威荣深层页岩气水平井压裂套变原因分析

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.02.012

Abstract

Abstract:

Casing deformation occurs frequently during the development of the Weirong Shale Gas Field in the Sichuan Basin. In order to solve this problem, analysis on load and deformation degree of three casing deformation has been carried out by finite element method to discuss the deformation type. Meanwhile, by means of theoretical analysis, finite element simulation and equivalent test evaluation, the quantitative analysis is carried out on the parameters such as the overall angle change rate, cementing quality, wellbore temperature-pressure change and instantaneous stop pump. The influence of different engineering factors on casing strength weakening shows that the engineering factors are not the main factors of casing deformation. According to the analysis of comprehensive factors in the transformation process such as formation anisotropy, wellbore temperature-pressure coupling and reservoir lithologic interface, it is considered that the casing strength decreases under engineering conditions, while in the process of fracturing, the slip of weak strata or the non-uniform compression load of reservoir on casing leads to casing stress concentration and deformation. The relevant understanding provides a reference for the formulation of casing deformation prevention and control measures of Weirong Shale Gas Field.

Key words: shale gas, casing deformation, cementing quality, volume fracturing, shear deformation, extrusion deformation

CLC Number:

TE37

QIAO Zhiguo,YE Cuilian. Cause analysis of casing deformation in fracturing of horizontal wells in Weirong deep shale gas field[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 223-229.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 2

Table 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 20

[1]	JANSZEN M, BAKKER T, ZITHA P L J. Hydraulic fracturing in the Dutch Posedonia Shale[C]// paper SPE-174231-MS presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, June 3-5, 2015, Budapest, Hungary.
[2]	SUGDEN C, JOHNSON J, CHAMBER S, et al. Special considerations in the design optimization of the production casing in high-rate, multistage-fractured shale wells[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2012,2(4):459-472.
[3]	LIAN Z H, YU H, LIN T J, et al. A study on casing deformation failure during multi-stage hydraulic fracturing for the stimulated reservoir volume of horizontal shale wells[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015,23:538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.028
[4]	YAN W, ZOU L Z, LI H, et al. Investigation of casing deformation during hydraulic fracturing in high geo-stress shale gas play[J]. Journalof Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017,150:22-29.
[5]	LIU K, GAO D L, WANG Y B, et al. Effect of local loads on shale gas well integrity during hydraulic fracturing process[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017,37:291-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.053
[6]	陈朝伟, 石林, 项德贵. 长宁—威远页岩气示范区套管变形机理及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2016,36(11):70-75.
	CHEN Zhaowei, SHI Lin, XIANG Degui. Mechanism of casing deformation in the Changning-Weiyuan national shale gas project demonstration area and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016,36(11):70-75.
[7]	蒋可, 李黔, 陈远林, 等. 页岩气水平井固井质量对套管损坏的影响[J]. 天然气工业, 2015,35(12):77-82.
	JIANG Ke, LI Qian, CHEN Yuanlin, et al. Influence of cementing quality on casing failures in horizontal shale gas wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015,35(12):77-82.
[8]	范明涛, 柳贡慧, 李军, 等. 页岩气井温压耦合下固井质量对套管应力的影响[J]. 石油机械, 2016,44(8):1-5.
	FAN Mingtao, LIU Gonghui, LI Jun, et al. Effect of cementing quality on casing stress of shale gas well under heat-mechanical coupling[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2016,44(8):1-5.
[9]	田中兰, 石林, 乔磊. 页岩气水平井井筒完整性问题及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2015,35(9):70-76.
	TIAN Zhonglan, SHI Lin, QIAO Lei. Research of and countermeasure for wellbore integrity of shale gas horizontal well[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015,35(9):70-76.
[10]	于浩, 练章华, 徐晓玲, 等. 页岩气直井体积压裂过程套管失效的数值模拟[J]. 石油机械, 2015,43(3):73-77.
	YU Hao, LIAN Zhanghua, XU Xiaoling, et al. Numerical simulation for casing failure during volumetric fracturing of shale gas vertical wells[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015,43(3):73-77.
[11]	戴强. 页岩气井完井改造期间生产套管损坏原因初探[J]. 钻采工艺, 2015,38(3):22-25.
	DAI Qiang. Analysis of production casing damage reasons during testing and completion of shale gas well[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2015,38(3):22-25.
[12]	高利军, 柳占立, 乔磊, 等. 页岩气水力压裂中套损机理及其数值模拟研究[J]. 石油机械, 2017,45(1):75-80.
	GAO Lijun, LIU Zhanli, QIAO Lei, et al. Mechanism analysis and numerical simulation of casing failure in hydraulic fracturing of shale gas formation[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2017,45(1):75-80.
[13]	李凡华, 乔磊, 田中兰, 等. 威远页岩气水平井压裂套变原因分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2019,41(6):734-738.
	LI Fanhua, QIAO Lei, TIAN Zhonglan, et al. Analysis on the causes of casing deformation in fractured shale-gas horizontal wells of Weiyuan Block[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019,41(6):734-738.
[14]	李留伟, 王高成, 练章华, 等. 页岩气水平井生产套管变形机理及工程应对方案——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区黄金坝区块为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2017,37(11):91-99.
	LI Liuwei, WANG Gaocheng, LIAN Zhanghua, et al. Deformation mechanism of horizontal shale gas well production casing and its engineering solution: A case study on the Huangjinba unit of the Zhaotong national shale gas demonstration zone[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017,37(11):91-99.
[15]	黄永智, 李轩, 戴昆, 等. 页岩气生产套管损坏原因浅析与推荐解决方案[J]. 石油管材与仪器, 2020,6(3):82-85.
	HUANG Yongzhi, LI Xuan, DAI Kun, et al. Damage causes and solutions for shale gas production casing[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2020,6(3):82-85.
[16]	张庆生, 韩伟民, 闫怡飞, 等. 基于套变数据的盐岩地层非均匀地应力反演[J]. 断块油气田, 2020,27(1):126-130.
	ZHANG Qingsheng, HAN Weimin, YAN Yifei, et al. Inversion study on non-uniform in-situ stress in salt formation based on casing deformation data[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2020,27(1):126-130.
[17]	席岩, 李军, 柳贡慧, 等. 瞬态力-热耦合作用下水泥环形态对套管应力的影响[J]. 断块油气田, 2017,24(5):700-704.
	XI Yan, LI Jun, LIU Gonghui, et al. Impact analysis of cement sheath shape on casing stress under transient mechanical-thermal coupling effect[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017,24(5):700-704.
[18]	SHEN Z, LING K. Maintaining horizontal well stability during shale gas development[C]// paper SPE-164037-MS presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, January 28-30, 2013, Muscat, Oman.
[19]	LIAN Z H, YU H, LIN T J, et al. A study on casing deformation failure during multi-stage hydraulic fracturing for the stimulated reservoir volume of horizontal shale wells[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015,23:538-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.028
[20]	郭雪利, 李军, 柳贡慧, 等. 基于震源机制的页岩气压裂井套管变形机理[J]. 断块油气田, 2018,25(5):665-669.
	GUO Xueli, LI Jun, LIU Gonghui, et al. Research on casing deformation for shale gas wells based on focal mechanism[J]. Fault-Block Oil &Gas Field, 2018,25(5):665-669.

