甘谷驿油田L2区特低渗储层非均质性及其对油层分布的影响

Abstract

Abstract:

The Chang 6₁ reservoir was the main oil-bearing beds in the study area of Ganguyi Oilfield in Ordos Basin. The exploration and development practice showed that the reservoir characteristics had strong heterogeneity in three-dimensional space, and the vertical and horizontal distribution of the reservoirs were complex, which directly restrictsed the subsequent rolling exploration and development. In the study, based on the core observations and logging data, and combined with analytical testing, the controlling effect of the reservoir macroscopic heterogeneity on the oil layer distribution was systematically and visually analyzed. The complexity of the Chang 6₁ reservoir in the study area was caused by a variety of factors. Among them, the distribution of the sedimentary microfacies and diagenetic facies directly controlled that of the high quality reservoirs. And the interlayer heterogeneity, especially the interlayer permeability, was easy to cause the selective filling of oil, while the interlayer heterogeneity directly caused the heterogeneous distribution of oil in composite sand body. Through this study, the distribution law of ultra-low permeability and ultra-low permeability reservoirs in Ordos Basin could be better understood intuitively, which provides guidance for finding favorable zones in the future.

Key words: extra-low permeability reservoir, reservoir heterogeneity, distribution of oil layer, Ganguyi Oilfield

CLC Number:

TE122

Li Ming,Qi Nan,Chen Chaobing,Zhu Yushuang,Zhang Quanpei. Extra-low permeability reservoir heterogeneity and its effect on the distribution of reservoirs in L2 area of Ganguyi Oilfield[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 1-6.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References 17

[1]	于翠玲, 林承焰 . 储层非均质性研究进展[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2007,14(4):15-18.
[2]	裘怿楠, 薛叔浩, 应凤祥 . 中国陆相油气储集层[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997.
[3]	王德发, 陈建文, 李长山 . 中国陆相储层表征与成藏型式[J]. 地学前缘, 2000,7(4):363-369.
[4]	林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲 . 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅰ)——非均质控油理论的由来[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007,19(2):16-21.
[5]	林承焰, 谭丽娟, 于翠玲 . 论油气分布的不均一性(Ⅱ)——非均质控油理论探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007,19(3):14-22.
[6]	刘文超 . 码头庄油田储层非均质性及其与剩余油分布的关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012,24(2):111-116.
[7]	曾溅辉 . 正韵律砂层中渗透率级差对石油运移和聚集影响的模拟实验研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2000,27(4):102-105.
[8]	曾溅辉, 王洪玉 . 反韵律砂层石油运移模拟实验研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2001,19(4):592-597.
[9]	Weber K J . How heterogeneity affects oil recovery[J]. Reservoir Characterization, 1986: 487-544.
[10]	Weber K J . Influence of common sedimentary structures on fluid flow in reservoir models[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1982,34(3):665-672.
[11]	于兴河 . 油气储层地质学基础[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.
[12]	毛志强 . 非均质储层夹层控油作用初论——非均质储层油气分布规律及测井响应特征[J]. 地球科学, 2003,28(2):196-200.
[13]	曾溅辉, 王洪玉 . 层间非均质砂层石油运移和聚集模拟实验研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2000,24(4):108-111.
[14]	朱玉双, 柳益群, 赵继勇 , 等. 不同流动单元微观渗流特征研究——以华池油田长3油藏华152块为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008,30(1):103-108. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200801103
[15]	曾溅辉, 彭继林, 邱楠生 , 等. 砂—泥岩界面碳酸盐溶解—沉淀反应及其石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006,17(6):760-764.
[16]	石玉江, 肖亮, 毛志强 , 等. 低渗透砂岩储层成岩相测井识别方法及其地质意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8段储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2011,32(5):820-828.
[17]	赖锦, 王贵文, 王书南 , 等. 碎屑岩储层成岩相测井识别方法综述及研究进展[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,44(12):4942-4953.

