页岩油蓄能体积压裂开发效果预测与评价方法

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.05.009

Abstract

Abstract:

Energy storage volume fracturing is a pivotal early development technique for shale reservoirs, designed to supplement reservoir energy preemptively and significantly boost single well production. A method for predicting the maximum cumulative oil production during the development stage of energy storage fracturing is proposed, based on the mechanisms of imbibition and displacement coupled with the statistical analysis of actual production data. The results demonstrate that following a 30% flowback ratio, the cumulative oil production from energy storage fracturing exhibits a strong linear relationship with the logarithm of the flowback ratio. This relationship can predict the maximum cumulative oil production of a single well after fracturing. Validated by actual production data from other shale reservoirs, this method proves to be more accurate and universal than the decline curve analysis method. It encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of subjective and objective factors such as reservoir conditions, fracturing scale and technology, production system design, and drainage efficiency. Additionally, the method facilitates the determination of the liquid-to-oil ratio and the reasonable flowback rate. By controlling the average rate of discharge and production within the range of 6~8 m³/（d·km）, which aligns with the rates of oil drainage and imbibition, higher oil recovery and a lower liquid-to-oil ratio are achieved. This prediction method for maximum recoverable oil post-single well fracturing provides a basis for the economic benefit evaluation, production system optimization, and fracturing cost control of energy storage fracturing. It holds significant guiding importance for geological-engineering integration, well spacing optimization, and fracturing design.

Key words: flowback ratio, energy storage, fracturing, oil recovery, cumulative oil production

CLC Number:

TE349

XU Ning,CHEN Zhewei,XU Wanchen, et al. Prediction and evaluation method for development effect of shale oil storage volume fracturing[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 741-748.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References 28

