聚合物驱有效流度控制时间范围及其影响因素研究

Abstract

Abstract:

The study on the effective control time range of polymer flooding and its influencing factors is conducive to the further development of oil recovery measures after polymer flooding. Based on the theory of characteristic curve of water flooding reservoir and the mobility controlling mechanism of polymer flooding, a judgment method was established, and the influencing factors were analyzed through the indoor flooding experiments. The results showed that there were some differences in the water flooding characteristic curves before and after polymer flooding. With the follow-up process of water flooding, its rule would gradually return to the original rule before polymer flooding. It was feasible to judge the effective mobility control range of polymer flooding by the consistency of the characteristic curve of water flooding before and after polymer flooding. The effect of increasing the viscosity of polymer solution on its mobility control time was relatively small, only 10 ^-2 order of magnitude of PV injection. Increasing the residual resistance factor（RRF） could significantly prolong the effective mobility control time of polymer flooding, and reached 10 ^-1 order of magnitude of PV injection. The residual resistance coefficient of polymer is the main factor affecting the effective mobility control time.

Key words: polymer flooding, mobility control, characteristic curve of water flooding, solution viscosity, residual resistance factor

CLC Number:

TE357

Leiting SHI,Shijie ZHU,Jian ZOU, et al. Study on effective mobility control time ramge and influencing factors of polymer flooding[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 31-35.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 3

Table 3

Fig. 4

Table 4

References 16

[1]	胡博仲 . 聚合物驱采油工程[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004.
[2]	闻一平 . 不同代数树枝聚合物建立残余阻力系数的能力研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2015.
[3]	张鹏 . 缔合型聚合物在孔隙介质中的流动性质与驱油能力研究[D]. 东营:中国石油大学, 2013.
[4]	孙晨 . 提高海上稠油油藏早期注聚效果研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2012.
[5]	隋军, 廖广志, 牛金刚 . 大庆油田聚合物驱油动态特征及驱油效果影响因素分析[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1999,18(5):17-20.
[6]	刘晨, 王凯, 王业飞 . 针对A油田的抗温、抗盐聚合物/表面活性剂二元复合驱油体系研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(3):152-158.
[7]	吴海俊, 付美龙, 孙晶 , 等. 稠油油藏三元复合驱参数优化实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018,25(4):138-142.
[8]	杨二龙, 贾聚全, 齐士琨 , 等. 海上稠油油田聚驱后二元复合驱注入时机与注入方式优选[J]. 油田化学, 2015,32(2):259-262.
[9]	陈金凤, 李洁, 张丽娟 . 大庆油田三元复合驱注入时机[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015,34(5):91-96.
[10]	叶仲斌 . 提高采收率原理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007: 69-73.
[11]	张超, 叶仲斌, 施雷庭 , 等. 疏水缔合聚合物建立流动阻力机理研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2007,19(4) : 251-253.
[12]	李国 . 大庆油田聚合物驱后利用残余聚合物挖潜剩余油技术探索[J]. 油田化学, 2010,27(2):192-195.
[13]	俞启泰 . 几种重要水驱特征曲线的油水渗流特征[J]. 石油学报, 1999,20(1):56-60.
[14]	万吉业 . 水驱油田的驱替系列及其应用(II)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1983,1(10):44-49.
[15]	邹存友, 于立君 . 中国水驱砂岩油田含水与采出程度的量化关系[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(2):288-292.
[16]	郭智栋 . 基于高残余阻力系数的高渗透稠油油藏聚合物驱驱替液技术[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2011.

瞬时含水率率,%	后续水驱过程中实验取样点下的采出程度,%
瞬时含水率率,%	第一个点	第二个点	第三个点	第四个点	第五个点
84.21	46.50	—	—	—	—
89.29	47.50	47.50	—	—	—
89.09	48.33	48.33	48.33	—	—
90.74	49.00	49.00	49.00	49.00	—
92.73	49.50	49.50	49.50	49.50	49.50
94.83	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00
94.64	50.50	50.50	50.50	50.50	50.50
94.44	50.83	50.83	50.83	50.83	50.83
96.43	51.17	51.17	51.17	51.17	51.17
96.15	51.50	51.50	51.50	51.50	51.50
96.30	51.83	51.83	51.83	51.83	51.83
拟合的曲线公式	y=108.09ln（x）-329.5	y=95.436ln（x）-279.88	y=104.59ln（x）-315.8	y=92.986ln（x）-270.22	y=72.569ln（x）-189.91

