中国南方常压页岩气勘探开发面临的挑战及对策

Abstract

Abstract:

Normal pressure shale gas is one of the main types of shale gas exploration and development in China. It has great resource potential and broad prospects. In recent years, Sinopec East China Oil and Gas Company has continued to carry out normal pressure shale gas exploration and practice in Nanchuan-Wulong area of the basin-margin transition zone in southeastern Chongqing. Positive progress has been made in the following aspects such as basic geological theory research, low cost engineering technology research, green mine construction of normal pressure shale gas. The enrichment and high yield geological theory of “three factors controlling gas”, and the classification and evaluation standard and the target evaluation system of shale reservoirs are established. Six low cost engineering technologies of normal pressure shale gas are proposed, that is, low density 3D seismic exploration, well completion at the “second” section, “drop ball steering+continuous sand addition”, “three steps” fracturing sand addition, electric fracturing and high efficiency drainage gas production. The development technology strategy of normal pressure shale gas is preliminarily formed. The integrated green exploration and development mode is put forward. More breakthrough and efficient development of normal pressure shale gas exploration are realized. Normal pressure shale gas shows a good prospect of exploration and development. However, the exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in China is still in its infancy and exploration stage. There are still many challenges in aspects such as theoretical innovation, technological breakthrough and benefit development. So that five countermeasures are proposed for the development of China’s normal pressure shale gas industry: ①deepen the research on the main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment and high-yield, and strengthen the target evaluation; ②speed up the research on the supporting technology of excellent drilling and completion for the further acceleration and efficiency increasing; ③strengthen the research on high-efficiency fracturing technology to increase production, reduce cost and increase efficiency; ④strengthen the research on the production rule of normal pressure shale gas, and formulate the technical strategy of benefit development; ⑤fully implement the integrated operation mode of shale gas geological engineering, improve the management quality and create benefit. These countermeasures are counted on accelerating the development of normal pressure shale gas industry in China.

Key words: southern China, normal pressure shale gas, wufeng formation-longmaxi formation, exploration and development, geological engineering integration

CLC Number:

TE122

Zhixiong FANG. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 1-13.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References 24

[1]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教 , 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010,37(6):641-653. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60001-3
[2]	马永生, 冯建辉, 牟泽辉 , 等. 中国石化非常规油气资源潜力及勘探进展[J]. 中国工程科学, 2012,14(6):22-29.
[3]	张大伟, 李玉喜, 张金川 , 等. 全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2012.
[4]	王志刚 . 涪陵页岩气勘探开发重大突破与启示[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015,36(1):1-6. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150101
[5]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 魏志红 , 等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016,21(3):24-37.
[6]	孙健, 罗兵 . 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田构造变形特征及对含气性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016,37(6):809-818.
[7]	翟刚毅, 包书景, 王玉芳 , 等. 古隆起边缘成藏模式与湖北宜昌页岩气重大发现[J]. 地球学报, 2017,38(4):441-447.
[8]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣 . 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(4):561-574.
[9]	方志雄, 何希鹏 . 渝东南武隆向斜常压页岩气形成与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016,37(6):819-827.
[10]	卞晓冰, 蒋廷学, 卫然 , 等. 常压页岩气水平井压后排采控制参数优化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016,35(5):170-174.
[11]	何希鹏, 张培先, 房大志 , 等. 渝东南彭水—武隆地区常压页岩气生产特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(5):72-79.
[12]	何希鹏, 何贵松, 高玉巧 , 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气地质特征及富集高产规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(12):1-14.
[13]	高玉巧, 蔡潇, 张培先 , 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层孔隙特征与演化[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(12):15-25.
[14]	潘仁芳, 李笑天, 金吉能 , 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气储层非均质性特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(12):26-36.
[15]	马力, 陈焕疆, 甘克文 , 等. 中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004: 59-82.
[16]	袁玉松, 周雁, 邱登峰 , 等. 埋藏过程中泥页岩非构造裂缝的形成演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015,36(5):822-827. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150514
[17]	郭彤楼, 张汉荣 . 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014,41(1):28-36.
[18]	金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波 , 等. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(1):1-10.
[19]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 张钰莹 . 四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(2):8-17.
[20]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平 , 等. 涪陵页岩气田富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017,44(4):481-491.
[21]	何希鹏, 高玉巧, 唐显春 , 等. 渝东南地区常压页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017,28(4):654-664.
[22]	余川, 聂海宽, 曾春林 , 等. 四川盆地东部下古生界页岩储集空间特征及其对含气性的影响[J]. 地质学报, 2014,88(7):1311-1320.
[23]	ZHANG L C, LU S F, XIAO D S , et al. Characterization of full pore size distribution and its significance to macroscopic physical parameters in tight glutenites[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017,38:434-449.
[24]	龙胜祥, 彭勇民, 刘华 , 等. 四川盆地东南部下志留统龙马溪组一段页岩微—纳米观地质特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2017,37(9):23-30.

