中国石化地下储气库一体化综合平台研发与应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.06.009

Abstract

Abstract:

Underground Gas Storage（UGS） is a complex, multifaceted process with multiple stages and a long operational cycle, making it a long-term systemic endeavor. The lifecycle of gas storage encompasses various phases including site selection evaluation, scheme design, engineering construction, production and operation, optimization of operations, and eventual abandonment. The integration of these phases is crucial for the safe construction and efficient operation of gas storage facilities. Given the complexity and scope of UGS, there is a pressing need for a comprehensive system that encompasses “management decision-making, monitoring, early warning, simulation analysis, and production control” to facilitate the integrated application of the entire gas storage process. This paper specifically addresses the construction plan of Sinopec gas storage, aligning with the national mandate for “industrialization and informatization” integration. It aims to bridge the gap between management, research, and production in gas storage, addressing both managerial and technical challenges throughout the entire process of site location, design, operation, and analysis. The ultimate objective is to enhance quality and efficiency in gas storage operations. An integrated platform for UGS has been designed and developed, focusing on “production monitoring, tracking analysis, remote control, and auxiliary decision-making” as its core components. Research indicates that this platform has significantly advanced the digitalization of various aspects of gas storage, such as site optimization, geological research, injection and production control, and peak shaving optimization, across all nodes. It enables precise control over production process nodes, intelligent analysis of production and operational trends, and scientific decision-making for production and control. The research shows that the platform has realized the digital improvement of the gas storage site optimization, geological research, injection and production control, peak shaving optimization and the whole node, accurately controlled the production process nodes, intelligently analyzed the production and operation trend, scientifically made the production and control decisions, and realized the integrated management and research of the gas storage site optimization, scheme design, production and operation, and dynamic analysis.

Key words: underground gas storage, geographic information system, digital management, intelligent operation, integrated platform

CLC Number:

TE132

MI Lidong,ZENG Daqian,LIU Hua,ZHANG Guangquan,ZHANG Junfa. Development and application of Sinopec integrated management platform for underground gas storage[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 781-788.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 17

[1]	曾大乾, 张俊法, 张广权, 等. 中石化地下储气库建库关键技术研究进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(6): 115-123.
	ZENG Daqian, ZHANG Junfa, ZHANG Guangquan, et al. Research progress of Sinopec’s key underground gas storage construction technologies[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(6): 115-123.
[2]	张广权, 曾大乾, 范照伟, 等. 利用地应力评价地下储气库断层密封性方法及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(6): 923-930.
	ZHANG Guangquan, ZENG Daqian, FAN Zhaowei, et al. Method and application of fault sealing evaluation of underground gas storage using geostress[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(6): 923-930.
[3]	文韵豪, 王秋晨, 巴玺立, 等. 国内外智能化储气库现状及展望[J]. 油气与新能源, 2022, 34(6): 60-64.
	WEN Yunhao, WANG Qiuchen, BA Xili, et al. Insights and forecast on domestic and international intelligent gas storage[J]. Oil and Gas and New Energy, 2022, 34(6): 60-64.
[4]	张磊. 基于自动化系统的智能储气库建设探索[J]. 电子测试, 2022, 36(16): 82-84.
	ZHANG Lei. Exploration of intelligent gas storage construction based on automation system[J]. Electronic Test, 2022, 36(16): 82-84.
[5]	刘烨, 何刚, 杨莉娜, 等. “十四五”期间我国储气库建设面临的挑战及对策建议[J]. 石油规划设计, 2020, 31(6): 9-13.
	LIU Ye, HE Gang, YANG Lina, et al. Challenges and countermeasures for China’s gas storage construction during the “fourteenth five-year plan” period[J]. Petroleum Planning and Design, 2020, 31(6): 9-13.
[6]	赵平起, 李才雄, 王权国, 等. 大港油田储气库发展历程及相关思考[J]. 国际石油经济, 2021, 29(6): 63-70.
	ZHAO Pingqi, LI Caixiong, WANG Quanguo, et al. Development history and relevant thinking of gas storage in Dagang Oilfield[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2021, 29(6): 63-70.
[7]	马新华, 郑得文, 魏国齐, 等. 中国天然气地下储气库重大科学理论技术发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 93-99.
	MA Xinhua, ZHENG Dewen, WEI Guoqi, et al. Development directions of major scientific theories and technologies for underground gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 93-99.
[8]	张刚雄, 郑得文, 张春江, 等. 地下储气库信息数据管理平台开发及应用[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(12): 1284-1287.
	ZHANG Gangxiong, ZHENG Dewen, ZHANG Chunjiang, et al. Development and application of underground gas storage information data management platform[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(12): 1284-1287.
[9]	赵爱国, 尹文斌, 李红军, 等. 中控自动化控制系统在驴驹河储气库中的应用[J]. 中国仪器仪表, 2021, 41(6): 23-27.
	ZHAO Aiguo, YIN Wenbin, LI Hongjun, et al. Application of central control automation control system in Lvju River gas storage[J]. China Instruments and Meters, 2021, (6): 23-27.
[10]	张晓冉, 薛辉, 张磊, 等. 文96地下储气库SCADA系统[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2014, 33(10): 90-91.
	ZHANG Xiaoran, XUE Hui, ZHANG Lei, et al. Wen 96 underground gas storage SCADA system[J]. Oil and Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2014, 33(10): 90-91.
[11]	游赟, 禹贵成, 周博涵, 等. 相国寺储气库压缩机活塞杆断裂故障分析研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2020, 39(12): 30-34.
	YOU Yun, YU Guicheng, ZHOU Bohan, et al. Analysis and research on piston rod fracture of compressor in Xiangguosi gas storage[J]. Oil and Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2020, 39(12): 30-34
[12]	廖浩然, 任科, 禹贵成, 等. 相国寺储气库智能化建设探索与实践[C]// 第32届全国天然气学术年会(2020)论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2020:3005-3014.
	LIAO Haoran, REN Ke, YU Guicheng, et al. Exploration and practice of intelligent construction of Xiangguosi gas storage[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference(2020). Beijing: Chinese Petroleum Society, 2020: 3005-3014.
[13]	曾大乾, 胡宗全, 糜利栋, 等. 不同类型地下储气库库址评价标准体系及筛选平台[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(增刊1): 117-124.
	ZENG Daqian, HU Zongquan, MI Lidong, et al. Evaluation standard system and screening platform for different types of underground gas storage sites[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(suppl. 1): 117-124.
[14]	叶康林. 地下天然气储气库信息化建设现状与探讨[J]. 信息系统工程, 2019, 32(7): 124-126.
	YE Kanglin. Current situation and discussion of underground natural gas storage informatization construction[J]. Information System Engineering, 2019, 32(7): 124-126.
[15]	万旸. 地下天然气储气库数字化建设现状[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2021, 50(10): 216-217.
	WAN Yang. Digital construction status of underground natural gas storage[J]. Chemical Engineering and Equipment, 2021, 50(10): 216-217.
[16]	糜利栋, 顾少华, 薛亮, 等. 基于数据驱动技术的智能试井解释方法——以有水气藏产水气井为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2): 119-124.
	MI Lidong, GU Shaohua, XUE Liang, et al. An intelligent well test interpretation method based on data driven technology: A case study from one water-producing gas well of water-bearing gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 119-124.
[17]	糜利栋, 顾少华, 薛亮, 等. 基于人工智能技术的试井解释方法研究[C]// 第32届全国天然气学术年会(2020)论文集. 北京: 中国石油学会, 2020: 1177-1185.
	MI Lidong, GU Shaohua, XUE Liang, et al. Research on well test interpretation methods based on artificial intelligence technology[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference(2020). Beijing: Chinese Petroleum Society, 2020: 1177-1185.

