重庆市武隆区黄莺乡五峰组—龙马溪组剖面沉积特征及地质意义

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.01.008

Abstract

Abstract:

At present, the Wufeng-Longmaxi Marine high quality shale is the only case that has been commercially exploited in China. Taking Huangying section in Wulong District, Chongqing as an example, the characteristics of sedimentary geochemistry and their interrelationship of Marine high quality shale are studied by the field observation and field measurement combined with laboratory experiment analysis. The results show that: firstly, the black siliceous shales of Wufeng Formation and dark gray shell argillaceous limestone of Guanyinqiao Formation are exposed from bottom to top in Huangying section, which reflects the sedimentary environment from deep water shelf to shallow sea and then to deep water shelf. Secondly, the biostratigraphy of outcrop layer is continuous and intact, and the Kaidian-Rudan WF2-LM5 graptolite zone can be recognized. The graptolite type, content and preservation characteristics are closely related to the sedimentary environment. Thirdly, the Wulong area is located in the hydrocarbon generation center of the deepwater shelf. The high-quality shale has large thickness, superior static index, high hydrocarbon generation intensity and good material basis for shale gas enrichment. Fourthly, Wulong area is the sweet spot of both shale gas exploration and development because of the good accumulation and enrichment conditions of shale gas in small layer ①—④.

Key words: high quality shale, sedimentary environment, shale gas, Longmaxi-Wufeng Formation, Huangying section of Wulong

CLC Number:

TE122

Xipeng HE,Yuqiao GAO,Jun MA, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and geological significance of outcrop in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Huangying Town, Wulong District, Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 95-106.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 8