项别	常压页岩气	高压页岩气
沉积特征	处于深水陆棚相上斜坡,优质页岩厚24~35 m,石英含量 >50 %,黏土矿物含量<30 %	处于深水陆棚相下斜坡,优质页岩厚度38~45 m,石英含量40 %~50 %,黏土矿物含量30 %~40 %
储集特征	基质孔隙度3.5 %~5.0 %,高角度缝及层理缝更发育	基质孔隙度4.0 %~6.0 %,高角度缝相对不发育
赋存状态	吸附气占比高（40 %~60 %）	吸附气占比低（25 %~40 %）
应力特征	地应力相对较小,40~60 MPa,最大水平主应力和最小水平主应力差异大,差异系数0.27~0.34	地应力较大,50~80 MPa,最大水平主应力和最小水平主应力差异小,差异系数0.11~0.13
温压特征	地温梯度低,（2.1~2.5） ℃/100 m,地层压力系数<1.3	地温梯度高,（2.6~3.0） ℃/100 m,地层压力系数>1.3
生产特征	返排率高,日产液高,产量递减相对较慢	返排率低,日产液低,产量递减相对较快

孔隙类型		亚类	特征描述	成因
无机孔		粒间孔	颗粒间孔隙或矿物间的接触部分,一般为数百纳米及其以下	压实残余、溶蚀或收缩
		粒内孔	数纳米到数百纳米不等,包括颗粒内微孔及黏土矿物解理缝	溶蚀
		晶间孔	矿物晶体间的孔隙,主要位于黏土矿物及黄铁矿物部分	结晶
有机孔	干酪根孔	无定形干酪根孔	数纳米到数百纳米不等,圆度较高且密集分布的孔隙	降解、热演化作用
	干酪根孔	结构型干酪根孔	数纳米到数百纳米不等,孔隙保有母质原始结构	热演化作用、凝胶作用
	沥青孔	固体沥青孔	数纳米到数百纳米不等,原生沥青保有母质原始结构,孔隙多为圆或次圆	降解、液态烃演化
	沥青孔	沥青球粒孔	数十纳米到数百纳米不等,孔隙为不规则棱角状	热演化作用、物理堆积
微裂缝		应力缝	宽度一般小于2 μm,长度几微米到数厘米不等,矿物颗粒或有机质颗粒不规则破裂	应力（构造及成岩）
微裂缝		收缩缝	宽度一般小于1 μm,长度不超过100 μm,多见于有机质与矿物颗粒接触面	脱水或收缩

储层分级	微孔（<5 nm）		小孔（5~25 nm）		常压页岩储层		高压页岩储层
储层分级	孔容/（mL·g^-1）	孔隙度/%	孔容/（mL·g^-1）	孔隙度/%	TOC/%	实验测总含气量/（mL·g^-1）	TOC/%	实验测总含气量/（mL·g^-1）
好储层	>0.006	>1.5	>0.005	>1.25	>4.5	>2.2	>3.5	>4.5
中储层	>0.006	>1.5	>0.002	>0.5	2.5~4.5	>1.8	2.0~3.5	>3.7
差储层	0.002~0.006	0.5~1.5			1.0~2.5	<1.5	1.0~2.0	<2.3
非储层	<0.002	<0.5			<1.0		<1.0