样品编号	层位	井号	深度/m	孔隙度,%	渗透率/10^-3μm²	原始含油饱和度,%	平均含油饱和度,%
L1-1	长6₁¹	L135	404.31	10.8	1.21	62.3	63.3
L1-2	长6₁¹	L202	487.64	11.9	2.05	65.2
L1-3	长6₁¹	L287	465.30	11.2	1.94	68.6
L1-4	长6₁¹	L208	511.67	10.7	1.56	57.1
L2-1	长6₁²	L174	485.26	9.5	1.02	53.0	48.8
L2-2	长6₁²	L287	478.89	10.4	1.35	47.9
L2-3	长6₁²	L179	552.99	9.1	0.88	45.6
L3-1	长6₁³	L197	496.85	8.2	0.69	43.2	39.5
L3-2	长6₁³	L287	486.27	7.9	0.51	39.8
L3-3	长6₁³	L135	430.06	8.5	0.58	35.4

Extra-low permeability reservoir heterogeneity and its effect on the distribution of reservoirs in L2 area of Ganguyi Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 17

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	MA Daixin,REN Xianjun,ZHAO Mifu,HAN Jiaoyan,LIU Yuhu. Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 167-175.
[2]	LI Ruilei,CAO Lei,FAN Xuepei,FENG Xiaohui,LI Ning. Comparison, optimization and application of multiple prestack inversion algorithm for intermediate basic volcanic reservoirs: A case study of Huoshiling Formation in Chaganhua area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 207-215.
[3]	SHEN Yanjie,LI Junru,ZHANG Liya,ZHOU Yang,CHENG Rihui. Volcanic facies development characteristics of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin: A case study of field outcrops in Jiutai area of Jilin Province [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 224-236.
[4]	ZHANG Wen,LIANG Lixi,LIU Xiangjun,XIONG Jian,ZHANG Yinan. Etching morphology and mechanical properties of carbonate rocks under acid action [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 247-255.
[5]	CHEN Hongcai, LI Zhaorui. Seismic prediction technology for thin sandstone reservoir of Dainan Formation in Majiazui Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 108-116.
[6]	HE Dongbo, REN Lu, HAO Jie, LIU Xiaoping, CAO Qian. Quantitative evaluation system of geothermal resources based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of middle-deep hydrothermal sandstone reservoir in Caofeidian of Hebei Province [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 713-725.
[7]	YAN Lini, ZHU Hongquan, YE Sujuan, ZHU Li. Origin of “cake-like” fractures and its significance for gas exploration in the second member of Xujiahe Formation of Xinchang structural belt [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 559-568.
[8]	ZHENG Gongying, LYU Qibiao, YANG Yongjian, XU Shoucheng. Prestack seismic prediction of sandstone reservoirs in the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Dongfengchang area of Ziyang [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 569-580.
[9]	ZHANG Zhuang, ZHANG Shunli, HE Xiubin, XIE Dan, LIU Yanhua. Development characteristics of fractures in the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Hexingchang Gas Field, western Sichuan Depression and their main control factors of formation: A case study of Hexingchang Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 581-590.
[10]	QIAN Yugui. Application of machine deep learning technology in tight sandstones reservoir prediction: A case study of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang, western Sichuan Depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 600-607.
[11]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[12]	SONG Dekang,LIU Xiaoxue,SHAO Zeyu,JIANG Zhenxue,HOU Lili,WANG Yuchao,HE Shijie,LIU Jipeng. Accumulation mode of Quaternary mudstone gas reservoir in Sanhu Depression, Qaidam Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 495-504.
[13]	SHEN Li,WANG Caizhi,NING Congqian,LIU Yingming,WANG Hao. Well-log lithofacies classification based on machine learning for Chang-7 member in Longdong area of Ordos Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 525-536.
[14]	LI Shilun,TANG Yong,DUAN Shengcai,QIN Jiazheng,CHEN Yinuo,LIU Yaxin,ZHENG Peng,ZHAO Guoqing. Progress in source-sink matching and safety evaluation of CO₂ geological sequestration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 269-297.
[15]	LI Guoyong. Key technology of fine description of complex fault block reservoir and its application [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 152-162.