塔西南石炭系卡拉沙依组烃源岩评价与优选

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.04.015

Abstract

Abstract:

The study explores the abundant oil and gas reserves in the Carboniferous of the southwestern Tarim Basin, with a specific focus on the source rocks of the Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation. By conducting kerogen identification, total organic carbon（TOC） testing, and thermal simulation, the research revealed that these mudstone source rocks primarily consist of Type Ⅲ kerogen. Their TOC ranged from 0.2% to 2.8%, averaging 1.0%. The thermal maturity of the rocks, indicated by a vitrinite reflectance（R_o） greater than 0.7%, varied across different areas. The hydrocarbon generation history of these source rocks was also examined. In the Magaiti slope, the rocks underwent two phases of hydrocarbon generation: one during the Late Hercynian period and another during the Himeyama period. In contrast, in the Bachu bulge, there was only one hydrocarbon generation phase, occurring during the Late Hercynian period. The source rocks in the Magaiti slope are considered mature and are still generating hydrocarbons, influenced by factors such as source rock thickness, TOC, maturity, and the history of hydrocarbon generation and excretion. Furthermore, the source rocks in the western piedmont zone were identified as having the best quality and the highest hydrocarbon generation intensity.

Key words: southwestern Tarim Basin, Carboniferous, Kalashayi Formation, source-rock evaluation, thermal simulation

CLC Number:

TE122

Fushun ZHANG,Qiming ZHENG,Hanwen HU, et al. Evaluation and optimal selection of Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation source rocks in southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 647-656.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 5