评价参数			一类区	二类区	三类区
物质基础	关键参数	优质页岩厚度/m	>30	20~30	15~20
		有机质丰度/%	>3	2~3	1~2
		优质页岩分布面积/km²	>100	50~100	<50
		资源丰度/（10⁸m³·km^-2）	>8	4~8	<4
	辅助参数	热演化程度/%	2.0~3.0	3.0~3.5	>3.5
富集程度	关键参数	地层压力系数	>1.1	0.9~1.1	<0.9
		孔隙度/%	>4	2~4	<2
		含气量/（m³·t^-1）	>4	2~4	<2
	辅助参数	距剥蚀边界距离/km	>4	2~4	<2
		断裂发育程度	断裂较少,规模小	断裂较发育,规模小	断裂发育,规模大
		距开启断层距离/km	>1.5	0.5~1.5	<0.5
		孔径/nm	>10为主	2~10为主	<2为主
		比表面积/（m²·g^-1）	>20	15~20	<15
地应力场	关键参数	构造样式	背斜、斜坡、褶皱宽缓的向斜	较宽缓向斜	较紧闭—紧闭复杂褶皱
		埋深/m	1 500~3 800	1 000~1 500或3 800~4 500	>4 500
		层理缝	发育	较发育	不发育
		微裂缝	发育	较发育	不发育
		地应力/MPa	<80	80~95	>95
		应力差异系数	<0.2	0.2~0.3	>0.3
		硅质含量/%	>50	30~50	<30
		曲率	中等	大	小
	辅助参数	泊松比	<0.25	0.25~0.30	>0.30
		黏土含量/%	<30	30~40	>40
		脆性指数/%	>50	30~50	<30
		顶底板	具应力隔挡	应力隔挡不明显	不具应力隔挡

Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 24

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[3]	SANG Shuxun,HAN Sijie,ZHOU Xiaozhi,LIU Shiqi,WANG Yuejiang. Deep coalbed methane resource and its exploration and development prospect in East China [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 403-415.
[4]	LIU Ming,MENG Qingli,DU Yuan,LI Yanjing. Application of seismic exploration technology in shale gas exploration and development in Nanchuan area [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 407-416.
[5]	JIANG Shu,LI Chun,CHEN Guohui,GUO Tonglou,WU Yuyuan,HE Xipeng,GAO Yuqiao,ZHANG Peixian. Occurrence of normally-pressured shale gas in China and the United States and their effects on mobility and production: A case study of southeast Sichuan Basin and Appalachia Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 399-406.
[6]	YANG Yaozhong,TAN Shaoquan,SUN Yeheng,MU Xing,MA Chengjie,LIU Jiantao. Construction and application of digital platform for comprehensive research of oil and gas exploration and development [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 628-634.
[7]	HU Chunfeng,MEI Junwei,LI Shizhao,LU Bi,MA Jun,QIAN Jin. Analysis on geological and engineering factors of development effects on normal pressure shale gas in Nanchuan Block, eastern Suchuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 559-568.
[8]	WANG Yunhai,REN Jianhua,CHEN Zuhua,MEI Junwei,HU Chunfeng,WANG Wei,LU Bi. Integrated benefit development and intelligent evaluation of normal pressure shale gas [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 487-496.
[9]	HE Xipeng,GAO Yuqiao,HE Guisong,ZHANG Peixian,LIU Ming,SUN Bin,WANG Kaiming,ZHOU Di'na,REN Jianhua. Geological characteristics and key technologies for exploration and development of Nanchuan Shale Gas Field in southeast Chongqing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 305-316.
[10]	LI Donghai,ZAN Ling,HUANG Wenhuan,YU Wenduan,MA Xiaodong,ZHENG Yongwang,ZHOU Tao,YIN Yanling. Exploration and development integration practice of subtle reservoir of 3rd member of Funing Formation in western slope of Qintong depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 281-290.
[11]	ZHOU Guangzhe. Practice of progressive exploration-development integration in SD Oil Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 261-268.
[12]	CEN Tao,XIA Haibang,LEI Lin. Research and application of key technologies for fracturing of normal pressure shale in Southeastern Chongqing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 70-76.
[13]	REN Bozhang. Application of spark source in exploration of mountains in southern China [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 28-33.
[14]	WU Yuyuan,CHEN Zhenlong. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of deep CBM of South Yanchuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 1-11.
[15]	JIANG Tingxue,SU Yuan,BIAN Xiaobing,MEI Zongqing. Network fracturing technology with low cost and high density for normal pressure shale gas [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 78-83.