[1]	李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.02.001
	LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai. Progress, challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.02.001
[2]	雷群, 翁定为, 罗健辉, 等. 中国石油油气开采工程技术进展与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 139-145. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.01.14
	LEI Qun, WEND Dingwei, LUO Jianhui, et al. Achievements and future work of oil and gas production engineering of CNPC[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 139-145.
[3]	金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 等. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835. doi: 10.7623/syxb202107001
	JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 821-835. doi: 10.7623/syxb202107001
[4]	陈祥, 王敏, 严永新, 等. 泌阳凹陷陆相页岩油气成藏条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(4): 568-576.
	CHEN Xiang, WANG Min, YAN Yongxin, et al. Accumulation conditions for continental shale oil and gas in the Biyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(4): 568-576.
[5]	焦方正. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油缝网波及研究及其在体积开发中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1181-1187.
	Jiao fangzheng. Research on shale oil fracture net sweep in Ordos Basin and its application in volume development[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1181-1187.
[6]	路向伟, 王力, 郑奎, 等. X油田A83 C7页岩油储层高效开发技术评价与分析[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2021, 1(10): 95-97.
	LU Xiangwei, WANG Li, ZHENG Kui, etc. Evaluation and analysis of high efficiency development technology for A83 C7 shale oil reservoir in X oilfield[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2021, 1(10) : 95-97.
[7]	常凌云. 基于决策树算法的压裂井判别及效果预测方法研究[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2021, 24(6): 113-114.
	Chang Lingyun. Research on decision tree algorithm-based method for distinguishing and predicting fracturing wells[J]. China Management Informationization, 2021, 24(6): 113-114.
[8]	李凯凯, 安然, 岳潘东, 等. 安83区页岩油水平井大规模蓄能体积压裂技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(4): 125-129.
	LI Kaikai, AN Ran, YUE Pandong, et al. Large scale energy storage volumetric fracturing technology for horizontal wells in the An 83 shale reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 125-129.
[9]	张衍君, 邹易, 董正亮, 等. 页岩油储层压裂井间干扰条件下受干扰井排采特征: 以吉木萨尔页岩油储层为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(1): 108-115.
	ZHANG Yanjun, ZOU Yi, DONG Zhengliang, et al. Production characteristic of interfered well under inter-well fracturing interference in shale oil reservoir: A case study on Jimusaer shale oil reservoir[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(1): 108-115.
[10]	王欣, 才博, 李帅, 等. 中国石油油气藏储层改造技术历程与展望[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(1): 67-75.
	WANG Xin, CAI Bo, LI Shuai, et al. Development process and prospect of CNPC's reservoir stimulation technologies[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(1): 67-75.
[11]	张矿生, 王文雄, 徐晨, 等. 体积压裂水平井增产潜力及产能影响因素分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(35): 10475-10480.
	ZHANG Kuangsheng, WANG Wenxiong, XU Cheng, et al. Analysis on stimulation potential and productivity influencing factors of network fractured horizontal well[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(35): 10475-10480.
[12]	张芮菡, 张烈辉, 卢晓敏, 等. 低渗透裂缝性油藏压裂水平井产能动态分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(16): 41-48.
	ZHANG Ruihan, ZHANG Liehui, LU Xiaomin, et al. Deliverability analysis of fractured horizontal wells in low permeability fractured reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(16): 41-48.
[13]	刘子雄, 王艳红, 高杰, 等. 基于压裂返排数据的有效破裂体积计算方法[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33(2): 112-115.
	LIU Zixiong, WANG Yanhong, GAO Jie, et al. New calculation method of effective fracture volume based on fracture flowback data[J]. Petroleum Geology ＆ Engineering, 2019, 33(2): 112-115.
[14]	BUCKLEY S E, LEVERETT M C. Mechanism of fluid displacements in sands[J]. Transactions of the AIME, 1942, 146(1): 107-116.
[15]	WELGE H J. A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1952, 4(4): 91-98.
[16]	赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.01.01
	ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
[17]	许宁, 满安静, 徐萍, 等. 非常规油藏补能提采开发方式研究进展及路径优选[J]. 中外能源, 2023, 28(8): 38-42.
	XU Ning, MAN Anjing, XU Ping, et al. Research progress and path optimization of enhanced oil recovery by energy supplement in unconventional reservoirs[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2023, 28(8): 38-42.
[18]	焦方正, 邹才能, 杨智. 陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.06.01
	JIAO Fangzheng, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi. Geological theory and exploration & development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078.
[19]	邱润东, 顾春元, 薛佩雨, 等. 不同渗透率砂岩岩心在纳米流体中的渗吸特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(2): 330-337. doi: 10.11698/PED.2022.02.11
	QIU Rundong, GU Chunyuan, XUE Peiyu, et al. Imbibition characteristics of sandstone cores with different permeabilities in nanofluids[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(2): 330-337.
[20]	贾承造, 庞雄奇, 宋岩. 论非常规油气成藏机理: 油气自封闭作用与分子间作用力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 437-452. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.01
	JIA Chengzao, PANG Xiongqi, SONG Yan. The mechanism of unconventional hydrocarbon formation: Hydrocarbon self containment and intermolecular forces[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 437-452.
[21]	黄兴, 窦亮彬, 左雄娣, 等. 致密油藏裂缝动态渗吸排驱规律[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 924-935. doi: 10.7623/syxb202107007
	HUANG Xing, DOU Liangbin, ZUO Xiongdi, et al. Dynamic imbibition and drainage law of fractures in tight reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 924-935.
[22]	杜猛, 杨正明, 吕伟峰, 等. 基质裂缝耦合下的致密油/页岩油动态渗流实验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(2): 356-366. doi: 10.11698/PED.2023453
	DU Meng, YANG Zhengming, LYU Weifeng, et al. Experiment of dynamic seepage of tight/shale oil under matrix fracture coupling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(2): 356-366.
[23]	虞绍永. 页岩及致密油气藏工程方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2018.
	YU Shaoyong. Shale and tight reservoir engineering method[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[24]	雷浩, 郑有恒, 何建华, 等. 页岩油藏流体渗流特征物理模拟新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1346-1356. doi: 10.7623/syxb202110008
	LEI Hao, ZHENG Youheng, HE Jianhua, et al. A new method for physical simulation of flow characteristics of fluids In shale oil reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1346-1356. doi: 10.7623/syxb202110008
[25]	刘惠民, 于炳松, 谢忠怀, 等. 陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343. doi: 10.7623/syxb201812002
	LIU Huimin, YU Bingsong, XIE Zhonghuai, et al. Characteristics and implications of micro-lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale: A case study of Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343. doi: 10.7623/syxb201812002
[26]	张顺, 刘惠民, 王敏, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 754-766. doi: 10.7623/syxb201807003
	ZHANG Shun, LIU Huimin, WANG Min, et al. Pore evolution of Shale oil reservoirs in Dongying sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(7): 754-766. doi: 10.7623/syxb201807003
[27]	戚超, 王晓琦, 王威, 等. 页岩储层微观裂缝三维精细表征方法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1175-1185. doi: 10.7623/syxb201810009
	QI Chao, WANG Xiaoqi, WANG Wei, et al. Three dimensional fine characterization method of micro fractures in shale reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(10): 1175-1185. doi: 10.7623/syxb201810009
[28]	周福建, 苏航, 梁星原, 等. 致密油储集层高效缝网改造与提高采收率一体化技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 1007-1014. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.20
	ZHOU Fujian, SU Hang, LIANG Xingyuan, et al. Integrated hydraulic fracturing techniques to enhance oil recovery from tight rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 1007-1014.