载荷（t）	139.7 mm×10.54 mm125 V变形量（mm）	139.7 mm×12.70 mm125 V 变形量（mm）
100	7.5	5.9
300	22.6	17.9
505	39.0	30.0

载荷（t）	139.7 mm×10.54 mm125 V 变形量（mm）	139.7 mm×12.70 mm125 V变形量（mm）
100	9	6.5
300	27	19.5
450	39	29.4

井号	施工段	遇阻情况
WY1-1HF	第7段	109.5 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,有对称卡痕
	第11~13段	99.95 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,洗井后,再次泵送遇阻,检查桥塞启动有明显划痕
	第14段	遇阻后连油下95 mm铅印,单侧压痕明显,后连油射孔压裂
WY3-1HF	第3段	103.2 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,无明显压痕
	第13段	95 mm全可溶桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,有对称划痕
	第19段	泵送95 mm全可溶桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,无明显划痕
WY9-1HF	第16段	103.2 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,有对称刮痕
WY9-1HF	第18~19段	103.2 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,单侧明显划痕
WY5-1HF	第7~8段	100 mm桥塞+射孔枪遇阻,有对称划痕
WY5-1HF	第9~12段	100 mm桥塞遇阻,单侧明显划痕;连油下95 mm通井规单侧明显划痕

套管规格（mm）	钢级	壁厚（mm）	抗外挤强度（MPa）
套管规格（mm）	钢级	壁厚（mm）	API 理论值	偏心70 %+ 水泥环缺失20°	偏心40 %+ 水泥环缺失20°
?139.7	125V	12.70	156.7	152.6	150.3
?139.7	125V	10.54	120.2	117.0	115.3

套管规格（mm）	壁厚（mm）	抗外挤强度（MPa）					地层破裂压力（MPa）	套管内压力（MPa）	抗外挤安全系数
套管规格（mm）	壁厚（mm）	API 理论值	偏心40 %+ 水泥环缺失20°	温度降影响为90 ℃时	井身全角变化率为10°/30 m时	瞬时停泵27 s	地层破裂压力（MPa）	套管内压力（MPa）	抗外挤安全系数
?139.7	12.70	156.7	150.3	124.3	120.7	110.7	120	100	6.5
?139.7	10.54	120.2	115.3	90.3	86.7	76.6	120	100	4.5

Cause analysis of casing deformation in fracturing of horizontal wells in Weirong deep shale gas field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[3]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[4]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[5]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[6]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[7]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[8]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[9]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[10]	LU Bi,HU Chunfeng,MA Jun. Influencing factors and countermeasures of inter-well interference of fracturing horizontal wells in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[11]	QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[12]	NIE Yunli, GAO Guozhong. Classification of shale gas “sweet spot” based on Random Forest machine learning [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[13]	ZHANG Longsheng,WANG Weiheng. Study and application of a high temperature foaming agent in anionic-nonionic system namely HDHP: A case study of shale gas wells in Dongsheng Block, Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[14]	ZHAO Renwen,XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,ZHOU Nengwu. Comparison of reservoir characteristics between continental shale from faulted basin and marine shale under high-over mature stage: Taking Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi faulted basin and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin as an example [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 52-63.
[15]	LI Ying,LI Maomao,LI Haitao,YU Hao,ZHANG Qihui,LUO Hongwen. Physicochemical mechanism of water phase imbibition in shale reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 64-73.