超临界CO2萃取致密油的数值模拟研究

Abstract

Abstract:

The huff and puff operation by CO₂ extraction can overcome the production and development problems of tight reservoirs which are difficult to form effective displacement. Crude oil fractions were divided by PVTi module, and the pseudo-component properties of formation crude oil could be obtained by combining with the expansion experimental data of CO₂ injection. Relevant factors affecting the extraction of tight oil by CO₂ were studied by CFD simulation. The results showed that supercritical CO₂ mainly extracted the light components of crude oil in porous media, especially those below C₁₅₊. The higher injection pressure was, and the more CO₂ was injected, the stronger the solubility of crude oil would be, and it could enhance the extraction of heavy components. Meanwhile, the increase of CO₂ injection could also promote the retention of CO₂ in porous media, which was conducive to CO₂ storage. With the increase of porosity, the extraction effect of CO₂ increased first and then decreased, and was still 44 % under the condition of lower porosity. The extraction of tight oil by CO₂ has a certain application prospect.

Key words: tight oil, CO₂, extraction, porous media, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

TE348

Shi Leiting,Zhu Shijie,Ma Jie,Yang Mei,Peng Yangping,Ye Zhongbin. Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 25-31.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 4

Fig. 3

Table 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 6

References 16

[1]	贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠 , 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(3):5-12.
[2]	王高峰, 郑雄杰, 张玉 , 等. 适合二氧化碳驱的低渗透油藏筛选方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(3):358-363.
[3]	郭冀隆 . 二氧化碳地质封存过程中CO₂—水—岩相互作用实验研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2017.
[4]	李孟涛, 单文文, 刘先贵 , 等. 超临界二氧化碳混相驱油机理实验研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006,27(3):80-83.
[5]	王鉴, 张楠, 武芹 , 等. 超临界CO₂溶解性能的研究进展[J]. 炼油与化工, 2011,22(5):1-5.
[6]	Okamoto Ikuo, Li Xiaochun, Ohsumi Takashi . Effect of supercritical CO₂ as the organic solvent on cap rock sealing performance for underground storage[J]. Energy, 2005,30(11):2344-2351. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2003.10.025
[7]	Cuiyu dong, BTodd Hoffman . Modeling gas injection into shale oil reservoirs in the Sanish Field, North Dakota[C]// paper URTEC-1581998-MS presented at the Technology ConferenceSource SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 12-14 August 2013, Denver, Colorado, USA.
[8]	Chengyao Song, Daoyong Yang . Performance evaluation of CO₂ huff-n-puff processes in tight oil formations[C]// paper SPE-167217-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, 5-7 November 2013, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
[9]	Yousefi S, Atrens A D, Sauret E . CFD convective flow simulation of the varying properties of CO₂-H₂O mixtures in geothermal systems[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2015: 1-8.
[10]	Qianlin zhu, Qianlong Zhou, Xiaochun Li . Numerical simulation of displacement characteristics of CO₂ injectedin pore-scale porous media[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016,8(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.08.004
[11]	Elena Fernandez, Deirdre Hugi-Cleary , M Victoria López-Ramón. Adsorption of phenol from dilute and concentrated aqueous solutions by activated carbons[J]. Langmuir, 2003,19(23):9719-9723. doi: 10.1021/la030137d
[12]	徐艳梅 . CO₂在多孔介质中的非平衡扩散理论与实验研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2008.
[13]	孙扬, 孟英峰, 练章华 , 等. 重馏分特征化对油气藏流体相态特征模拟计算的影响[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2009,2(2):39-43.
[14]	姜凤光, 胡永乐 . 二氧化碳驱地下流体相态特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014,21(6):90-92.
[15]	Karen Schou Pedersen, Peter L Christensen, Jawad Azeem Shaikh. Phase behavior of petroleum reservoir fluids[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.
[16]	Ruina Xu, Peixue Jiang . Numerical simulation of fluid flow in microporous media[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008,29(5):1447-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.05.005

原油性质变化	物理变化	其他
降低原油黏度	原油体积膨胀	溶解气驱作用
改善原油与水的流度比	轻组分萃取、萃取作用	混相效应
降低油水间界面张力	分子扩散作用	提高地层渗透率

组分	摩尔组成/（mol%）	质量分数,%
C₅₊	30.264	5.128 1
C₁₀₊	14.222	5.455 3
C₁₅₊	9.850	6.045 9
C₂₀₊	14.488	11.601 0
C₂₅₊	17.432	24.599 0
C₃₀₊	13.744	47.170 7

组分	分子量	临界压力/MPa	临界温度/K	方程系数Ω_a	方程系数Ω_b	偏心因子	等张比容
CO₂	44.01	7.39	304.70	0.43	0.09	0.23	78.00
C₅₊	16.04	4.60	190.60	0.43	0.09	0.01	77.00
C₁₀₊	36.32	4.60	334.13	0.43	0.09	0.12	126.86
C₁₅₊	58.12	3.73	417.46	0.43	0.09	0.19	186.10
C₂₀₊	75.82	3.27	478.13	0.43	0.09	0.26	241.47
C₂₅₊	133.63	2.54	616.64	0.43	0.09	0.43	389.78
C₃₀₊	325.00	1.04	839.84	0.43	0.09	1.04	828.33

