基于微地震数据和嵌入式离散裂缝的页岩气开发渗流数值模拟

Abstract

Abstract:

Shale gas development is in an important position of natural gas development strategy for Sinopec, and numerical simulation technology is an important technical means to optimize the policy and scheme of development technology, predict the production performance of gas wells, study the production rule, and track and optimize the development of gas fields. The traditional numerical simulation method of shale gas development adopts equivalent medium model, can not depict the distribution of crack network after fracturing, and is unable to accurately predict the production of layered reserves, so that it can not meet the needs of the field. Therefore, a new method for shale gas simulation based on embedded fracture modeling is proposed. This method consists with four stages:①to establish geological structure model; ②to describe the fracture characteristics of the fracture network based on micro-seismic data, and then embed it in the geological model background grid and calculate the conductivity; ③to fit the production data and adjust the fracture parameters; ④to prediction and analyze the productivity and production of reservoir reserves for multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells. The proposed method has been applied to a three staged fracturing wells in Fuling shale gas reservoir and the utilization of the reserve in the well is analyzed. It provides technical support for the next adjustment scheme of the platform.

Key words: shale gas, numerical simulation, fracture modeling, microseismic data

CLC Number:

TE319

DAI Cheng,HU Xiaohu,FANG Sidong,GUO Yandong. Numerical simulation for seepage of shale gas reservoir development based on microseismic data and embedded fracture modeling[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 70-77.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 7

Table 5

Fig. 8

References 18

[1]	董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景 , 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J]. 天然气工业, 2016,36(1):19-32.
[2]	邹才能, 董大忠, 杨桦 , 等. 中国页岩气形成条件及勘探实践[J]. 天然气工业, 2011,31(12):26-39. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.12.005
[3]	蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟 , 等. 页岩气储层的基本特征及评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2010,30(10):7-12. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.10000976.2010.10.002
[4]	CIPOLLA C L . Modeling production and evaluating fracture performance in unconventional gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2009,61(9):84-90.
[5]	CIPOLLA C L, LOLON E P, ERDLE J C , et al. Reservoir modeling in shale-gas reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2010,13(4):638-653.
[6]	WARREN J E, ROOT R J . The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs[J]. SPE Journal, 1963,3(3):245-255
[7]	KAZEMI H, GILMAN J R . Multiphase flow in fractured petroleum reservoirs[J]. Flow & Contamination Transport in Fractured Rock, 1993,31(91):267-323
[8]	PRUESS K . A practical method for modeling fluid and heat flow in fractured porous media[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1985,25(1):14-26.
[9]	WU Y S, PRUESS K . A multiple-porosity method for simulation of naturally fractured petroleum reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988,3(1):327-336.
[10]	苏玉亮, 盛广龙, 王文东 , 等. 页岩气藏多重介质耦合流动模型[J]. 天然气工业, 2016,36(2):52-59.
[11]	YANG T Y, LI X, ZHANG D X . Quantitative dynamic analysis of gas desorption contribution to production in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2015,9:18-30.
[12]	葛洪魁, 申颖浩, 宋岩 , 等. 页岩纳米孔隙气体流动的滑脱效应[J]. 天然气工业, 2014,34(7):46-54.
[13]	WU Y S, LI J F, DING D , et al. A generalized framework model for the simulation of gas production in unconventional gas reservoirs[J]. SPE Journal, 2014,19(5):845-857.
[14]	糜利栋, 姜汉桥, 李俊键 . 页岩气离散裂缝网络模型数值模拟方法研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010,25(11):1795-1803.
[15]	严侠, 黄朝琴, 姚军 , 等. 基于模拟有限差分的嵌入式离散裂缝数学模型[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2014,44(12):1333-1342.
[16]	YAN X, HUANG Z Q, YAO J , et al. An efficient embedded discrete fracture model based on mimetic finite difference method[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2016,145:11-21.
[17]	卫鹏云, 施安峰, 王晓宏 , 等. 页岩气藏的双重介质-离散裂缝模型[J]. 力学季刊, 2015,36(2):179-188.
[18]	DAI C, XUE L, WANG W , et al. Analysis of the influencing factors on the well performance in shale gas reservoir[J]. Geofluids, 2017, ( 11):1-12.

小层	厚度/ m	孔隙度/ %	含气饱和度/ %	吸附气含量/（m³·t^-1）	储量/ 10⁸ m³
①	6.00	4.51	69.10	2.70	3.06
②	1.00	4.90	69.50	3.10	0.56
③	14.10	4.73	67.80	2.60	7.00
④	9.30	4.73	59.80	1.90	3.71
⑤	9.60	5.61	60.10	1.90	4.00

属性	取值
模型尺寸/m³	1 800×1 800×85
埋深/m	2 550
网格数	291 600
储层压力/MPa	38
储层温度/℃	85
Langmuire体积/（m³·t^-1）	2.1~3.6
Langmuire压力/MPa	6
地质储量/m³	18.3×10⁸
基质渗透率/10^-3 μm²	4.93×10^-5
水力裂缝导流能力/（10^-3 μm²·m）	9.87

井号	微裂缝导流能力/ （10^-3 μm²·m）	主裂缝导流能力/ （10^-3 μm²·m）	有效裂缝半长/ m
JYA-1HF	4.93	9.87	82 ~ 174
JYA-2HF	14.80	19.70	61 ~ 127
JYA-3HF	4.93	4.93	66 ~ 189

小层	JYA-1HF 动用面积/km²	JYA-2HF 动用面积/km²	JYA-3HF 动用面积/km²	剩余储量/10⁸ m³
1	0.31	0.26	0.26	2.72
2	0.31	0.25	0.26	0.51
3	0.29	0.25	0.26	6.33
4	0.27	0.23	0.24	3.39
5	0.25	0.20	0.23	3.68
平均动用面积	0.29	0.24	0.25
动用百分比/%	32.92	31.70	33.39

井号	加密前EUR/10⁸ m³	加密后EUR/10⁸ m³
JYA-1HF	1.40	1.36
JYA-2HF	1.18	1.16
JYA-3HF	1.14	0.98
JYA-4HF（加密）		0.91
JYA-5HF（加密）		0.97
合计	3.72	5.38

Numerical simulation for seepage of shale gas reservoir development based on microseismic data and embedded fracture modeling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 18

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	MA Daixin,REN Xianjun,ZHAO Mifu,HAN Jiaoyan,LIU Yuhu. Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 167-175.
[2]	ZHANG Lianfeng,ZHANG Yilin,GUO Huanhuan,LI Hongsheng,LI Junjie,LIANG Limei,LI Wenjing,HU Shukui. Development adjustment technology of extending life cycle for nearly-abandoned reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[3]	CUI Yudong, LU Cheng, GUAN Ziyue, LUO Wanjing, TENG Bailu, MENG Fanpu, PENG Yue. Effects of creep on depressurization-induced gas well productivity in South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[4]	HE Haiyan, LIU Xianshan, GENG Shaoyang, SUN Junchang, SUN Yanchun, JIA Qian. Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[5]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[6]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[7]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[8]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[9]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[10]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[11]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[12]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[13]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[14]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[15]	YANG Bing, FU Qiang, GUAN Jingtao, LI Linxiang, PAN Haoyu, SONG Hongbin, QIN Tingting, ZHU Zhiwei. Oil displacement efficiency based on different well pattern adjustment simulation in high water cut reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 519-524.