井号	层位	水平段长度/m	总入地液量/m³	阶段累计产油量/t	目前日产油量/t	生产时间/d	见油前排液速度/(m³/d)	F-EUR/t			蓄压采收率/%	液油比/(m³/t)	平均返排速度/(m³/d)
井号	层位	水平段长度/m	总入地液量/m³	阶段累计产油量/t	目前日产油量/t	生产时间/d	见油前排液速度/(m³/d)	递减曲线法	返排率法		蓄压采收率/%	液油比/(m³/t)	平均返排速度/(m³/d)
QLL86H601	长6段3砂岩组 1小层	832.0	11 185.4	3 360	6.01	334	32.4	4 072		6 474	7.45	2.07	13.7
N175-H1	长8段2砂岩组	1 110.4	19 072.0	6 490	3.63	1 010	80.6	7 264		9 437	7.02	2.81	13.7
N175-H2	长8段2砂岩组	1 157.8	14 556.0	1 401	0	669	18.4			1 520	0.88	9.58	19.9
N175-H3	长8段2砂岩组	1 562.1	21 556.0	5 645	3.62	669	23.1			8 681	3.75	2.48	15.6
N179-H601	长6段2砂岩组	1 477.3	26 246.0	5 559	11.07	530	32.5			12 735	7.31	2.03	15.2
N218-H1	长8段1砂岩组	1 142.0	14 590.0	11 732	19.90	775	27.1			21 970	18.81	0.66	9.9
L83-H1	长6段3砂岩组 4小层	990.7	15 232.0	4 286	3.68	964	43.6	4 559		4 950	6.58	2.56	8.8
B24-H1	长8段1砂岩组	774.0	6 530.9	2 662	2.91	689	12.1	5 469		7 225	9.32	0.90	4.1
Z161-H701	长7段1砂岩组	1 299.2	31 270.0	5 296	9.55	626	31.0	13 066		14 124	8.88	2.21	13.8
L208-H1	长2段2砂岩组	850.6	7 749.3	3 117	10.54	445	18.5			7 828	10.39	1.76	11.6
L208-H2	长2段2砂岩组	739.0	7 024.9	4 528	12.27	445	20.3	10 148		10 988	16.01	0.96	7.7
L63-H202	长2段2砂岩组	728.0	6 216.3	3 707	8.12	426	15.8	7 991		7 196	9.83	0.86	6.6

井号	层位	水平段长/m	入地液量/m³	已产时间/d	阶段累计产油量/t	日产油量/ t	现返排率/ %	F-EUR/ t	相关系数	采收率/ %	液油比/（m³/t）	最大日产液量/m³	平均返排速度/（m³/d）
HP1	长7段	1 500	15 498	3 139	28 633	5.90	50.4	44 557	0.992 3	19.4	0.35	28.5	8.8
HP2	长7段	1 500	13 970	3 157	25 975	5.10	62.3	40 213	0.991 9	17.5	0.35	24.3	11.1
HP3	长7段	1 500	13 959	3 201	26 973	6.52	60.4	41 674	0.994 2	18.2	0.33	23.8	9.0
HP4	长7段	1 500	14 274	3 214	27 436	7.06	59.4	41 861	0.991 2	18.3	0.34	24.0	6.2
HP5	长7段	1 500	16 186	2 984	24 994	6.42	40.8	48 188	0.991 6	21.0	0.34	24.0	11.0
HP6	长7段	1 500	14 220	2 958	28 372	6.84	53.0	43 596	0.984 8	19.0	0.33	24.1	10.0
HP7	长7段	1 500	7 452	3 170	30 386	8.42	80.9	35 238	0.991 3	15.4	0.21	25.0	9.4
HP8	长7段	1 500	11 055	3 176	27 356	8.26	82.2	32 096	0.998 8	14.0	0.34	23.4	9.0
HP9	长7段	1 500	11 332	2 952	27 552	6.90	87.5	30 189	0.988 6	13.2	0.38	30.1	15.5
HP10	长7段	1 500	20 057	2 937	21 268	4.61	73.7	25 622	0.991 8	11.2	0.78	26.0	12.2
NP1	长7段	1 206	9 628	3 142	12 835	3.94	53.4	17 088	0.982 1	9.3	0.56	9.0	6.1
NP6	长7段	1 800	19 578	2 538	17 653	5.39	36.0	25 305	0.994 6	9.2	0.77	15.9	7.6
NP7	长7段	1 800	23 089	2 544	9 997	3.16	24.8	19 168	0.996 8	7.0	1.20	16.2	14.0
NP8	长7段	1 800	16 236	2 473	19 305	4.71	43.1	37 891	0.991 2	13.8	0.43	20.8	9.9
NP9	长7段	1 800	20 897	2 445	12 372	4.81	29.1	25 028	0.989 9	9.1	0.83	17.4	11.8
平均			15 162	2 935	22 740	5.87	55.8	33 848	0.991 4	14.4	0.50	22.2	10.1