References 28

[1]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 涪陵页岩气田富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4):481-491.
	GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Geological factors controlling shale gas enrichment and high production in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4):481-491.
[2]	陈旭, 樊隽轩, 王文卉, 等. 黔渝地区志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的阶段性渐进展布模式[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2017, 47(6):720-732.
	CHEN Xu, FAN Junxuan, WANG Wenhui, et al. Stage-progressive distribution pattern of the Lungmachi black graptolitic shales from Guizhou to Chongqing, Central China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2017, 47(6):720-732.
[3]	贾云倩, 刘子平, 任晓海, 等. 有机质类型分异规律及其主控机制——以威远志留系龙马溪组页岩储层为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(2):341-352.
	JIA Yunqian, LIU Ziping, REN Xiaohai, et al. Organic matter type differentiation process and main control mechanism: case study of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale reservoir in Weiyuan area[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(2):341-352.
[4]	华柑霖, 吴松涛, 邱振, 等. 页岩纹层结构分类与储集性能差异—以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(2):281-296.
	HUA Ganlin, WU Songtao, QIU Zhen, et al. Lamination texture and its effect on reservoir properties: A case study of Longmaxi Shale, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(2):281-296.
[5]	管全中, 董大忠, 张华玲, 等. 富有机质页岩生物成因石英的类型及其耦合成储机制——以四川盆地上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4):700-709.
	GUAN Quanzhong, DONG Dazhong, ZHANG Hualing, et al. Types of biogenic quartz and its coupling storage mechanism in organic-rich shales: A case study of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4):700-709.
[6]	聂海宽, 张柏桥, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气高产地质原因及启示——以涪陵页岩气田JY6-2HF为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3):464-473.
	NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Baiqiao, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Geological factors contributing to high shale gas yield in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Fms of Sichuan Basin: A case study of Well JY6-2HF in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(3):464-473.
[7]	胡东风. 四川盆地东南缘向斜构造五峰组—龙马溪组常压页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5):605-615.
	HU Dongfeng. Main controlling factors on normal pressure shale gas enrichment in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in synclines, southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(5):605-615.
[8]	马新华, 谢军, 雍锐, 等. 四川盆地南部龙马溪组页岩气地质特征及高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5):1-15.
	MA Xinhua, XIE Jun, YONG Rui, et al. Geological characteristics and high production control factors of shale gas in Silurian Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5):1-15.
[9]	姜振学, 宋岩, 唐相路, 等. 中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3):617-628.
	JIANG Zhenxue, SONG Yan, TANG Xianglu, et al. Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3):617-628.
[10]	郭彤楼, 蒋恕, 张培先, 等. 四川盆地外围常压页岩气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5):837-845.
	GUO Tonglou, JIANG Shu, ZHANG Peixian, et al. Progress and direction of exploration and development of normally-pressured shale gas from the periphery of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5):837-845.
[11]	何希鹏. 四川盆地东部页岩气甜点评价体系与富集高产影响因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1):59-71.
	HE Xipeng. Sweet spot evaluation system and enrichment and high yield influential factors of shale gas in Nanchuan area of eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1):59-71.
[12]	郭少斌, 王子龙, 马啸. 中国重点地区二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3):377-385.
	GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3):377-385.
[13]	何希鹏, 何贵松, 高玉巧, 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气地质特征及富集高产规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(12):1-14.
	HE Xipeng, HE Guisong, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Geological characteristics and enrichment laws of normal-pressure shale gas in the basin-margin transition zone of SE Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(12):1-14.
[14]	何希鹏, 张培先, 房大志, 等. 渝东南彭水—武隆地区常压页岩气生产特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(5):72-79.
	HE Xipeng, ZHANG Peixian, FANG Dazhi, et al. Production characteristics of normal pressure shale gas in Pengshui-Wulong area, southeast Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(5):72-79.
[15]	何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带金佛斜坡常压页岩气富集模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(6):50-60.
	HE Guisong, HE Xipeng, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Enrichment model of normal-pressure shale gas in the Jinfo slope of the basin-margin transition zone in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(6):50-60.
[16]	郑宇龙, 牟传龙, 王秀平. 四川盆地南缘五峰组—龙马溪组沉积地球化学及有机质富集模式——以叙永地区田林剖面为例[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(5):541-560.
	ZHENG Yulong, MOU Chuanlong, WANG Xiuping. Sedimentary geochemistry and patterns of organic matter enrichment of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the Southern Margin of Sichuan Basin, China: A case study of Tianlin profile in Xuyong Area[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(5):541-560.
[17]	韩京, 蔡全升, 黎洋, 等. 海相优质页岩的形成环境及发育模式——以中扬子地区秭归新滩剖面五峰—龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(4):661-674.
	HAN Jing, CAI Quansheng, LI Yang, et al. Forming environment and development model of high-quality marine shale: A case of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations shale in Zigui-Xintan section in the Middle Yangtze region[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(4):661-674.
[18]	董大忠, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 等. 黑色页岩微裂缝发育控制因素——以长宁双河剖面五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):763-774.
	DONG Dazhong, SHI Zhensheng, SUN Shasha, et al. Factors controlling microfractures in black shale: A case study of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Shuanghe Profile, Changning area, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):763-774.
[19]	李一凡, 魏小洁, 樊太亮. 海相泥页岩沉积过程研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(1):73-87.
	LI Yifan, WEI Xiaojie, FAN Tailiang. A review on sedimentary processes of marine mudstones and shales[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(1):73-87.
[20]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 等. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3):273-283.
	NIE Haikuan, LI Donghui, JIANG Tao, et al. Logging isochronous stratigraphic division of shale based on characteristics of graptolite zones and its significance: A case study of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(3):273-283.
[21]	王玉满, 李新景, 陈波, 等. 中上扬子地区埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层分布特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1):42-54.
	WANG Yuman, LI Xinjing, CHEN Bo, et al. Distribution characteristics and geological significance of the thickest Aeronian bentonite bed in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(1):42-54.
[22]	易定鑫, 田景春, 井翠, 等. 五峰组—龙马溪组笔石带划分与沉积环境的意义——以重庆武隆接龙剖面为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(6):33-43.
	YI Dingxin, TIAN Jingchun, JING Cui, et al. Graptolite biostratigraphy and sedimentary environment significance:A case study from the Wufeng Formation- Longmaxi Formation of Jielong Section in Wulong, Southeastern Chongqing[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(6):33-43.
[23]	方志雄, 何希鹏. 渝东南武隆向斜常压页岩气形成与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6):819-827.
	FANG Zhixiong, HE Xipeng. Formation and evolution of normal pressure shale gas reservoir in Wulong Syncline, Southeast Chongqing, China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6):819-827.
[24]	吴蓝宇, 陆永潮, 蒋恕, 等. 上扬子区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组沉积期火山活动对页岩有机质富集程度的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):806-816.
	WU Lanyu, LU Yongchao, JIANG Shu, et al. Effects of volcanic activities in Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi period on organic-rich shale in the Upper Yangtze area, South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):806-816.
[25]	吴聿元, 张培先, 何希鹏, 等. 渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩岩石相及与页岩气富集关系[J]. 海相油气地质, 2021, 25(4):335-343.
	WU Yuyuan, ZHANG Peixian, HE Xipeng, et al. Lithofacies and shale gas enrichment of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Southeastern Chongqing[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2021, 25(4):335-343.
[26]	何贵松, 万静雅, 周頔娜, 等. 南川地区南页1井五峰组—龙马溪组页岩特征与生物地层[J]. 地层学杂志, 2019, 43(4):376-388.
	HE Guisong, WAN Jingya, ZHOU Di'na, et al. Characteristics and biostratigraphy of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale in Nanye well 1 of Nanchuan area[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2019, 43(4):376-388.
[27]	方栋梁, 孟志勇. 页岩气富集高产主控因素分析——以四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1):37-41.
	FANG Dongliang, MENG Zhiyong. Main controlling factors of shale gas enrichment and high yield: A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1):37-41.
[28]	舒志国, 王进. 四川盆地涪陵气田焦石坝区块上部气层地质特征分析及有利区优选[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1):34-44.
	SHU Zhiguo, WANG Jin. Geological characteristics and optimization of favorable areas in the upper gas reservoir of Jiaoshiba block in the Fuling Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1):34-44.

