塔河油田缝洞型超深超稠油藏效益开采技术研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.02.016

Abstract

Abstract:

The super heavy oil of Tahe Oilfield has high geological reserves, deep burial, and fluidity in the reservoir. During lifting, as the temperature decreases, the viscosity increases and the flow capacity decreases, leading to the impossible production. Therefore, recovery mainly adopts dilute oil to reduce adhesion. With the continuous drop in oil prices, the influence by the sales price difference between the added dilute oil and the produced heavy oil, and the energy consumption caused by the repeated work of dilute oil, lead to the decrease of the benefit. In order to improve the production efficiency of super heavy oil reservoir, the technology exploration, technical tackling and pilot test are carried out from three aspects of stratum, wellbore and surface. The application of mineral-insulated copper-clad cable heating and nano thermal insulation tubing has achieved remarkable results, saving 98 600 tons of dilute oil. It can be popularized in such super heavy oil reservoirs. The breakthrough of temperature-resistant and salt-resistant water-soluble viscosity reducer and the progress of the sulfur-resistant screw pump lift technology provide sufficient conditions for the efficiency recovery of super heavy oil reservoirs. The principle of efficient ground gathering and transportation is simple, but involves the network transformation and equipment upgrade, with high cost and complex implementation. Now the test equipments are in preparation. As the technology of formation viscosity reduction is very difficult, it is in the stage of technical demonstration. The development and integrated application of low-cost recovery technology for super heavy oil improve the development benefit. And after general consideration, the bottleneck is found out according to the specific well conditions, and the matching technology in the technical system is select, so as to achieve the goal of efficiency recovery for super heavy oil, and improve the ability of oilfields to cope with low oil prices.

Key words: super heavy oil mining, formation viscosity reduction, wellbore insulation, wellbore viscosity reduction, high-efficiency lifting, efficiency recovery

CLC Number:

TE345

SUI Fen. Study on benefit extraction technology of super deep super heavy fractured-vuggy reservoir in Tahe Oilfield[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 94-100.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 2

