012, 27(4):346-355. doi: 10.2118/134491-PA
[6]	苏玉亮, 詹耀华, 鲁明晶, 等. 人工裂缝作用下地应力场变化规律研究[C]// 油气田勘探与开发国际会议,中国陕西西安, 2018:300-310.
	SU Yuliang, ZHAN Yaohua, LU Mingjing, et al. Investigation of production induced stress field under the influence of the artificial initial fracture[C]// International Field Exploration and Development Conference in Xi’an, Shaanxi, Chian, 2018: 300-310.
[7]	邓燕. 重复压裂压新缝力学机理研究[D]. 成都:西南石油学院, 2005.
	DENG Yan. Study on mechanical mechanism of refuracturing fracture[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2005.
[8]	JU Y, LIU P, CHEN J L, et al. CDEM-based analysis of the 3D initiation and propagation of hydrofracturing cracks in heterogeneous glutenites[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 35(35):614-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.011
[9]	NAGASO M, MIKADA, H, TAKEKAWA J. The mechanism of complex hydraulic fracture creation due to strength heterogeneity[C]// Paper IPTC-18723-MS presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, November 2016.
[10]	郑继明, 李永环, 王贤君, 等. 大庆油田致密砂岩储层压裂裂缝扩展形态试验研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33(4):107-110.
	ZHENG Jiming, LI Yonghuan, WANG Xianjun, et al. Experimental study on fracture propagation pattern of tight sandstone reservoirs in Daqing oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2019, 33(4):107-110.
[11]	张红静, 徐康泰, 刘立冬, 等. 非稳态渗流下砂砾岩水力裂缝扩展数值模拟[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(6):751-755.
	ZHANG Hongjing, XU Kangtai, LIU Lidong, et al. Numerical simulation on hydraulic fracture propagation in glutenite under the effect of unsteady seepage[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2017, 39(6):751-755.
[12]	张子麟, 陈勇, 张全胜, 等. 致密砂砾岩压裂裂缝遇砾扩展模式的数值模拟研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(4):132-138.
	ZHANG Zhilin, CHEN Yong, ZHANG Quansheng, et al. Numerical simulation on propagation mode of hydraulic fracture approaching gravels in tight glutenite[J]. Petroleum Geology And Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(4):132-138.
[13]	赵金洲, 赵金, 胡永全, 等. 水力压裂裂缝应力场变化规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12):1677-1683.
	ZHAO Jinzhou, ZHAO Jin, HU Yongquan, et al. Study on stress field distribution of hydraulic fracturing[J]. Natural Gas Geosciense, 2019, 30(12):1677-1683.
[14]	俞天喜, 袁峰, 周培尧, 等. 玛南斜坡上乌尔禾组颗粒支撑砾岩裂缝扩展形态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(1):53-62.
	YU Tianxi, YUAN feng, ZHOU Peiyao, et al. Fracture propagating shapes in gravel-supported conglomerate reservoirs of Upper Wuerhe Formation on Manan Slope, Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(1):53-62.
[15]	邹雨时, 石善志, 等. 致密砾岩加砂压裂与裂缝导流能力实验——以准噶尔盆地玛湖致密砾岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021,(6):1-8.
	ZOU Yushi, SHI Shanzhi, et al. Experimental modeling of sanding fracturing and conductivity of propped fractures in conglomerate: A case study of Mahu tight conglomerate in Junggar Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, (6):1-8.
[16]	李宁, 张士诚, 马新仿, 等. 砂砾岩储层水力裂缝扩展规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(10):2383-2392.
	LI ning, ZHANG Shicheng, MA Xinfang, et al. Experimental study on the propagation mechanism of hydraulic fracture in glutenite formations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(10):2383-2392.
[17]	刘向君, 熊健, 梁利喜, 等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组砂砾岩储集层岩石力学特征与裂缝扩展机理[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):83-91.
	LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, et al. Rock mechanical characteristics and fracture propagation mechanism of sandy conglomerate reservoirs in Baikouquan Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):83-91.
[18]	李连崇, 李根, 孟庆民, 等. 砂砾岩水力压裂裂缝扩展规律的数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(5):1501-1507.
	LI Lianchong, LI Gen, MENG Qingmin, et al. Numerical simulation of propagation of hydraulic fractures in glutenite formation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(5):1501-1507.
[19]	孙璐, 刘月田, 王宇, 等. 压敏油藏不规则裂缝形态对压裂水平井产能的影响[J]. 石油科学通报, 2018, 3(1):45-56.
	SUN Lu, LIU Yuetian, WANG Yu, et al. Impact of fractured irregular geometry on productivity of multiple fractured horizontal wells in a pressure-sensitive tight oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2018, 3(1):45-56.
[20]	郭建春, 刘恒, 曾凡辉. 裂缝变缝宽形态对压裂井长期产能的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):111-115.
	GUO Jianchun, LIU Heng, ZENG Fanhui. Influence of varying fracture width on fractured well’s long-term productivity[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(1):111-115.
[21]	李士斌, 官兵, 张立刚, 等. 水平井压裂裂缝局部应力场扰动规律[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(6):112-119.
	LI Shibin, GUAN Bing, ZHANG Ligang, et al. Local stress field disturbance law of horizontal well fracturing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(6):112-119.
[22]	魏臣兴, 练章华, 丁亮亮, 等. 分支井渗流—应力耦合场分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4):124-128.
	WEI Chenxing, LIAN Zhanghua, DING Liangliang, et al. Analysis of seepage-stress coupling field for lateral wells[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(4):124-128.
[23]	BRUNO M S, NAKAGAWA F M. Pore pressure influence on tensile fracture propagation in sedimentary rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 1991, 28(4):261-273. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(91)90593-B