阶	V/(V+Ni)	Al/(Al+Fe +Mn)	Al/Ti	沉积相
鲁丹阶	0.71~0.97 0.90	0.14~1.00 0.75	7.00~18.56 10.59	深水陆棚相
赫南特阶	0.97	0.59	7.36	闭塞浅海相
凯迪阶	0.88~0.97 0.92	0.54~1.00 0.87	9.50~13.16 10.59	深水陆棚相

层号	层厚（m）	手持GR（API）	TOC（%）	孔隙度（%）	石英（%）	黏土（%）	R_o（%）
⑤	8.92	166.20~206.91 206.91	3.08~4.44 3.58(21)		45.10~58.00 52.03(21)	31.7~43.4 36.63(21)
④	8.74	216.46~330.48 248.04	3.71~5.58 4.55(23)		39.10~61.10 54.38(23)	22.10~36.10 31.02(23)	3.06(1)
③	13.78	218.78~279.71 241.31	4.23~5.56 4.88(39)	4.41(1)	45.2~72.8 66.12(39)	19.9~45.1 25.20(39)	2.48~2.69 2.57(5)
②	1.36	268.20~340.96 288.47	5.32~5.53 5.43(3)		64.8~71.2 68.03(3)	22.4~28.3 25.33(3)	2.37~2.52 2.45(2)
①	6.83	120.23~246.06 197.97	3.82~7.38 4.88(23)	7.49(1)	6.10~82.00 66.31(23)	8.20~45.90 25.51(23)	2.45~2.59 2.59(5)

层号	层厚（m）	TOC （%）	孔隙度（%）	石英含量（%）	黏土含量（%）	R_o （%）
黄莺乡	32.7	3.95	5.59	61.02	28.70	2.60
LY1	31.0	4.36	4.21	62.56	25.59	2.58
LY2	35.0	4.49	4.46	57.07	23.67	2.95
LY3	35.0	3.56	3.25	54.01	25.06	3.13

Sedimentary characteristics and geological significance of outcrop in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Huangying Town, Wulong District, Chongqing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Weiming, JIANG Lin, LUO Tongtong, LI Yue, WANG Jianhua. Research on deep learning-based fracture network inversion method for shale gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 142-151.
[2]	HE Chunyan, ZHAO Yong, LI Nanying, YANG Jian, CAO Haitao, TANG Ronglin. Intelligent production adjustment early warning for shale gas wells based on fuzzy logic control [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 152-160.
[3]	CHEN Ling, SUN Wei, ZHOU Yatong. Study on reserve calculation standards for normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs: A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoir in the Wulong block of southeastern Chongqing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 49-55.
[4]	HU Xiaohu, LIU Hua, HE Hui, YUAN Hongfei. Well test analysis method of shale gas well groups considering fracture network connectivity [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 79-87.
[5]	WANG Jiawei, ZHANG Bohu, HU Yao, HE Zhengyi, HU Xinxin, CHEN Wei, LUO Chao. Inversion of multiphase tectonic stress field and fracture evolution in shale gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 560-568.
[6]	LIANG Xiaobai, JU Wei. Fault connectivity evaluation based on topological structure analysis: A case study of multi-stage faults of deep shale gas reservoirs in central Luzhou Block, southern Sichuan [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 446-457.
[7]	GAO Quanfang,ZHANG Peixian,GUAN Linlin,LI Yanjing,NI Feng. Influence of lower-level reverse faults on shale gas enrichment and high yield: A case study of Pingqiao Dong-1 Fault in Nanchuan area, southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 458-467.
[8]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[9]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[10]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[11]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[12]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[13]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[14]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[15]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.