体系	不同黏度的体系			体系	不同残余阻力系数的体系
体系	黏度/ （mPa·s）	阻力系数	残余阻力系数	体系	黏度/ （mPa·s）	阻力系数	残余阻力系数
H₁	10.1	30.0	5.8	H₁	10.1	30.0	5.8
H₂	18.5	43.5	6.4	M₂	8.8	71.4	21.3
H₃	32.2	60.0	6.9	HM₃	9.2	112.5	28.1

体系	水驱特征曲线	后续水驱特征曲线	驱替范围值
H₁	y=206.84ln（x）-562.93 R²=0.995 5	y=206.11ln（x）-751.69 R²=0.971 7	0~0.323PV
H₂	y=260.31ln（x）-775 R²=0.960 5	y=254.4ln（x）-972.14 R²=0.944 1	0~0.318PV
H₃	y=255.96ln（x）-744.75 R²=0.998 7	y=253.26ln（x）-999.44 R²=0.790 7	0~0.329PV

体系	水驱特征曲线	后续水驱特征曲线	驱替范围值
H₁	y=206.84ln（x）-562.93 R²=0.995 5	y=206.11ln（x）-751.69 R²=0.971 7	0~0.323 PV
M₂	y=130.78ln（x）-362.76 R²=0.960 9	y=135.33ln（x）-472.97 R²=0.992	0~0.422 PV
HM₃	y=320.34ln（x）-991.15 R²=0.971 6	y=324.38ln（x）-1 288.5 R²=0.961 5	0~0.484 PV

Study on effective mobility control time ramge and influencing factors of polymer flooding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG Lianfeng,ZHANG Yilin,GUO Huanhuan,LI Hongsheng,LI Junjie,LIANG Limei,LI Wenjing,HU Shukui. Development adjustment technology of extending life cycle for nearly-abandoned reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[2]	HU Depeng. Injection-production features of polymer flooding for horizontal wells and influencing factors of development effects for well groups [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 809-815.
[3]	LI Xi,ZHOU Xi,YE Zhongbin,SHU Zheng,CHEN Wenjuan,LU Yixin,QIU Cheng,HE Shurui. Performance enhancement of hydrophobically associative polymer by watersoluble β-cyclodextrin polymer [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 884-889.
[4]	YAN Jianli,YAN Guanshan,GU Zhimeng,BIE Mengjun,ZHANG Zhenjie. Selection of fracturing wells and layers of Bohai J Oil Field in the late stage of high water cut and its application [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 736-743.
[5]	XU Jianping,YUAN Yuanda,XIE Qing,WEI Xuegang,FENG Zhen. Advance in application of molecular dynamics simulation in polymer flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 414-421.
[6]	ZHANG Xiaojing,LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo,LIANG Limei,GUO Linlin. Research on multi-stage heterogeneous flooding based on polymer flooding [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 90-95.
[7]	WANG Zhengxin,ZHANG Lianfeng,YANG Lu,LIU Yanhua,LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo. Heterogeneous combination flooding system for reservoir after polymer flooding in Shuanghe Oil Filed [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 78-84.
[8]	ZHANG Lei,JIA Lan,ZHANG Daolian. Developing technical countermeasures in the late stage of polymer flooding in small fault block reservoirs with strong edge water [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 72-77.
[9]	LIANG Yan,WANG Zenglin,SHI Shubin,GUO Yongjun,HU Jun,LUO Pingya,ZHANG Xinmin,CAO Miao,ZHANG Wei,LIU Yang. Heavy oil displacement-mobility control and heterogeneity adjustment: Associative polymer versus HPAM [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 65-71.
[10]	XU Hui,ZHU Yangwen,SONG Min,PANG Xuejun,SUN Xiuzhi. Study on oil displacement performance of temperature sensitive polymer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 53-57.
[11]	YU Meng,TIE Leilei,LI Xiang,ZHANG Bo,LIU Wenhui,CHANG Zhen. Experiments on adaptability of polymer flooding for medium-high permeability reservoir in Bohai Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 40-45.
[12]	LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo,YANG Lisheng,GUO Linlin,ZHANG Xiaojing. Adaptability of heterogeneous flooding system to low-medium permeability reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 17-23.
[13]	WANG Zhiyuan,ZHANG Liehui,TAN Long,ZHANG Chaoliang,TANG Hongming. Study on mechanism and controlling factors of polymer flooding in conglomerate reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 109-114.
[14]	ZHU Shijie,SHI Leiting,ZHANG Jian,LI YanLi,WANG Gang,XUE Xinsheng,YE Zhongbin. Application method of determining polymer injection timing with relative permeability curves [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 128-134.
[15]	LIU Wentao,ZHANG Defu,CHENG Hongjie,WANG Xiaoguang. Well test model of three parts composite reservoirs with Newton/non-Newton/Newton for polymer flooding [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 26-30.