Table 6

References 21

[1]	沈安江, 陈娅娜, 蒙绍兴 , 等. 中国海相碳酸盐岩储层研究进展及油气勘探意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019,24(4):1-14.
	SHEN A J, CHEN Y N, MENG S X , et al. The research progress of marine carbonate reservoirs in China and its significance for oil and gas exploration[J]. Marine Petroleum Geology, 2019,24(4):1-14.
[2]	SUN Q, ZHANG N, MOHAMED F , et al. Structural regeneration of fracture-vug network in naturally fractured vuggy reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018,165:28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.030
[3]	赵锐, 赵腾, 李慧莉 , 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田断控缝洞型储层特征与主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019,26(5):8-13.
	ZHAO R, ZHAO T, LI H L , et al. Fault-controlled fracture-cavity reservoir characterization and main-controlling factors in the Shunbei hydrocarbon field of Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019,26(5):8-13.
[4]	吕心瑞, 李红凯, 魏荷花 , 等. 碳酸盐岩储层多尺度缝洞体分类表征——以塔河油田S80单元奥陶系油藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017,38(4):813-821.
	LYU X R, LI H K, WEI H H , et al. Classification and characterization method for multi-scale fractured-vuggy reservoir zones in carbonate reservoirs: An example from Ordovician reservoirs in Tahe oilfield S80 unit[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017,38(4):813-821.
[5]	鲜强, 冯许魁, 刘永雷 , 等. 塔中地区碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层叠前流体识别[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019,40(1):196-204.
	XIAN Q, FENG X K, LIU Y L , et al. Pre-stack fluid identification for fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir in Tazhong area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019,40(1):196-204.
[6]	刘遥, 荣元帅, 杨敏 . 碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏缝洞单元储量精细分类评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018,40(3):431-438.
	LIU Y, RONG Y S, YANG M . Detailed classification and evaluation of reserves in fracture-cavity units for carbonate fracture-cavity reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018,40(3):431-438.
[7]	金强, 田飞, 张宏方 . 塔河油田岩溶型碳酸盐岩缝洞单元综合评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015,37(3):272-279. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503272
	JIN Q, TIAN F, ZHANG H F . Comprehensive evaluation of fracture-cave units in karst carbonates in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015,37(3):272-279. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503272
[8]	郭继香, 张江伟 . 稠油掺稀降黏技术研究进展[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014,14(36):124-132.
	GUO J X, ZHANG J W . Review on the technology of blending diluting oil in heavy oil well[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014,14(36):124-132.
[9]	朝鲁门, 史继伟, 张江 , 等. 浅析塔河油田稠油井掺稀降黏工艺技术[J]. 化工管理, 2018,33(17):51-52.
	CHAO R M, SHI J W, ZHANG J , et al. Brief analysis of viscosity reduction technology for heavy oil wells in Tahe oilfield[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2018,33(17):51-52.
[10]	王鹏, 徐海霞, 陈兰 , 等. 高温稠油掺稀降黏开采辅助降黏剂的研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2018,41(1):95-98.
	WANG P, XU H X, CHEN L , et al. Development of viscosity reducer for thinning production of high temperature heavy oil[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2018,41(1):95-98.
[11]	张成志 . 塔河油田稠油井掺稀油降黏工艺的应用分析[J]. 化工中间体, 2015,11(4):55.
	ZHANG C Z . Tahe oilfield heavy oil Wells with thin oil viscosity process analysis of the application[J]. Chemical Intermediates, 2015,11(4):55.
[12]	贾晓燕 . 塔河油田深层稠油开采技术研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2014,26(4):46-48.
	JIA X Y . Study on recovery technology of deep heavy oil in Tahe Oilfield[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2014,26(4):46-48.
[13]	熊小伟, 王少亭, 韩利宝 , 等. 空心杆井筒电加热采油技术应用与实践[C]// 宁夏回族自治区科学技术协会.第十五届宁夏青年科学家论坛石化专题论坛论文集.宁夏回族自治区:《石油化工应用》杂志社, 2019: 21-24.
	XIONG X W, WANG S T, HAN L B , et al. Application and practice of electric heating oil mining technology for hollow drill[C]// paper presented at the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Science and Technology Association-The 15th Ningxia Youth Scientists Forum Petrochemical Thematic Forum Paper Collection-Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region: Petrochemical Application Magazine, 2019: 21-24.
[14]	郑冰 . 电热杆在稠油举升工艺中的应用探讨[J]. 中国石油石化, 2016,15(S2):40.
	ZHENG B . Discussion on application of electric heating rod in heavy oil lifting process[J]. China Petroleum, 2016,15(S2):40.
[15]	程仲富 . 塔河油田超深超稠油矿物绝缘电缆加热技术研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2017,14(21):32-35.
	CHENG Z F . The technology for heating with insulating cable in ultra-deep and ultra-heavy oil wells in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2017,14(21):32-35
[16]	郭道宏 . 油管隔热保温试验研究[J]. 石油矿场机械, 2011,40(11):26-28.
	GUO D H . Testing study of thermal insulation for tubing[J]. Oil Field Equipment, 2011,40(11):26-28.
[17]	毕普跃, 刘心田 . 稠油热采注汽管网保温技术应用分析[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2017,43(12):61.
	BI P Y, LI X T . Application and analysis of thermal insulation technology for hot oil injection steam pipe network[J]. Chemical Engineering Design Communications, 2017,43(12):61.
[18]	毛金成, 刘佳伟, 李勇明 , 等. 超稠油化学降黏剂研究与进展[J]. 应用化工, 2016,45(7):1367-1371.
	MAO J C, LIU J W, LI Y M , et al. Research and development of super heavy oil viscosity reducer[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2016,45(7):1367-1371.
[19]	郑磊, 吴晓东, 徐军 , 等. 热采高温井全金属螺杆泵举升技术及其适应性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018,18(21):206-211.
	ZHENG L, WU X D, XU J , et al. Artificial lift technique of all metal progressing cavity pump used in thermal production wells and its adaptability[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018,18(21):206-211.
[20]	宁碧, 吴亚龙, 李静嘉 , 等. 气举工艺在稠油开采中的应用现状[J]. 中国石油和化工, 2015,15(12):53-55.
	NING B, WU Y L, LI J J , et al. Current status of application of gas lifting technology in heavy oil mining[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 2015,15(12):53-55.
[21]	杜林辉, 梁志艳, 蒋磊 , 等. 稠油机采井泵深与掺稀混配点分离设计及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014,21(3):145-147.
	DU L H, LIANG Z Y, JIANG Li , et al. Separate design between pump setting depth and mixing point for diluent oil blending in heavy oil mechanical producers and its application[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014,21(3):145-147.

井号	实施日期	井口温度增加/℃	日增油/t	日节约稀油/t	稀稠比差	稀稠比降低幅度/%	累节约稀油/t	累增油/t
TH12445	20170416	12	0	0			6 228.5	201.8
TH12248	20170115	36	10.4	59.9	-1.76	65.96	36 467.3	940.8
TH10342	20170811	10	0	0	0	18.45	9 601.1	221.4
TH12386	20170820	45	9.6	0	0.10	-5.32	2 270.0	1 431.4
TH12340	20170830	1	2.5	35.3	-1.07	38.34	20 161.8	5 987.3
S99	20170908	14	6.7	16.4	-0.41	28.48	5 896.2	2 760.8
TH10377X	20171113	16	19.1	26.0	-0.42	37.23	8 715.2	3 174.4
TH12218	20180618	17	7.1	24.2	-0.82	36.85	2 550.9	1 674.5
TH10375	20180708	8	0.9	9.1	-0.23	15.41	861.7	155.0
TH10367	20180709	18	2.8	24.8	-0.84	44.72	1 895.0	193.6
TH12277	20180716	23	0	6.3	-0.15	7.40	565.0	44.0
TH12549H	20180724	17	6.7	35.5	-1.23	47.26	2 132.6	414.6
TH12319CH	20180902	32	7.3	25.8	-0.93	39.34	428.9	118.3
平均值		17			-0.65
合计			73.1	263.3		31.18	97 774.2	17 317.9