Table 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 26

[1]	贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.01.01
	JIA Chengzao. Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.01.01
[2]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 689-701.
	ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China: characteristics, challenges and prospect(Ⅰ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 689-701.
[3]	赵文智, 董大忠, 李建忠, 等. 中国页岩气资源潜力及其在天然气未来发展中的地位[J]. 中国工程科学, 2012, 14(7): 46-52.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, DONG Dazhong, LI Jianzhong, et al. The resource potential and future status in natural gas development of shale gas in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2012, 14(7): 46-52.
[4]	董大忠, 高世葵, 黄金亮, 等. 论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(12): 1-15.
	DONG Dazhong, GAO Shikui, HUANG Jinliang, et al. A discussion on the shale gas exploration ＆ development prospect in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Nature Gas Industry, 2014, 34(12): 1-15.
[5]	张金川, 杨超, 陈前, 等. 中国潜质页岩形成和分布[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 74-86. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.2016.01.007
	ZHANG Jinchuan, YANG Chao, CHEN Qian, et al. Deposition and distribution of potential shales in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 74-86. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.2016.01.007
[6]	方志雄. 中国南方常压页岩气勘探开发面临的挑战及对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(5): 1-13.
	FANG Zhixiong. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 1-13.
[7]	卢双舫, 马延伶, 曹瑞成, 等. 优质烃源岩评价标准及其应用: 以海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷为例[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2012, 37(3): 535-544.
	LU Shuangfang, MA Yanling, CAO Ruicheng, et al. Evaluation criteria of high-quality source rocks and its applications: Taking the Wuerxun Sag in Hailaer Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences(Acta of China University of Geosciences), 2012, 37(3): 535-544.
[8]	贾承造. 中国石油工业上游前景与未来理论技术五大挑战[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 1-14. doi: 10.7623/syxb202401001
	JIA Chengzao. Prospects and five future theoretical and technical challenges of the upstream petroleum industry in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 1-14. doi: 10.7623/syxb202401001
[9]	田雷, 崔海峰, 刘军, 等. 塔西南坳陷早、中寒武世岩相古地理格局分析[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2016, 40(6): 18-25.
	TIAN Lei, CUI Haifeng, LIU Jun, et al. Analysis on the paleogeographic framework of the early-middle Cambrian in southwest depression of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2016, 40(6): 18-25.
[10]	韩睿. 塔西南地区阿尔塔什剖面石炭系混合沉积及层序地层研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2023.
	HAN Rui. Mixed deposition and sequence stratigraphy of Carboniferous in Altash section, southwestern Tarim Basin[D]. Guilin:Guilin University of technology, 2023.
[11]	崔海峰, 田雷, 刘军, 等. 塔西南坳陷麦盖提斜坡油气成藏模式[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(6): 34-42.
	CUI Haifeng, TIAN Lei, LIU Jun, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation pattern of reservoirs in Maigaiti Slope, Southwest Tarim depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(6): 34-42.
[12]	程晓敢, 黄智斌, 陈汉林, 等. 西昆仑山前冲断带断裂特征及构造单元划分[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(2): 2591-2601.
	CHENG Xiaogan, HUANG Zhibin, CHEN Hanlin, et al. Fault characteristics and division of tectonic units of the thrust belt in the front of the West Kunlun Mountains[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2012, 28(2): 2591-2601.
[13]	王清华, 杨海军, 李勇, 等. 塔西南山前地区恰探1井石炭系—二叠系重大突破与勘探前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(4): 34-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.04.004
	WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, LI Yong, et al. Major breakthrough in the Carboniferous-Permian in Well Qiatan 1 and exploration prospect in the piedmont southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(4): 34-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2023.04.004
[14]	廖晓, 王震亮, 范昌育, 等. 低勘探程度地区烃源岩综合评价———以塔里木盆地西南拗陷石炭系烃源岩为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(2): 261-267.
	LIAO Xiao, WANG Zhenliang, FAN Changyu, et al. The comprehensive evaluation of source rock in low-exploration area: A case study on the Carboniferous source rock in southwest Sag of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 261-267.
[15]	刘高波, 施泽进, 佘晓宇. 巴楚-麦盖提的区域构造演化与油气分布规律[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(2): 157-161.
	LIU Gaobo, SHI Zejin, SHE Xiaoyu. Regional tectonic evolution and distribution of Bachu-Markit[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(2): 157-161.
[16]	方爱民, 马建英, 王世刚, 等. 西昆仑-塔西南坳陷晚古生代以来的沉积构造演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(12): 3396-3406.
	FANG Aimin, MA Jianying, WANG Shigang, et al. Sedimentary tectonic evolution of the southwestern Tarim Basin and west Kunlun orogen since Late Paleozoic[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(12): 3396-3406.
[17]	郭齐军, 赵省民. 塔河地区石炭系沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(1): 99-102.
	GUO Qijun, ZHAO Xingmin. Depositional characteristics of carboniferous in Tahe region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(1): 99-102.
[18]	刘占红, 陈荣, 宋成兵, 等. 塔里木盆地石炭系卡拉沙依组旋回地层与层序地层综合研究[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2012, 37(5): 1051-1065.
	LIU Zhanhong, CHEN Rong, SONG Chengbing, et al. Cyclostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy on Carboniferous Karashayi Formation of Tarim Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences(Acta of China University of Geoscience), 2012, 37(5): 1051-1065.
[19]	韩睿, 张尚锋, 罗顺社, 等. 碎屑岩与碳酸盐岩混合沉积模式——以新疆塔西南地区上石炭统卡拉乌依组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(2): 269-276.
	HAN Rui, ZHANG Shangfeng, LUO Shunshe, et al. Mixed sedimentary model of clastic rocks and carbonate rocks: A case study of Karawuyi Formation of Upper Carboniferous in southwest Tarim, Xinjiang[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(2): 269-276.
[20]	巩高阳, 张尚锋, 罗顺社, 等. 塔里木盆地西南缘生物礁特征--以阿尔塔什剖面石炭系和什拉甫组为例[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2023, 39(4): 66-75.
	GONG Gaoyang, ZHANG Shangfeng, LUO Shunshe, et al. Characteristics of Carboniferous reef in Heshilafu Formation at Altash section in the southwestern margin of Tarim Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(4): 66-75.
[21]	德勒达零, 穆哈泰. 塔西南坳陷石炭一二叠纪沉积与古地理特征的关系[J]. 新疆石油学院学报, 2000, 12(3): 4-8.
	DILIDAI, MUHATA. Study the relationship between depositional characteristics and paleogeographical features in Carboniferous—Permian of southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute, 2000, 12(3): 4-8.
[22]	廖晓. 塔里木盆地西南坳陷中新生代构造演化特征及对油气成藏的控制作用[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2019.
	LIAO Xiao. Meso-Cenozoic tectonic evolution characteristics and its controlling effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Southwest Depression of Tarim Basin[D]. Xi’an: Northwest University, 2019.
[23]	刘军, 田雷, 杨丽莎, 等. 塔里木盆地塔西南坳陷古生界成藏条件特殊性与油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(9): 61-72.
	LIU Jun, TIAN Lei, YANG Lisha, et al. Particularity of Paleozoic Hydrocarbon Accumulation Conditions in the Southwest Tarim Depression and its implications for petroleum exploration[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(9): 61-72.
[24]	曾昌民, 张亮, 雷刚林, 等. 塔西南坳陷烃源岩生标特征对比及沉积环境指示意义[J]. 新疆地质, 2011, 29(3): 319-323.
	ZENG Changmin, ZHANG Liang, LEI Ganglin, et al. Biomarkers characteristics of source rocks of southwest Tarim Depression and its signification for sedimentary environment[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2011, 29(3): 319-323.
[25]	胡健, 王铁冠, 陈建平, 等. 塔西南坳陷周缘原油地球化学特征与成因类型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1221-1233. doi: 10.7623/syxb201510005
	HU Jian, WANG Tieguan, CHEN Jianping, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin patterns of oils in periphery of southwestern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(10): 1221-1233. doi: 10.7623/syxb201510005
[26]	徐兴友, 张林晔, 陈致林, 等. 塔西南胜利探区和参1井天然气来源[J]. 特种油气藏, 2003, 11(3): 47-49.
	XU Xingyou, ZHANG Linhua, CHEN Zhilin, et al. Natural gas source in Hecan 1 of southwest Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2003, 11(3): 47-49.

