凝析气藏反凝析伤害评价方法及应用

Abstract

Abstract:

For the characteristics of condensate gas reservoirs, evaluation methods on just one side would lead to misjudgment on retrograde condensation of gas reservoir. Therefore, qualitative and quantitative comprehensive evaluation method of retrograde condensation damage was established. Firstly, the retrograde condensate phase evaluation and production dynamic analysis were used to judge whether the retrograde condensation of gas wells occurred or not. And then, methods such as the gas well productivity, pollution skin coefficient, numerical simulation and pressure build-up testing were comprehensively applied to quantitatively evaluate the degree and radius of the retrograde condensate damage. The established method was carried out in the case of the well-169 of Zanarol condensate gas reservoir in Kazakhstan. The results show that gas condensate has occurred in Zanarol condensate gas reservoir. Retrograde condensation has great influence on oil productivity, but a little on that of gas. And the damage degree is different for different gas wells. Generally, retrograde condensation damage was little and its influence rate was less than 16 %. Pollution radius was about 20 m. Thicker gas layer and carbonate reservoirs with developed fracture-vug were important reasons for less influence of retrograde condensation damage on gas well productivity in Zanarol. The established method can be used as a reference for the analysis of complex condensate gas reservoirs.

Key words: condensate gas reservoir, retrograde condensation, damage radius, phase behavior, Zanarol

CLC Number:

TE372

ZOU Chunmei,TANG Yong,YAN Jun,SUN Jiewen,LI Yuhong,CUI Yinan. The evaluation methods and application of retrograde condensation damage in condensate gas reservoir[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 30-34.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

References 17

[1]	姜贻伟, 毕建霞, 李闵 , 等. 凝析气井反凝析污染对产能影响研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2005,27(6):46-47.
[2]	胡永乐 . 凝析、低渗气藏流体相态与渗流机理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010
[3]	AYUB M, RAMADAN M . Mitigation of near wellbore gas-condensate by CO₂ huff-n-puff injection: A simulation study[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019,175:998-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.066
[4]	杨兆中, 何睿, 李小刚 , 等. 致密火山岩凝析气藏石蜡伤害理论和实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2016,6(2):37-41.
[5]	孔婷, 张敏 . C₄-C₈轻烃在原油地球化学研究中的应用:以塔里木盆地大宛齐油田凝析油为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017,39(4):535-543.
[6]	彭松, 郭平 . 缝洞型碳酸盐岩凝析气藏注水开发物理模拟研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014,36(5):645-649. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201405645
[7]	汤勇, 杜志敏, 孙雷 , 等. 解除低渗凝析气井近井污染研究现状及进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2007,27(6):88-91.
[8]	周小平, 孙雷, 陈朝刚 . 低渗透凝析气藏反凝析水锁伤害解除方法现状[J]. 钻采工艺, 2005,28(5):66-68.
[9]	肖丽仙, 杜建芬, 郭平 , 等. 凝析气藏反凝析污染研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2009,16(4):102-104.
[10]	高建军, 韩继凡, 郝巍 , 等. 丘东气田反凝析污染评价及解除方法研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2010,17(2):85-87.
[11]	李小刚, 谢信捷, 杨兆中 , 等. 特低渗凝析气藏复合解堵技术应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017,7(3):44-49.
[12]	王少飞, 汪周华, 张雅玲 , 等. 压裂解除凝析气井反凝析伤害的新认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018,8(2):30-34.
[13]	江同文, 朱忠谦, 熊钰 , 等. 凝气气藏循环注气开发动态分析方法与实践[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013.
[14]	石军太, 李相方, 周建睿 , 等. 凝析气藏各区渗透率及半径确定方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2012,31(1):80-84.
[15]	宋珩, 傅秀娟, 范海亮 , 等. 带气顶裂缝性碳酸盐岩油藏开发特征及技术政策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009,36(6):756-761.
[16]	喻莲, 汪伟光 . 凝析气顶油藏剩余油分布模式及挖潜对策——以让纳若尔油田A南和Б南层系为例[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2011,13(5):11-13.
[17]	GRINGARTEN A C, AL-LAMKI A, DAUNGKAEW S, et al. Well test analysis in gas-condensate reservoirs[C]// paper SPE-62920-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1-4 October 2000, Dallas, Texas, USA.

参数	取值
有效渗透率/10^-3 μm²	39.50
有效厚度/m	35.80
机械表皮系数	0.10
地层温度/℃	54.20
原始地层压力/MPa	26.57
露点压力/MPa	26.57
孔隙度/%	9.19
目前产气量/（10⁴ m³·d^-1）	18.69
油的临界流动饱和度	0.25
油临界流动饱和度对应的气体相对渗透率	0.70

井名	表皮系数	井储系数/ （L·MPa^-1）	有效渗透率/ 10^-3μm²	反凝析污染状态
169	8.020	991.37	29.0	存在污染
180	10.060	435.74	12.0	存在污染
184	10.000	855.34	48.3	存在污染
625	1.430	4 772.39	7.5	轻微污染
629	-0.921	36 657.45	412.0	无污染
944	17.100	903.76	33.2	存在污染
642	0.760	8 299.80	62.5	无污染
190	14.800	991.37	21.4	存在污染
166	-2.070	6 386.24	9.4	无污染
366	9.390	1542.38	28.3	存在污染

The evaluation methods and application of retrograde condensation damage in condensate gas reservoir

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 17

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	TAN Xianhong,LIANG Bin,WANG Shuai,TIAN Bo,PENG Shiqiang,LI Nan,XIA Yang. A productivity evaluation method of gas wells in condensate gas reservoirs with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 724-729.
[2]	SUN Bowen,GUO Ping,WU Yiming,WANG Zhouhua,ZHOU Daiyu,LIU Zhiliang. Dew point pressure prediction model of condensate gas reservoir based on alternating conditional expectation transform [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 107-112.
[3]	JIANG Yanbo. Experiment and characterization on phase behavior of CO₂ and crude oil in porous media [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 23-27.
[4]	HE Anle,ZOU Chunmei,CUI Yinan,YAN Jun,ZHANG Hewen,TANG Yong. Research on enhancing condensate oil production by CO₂ huff-n-puff in South A condensate gas reservoir of Zanarol Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 28-32.
[5]	YANG Xue. EOR technology by dry gas injection after plugging removing by CO₂ huff and puff: A case study of condensate gas reservoir in a block of Zhongyuan Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 75-79.
[6]	Wang Shaofei,Wang Zhouhua,Zhang Yaling,Guo Ping,Jiao Tingkui,Du Jianfen. A new cognition of the reduction of retrograde condensation damage in gas condensate wells by fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 30-34.