Development and application of Sinopec integrated management platform for underground gas storage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 17

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	XUE Yuze, ZHANG Yugui, MA Yinjuan, XUE Chao. Reinjection tracer test of karst geothermal reservoir in the southeastern margin of Ordos Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 757-764.
[2]	NIE Yunli, GAO Guozhong. Classification of shale gas “sweet spot” based on Random Forest machine learning [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[3]	LIU Yexuan,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,ZHOU Xin,LIANG Lixi. Evaluation method of fracability of shale oil reservoir considering influence of interlayer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[4]	CHEN Qianqian. Characteristics and exploration horizon optimization of marine-continental transitional shale in the South of North China Basin: A case study of Upper Paleozoic in Tongxu area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 690-697.
[5]	MA Lin,JIANG Xiani,GONG Jinsong. Analysis of logging characteristics of high quality shale gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 445-454.
[6]	HE Faqi,XU Bingwei,SHAO Longkan. On philosophy and innovative thinking of oil & gas exploration and development: Commemoration of the first oil well on land in China, Well-Yan1 [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 265-273.
[7]	WANG Yongshi,TANG Dong. Geological characteristics of typical shale profile in a saline lacustrine rift basin: A case study of Dongying sag [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 181-191.
[8]	LI Haohan,BAO Shujing,ZHANG Yanlin,DUAN Ke,CHEN Ke,ZHOU Zhi,SONG Teng,LI Fei. Outcrop characteristics and shale gas geological significance of the second member in Doushantuo Formation of Lower Sinian in western Hubei [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 171-180.
[9]	ZHAN Xiaohong,CHEN Xuehui,LIU Chao,HE Wenbin,ZHANG Zhiping. Characteristics of Tiansheng Outcrop in Wufeng Formation- 1st Member of Longmaxi Formation, Wulong, Chongqing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 150-159.
[10]	GAO Yuqiao,LIU Nana,ZHANG Peixian,HE Guisong,GAO Quanfang. Geological characteristic and its implications of shale exploration in Qijiang, Chongqing, China [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 119-129.
[11]	OU Fang,YANG Huiting,HUANG Xiaobing. Application of logging interpretation method for reef shoal reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of X Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.
[12]	ZHAO Peirong. Reservoir characteristics and gas exploration potential of Permian Mao-1 Member of Maokou Formation in Jiaoshiba Area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 772-781.
[13]	YANG Fan,LAN Jiada,MENG Qingli,XUE Ye,LI Yanjing,ZHAO Sucheng,YU Ruoshui,JI Ming,JIANG An,REN Junxing. Application of well-constrained travel time preserving tomography technology in Nanchuan area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 514-520.
[14]	LIU Houyu. Adaptability evaluation and analysis of low density 3D seismic exploration method for shale gas [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 34-41.
[15]	LI Xiansheng,LIU Xiangjun,LIANG Lixi,LI Wei,GAO Yang,XIONG Jian. Correction methods for acoustic anisotropy of bedding shale [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 49-54.