	岩相	分布地区	干酪根类型	姥植比	C24/C26
潮坪—潟湖	煤、碳质泥岩暗色泥岩	巴麦地区	Ⅱ₂-Ⅲ型，偏Ⅲ型	一般小于1	一般大于0.6
陆棚	泥岩、灰质泥岩	塔西南坳陷及山前带	Ⅱ-Ⅲ型，偏Ⅱ型	一般大于1	一般小于0.6

井名	TOC含量/%			样品数量/个
井名	最大值	最小值	平均值	样品数量/个
巴探5	1.42	0.15	0.84	23
玛北1	1.43	0.93	1.08	4
皮山北2	1.83	0.95	1.34	5
玛4	2.06	0.38	1.10	18
山1	2.48	0.09	1.05	16
和1	1.35	0.29	0.97	18
玛参1	2.59	0.09	0.87	34
和田1	1.13	0.25	0.86	20

井号/剖面	岩性	井深/m	样品数量	（S₁+S₂）/（mg/g）		T_max/℃		I_H/（mg/g）		I_O/（mg/g）
井号/剖面	岩性	井深/m	样品数量	最大值~ 最小值	平均值	最大值~ 最小值	平均值	最大值~最小值	平均值	最大值~ 最小值	平均值
棋盘	灰黑色泥岩	露头	7	0.01~0.49	0.11	320~544	483	5~44	19	50~356	163
昔力必里	灰黑色灰质泥岩	露头	4	0~0.02	0.01	294~522	435	0~1	0	26~59	50
阿尔塔什	灰黑色含灰质泥岩	露头	6	0~0.15	0.03	445~509	481	0~20	6	45~380	239
巴探10	暗色泥岩	2 212~2 300	6	0.02~12.23	2.91	431~436	434	52~171	94	5~43	16
巴探11X	暗色泥岩	4 366~4 400	4	0.03~1.62	0.90	432~439	435	38~118	73	37~366	154
玛北1	暗色泥岩	2 860~3 113	11	0.01~1.86	0.68	429~434	432	30~163	64	11~127	33
皮山北2	暗色泥岩	5 923~6 100	6	0.03~1.61	0.79	441~460	453	34~66	49	2~82	29

Evaluation and optimal selection of Carboniferous Kalashayi Formation source rocks in southwestern Tarim Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 26

Related Articles 4

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LUO Shaohui,WANG Rongying,YUE Yong,LI Bin,WEI Huadong,JIN Xianmei,JIANG Zhongzheng,CAO Yang. Cambrian infill sequence and sedimentary evolution in southwestern Tarim Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 284-296.
[2]	TAO Jinyu,SHEN Baojian,HU Zongquan,PAN Anyang. Pore characteristics and evaluation of shale reservoir in Lower Carboniferous Luzhai Formation, northern part of middle Guangxi Depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 437-444.
[3]	YI Tongsheng,CHEN Jie. Occurrence characteristics and exploration potential of Carboniferous shale gas in western Guizhou [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 82-94.
[4]	Jia Jun,Li Chang,Wang Liang,Zhao Ning. Experimental study on identification of influencing factors of igneous gas and water layer by longitudinal and shear wave velocities [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 8-13.