模拟编号	实验条件
模拟编号	温度/ ℃	压力/ MPa	孔隙度, %	渗透率/ 10^-3μm²	CO₂注入量, %
1	72	9.85	10	0.95	10
2	72	12.00	10	0.95	20
3	72	20.80	10	0.95	40
4	72	20.80	15	2.23	40
5	72	20.80	20	3.03	40
6	72	20.80	10	0.95	20
7	72	20.80	10	0.95	55
8	72	20.80	10	0.95	70

组分名称	孔隙度为10 %的质量/kg			孔隙度为15 %的质量/kg			孔隙度为20 %的质量/kg
组分名称	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量	初始含量	萃取后含量	萃取量
C₅₊	0.056 6	0.000 2	0.056 4	0.059 1	0.000 2	0.059 0	0.063 3	0.000 2	0.063 1
C₁₀₊	0.060 1	0.004 3	0.055 8	0.062 8	0.004 4	0.058 5	0.067 2	0.004 5	0.062 7
C₁₅₊	0.066 7	0.010 9	0.055 8	0.069 8	0.011 0	0.058 8	0.074 6	0.011 4	0.063 2
C₂₀₊	0.128 0	0.080 4	0.047 6	0.133 7	0.080 8	0.052 9	0.143 1	0.083 7	0.059 4
C₂₅₊	0.271 4	0.234 9	0.036 5	0.283 6	0.236 2	0.047 4	0.303 4	0.244 5	0.058 8
C₃₀₊	0.520 3	0.492 2	0.028 1	0.543 9	0.495 0	0.048 8	0.581 7	0.512 5	0.069 2
CO₂	0.000 0	0.044 1		0.000 0	0.044 4		0.000 0	0.045 9
总质量	1.103 1	0.867 0		1.153	0.872		1.233 2	0.902 7

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

模拟条件	萃取后总质量/kg	初始原油质量/kg	萃取率, %	CO₂滞留量/kg
压力9.85 MPa	0.965 6	1.103 1	18.14	0.029 5
压力12.00 MPa	0.953 7	1.103 1	23.91	0.051 1
压力20.80 MPa	0.867 0	1.103 1	44.68	0.041 1
孔隙度10 %	0.867 0	1.103 1	44.68	0.041 1
孔隙度15 %	0.872 0	1.153 0	53.37	0.044 4
孔隙度20 %	0.902 7	1.233 2	51.43	0.045 9
CO₂注入量20 %	0.908 6	1.103 1	32.92	0.027 4
CO₂注入量55 %	1.015 8	1.103 1	45.15	0.156 7
CO₂注入量70 %	1.160 5	1.103 1	46.54	0.286 8

[1]	CUI Yudong, LU Cheng, GUAN Ziyue, LUO Wanjing, TENG Bailu, MENG Fanpu, PENG Yue. Effects of creep on depressurization-induced gas well productivity in South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[2]	HE Haiyan, LIU Xianshan, GENG Shaoyang, SUN Junchang, SUN Yanchun, JIA Qian. Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[3]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[4]	LUO Hongwen, ZHANG Qin, LI Haitao, XIANG Yuxing, LI Ying, PANG Wei, LIU Chang, YU Hao, WANG Yaning. Influence law of temperature profile for horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 676-685.
[5]	YANG Bing, FU Qiang, GUAN Jingtao, LI Linxiang, PAN Haoyu, SONG Hongbin, QIN Tingting, ZHU Zhiwei. Oil displacement efficiency based on different well pattern adjustment simulation in high water cut reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 519-524.
[6]	LI Shilun,TANG Yong,DUAN Shengcai,QIN Jiazheng,CHEN Yinuo,LIU Yaxin,ZHENG Peng,ZHAO Guoqing. Progress in source-sink matching and safety evaluation of CO₂ geological sequestration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 269-297.
[7]	YANG Yu,XU Qilin,LIU Ronghe,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping,WANG Jianmeng. Phase equilibrium law of CO₂ storage in depleted gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 280-287.
[8]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[9]	CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO₂ sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[10]	WANG Jianmeng,CHEN Jie,JI Lidong,LIU Ronghe,ZHANG Qian,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping. Research progress and prospect of state equation in CO₂ storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 305-312.
[11]	HOU Mengru,LIANG Bing,SUN Weiji,LIU Qi,ZHAO Hang. Influence of mineral interface stiffness on fracture propagation law of shale hydraulic fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 100-107.
[12]	LIU Yexuan,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,ZHOU Xin,LIANG Lixi. Evaluation method of fracability of shale oil reservoir considering influence of interlayer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[13]	HE Feng,FENG Qiang,CUI Yushi. Production schedule optimization of gas wells in W shale gas reservoir under controlled pressure difference based on numerical simulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.
[14]	CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,YANG Qingchun,ZHANG Lisong. Sequential coupling thermal-hydro-mechanical model for multiple cluster of fracturing network fracturing in dry hot rock reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 869-876.
[15]	ZHOU Haiyan,ZHANG Yunlai,LIANG Xiao,ZHANG Jilei,XU Yanan,LIU Jizhu. Liquid production splitting of multi-layer mining considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 945-950.

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO2

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

Numerical simulation of tight oil extraction with supercritical CO₂