项目	采油工况要求	纳米保温油管性能指标
导热系数/[W·（m·K）^-1]	≤0. 018	≤0. 012
涂层厚度/mm	≤6	5
耐高温/℃	≥120	130
抗腐蚀	硫化氢、二氧化碳	硫化氢浓度<1 %, 二氧化碳浓度<1 %
耐浸泡	三相混合油液	可长期使用
耐压/MPa	≥35	35
机械性能	耐碰撞、耐磨	耐碰撞、耐磨
维修	快速修复	适用
使用深度/m	≥2 500	3 000

井号	下深/m	井口温度增加/℃	日增油/t	日节约稀油/t	稀稠比差	稀稠比降低幅度/%	累节约稀油/t	累增油/t
TH12266X	2 807	20	5	4.6	-0.1	6.25	270	1 439
TH10387	2 221	1	8	6.0	-0.2	11.76	526	540
平均值	2 514	11			-0.2	9.01
合计			13	10.6			796	1 979

井号	加药浓度/%	稀稠比	原始黏度/（mPa·s）	稀油量/g	稠油量/g	掺稀后黏度/（mPa·s）	降黏率/%
TK688		2∶1	480 000	100	50	1 460
	0.1	2∶1		100	50	1 050	28.08
		1.3∶1		65	50	3 360
	0.1	1.3∶1		65	50	2 450	27.08
TH12555		2∶1	420 000	100	50	1 340
	0.1	2∶1		100	50	980	26.86
		1.3∶1		65	50	2 860
	0.1	1.3∶1		65	50	2 020	29.37

井号	日增油/t	日节约稀油/t	稀稠比差	稀稠比降低幅度/%	累节约稀油/t	累增油/t
TK690	7.0	1.40	-0.1	10.0	2 432	3 218
TK654	6.6	6.57	-0.4	57.1	3 690	3 735
S66	-14.0	1.84	-0.2	33.3	717	580
TK661	0.6	-2.40	0.1	-10.0	4 262	4 416
TK696X	-0.5	-1.88	0.1	-8.3	844	946
TK697	8.2	20.75	-0.8	53.3	1 900	792
TH10255X	12.0	8.91	-0.3	33.3	110	146
平均值			-0.2	24.1
合计	32.5	35.19			13 955	13 833

Study on benefit extraction technology of super deep super heavy fractured-vuggy reservoir in Tahe Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 21

Related Articles 7

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

井号	采油方式	增油量/（t·d^-1）	节约稀油量/（t·d^-1）	稀稠比差	稀稠比降低幅度/%	累节约稀油/t	累增油/t
TH12148	自喷	-7.0	0	0	0	617	909
TH12140	机抽	-1.0	6.4	-0.5	17.86	1 540	306
TH12124CH	自喷	-3.0	0	-2.6	100.00	0	0
TH121115	电泵	-3.2	-16.0	5.2	-83.87	299	40
TH121128	机抽	-5.0	0	-1.5	100.00	2	26
TH121101	自喷	5.0	11.0	-0.5	20.83	1 240	234
TH12118	自喷	2.0	6.2	-0.3	14.29	46	0
TH12186	自喷	2.0	-2.8	-0.3	14.29	770	165
TH121122	自喷	1.0	1	0	0	292	293
TH12192	机抽	0	-0.2	0	0	10	8
TH10121CH	机抽	12.5	-4.0	0.1	-10.00	64	216
平均值				-0.04	15.76
合计		3.3	1.6			4 880	2 197

[1]	YAN Jianli,YAN Guanshan,GU Zhimeng,BIE Mengjun,ZHANG Zhenjie. Selection of fracturing wells and layers of Bohai J Oil Field in the late stage of high water cut and its application [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 736-743.
[2]	SANG Linxiang,LYU Bailin,LU Yingbo,WANG Junheng,WANG Jian,HUANG Kechuan,MA Peng,XING Xiangrong. Experiment on steam flooding assisted by gas injection in Z32 heavy oil reservoir in Fengcheng of Xinjiang and its application [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 241-247.
[3]	PAN Jingjun,PU Wanfen,ZHAO Shuai,KANNI Zhati,WANG Ruyan,Li Yibo,WAN Zheng,GU Fei. Thermal effect caused by low-temperature oxidation of heavy crude oil under quasi-adiabatic condition [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 110-114.
[4]	JIN Zhongkang,WANG Zhilin,MAO Chaoqi. Dominant mechanism and application of CO₂ immiscible flooding in M block with low permeability [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 68-74.
[5]	CHENG Zhongfu,REN Bo,JIANG Yingfang,LIU Lei,YANG Zuguo. Feasibility of ground thermal cracking viscosity reduction and re-mixing technology of heavy oil in ultra-deep wells of Tahe Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 90-93.
[6]	ZHANG Xian,CHE Hongchang,LIU Yisheng,CHEN Xin. Improved efficiency of in-situ combustion by application of submicro metal oxides particles [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 36-40.
[7]	Jin Yong,Wang Zhilin,Jin Zhongkang. A new calculation model of CO₂ huff and puff injection volume in high water-cut horizontal wells based on improved volume method [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 19-24.