参数名	参数值	参数名	参数值
井底流压（MPa）	0.5	50 ℃条件下黏度（mPa·s）	13.33
边界压力（MPa）	6	渗透率（10^-3 μm²）	0.20
杨氏模量（GPa）	30	孔隙比	0.1
泊松比	0.2	裂缝长度（m）	300
滤失系数（m/s）	10~14	裂缝间距（m）	250

井号	井段深度（m）	施工用量
井号	井段深度（m）	70/140目陶粒（m³）	20/40目石英砂（m³）	滑溜水（m³）	原液（m³）	交联剂（m³）	暂堵球（个）
A1	2 841.0~2 900.0	56.6	113.4	3 119.5	990.5	9.9	310
A2	2 815.0~2 910.0	56.5	113.5	3 110.2	990.7	9.9	260
A3	2 823.0~2 847.0	34.4	55.6	2 175.3	640.2	6.4	200
A4	2746.1.0~2983.3	56.6	113.5	3 110.5	991.5	2.6	310

阶段	规模（m³）	裂缝半长（m）	缝高（m）	缝宽（mm）
首次压裂	86.71	41.88	35.57	5.84
普通重复压裂	200.23	45.19	39.01	11.12
体积压裂段1	2 884.14	123.65	95.35	6.74
体积压裂段2	1 360.22	183.04	112.23	1.14

阶段	规模（m³）	裂缝半长（m）	缝高（m）	缝宽（mm）
首次压裂	154.31	50.48	48.95	4.42
普通重复压裂	200.36	39.05	36.02	11.73
体积压裂段1	2 817.74	102.63	85.76	6.84
体积压裂段2	1 285.15	105.23	120.02	3.23

阶段	规模（m³）	裂缝半长（m）	缝高（m）	缝宽（mm）
首次压裂	75.31	38.69	28.45	1.55
体积重复压裂	2 875.25	93.35	110.14	1.51

Analysis of fracture geometry for refractured vertical wells in tight conglomerate reservoir

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 20

References 23

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

阶段	规模（m³）	裂缝半长（m）	缝高（m）	缝宽（mm）
首次压裂	97.28	54.63	25.78	3.37
体积压裂段1	2 857.27	134.06	75.48	4.85
体积压裂段2	1 341.23	159.79	118.35	2.36

[1]	CUI Yudong, LU Cheng, GUAN Ziyue, LUO Wanjing, TENG Bailu, MENG Fanpu, PENG Yue. Effects of creep on depressurization-induced gas well productivity in South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[2]	HE Haiyan, LIU Xianshan, GENG Shaoyang, SUN Junchang, SUN Yanchun, JIA Qian. Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[3]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[4]	YANG Bing, FU Qiang, GUAN Jingtao, LI Linxiang, PAN Haoyu, SONG Hongbin, QIN Tingting, ZHU Zhiwei. Oil displacement efficiency based on different well pattern adjustment simulation in high water cut reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 519-524.
[5]	CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO₂ sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[6]	HOU Mengru,LIANG Bing,SUN Weiji,LIU Qi,ZHAO Hang. Influence of mineral interface stiffness on fracture propagation law of shale hydraulic fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 100-107.
[7]	LIU Yexuan,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,ZHOU Xin,LIANG Lixi. Evaluation method of fracability of shale oil reservoir considering influence of interlayer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[8]	HE Feng,FENG Qiang,CUI Yushi. Production schedule optimization of gas wells in W shale gas reservoir under controlled pressure difference based on numerical simulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.
[9]	CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,YANG Qingchun,ZHANG Lisong. Sequential coupling thermal-hydro-mechanical model for multiple cluster of fracturing network fracturing in dry hot rock reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 869-876.
[10]	WANG Wei,CHEN Shaoying,YANG Qingchun,LIU Heping,ZHANG Lisong. Single-connected analytical model analysis of stress field response of geothermal reservoirs induced by staged fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 894-901.
[11]	ZHOU Haiyan,ZHANG Yunlai,LIANG Xiao,ZHANG Jilei,XU Yanan,LIU Jizhu. Liquid production splitting of multi-layer mining considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 945-950.
[12]	CUI Chuanzhi,YAN Dawei,YAO Tongyu,WANG Jian,ZHANG Chuanbao,WU Zhongwei. Prediction method of migration law and gas channeling time of CO₂ flooding front: A case study of G89-1 Block in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 741-747.
[13]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[14]	ZHOU Xin,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,LIANG Lixi,LIU Yexuan. Simulation of intersecting hydraulic fractures with natural fractures considering layer barrier effect [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 515-525.
[15]	LIU Xueli,ZHENG Xiaojie,DOU Lian,XIE Shuang,PENG Xiaolong,ZHU Suyang. High precision numerical simulation of thin sandstone reservoir with sufficient bottom water and multiple cyclothem: A case study on lower formation of 9th block of Tahe Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 391-398.

生产年限（a）	半缝长（m）	缝高（m）	缝宽（mm）
1	233.12	112.95	1.12
3	109.17	98.88	2.12
5	134.69	47.93	6.66