Prediction and evaluation method for development effect of shale oil storage volume fracturing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	LIAO Kai, ZHANG Shicheng, XIE Bobo. Simulation of reasonable shut-in time for shale oil after volume fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 749-755.
[2]	WANG Weiheng, GUO Xin, ZHANG Bin, XIA Weiwei. Development and performance evaluation of fracturing-displacement agent（HDFD） for shale oil: A case study of the second member of Funing Formation, Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 771-778.
[3]	CHEN Xiang, WANG Guan, LIU Pingli, DU Juan, WANG Ming, CHEN Weihua, LI Jinlong, LIU Jinming, LIU Fei. Experimental and simulation study on fracture conductivity of acid-fracturing in Dengying Formation of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 569-576.
[4]	YANG Zhaozhong, YUAN Jianfeng, ZHANG Jingqiang, LI Xiaogang, ZHU Jingyi, HE Jiangang. Research progress and understanding of fracturing fractures in horizontal wells of marine shale in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 600-609.
[5]	LU Cong, LI Qiuyue, GUO Jianchun. Research progress of distributed optical fiber sensing technology in hydraulic fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 618-628.
[6]	LI Xuebin,JIN Lixin,CHEN Chaofeng,YU Tianxi,XIANG Yingjie,YI Duo. Key technologies of horizontal well fracturing for deep coal-rock gas: A case study of Jurassic in Baijiahai area, Junggar Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 629-637.
[7]	ZHAO Haifeng, WANG Tengfei, LI Zhongbai, LIANG Wei, ZHANG Tao. Study on dynamic stress field for fracturing in horizontal well group of shale oil [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 352-363.
[8]	KONG Xiangwei,XU Hongxing,SHI Xian,CHEN Hang. Experimental simulation of fracture initiation and morphology in tight sandstone gas reservoirs temporary plugging fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 391-401.
[9]	LIU Xiao. Comparison of seam network morphology in coal reservoirs under different fracturing scales: A case of Yanchuannan CBM Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 510-518.
[10]	ZHANG Lianfeng,ZHANG Yilin,GUO Huanhuan,LI Hongsheng,LI Junjie,LIANG Limei,LI Wenjing,HU Shukui. Development adjustment technology of extending life cycle for nearly-abandoned reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 124-132.
[11]	TANG Jiandong, WANG Zhilin, GE Zhengjun. CO₂ flooding technology and its application in Jiangsu Oilfield in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 18-25.
[12]	ZHANG Zhichao,BAI Mingxing,DU Siyu. Characteristics of pore dynamics in shale reservoirs by CO₂ flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.
[13]	SHI Yan, XIE Junhui, GUO Xiaoting, WU Tong, CHEN Dequan, SUN Lin, DU Daijun. Experimental study on CO₂ flooding/huff and puff of medium-deep heavy oil in Xinjiang Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 76-82.
[14]	ZHAO Kun,LI Zeyang,LIU Juanli,HU Ke,JIANG Ranran,WANG Weixiang,LIU Xiuzhen. Parameter optimization and field practice of CO₂ pre-fracturing process in Jimsar shale oil block [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 83-90.
[15]	HE Dongbo, REN Lu, HAO Jie, LIU Xiaoping, CAO Qian. Quantitative evaluation system of geothermal resources based on analytic hierarchy process: A case study of middle-deep hydrothermal sandstone reservoir in Caofeidian of Hebei Province [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 713-725.